Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 21, 2018

Thermo-Efficiencies of a Tubular Combustor Under Different Inlet Conditions

  • Ahmet Topal EMAIL logo and Onder Turan ORCID logo

Abstract

Exergy efficiencies of the gas turbine become an important issue in recent years and by the way conducted studies regarding to this subject shows that the highest exergy destruction is observed in the combustor and afterburner modules. Therefore it is beneficial to perform analyses that are specific to the combustor exergy efficiency. This study includes the energy ηcc and exergy efficiencies ηex (thermo-efficiencies) of a tubular combustor for different inlet conditions. Both of the first law and second law efficiencies have been performed on the experimental data and efficiency trends are investigated for changing aerodynamic conditions. Combustor tests have been conducted in an atmospheric test rig and combustor air inlet temperatureT03, air mass flow rate m˙a and fuel mass flow rate m˙f have been set for the pre-defined conditions. Moreover, exhaust gas emissions were measured by using a gas analyzer system. In the study, highest energy and exergy efficiencies have been obtained at minimum aerodynamic loading condition as 99.0 % and 70.2 % respectively. Moreover efficiencies have the lowest value as 92.7 % and 54.0 % at the maximum aerodynamic loading condition. To summarize, this study aims to show the energy and exergy trends by changing inlet conditions of a tubular combustor in the atmospheric test rig.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thanks TUSAS Engine Industries Inc., Anadolu University in Turkey for financial, technical support and their colleagues who contributes to production, assembly and test processes of the combustor. This study was also supported by Anadolu University Scientific Research Projects Commission under the grant no: 1703F075.

Nomenclature

AFR

Air to fuel ratio

CO

Carbon monoxide

CO2

Carbon dioxide

EI

Emission Index (g/kg fuel)

e

Specific exergy (kJ/kg)

Ex

Exergy (kJ/kg)

g

Gravity, m2/s

h

Specific enthalpy (kW)

h

Water content of the inlet air, moles of water vapor per mole of dry inlet air

LHV

Lower heating value (kJ/kg)

m

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

m

Molar constant for Carbon

n

Molar constant for Hydrogen

Mw

Molecular weight (kg/kmol)

NOx

Nitrogen oxide

O2

Oxygen

P

Pressure (kPa)

PN

Moles of exhaust constituent “N” per mole of fuel

R

Specific gas constant (kJ/kg K)

S

Mole fraction of nitrogen plus mole fraction of argon in the dry inlet air

s

Specific entropy (kJ/kg K)

T

Temperature (K)

T

Mole fraction of carbon dioxide in dry inlet air

U

Mole fraction of methane in dry inlet air

UHC

Unburned hydrocarbon

V

Velocity, m/s

X

Moles of dry air/mole of fuel

x

Molar fraction

z

Height, m

η

Efficiency

Subscripts and superscripts
0

Ambient

3

Combustor inlet

4

Combustor outlet

a

Air

CH

Chemical

in

Inlet

KN

Kinetic

PH

Physical

PT

Potential

out

Outlet

References

1. Turan O. An exergy way to quantify sustainability metrics for high bypass turbofan engine. Energy. 2015;86:722–36.10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.026Search in Google Scholar

2. Aydın H, Turan O, Midilli A, Karakoç TH. Exergetic and exergo-economic analysis of a turboprop engine. A case study for CT7-9C. Int J Exergy. 2012;11:69–88.10.1504/IJEX.2012.049089Search in Google Scholar

3. Ehyaei MA, Anjiridezfuli A, Rosen MA. Exergetic analysis of an aircraft turbojet engine with an afterburner. Thermal Sci. 2013;17(4):1181–94.10.2298/TSCI110911043ESearch in Google Scholar

4. Bastani M, Jafari R, Ghasemi H. Exergy analysis of an aircraft turbojet engine. Int J Eng Sci Res Technol. 2015;4:380–6.Search in Google Scholar

5. Mousafarash A, Ahmedi P. Exergy and exergo-economic based analysis of a gas turbine power generation system. J of Power Technol. 2013;93:44–51.10.1007/978-3-319-07977-6_7Search in Google Scholar

6. Cilgin ME, Turan O. Entropy generation calculation of a turbofan engine: a case of CFM56-7B. Int J Turbo and Jet Engines. 2017. DOI:10.1515/tjj-2017-0053Search in Google Scholar

7. Topal A, Turan O. On-design exergy analysis of a combustor for a turbojet engine: a parametric study. Aircraft Eng Aerospace Technol. 2017;89:719–24.10.1108/AEAT-12-2016-0254Search in Google Scholar

8. Topal A. Küçük bir Turbojet Motor için Yanma Odası Tasarımı, Testi ve Termodinamik Analizi, MSc Thesis, Anadolu University, 2014Search in Google Scholar

9. SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice. Procedure for the analysis and evaluation of gaseous emissions from aircraft engines, SAE ARP1533 Rev A, 2004Search in Google Scholar

10. Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

11. Hepbasli A. A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2008;12:593–661.10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.001Search in Google Scholar

12. Turgut ET, Karakoc TH, Hepbasli A. Exergetic analysis of an aircraft turbofan engine. Int J Energy Res. 2007;31:1383–97.10.1002/er.1310Search in Google Scholar

13. Gülder ÖL. Flame temperature estimation of conventional and future jet fuels. National Res Counc Canada, Div Mech Eng, ASME. 1986;108:376–80.Search in Google Scholar

14. Dagaut P, Cathonnet M. The ignition, oxidation and combustion of kerosene: a review of experimental and kinetic modeling. Prog Energy Combustion Sci. 2006;32(1):48–92.10.1016/j.pecs.2005.10.003Search in Google Scholar

15. Çengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics-an engineering approach, 5th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Science, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lefebvre AH. Gas turbine combustion. New York: Taylor & Francis, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

17. Karimi MN, Kamboj SK. Exergy destruction and chemical irreversibilities during combustion in spark-ignition engine using oxygenated and hydrocarbon fuels. Int J Mech Ind Eng (IJMIE). 2012;2:7–11. ISSN No. 2231–6477.10.47893/IJMIE.2013.1117Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-02-21
Accepted: 2018-03-20
Published Online: 2018-04-21
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2018-0005/html
Scroll to top button