Skip to main content
Log in

Seismotectonic Deformation of Active Segments of the Junction Zone of the Kolyma–Omolon Superterrane and South Anui Suture (Southeastern Russia)

  • Published:
Geotectonics Aims and scope

Abstract

Our seismotectonic studies focus on active segments of the junction zone of the Kolyma–Omolon superterrane and the South Anui suture. The aim of our research is to identify features that show activation of suture zones and to determine the parameters of the stress–strain state of the crust in the study area. The analysis was based on the average seismotectonic deformation tensors, which were estimated for the main epicentral fields of Russia’s northeastern regions. New data are now available on the focal characteristics of moderate earthquakes, which can improve determination of the kinematic types of junctions of suture zones of the tectonic taxa located along the Arctic and Pacific continental margins. Seismotectonic crustal destruction regimes are determined for the active segments of the junction zone of the Kolyma–Omolon superterrane and the South Anui suture. These regimes are influenced by global geodynamic processes taking place at lithospheric plate margins, as well as by the dominant deformation fields of adjacent tectonic taxa. The seismotectonic analysis results suggest activation of the suture zones of the northwestern flank of the Kolyma–Omolon superterrane under stable north-eastward compression. The suture zones may extend into the Laptev Sea area, where they are conjugate with the structural elements of the South Anui suture (Novosibirsk–Svyatoi Nos segment). In the Anui–Chukotka segment of the suture, seismotectonic crustal destruction changes from compression to extension. This is due to the effect of deformation fields of active megazones of conjugated tectonic taxa of the Novosibirsk–Chukotka fold-and-thrust and Okhotsk–Chukotka active margin zones. For the tectonic taxa of the Arctic sector of Russia’s northeastern regions, a database has been consolidated, including the of seismotectonic crustal deformation parameters, which may be useful for various geodynamic reconstructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. A. Aksenov, N. N. Dunaev, A. S. Ionin, V. V. Kalinenko, V. S. Medvedev, Yu. A. Pavlidis, and M. G. Yurkevich, Eurasian Arctic Shelf in the Late Quaternary (Nauka, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. A. Bogdanov, “Continental margins: General problems regarding their structure and tectonic evolution,” in Fundamental Problems of General Tectonics (Nauchnyi mir, Moscow, 2001), pp. 231–249.

  3. G. E. Bondarenko, Doctoral Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy (Moscow, 2004).

  4. B. G. Bukchin, “On determination of source parameters from surface wave records in case of inaccurately set medium characteristics,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Fiz. Zemli, No. 9, 34–41 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. G. Golionko, A. E. Basilyan, P. A. Nikolsky, V. V. Kostyleva, N. A. Malyshev, V. E. Verzhbitsky, V. V. Obmetko, and A. A. Borodulin, “Fold–thrust deformations of New Siberia Island (Novosibirsky Islands, Russia): Age, morphology, and genesis of structures,” Geotectonics 53, 675–699 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. K. Danukalova, A. B. Kuzmichev, and V. A. Aristov, “Upper Devonian depositional system of Bel’kov Island (New Siberian Islands): An intracontinental rift or a continental margin?,” Geotectonics 48, 390–412 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. S. Drachev, A. V. Elistratov, and L. A. Savostin, “Structure and seismostratigraphy of the East Siberian Sea shelf along the Indigirka Bay–Jannetta Island seismic profile,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 377, 293–297 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. P. Imaeva, V. S. Imaev, and B. M. Koz’min, “Dynamics of seismogenerating structures in the frontal zone of the Kolyma–Omolon superterrane,” Geotectonics 50, 349–365 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. P. Imaeva, B. M. Koz’min, V. S. Imaev, and K. G. Mackey, “Seismotectonic studies of the pleistoseist area of the M s = 6.9 Ilin-Tass earthquake in northeast Yakutia,” Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 52, 821–835 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. P. Imaeva, G. S. Gusev, V. S. Imaev, S. V. Ashurkov, V. I. Mel’nikova, and A. I. Seredkina, “The geodynamic activity of recent structures and the tectonic stress fields in Northeast Asia,” Geodin. Tektonofiz. 8, 737–768 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2017-8-4-0315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. K. Kos’ko, N. N. Sobolev, E. A. Korago, V. F. Proskurnin, and N. M. Stolbov, “Geology of New Siberia Islands as the basis of interpretation of geophysical data on the East Arctic shelf of Russia,” Neftegaz. Geol. Teor. Prakt. 8 (2), 1–36 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. V. Lander, B. G. Bukchin, A. V. Kiryushin, and D. V. Droznin, “Tectonic evolution and parameters of the source of the Khailino earthquake of March 8, 1991 in Koryakia: Does the Beringian Plate exist?,” Vychisl. Seismol. Geodin. 3, 80–96 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. L. Levshin, T. B. Yanovskaya, A. V. Lander, B. G. Bukchin, M. P. Barmin, L. I. Ratnikova, and E. N. Its, Surface Seismic Waves in the Horizontally Inhomogeneous Solid Earth (Nauka, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. V. Metelkin, V. A. Vernikovskii, T. Yu. Tolmacheva, N. Yu. Matushkin, and A. I. Zhdanova, “First paleomagnetic data on the Early Paleozoic sediments of New Siberia Islands (East Siberian Sea): On the problem of the South Anyui Suture formation and the tectonic reconstruction of the Arctida continent,” Litosfera, No. 3, 11–31 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. A. Natal’in, Candidate’s Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy (Khabarovsk, 1981).

  16. L. M. Parfenov, Continental Margins and Island Arcs of Mesozoides of Northeast Asia (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1984) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. M. Parfenov, V. S. Oksman, A. V. Prokop’ev, V. F. Timofeev, F. F. Tret’yakov, V. A. Trunilina, and A. V. Deikunenko, “Assemblage of terranes in the Verkhoyansk–Kolyma orogenic zone,” in Tectonics, Geodynamics, and Metallogeny of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia), Ed. by L. M. Parfenov and M. I. Kuz’min (MAIK Nauka/Interperiodika, Moscow, 2001), pp. 199–254.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. M. Parfenov, A. V. Prokop’ev, and V. B. Spektor, “Topography of the Earh’s surface and its evolution,” in Tectonics, Geodynamics, and Metallogeny of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia), Ed. by L. M. Parfenov and M. I. Kuz’min (MAIK Nauka/Interperiodika, Moscow, 2001), pp. 12–32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. M. Pevzner, D. O. Gertsev, P. I. Fedorov, F. A. Romanenko, and Yu. V. Kushcheva, “Anyui Volcano in Chukotka: Age, structure, peculiarities of rocks’ composition and eruptions,” Lithol. Miner. Resour. 52, 20–50 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seismotectonics of the Northeastern Sector of Russian Arctic Region, Ed. by L. P. Imaeva and I. I. Kolodeznikov (Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Novosibirsk, 2017) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. I. Seredkina, “Seismic moment tensor of earthquakes in the North verkhoyansk region and Laptev Sea shelf,” Modern Methods of Processing and Interpreting Seismological Data: Proceedings of the XII International Seismological Workshop, Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2017, Ed. by A. A. Malovichko (Obninsk, Edinaya Geofiz. Sluzhba Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2017), pp. 338–341.

  22. K. B. Seslavinskii, “South Anyui Suture (West Chukotka),” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 249, 1181–1185 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. D. Sokolov, M. I. Tuchkova, A. V. Ganelin, G. E. Bondarenko, and P. Layer, “Tectonics of the South Anyui suture, Northeast Asia,” Geotectonics 49, 3–26 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Russian Tectonic Code, Ed. by N. V. Mezhelovskii (GEOKART–GEOS, Moscow, 2016) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. M. Til’man and N. A. Bogdanov, Tectonic Map of Northeast Asia, Scale 1 : 5 000 000, Ed. by Yu. M. Pushcharovskii (Kartografiya, Moscow, 1992).

  26. C. Bassin, G. Laske, and G. Masters, “The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America,” EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 81, Art. No. F897 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. F. Clinton, M. Nettles, F. Walter, K. Anderson, T. Dahl-Jensen, D. Giardini, A., Govoni W. Hanka, S. Lasocki, W. S. Lee, D. McCormack, S. Mykkelveit, E. Stutzmann, and S. Tsuboi, “Real-time geophysical data enhance Earth system monitoring in Greenland,” EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 95, 13–24 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. S. Drachev, S. Mazur, S. Campbell, C. Green, and A. Tishchenko, “Crustal architecture of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf and adjacent Arctic Ocean constrained by seismic data and gravity modeling results,” J. Geodyn. 119, 123–148 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. T. A. Dumitru, E. L. Miller, P. B. O’Sullivan, J. M. Amato, K. A. Hannula, A. T. Calvert, and P. B. Gans, “Cretaceous to Recent extension in the Bering Strait region, Alaska,” Tectonics 14, 549–563 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. M. Dziewonski and D. L. Anderson, “Preliminary Reference Earth Model,” Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 25, 297–356 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. K. Fujita, K. G. Mackey, R. C. McCaleb, L. V. Gunbina, V. N. Kovalev, V. S. Imaev, and V. N. Smirnov, “Seismicity of Chukotka, Northeastern Russia,” in Tectonic Evolution of the Bering Shelf-Chukchi Sea-Arctic Margin and Adjacent Landmasses, Vol. 360 of Geol. Soc. Am., Spec. Pap., Ed. by E. L. Miller, A. Grantz, and S. L. Klemperer (2002), pp. 259–272.

  32. K. Fujita, B. M. Kozmin, K. G. Mackey, S. A. Riegel, V. S. Imaev, and M. S. McLean, “Seismotectonics of the Chersky seismic belt, Eastern Russia (Yakutia) and Magadan district, Russia,” in Geology, Geophysics and Tectonics of Northeastern Russia: A Tribute to Leonid Parfenov, Vol. 4 of Stephan Mueller Spec. Publ. Ser., Ed. by D. B. Stone, K. Fujita, P. W. Layer, E. L. Miller, A. V. Prokopiev, and J. Toro (2009), pp. 117–145.

  33. D. Franke, K. Hinz, and C. Reichert, “Geology of the East Siberian Sea, Russian Arctic, from seismic images: Structures, evolution, and implications for the evolution of the Arctic Ocean Basin,” J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 109, Art. No. B07106 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. D. Franke, C. Reichert, V. Damm, and K. Piepjohn, “The South Anyui suture, Northeast Arctic Russia, revealed by offshore seismic data,” Norw. J. Geol. 88, 189–200 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Global Centroid Moment Tensor. https://www.globalcmt.org/. Accessed November 10, 2019.

  36. International Seismological Centre, Thatcham, U. K. http://www.isc.ac.uk. Accessed November 10, 2019.

  37. Harvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences. http://seismology.harvard.edu/resources.html. Accessed September–January 2015.

  38. L. P. Imaeva, V. S. Imaev, and B. M. Koz’min, “Structural–dynamic model of the Chersky seismotectonic zone (continental part of the Arctic–Asian seismic belt),” J. Asian Earth Sci. 116, 59–68 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. C. Lasserre, B. Bukchin, P. Bernard, P. Tapponier, Y. Gaudemer, A. Mostinsky, and R. Dailu, “Source parameters and tectonic origin of the 1996 June 1 Tianzhu (M w = 5.2) and 1995 July 21 Yongen (M w = 5.6) earthquakes near the Haiyuan fault (Gansu, China),” Geophys. J. Int. 144, 206–220 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. K. G. Mackey, K. Fujita, L. V. Gunbina, V. N. Kovalev, V. S. Imaev, B. M. Koz’min, and L. P. Imaeva, “Seismicity of the Bering Strait region: Evidence for a Bering block,” Geology 25, 979–982 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. K. G. Mackey, K. Fujita, H. E. Hartse, R. J. Stead, L. K. Steck, L. V. Gunbina, N. Leyshuk, S. V. Shibaev, B. M. Koz’min, V. S. Imaev, E. I. Gordeev, V. N. Chebrov, O. K. Masal’ski, N. A. Gileva, V. A. Bormatov, et al., “Seismicity map of Eastern Russia, 1960–2010,” Seismol. Res. Lett. 81, 761–768 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. K. Nakamura, G. Plafker, K. H. Jacob, and J. N. Davies, “A tectonic stress trajectory map of Alaska using information from volcanoes and faults,” Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo 55, 89–100 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  43. H.-C. Nataf and Y. Ricard, “3SMAC: On a priori tomographic model of the upper mantle based on geophysical modeling,” Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 95, 101–122 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. B. A. Natal’in, J. M. Amato, J. Toro, and J. E. Wright, “Paleozoic rocks of Northern Chukotka Peninsula, Russian Far East: Implications for the tectonics of the Arctic Region,” Tectonics 18, 977–1003 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. W. J. Nokleberg, L. M. Parfenov, J. W. H. Monger, I. O. Norton, A. I. Khanchuk, D. B. Stone, C. R. Scotese, D. W. Scholl, and K. Fujita, Phanerozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Circum-North Pacific, No. 1626 of U. S. Geol. Surv., Prof. Pap. (2000).

  46. K. Piepjohn, D. Franke, C. Gaedicke, S. Mrugalla, H. Lorenz, C. Brandes, W. Von Gosen, L. Labrousse, N. N. Sobolev, P. Solobev, T. Tolmacheva, G. Suan, and F. Talarico, “Mesozoic structural evolution of the New Siberian Islands,” in Circum-Arctic Lithosphere Evolution, Vol. 460 of Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., Ed. by V. Pease and B. Coakley (2018), pp. 239–262.

  47. A. V. Prokopiev, V. B. Ershova, O. Anfinson, D. Stockli, J. Powell, A. K. Khudoley, D. A. Vasiliev, N. N. Sobolev, and E. O. Petrov, “Tectonics of the New Siberian Islands archipelago: Structural styles and low-temperature thermochronology,” J. Geodyn. 121, 155–184 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. J. Toro, J. M. Amato, and B. Natal’in, “Cretaceous deformation, Chegitun River area, Chukotka Peninsula, Russia: Implications for the tectonic evolution of the Bering Strait region,” Tectonics 22, 5–19 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to V.I. Melnikova (Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk) for the data provided on the average tensors of seismotectonic deformations, A.V. Prokopyev (Institute of Diamond and Precious Metal Geology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk) for a discussion of the problems of geology and tectonics of the territory of northeastern Russia, M.N. Shoupletsova (Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow) for editing. The authors are grateful to the reviewers Prof. S.D. Sokolov (Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow) and Prof. E.A. Rogozhin (Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow) for comments.

Funding

The research was financed by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 19-05-00062 “Dynamics of Recent Structures of the Continental–Shelf Zone of the Northeastern Sector of the Russian Arctic.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. P. Imaeva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imaeva, L.P., Imaev, V.S. & Seredkina, A.I. Seismotectonic Deformation of Active Segments of the Junction Zone of the Kolyma–Omolon Superterrane and South Anui Suture (Southeastern Russia). Geotecton. 55, 20–35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852121010064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852121010064

Keywords:

Navigation