Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-sensor information fusion based control for VAV systems using thermal comfort constraints

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conventional control methods of variable air volume (VAV) air conditioning systems usually assume that the indoor air is well mixed, and consider each building zone as one node with homogeneous temperature distribution. The average temperature is subsequently used as the controlled parameter in the VAV cascade control process, which might cause uneven temperature distribution and unsatisfactory thermal comfort. This paper presents a coupled simulation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and building energy simulation (BES) for the VAV system in an office building located in Shanghai for the purpose of simulating the building, the VAV control system, and indoor thermal environment simultaneously. An external interface is developed to integrate the CFD and BES models based on quasi-dynamic coupling approach. Based upon the developed co-simulation platform, the novel VAV control method is further proposed by fusing information from multiple sensors. By adding two temperature sensors to constrain the thermal comfort of the occupied zone, the supply air temperature setpoint of the VAV terminal unit can be reset in real time. The novel control method is embedded into the co-simulation platform and compared with the conventional VAV control approach. The results illustrate that the temperature distribution under the proposed method is more uniform. At most times of the typical test day, the air diffusion performance indexes (ADPIs) for the proposed method are above 80%, while the ADPIs for the conventional control method are between 60% and 80%. Due to multi-sensor information fusion, the proposed VAV control approach has better ability to ensure the indoor thermal comfort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

area (m2)

A-C:

sensor positions

ADPI:

air diffusion performance index

AHU:

air handling unit

BES:

building energy simulation

CC:

pollutant concentration (ppm)

CFD:

computational fluid dynamics

DEM:

supply air temperature limitation

e :

difference of controlled variable and its setpoint

F :

mass flow rate (kg s−1)

G :

humidity (kg kg−1)

H :

control output

h :

heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

HVAC:

heating, ventilation and air conditioning K gain

k 1 :

number of building zones with connecting walls

k 2 :

number of building zones without connecting walls

m :

air mass (kg)

M :

metabolic rate (W m−2)

P :

pressure (Pa)

PMV:

predicted mean vote

Q :

heat (kW)

R :

thermal resistance (K kW−1)

S :

moisture or pollutant generation rate

T :

temperature (°C)

t :

time (s)

V :

air volume (m3)

v :

volume flow rate (m3 s−1)

VAV:

variable air volume

W :

mechanical work (W)

ρ :

air density (kg m−3)

τ :

time constant

ave:

average

cl:

cloth

exf:

exfiltration

eq2 :

inside part of the wall

fur:

furniture

in:

inlet

inf:

infiltration

int:

internal

out:

outlet

plt:

pollutant

RA:

return air

SA:

supply air

set:

setpoint

str:

non-transparent layer

win:

transparent layer

References

  • Axley J (2007). Multizone airflow modeling in buildings: History and theory. HVAC&R Research, 13: 907–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascione F, Bellia L, Capozzoli A (2013). A coupled numerical approach on museum air conditioning: Energy and fluid-dynamic analysis. Applied Energy, 103: 416–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadi E, da Silva MG, Antunes CH, Dias L (2012). A multi-objective optimization model for building retrofit strategies using TRNSYS simulations, GenOpt and MATLAB. Building and Environment, 56: 370–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbason M, Reiter S (2014). Coupling building energy simulation and computational fluid dynamics: Application to a two-storey house in a temperate climate. Building and Environment, 75: 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q (1995). Comparison of different k-ε models for indoor air flow computations. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 28: 353–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Li Z, Wang X, Lin B (2018). A graph- and feature-based building space recognition algorithm for performance simulation in the early design stage. Building Simulation, 11: 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkelmann FC, Buhl WF, Huang YJ, et al. (2001). EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 33: 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley DB, Hand JW, Kummert M, Griffith BT (2008). Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment, 43: 661–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho YH, Liu M (2009). Minimum airflow reset of single duct VAV terminal boxes. Building and Environment, 44: 1876–1885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho YH, Liu M (2010). Correlation between minimum airflow and discharge air temperature. Building and Environment, 45: 1601–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Hoyo Arce I, López SH, Perez SL, Rämä M, Klobut K, et al. (2018). Models for fast modelling of district heating and cooling networks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82: 1863–1873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djunaedy E, Hensen JLM, Loomans MGLC (2005). External coupling between CFD and energy simulation: Implementation and validation. ASHRAE Transactions, 111(1): 612–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Z, Jin X (2007). Detection and diagnosis for sensor fault in HVAC systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 48: 693–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Z, Xu P, Jin X, Liu Q (2015). Temperature sensor placement optimization for VAV control using CFD-BES co-simulation strategy. Building and Environment, 85: 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan B, Jin X, Du Z (2011). Optimal control strategies for multi-chiller system based on probability density distribution of cooling load ratio. Energy and Buildings, 43: 2813–2821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y, Ito K (2012). Energy consumption analysis intended for real office space with energy recovery ventilator by integrating BES and CFD approaches. Building and Environment, 52: 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanger PO (1970). Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harish VSKV, Kumar A (2016). A review on modeling and simulation of building energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56: 1272–1292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin X (1999). Study on simulation of VAV air-conditioning system and online optimal control, PhD Dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Ren H, Xiao X (2005). Prediction-based online optimal control of outdoor air of multi-zone VAV air conditioning systems. Energy and Buildings, 37: 939–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Du Z, Xiao X (2007). Energy evaluation of optimal control strategies for central VWV chiller systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 27: 934–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang SH, Kim HJ, Cho YH (2014). A study on the control method of single duct VAV terminal unit through the determination of proper minimum air flow. Energy and Buildings, 69: 464–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Chen H, Lin B, Zhu Y (2018). Fast bidirectional building performance optimization at the early design stage. Building Simulation, 11: 647–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam JC, Chan ALS (2001). CFD analysis and energy simulation of a gymnasium. Building and Environment, 36: 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Duan R, Chen C, Lin CH, Chen Q (2015). Inverse design of the thermal environment in an airliner cabin by use of the CFD-based adjoint method. Energy and Buildings, 104: 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Novoselac A (2015). Air Diffusion Performance Index (ADPI) of diffusers for heating mode. Building and Environment, 87: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro E, Jorge HM, Quintela DA (2011). HVAC system energy optimization in indoor swimming pools. In: Proceedings of the 3th International Youth Conference on Energetics (IYCE), Leiria, Portugal.

  • Strachan PA, Kokogiannakis G, MacDonald IA (2008). History and development of validation with the ESP-r simulation program. Building and Environment, 43: 601–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvalai G (2012). Implementation and validation of simplified heat pump model in IDA-ICE energy simulation environment. Energy and Buildings, 49: 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Jin X (1998). CO2-based occupancy detection for on-line outdoor air flow control. Indoor and Built Environment, 7: 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S (1999). Dynamic simulation of building VAV air-conditioning system and evaluation of EMCS on-line control strategies. Building and Environment, 34: 681–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wang H, Gao F, Zhou P, Zhai ZJ (2018). Literature review on pressure-velocity decoupling algorithms applied to built-environment CFD simulation. Building and Environment, 143: 671–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Chen Q (2001a). A two-layer turbulence model for simulating indoor airflow: Part I. Model development. Energy and Buildings, 33: 613–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Chen Q (2001b). A two-layer turbulence model for simulating indoor airflow: Part II. Applications. Energy and Buildings, 33: 627–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan D, Xia J, Tang W, Song F, Zhang X, et al. (2008). DeST—An integrated building simulation toolkit Part I: Fundamentals. Building Simulation, 1: 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Jin X, Du Z, Fan B, Chai X (2011). Evaluation of four control strategies for building VAV air-conditioning systems. Energy and Buildings, 43: 414–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Zhu S, MacNaughton P, Allen JG, Spengler JD (2018). Physiological and cognitive performance of exposure to biophilic indoor environment. Building and Environment, 132: 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Zhang Q, Kang J, Cui F (2018). Predicting integrated thermal and acoustic performance in naturally ventilated high-rise buildings using CFD and FEM simulation. Building Simulation, 11: 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai Z, Chen Q, Haves P, Klems JH (2002). On approaches to couple energy simulation and computational fluid dynamics programs. Building and Environment, 37: 857–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai Z, Chen Q (2006). Sensitivity analysis and application guides for integrated building energy and CFD simulation. Energy and Buildings, 38: 1060–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Xia J, Jiang Z, Huang J, Qin R, et al. (2008). DeST—An integrated building simulation toolkit Part II: Applications. Building Simulation, 1: 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Soh YC, Wu X (2015). Integrated analysis of CFD data with K-means clustering algorithm and extreme learning machine for localized HVAC control. Applied Thermal Engineering, 76: 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo W, Wetter M, Tian W, Li D, Jin M, Chen Q (2016). Coupling indoor airflow, HVAC, control and building envelope heat transfer in the Modelica Buildings library. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 9: 366–381.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51876119) and the Shanghai Pujiang Program (No. 17PJD017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhimin Du.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Shi, T., Jin, X. et al. Multi-sensor information fusion based control for VAV systems using thermal comfort constraints. Build. Simul. 14, 1047–1062 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0736-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0736-9

Keywords

Navigation