Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation of the interactions between a laser-generated bubble and a particle near a solid wall

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interactions between the bubbles and the particles near structures are important issues for the applications of the cavitation in the fluid machinery. To study the hidden microscopic mechanisms, a numerical method for simulating the laser-generated bubble between the solid wall and a particle is developed in this paper with considerations of the viscosities and the compressibility of the gas and the liquid phases, as well as the surface tension between them. The gas-liquid interface is tracked by the coupling level set and the volume of fluid (CLSVOF) method. The numerical results clearly reveal that the particle can influence the cavitation bubble behaviors. The potential damage of the nearby structures is numerically quantified in terms of the wall pressure, which helps better understand the synergetic effects of the particle on the cavitation. The effects of three dimensionless parameters on the wall pressure are also investigated, especially, on the peak pressure, namely, γ1 (defined as L1 / Rmax, where L1 is the distance from the center of the initial bubble to the solid wall and Rmax is the maximum bubble radius), γ2 (defined as L2 / Rmax, where L2 is the distance from the lower surface of the spherical particle to the initial bubble center) and θ (defined as Rp / Rmax, where Rp is the spherical particle radius). Further numerical results show that these parameters play a dominant role in determining the peak pressure. When γ1 < 1.00, the peak pressure on the solid wall during the bubble collapse is mainly resulted from the liquid jet. When γ1 > 1.00, the peak pressure is caused by the shock wave. With the increase of θ or decrease of γ2, the peak pressure increases. When γ2 > 2.00, the effect of the particle on the bubble behavior can be neglected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peters A., Lantermann U., el Moctar O. Numerical prediction of cavitation erosion on a ship propeller in model-and full-scale [J]. Wear, 2018, 408–409: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li S. C. Cavitation enhancement of silt erosion-An envisaged micro model [J]. Wear, 2006, 260(9–10): 1145–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suo D., Jin Z., Jiang X. et al. Microbubble mediated dual-frequency high intensity focused ultrasound thrombolysis: An In vitro study [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2017, 110(2): 023703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chahine G. L., Kapahi A., Choi J. K. et al. Modeling of surface cleaning by cavitation bubble dynamics and collapse [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2016, 29: 528–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma X. J., Zhao X., Huang B. et al. Physical investigation of non-spherical bubble collapse near a rigid boundary [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(3): 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang S. P., Zhang A. M., Liu Y. L. et al. Bubble dynamics and its applications [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(6): 975–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yin J., Zhang Y., Zhu J. et al. On the thermodynamic behaviors and interactions between bubble pairs: A numerical approach [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2021, 70: 105297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li S., Zhang A. M., Wang S. et al. Transient interaction between a particle and an attached bubble with an application to cavitation in silt-laden flow [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30(8): 082111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y., Qian Z., Ji B. et al. A review of microscopic interactions between cavitation bubbles and particles in silt-laden flow [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56: 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagterveld R. M., Boels L., Mayer M. J. et al. Visualization of acoustic cavitation effects on suspended calcite crystals [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2011, 18(1): 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng Y., Chen L., Liang X. et al. Numerical study of the interaction between a collapsing bubble and a movable particle in a free field [J]. Water, 2020, 12(12): 3331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li S., Han R., Zhang A. M. Nonlinear interaction between a gas bubble and a suspended sphere [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016, 65: 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y., Chen F., Zhang Y. et al. Experimental investigations of interactions between a laser-induced cavitation bubble and a spherical particle [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2018, 98: 645–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Poulain S., Guenoun G., Gart S. et al. Particle motion induced by bubble cavitation [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2015, 114(21): 214501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohl S. W., Klaseboer E., Khoo B. C. Spark bubble interaction with a suspended particle [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2015, 656(1): 012033.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lv L., Zhang Y., Zhang Y. Experimental investigations of the particle motions induced by a laser-generated cavitation bubble [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2019, 56: 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y. N., Xie X. Y., Zhang Y. X. High-speed experimental photography of collapsing cavitation bubble between a spherical particle and a rigid wall [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(6): 1012–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li S., Li Y. B., Zhang A. M. Numerical analysis of the bubble jet impact on a rigid wall [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2015, 50: 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koch M., Lechner C., Reuter F. et al. Numerical modeling of laser generated cavitation bubbles with the finite volume and volume of fluid method, using OpenFOAM [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2016, 126: 71–90.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Li S., Zhang A. M., Han R. et al. Experimental and numerical study on bubble-sphere interaction near a rigid wall [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2017, 29(9): 092102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ye X., Yao X., Han R. Dynamics of cavitation bubbles in acoustic field near the rigid wall [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 109: 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin J., Zhang Y., Zhang Y. Numerical study of a laser generated cavitation bubble based on FVM and CLSVOF method [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 240(7): 072021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnsen E., Colonius T. I. M. Numerical simulations of non-spherical bubble collapse [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 629: 231–262.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenshields C. J. OpenFOAM user guide Version 4.0 [R]. London, UK: OpenFOAM Ltd,, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weller H. G. A new approach to VOF-based interface capturing methods for incompressible and compressible flow [R]. Report TR/HGW, London, UK: OpenCFD Ltd., 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Deshpande S. S., Anumolu L., Trujillo M. F. Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interFoam [J]. Computational Science and Discovery, 2012, 5(1): 014016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sussman M., Puckett E. G. A coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing 3D and axisymmetric incompressible two-phase flows [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 162(2): 301–337.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Albadawi A., Donoghue D. B., Robinson A. J. et al. Influence of surface tension implementation in volume of fluid and coupled volume of fluid with level set methods for bubble growth and detachment [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2013, 53: 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Han B., Zhu R., Guo Z. et al. Control of the liquid jet formation through the symmetric and asymmetric collapse of a single bubble generated between two parallel solid plates [J]. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2018, 72: 114–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Lechner C., Koch M., Lauterborn W. et al. Pressure and tension waves from bubble collapse near a solid boundary: A numerical approach [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017, 142(6): 3649–3659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hsiao C. T., Jayaprakash A., Kapahi A. et al. Modelling of material pitting from cavitation bubble collapse [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 755: 142–175.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang S., Cui J., Zhang A. M. et al. Dynamic characteristics of large scale spark bubbles close to different boundaries [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2017, 29(9): 092107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-xue Zhang.

Additional information

Projects supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51876220), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. ZX20190184).

Biography: Jian-yong Yin (1993-), Male, Ph. D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, Jy., Zhang, Yx., Zhu, Jj. et al. Numerical investigation of the interactions between a laser-generated bubble and a particle near a solid wall. J Hydrodyn 33, 311–322 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0029-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0029-5

Key words

Navigation