1 Introduction

The laser engraving technology consists in the controlled generation of a focused light beam, the energy of which heats the point of impact on a non-transparent material for a given wavelength. Depending on the beam profile, the amount of energy supplied, the exposure time and the base material, the surface of the material changes with different courses and intensity (Mishra and Yadava 2015). The effects of laser radiation on the surface of the material are manifested only from a certain power and are irreversible (Minami et al. 2002). The most significant changes in the material during engraving are the loss of the material during sublimation (the depth) and the change in the chemical composition of the surface layer (the colour-shade). The ability to predict the intensity of this change in advance is one of the key areas of laser engraving quality control. A number of publications deal with the impact of laser power intensity on the resulting change of an engraved material (Pagano et al. 2009; Eltawahni et al. 2013; Hernández-Castañeda et al. 2011; Martinez-Conde et al. 2017). However, the shade created by the impact of a laser beam on wood does not depend only on the intensity (the power) and the profile of the laser beam (the cross-section). The material itself is used in combination with its surroundings (the air) to create the desired pigmentation (the shade) of the material. It therefore also depends on the type of wood, its temperature (and the ambient temperature), its humidity (and the ambient humidity), hardness and the current chemical composition of the engraved layers (the age of the wood and its surface treatment) (Wang et al. 2013). In addition to this, wood is a natural composite (Bruno 2018) and a living material, and even after its processing it is constantly changing (degrading—decomposing—absorbing or loosing water) (Chen et al. 2014). Wood dimensions can change as well (Kifetew 1996).

Such changes are accelerated by the environmental conditions (Wu 1998). These are mainly humidity, temperature, and the impact of UV radiation on the wood surface (Timar et al. 2016). To achieve optimal quality, it is necessary to have these changes under control. In addition to the impact of UV radiation, which is now standardly dealt with mainly in the storage stages, it is necessary to keep the material in an environment with a constant temperature and humidity during the time of storage and production, which is difficult to achieve in practice. This makes it difficult to estimate in advance the result for each power level of the laser beam, its different focus and the different materials used.

For a system that will be able to fine-tune the intensity of the laser beam, depending on the current properties of the base material and its environment, it is appropriate to use a sensitive and fast (pulse frequency) emitter. Nowadays the engraving of photographs into wood is performed mainly on a CO2 laser. CO2 lasers have high power, so they allow high production speeds and material cutting (Martinez-Conde et al. 2017). However, they generate longer wavelengths (10,600 nm), so they are not as accurate as the diode layers of a visible spectrum (455 nm) (Rothenbach and Gupta 2012). The use of semiconductor lasers has experienced a huge increase with the use of CD drives (Barletta et al. 2007; Hernández-Castañeda et al. 2011). They find their application here mainly due to their physical dimensions, purchase price and higher safety, which is given by the wavelength and output power. Thanks to the dramatic increase in the power of laser diodes in recent years this emitter is becoming an important piece of technology (Nakamura et al. 2000; Rodrigues et al. 2014). Diode lasers are increasingly appearing in industrial applications (Diaci et al. 2011; Zeni et al. 2003). Moreover, this potential is amplified by the rapid production due to its purchase price. Diode lasers can be power-controlled, and their beams can be focused relatively precisely (Wang et al. 2000). This makes it possible to transfer much finer details to a wood surface and potentially to calibrate minute changes in the material, in the environment and in the ubiquitous wear of the emitter. However, diode lasers still have up to two orders of magnitude lower optical power and thus production is significantly slowed down. A big advantage is their size, which is up to three orders of magnitude smaller. This makes it easier and cheaper to assemble semiconductor lasers into multi-beam systems that can be controlled simultaneously (increasing power) (Rodrigues et al. 2014), or separately (engraving multiline at once). Semiconductor lasers then have the potential to surpass CO2 lasers not only in accuracy, but also in the speed and economy of production for the application of photo engraving onto wood. The factor that ultimately determines them as a more suitable emitter for the production of engraved photographs onto wood, is its higher efficiency and effectiveness (Li 2000) in the calibration of the beam based on the current properties of a material and its environment.

The use of semiconductor lasers is increasing every year and today they are the most widely used type of laser emitter in the world. This is due to a wide range of uses and a significant increase in their maximum power performance in last decades. The total worldwide turnover from the sale of laser emitters in the year 2016 was 10.4 billion dollars (Holton et al. 2017). Of this 45% belonged just to the sale of semi-conductor lasers (Unlimited, Strategies 2017). The current trend, which is shown in Fig. 1, just suggests that this technology currently has a more promising future in terms of the attractivity of investment in research and development. For the reasons mentioned above, this calibration system design uses semiconductor emitters.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Semiconductor LASER sales (Holton et al. 2017)

The overall goal of this article is to provide necessary data and method, which widen the number of achievable colour shades for laser engraving systems. By conveniently switching between laser burning and laser carbonization, more shades can be produced on a wood surface.

2 Equipment, materials, and experimental procedures

This calibration system has been verified by several experiments in the last several years. The experiments were focused on the effects of the impact of a laser beam on a wooden base with different laser beam properties. The essential variables of the laser beam include its intensity, the cross-section of the beam profile (focus) (Leone et al. 2009) and the angle of rotation in respect to the production direction and the direction of the wood growth rings (Silvennoinen et al. 2000; Simonaho et al. 2004). The angle of rotation is important for semiconductor lasers that do not have a circular-beam cross-section, as in the case of CO2 lasers (Zhao et al. 2014). Wood is an inhomogeneous material (Wu and Seltman 1998; Leone et al. 2009). Significant variables of treated wood include its structure (wood species), wood hardness, age, and moisture (Silvennoinen et al. 2000; Hernández-Castañeda et al. 2011).

2.1 The base material

Beech veneer samples were selected as testing material for the experiments. The same veneers are used for products of laser engraved photographs on wood by a local start-up company. That is because thin layer of hardwood is easily framed. Beech wood is also one of the most used species for pyrography production (Petru and Lunguleasa 2015). It is widely used because of its convenient properties—lightness, hardness, and availability. The samples had dimensions of 300 × 200 mm, which roughly correspond to the standard size of A4 paper. A surface sample is shown in Fig. 2. The longer dimension is in the direction of the tree growth rings. The veneer has a thickness of 1.4 mm and is from the central part of a tree (the wood vein). From the engraved side it is sanded with a belt sander with a grit size of P150. The material was dried in an electrical oven. The drying temperature was set to 140 °C and took 40 min. After drying the samples reduced their size from 300 × 200 mm to approximately 299 × 195 mm. The drying temperature did not exceed 150 °C, at which point polymers in the wood begin to rapidly decompose (Bodirlau et al.2008), which generally darkens the shade of the wood (Kubovský and Kačík 2013). The beech wood used is medium hard with a typical density around 620–720 kg/m3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Beech veneer sample

2.2 The laboratory model

A standard CNC control system was chosen to control the laser engraving laboratory model. This machine has a working space of 500 × 500 mm. NEMA17 flange size hybrid stepper motors were used with 2 A stepper motor drivers. The microstepping setting was set to a 1/16 step and the production speed was 2000 mm/min for testing. The travels of the machine are designed using HIWIN linear systems with timing belts, which are driven by stepper motors via pulleys. The model structure is derived from a portal 2D CNC plotter. The distance of the laser emitter from the base wood was 40 mm. The working head is designed so that the passing air, which is formed by a strong blower dissipates heat from the laser cooler. Another essential element is the removal of sublimed material from the surface to be treated, which is critical for similar applications (Eltawahni et al. 2013). The model is depicted in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Model of laboratory stand

2.3 Semiconductor lasers

The laser diode used for testing is marked NUBM44-V2 and it is supplied by the Japanese producer of laser diodes NICHIA. It is a 9 mm multi-mode diode, which provides maximal optical power of 7 W. The power distribution in the laser beam of this diode is illustrated in Fig. 4. This emitter uses gallium nitride (GaN) transition technology to generate a laser beam, which produces a laser with a wavelength of 445 nm. The electronic circuits used to control this emitter were supplied by the Polish company OPT-LASERS. The driver used is modulated via a PWM input and generates power pulses with a frequency at 1 kHz. The individual pulses are based on a constant current source and contain several functions to increase the life of the laser diode, such as a soft start, heat protection etc. The diode laser has a rectangular beam profile. There are a number of applications for this beam profile which is more suitable than circular CO2 laser beams (Huaming et al. 2018). One such application is the engraving of photographs into wood.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Semiconductor LASER beam profile

2.4 Laser optics

The output of a semiconductor laser emitter must be adequately focused (Cuccolini et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2000). An aspherical collimating lens, which is made of glass was chosen to focus the laser beam with a wavelength of 455 nm. Its dimensions and other specifications are illustrated in Fig. 5 including the cross-section view. For the type used, with a laser emitter wavelength of 455 nm, the additional dimensions are as follows. The focal length of the diode (SD) is 3.1 mm, edge thickness is 10 mm and CA is 5 mm. The diameter of internal thread M is 9 mm.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Three element glass lens

2.5 Power control system

Pulsed (PWM) power control system controls the power output of a laser diode. The laser driver feeds modulated power signals to the emitter at 1 kHZ frequency. Duty cycle of a signal corresponds to desired power output hence the desired colour shade. Laser drivers often include special signal shaping systems. The most important and most significant from the measurement point of view is a soft start. The typical shape of a laser diode power signal is shown in Fig. 6. Semiconductor components are prone to heat sensitivity. The higher the laser temperature the higher the required current to sustain constant power output. It is important to keep the laser diode actively cooled down to constant temperature. The temperature of the laser housing for these measurements was 20 °C. For this temperature, the laser power properties are listed in Table 1. The voltage and current are constant for laser beam generation and were set prior to the experiments. The control variable is a duty cycle generated with control system on ATMEGA 328p MCU at 1 kHz and amplified by laser driver.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Measurement of laser power control signals at 10% PWM

Table 1 Laser power output properties for different power output settings at 20 °C

2.6 Shade sample

It is very difficult to describe in detail all factors that affect the range of shades. In the initial phase this work was focused on identifying the most important factor to maximize the number of shades. A shade sample (Fig. 7) was prepared for the measurement, which was to reveal this factor. It contained both sharp transitions and a continuous increase in beam intensity. The intensity change occurred in the sample both in the horizontal and vertical axes. The measurement system was chosen based on initial experience. To improve the calibration of the working head it is appropriate to perform another series of measurements, which is part of the recommendation for further directing the solution. The prepared samples were engraved on a treated piece of beech veneer. Exactly sixteen tests fit on each surface. Each test had different production conditions and different surface finishes. A total of ninety-six tests were performed. In terms of the evaluation, a parameter was successfully identified, that led to a fundamental change in the engraved shade. Some parameters were completely ruled out and some require separate and more sensitive measurements.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Grayscale test pattern (right—the graphic used for gcode generation, left—pattern with description of shade values)

The parameter that had the greatest impact on the resulting colour of the engraved shade is the beam profile. On the one hand, it is given by the structural design of the emitter, but mostly by the focusing method, which also effects the overall dimensions of the processed point (Eltawahni et al. 2013). The laboratory model that was used for this test contains three series of lenses, that focus the beams on the wood surface. During testing the focus of the beam was fixed, however some tested surfaces were placed on an inclined plane. Thanks to this it was possible to observe the effect of the impact on the focused and defocused beam. This phenomenon is most evident in samples 075 and 072 in Fig. 8. Here it can be seen that the focused beam darkens the wood surface only to a dark brown shade. A typical representative is sample 075. Due to the variable focus, a slight darkening appeared in the corners. However, the central part of the sample achieves only a dark brown shade. On the contrary, in the case of edge samples, which were further or closer to the focused point of the beam, a further darkening of the points can be very clearly seen (sample 072). The reason for these differences is the different beam power density and surface treatment time, which are parameters that play a role in other laser applications (Minami et al. 2002). The primary role of laser engraving is to maximize the number of distinguishable shades. To be able to use both colour scales, it is necessary to divide the calibration sample approximately and to defocus the beam profile for the group of the darkest shades. It is very convenient that the focused beam affects the shade of the wood at lower levels than the defocused beam. This also predetermines it for the lower half of the shades. The upper half of the shades will then be obtained with a defocused beam. Similar systems are already used as autofocus systems (Cao et al. 2018).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Results of focused and defocused LASER

To verify the proposed calibration system, the laser beam profile was measured. Thanks to this measurement, the power cross-section of the beam (Fig. 4) and the output characteristics (Fig. 12) of the emitter were obtained. A diagram of this measurement is shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Scheme of laser power characteristics measurement

3 Results and discussion

The calibration system brings a significant improvement in the production of engraved photographs. The main objective is the number and even distribution of the shades achieved during production. Laser beam shaping by focus control was further examined. All essential data was collected and optimal parameter settings for laser production were calculated.

By changing the beam profile, it is possible to control the chemical processes taking place on the wood surface. The two chemical processes are combustion and carbonization. During the combustion process, the material is considerably heated, it ignites and burns (sublimes) and leaves the surface to be treated in the form of smoke. The beam then “cuts” the depth and removes the material. The shade of the surface treated in this way differs significantly depending on the type of wood, and for beech it is a dark brown shade. The other process is carbonization. This is a well-described and well-known process that has been used for a very long time in the production of charcoal, which has several applications on both small and industrial scales (Jesus et al. 2019). Carbonization affects not only the shade of surface but also wood mechanics (Assis et al. 2016). The carbonizing material does not burn and thus the material is not taken away as in the case of combustion (Leone et al. 2009). Organic structures decompose on the surface to be treated, leaving a large amount of black carbon behind (Xu et al. 2017). A surface treated in this way changes colour to a deep black. By combining and controlling these two processes, it is possible to increase the number of shades achieved by laser processing. Each process has its own range of shades. The surface differences in these two treatment methods can be seen in Figs. 10 and 11. Under electron microscope it is visible that defocused laser is causing carbonization on the surface layer of the wood sample. This process leaves a significant number of inorganic compounds (black carbon) which is darkening the resulted colour. By suitably defocusing the beam, it is then possible to freely switch between these two processes, and thus expand the range of achievable shades for engraving photographs into wood even more. Similar dual focus systems are already used in other applications (Mishra and Yadava 2015).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Surface view of wood samples scanned with electron microscope shown in Fig. 11

Fig. 11
figure 11

Electron microscope scan. Left—natural wood surface, middle—burned surface, right—carbonized surface

3.1 Shade dependence on beam power

The basic input that affects the rate of change on the wood surface during laser engraving, is the power of the laser beam. The power of the laser beam ranges from mW up to MW depending on the emitter used and targeted application. For wood, engraving powers in the range of tens to hundreds of watts are used for CO2 lasers, and units up to tens of watts for semiconductor lasers. The dependence of the course of the individual shades on the beam power can be divided into three general intervals. The first interval is related to the property of the material (wood) in resisting the effects of laser radiation. This interval is mainly the function of wood humidity, age, density, colour, or light reflectance. The low power levels of the first interval of the laser beam do not cause any change on the surface of the wood visible to the human eye. There is only a relatively slight heating of the material within its standard storage conditions. It is important to note that all power intervals discussed in this paragraph will be fundamentally different for each piece of wood, even for samples from a single tree. The second interval is characterized by a sharp change in shade. The heat generated on the surface of the wood exceeds the permissible limit of organic polymers. There is an increasing intensity of carbonization, combustion, and other processes. In the case of wood materials, a point appears in the power characteristic of the emitter at which the rate of wood darkening suddenly decreases with linear power increase. This is because carbonization is affected by heating rate as well as final temperature (Yamashita and Machida 2011). Here is the beginning of the third and last interval of wood shade change by the action of a laser beam. Despite an increase in optical performance, the darkening of the wood surface has only a minimal effect. All these intervals are visible in Fig. 13. This occurs even though the power characteristic of the semiconductor emitter is very linear, and the emitter thus still supplies the same energy increments. In Fig. 12 the characteristic obtained from measuring the power of the laser beam is shown. The average value and the maximum and minimum of a given measurement are shown. The actual performance characteristic shows a strong linearity and the non-linear elements in the shade characteristic of the burnt wood are thus caused by the physical properties of the base material.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Laser power output measurement graph

3.2 Shade dependence on beam focus

As mentioned above the shade of the burnt wood surface does not only depend on the power of the emitter. It also depends on the beam profile and its cross-sectional power density. Shade dependence on beam power and its focus is shown in Fig. 13. A focused beam has a higher power density, so the wood immediately sublimes (burns), which leads to a sharp loss of material and it darkens to a dark brown colour. Conversely, if the beam is slightly out of focus, its impact profile has a lower power density and acts on the wood for a longer period of time. This creates suitable conditions for starting the carbonization process, in which black carbon is formed on the wood surface and the shade shifts to a deep black colour. To demonstrate this phenomenon, a shade pattern was created, which was engraved on a wood surface which was placed on an inclined plane. The result of burned and carbonized shade change at different power levels is shown in the graph of Fig. 13. The shade components are distributed according to CIELAB colour space. This colour space was selected since the treatment of a wood by laser beam does not only darken the surface but can slightly change its colour tint as well (Vidholdova et al. 2017; Petutschnigg et al. 2013).

Fig. 13
figure 13

Wood colour changes with increasing laser power (CIELAB colour space; Left: L*, Middle: a*, Right: b*

It is obvious from measurement that while a major change in surface colour can be observed in lightness (L*), there is only a minor change in b* axis and very small change in a* axis. It should be noted that results are averages of 10 unique measurements and that wood is inhomogeneous material. That is why, there is considerable potential for measurement error especially for the a* axis (Table 2).

Table 2 Average of relative errors of measurements
$$\mathrm{RE}=\frac{\left|{\text{Measured value}}-{\text{Mean value}}\right|}{\text{Mean value}}\, \cdot 100\%$$

3.3 Calibration of the power system

The calibration system’s function is to divide the power levels into levels that will be treated by the combustion process and levels that will be treated by surface carbonization. There usually are 2–3 distinctive laser power output intervals which do not provide visible surface colour changes (Petru and Lunguleasa 2015). The first interval is at the lowest laser power output setting and the second at the highest laser power settings. The highest power output values do not sufficiently change the colour of the wood surface. This is because the power density is very high, and the laser starts depth-cutting the surface instead of just darkening. This high-power output interval is trimmed and replaced with controlled beam defocus values to achieve surface carbonization, and thus further darkening of the engraved point. This principle is illustrated to compare the luminosity of the shade of the surface of charred and carbonized wood (Fig. 14). Laser power and defocus settings are shown in Table 3.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Combination of burned and carbonized colour shades

Table 3 Defocus parameters setting for laser control with corresponding shades

3.4 Photo engraving results

The results of the proposed calibration system are shown and compared in Fig. 15. To compare the production quality (number of achieved shades and its distribution), histograms of each result are shown in Fig. 16. The picture shows the fundamental differences in contrast and in the level of detail. This is possible using semiconductor technology to fine tune power and focus between the burnt and carbonized point of the graphic base. Thanks to this, each input photograph can be transferred to any wooden surface with an increased quality of results. It should be noted that the production times of the photographs shown are about thirty minutes for CO2 lasers, while for the semiconductor emitter of the laboratory model it was 3 h. The difference in speed is considerable. Current methods are up to six times faster than the proposed method. This fact is mainly caused by the significantly lower output power of the semiconductor diode that was used. Similar types of diodes have considerable potential to significantly increase the output power in the coming years. The proposed method envisages a threefold acceleration of the production process in the next 2 years. This would soon reduce the speed difference by half. At that moment this proposed method would not only provide higher production quality and accuracy compared to the input graphs but would also begin to compete with CO2 lasers in economic fields. This is because semiconductor lasers have significantly higher efficiencies and lower operating costs (Li 2000). Double production time can still mean lower production costs even if the depreciation of the machine is considered. The dimensions of semiconductor technology (Li 2000) are also much more convenient for designing work heads with multiple emitters together. This can compensate for the lower output power and can be produced faster than CO2 lasers.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Comparison of engraved pictures on wood surface. From left: ordered Bayer dithering method; Floyd Steinberg dithering method, Woodener company dithering method and method described in this research

Fig. 16
figure 16

Histogram comparison of engraved photo results from Fig. 15

The higher quality of the transfer of the graphic base to the wood using the above-mentioned calibration system is also evident from the histograms of the results compared in Fig. 16. It is obvious that commercial solutions do not reach such a range of individual shades and their even distribution. This is also due to the nature of the input graphics. However, when using a uniform base, the first three histograms contain significant gaps. For the first histogram on the left, the complete absence of dark tones can be observed, which is described by a zero number of scanned pixels for 8-bit values of 0–90. In this case, the larger third of the histogram is completely missing. The second example is better. However, the dark shades of the surface are in this case achieved by the age of the wood surface. As mentioned in the introduction, wood tends to darken its colour due to degradation of polymers. Freshly cut wood will have significantly lighter colour than older wood samples which were subjected to light, heat, and oxygen for a period of time. Therefore, there are no light shades in this sample. The third example showed an exceptionally wide range of shades for the CO2 laser. One of the reasons was the high firing power, which moved the material to a depth of 1 mm. As a result, there was a higher energy density of the laser beam and a slight defocusing, which caused the carbonization of the wood surface, which began in several places. That is why dark shades appeared in the histogram from the beginning. However, a higher value of the laser beam power makes it more difficult to produce other shades. The entire histogram, and of course, the resulting image is then distributed mainly between two colours. That is between the natural colour of the surface and the colour of an intense laser burning with a constant power. The colour of the natural surface is lighter, as this pattern is made on birch wood instead of beech. The last example is a result of proposed calibration system. Wider distribution of the shades is visible both from the picture and the histogram. The fineness of the semiconductor technology can cause very small darkening differences in the material. In addition to the calibration system and suitable defocusing of the optics, it is possible to achieve very dark values, which are formed by the black carbon of the carbonized surface.

4 Conclusion

This contribution was aimed to widen the number of possible colour shades produced by laser for photo engraving techniques. The method of chemical reaction control during wood heating was explored. By switching between wood burning and wood carbonization with beam focus, more colour shades can be obtained. The differences in tint change (CIELAB a* and CIELAB b* axes) were especially significant after 1.33 J s−1 of laser beam power output. The change in lightness (CIELAB L* axis) can be increased by additional 25% when using carbonization in laser engraving process. These improvements for laser engraving colour shades are interesting for pyrography works and laser engraving of photographs and graphics on all kinds of wood material. A test sample laser-burned by proposed calibration system was compared to three other samples made by current companies offering laser burned photographs. The main outcome of this improvement is visible in wider distribution of final product’s histogram. The number of manufacturable colour shades plays a crucial part in the quality of laser burning technology in case of photographs and shaded graphics. All-important laser setting parameters for beech wood were examined and are provided within this publication.