Abstract
In this study, we perform a diachronic analysis of the temporal trends of scholarly articles over a fairly long time scale. Through the retweeting dynamics of 298 highly retweeted articles, we find that nearly 57% of the articles have multiple peaks on diffusion curves after their initial exposure on social media. We characterize this phenomenon by measuring the time interval between peaks, the height and width of peaks, diffusion performance and the similarities between peaks. We discover that bursts of multi-peak articles usually have short durations and small coverage and that the length of the peak interval determines correlations between peaks. We also find that overlapping users between peaks can act like weak ties and spread information from one group to another, catalyzing information to experience a renewed burst of retweets. Based on the presence or absence of overlapping users, we summarize the occurrence mechanism of the multi-peak phenomenon into two types: (1) Cross-community diffusion through overlapping users. (2) Bursty diffusion of key opinion leaders at different times.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Science communicator: someone who links frequently to scientific articles from a variety of different journals or publishers.
References
Adelman, M. B., Parks, M. R., & Albrecht, T. L. (1987). Beyond close relationships: Support in weak ties. In T. L. Albrecht, & M. B. Adelman, Associates (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp. 126–147). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bakshy, E., Karrer, B., & Adamic, L. A. (2009). Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 325–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1566374.1566421.
Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 519–528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187907.
Barabási, A.-L. (2005). The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature, 435(7039), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03459.
Barabási, A.-L., & Gelman, A. (2010). Bursts: The hidden pattern behind everything we do. Physics Today, 63, 46. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3431332.
Bauer, M. W. (2012). Public attention to science 1820–2010—A Longue Durée picture. In S. Rödder, M. Franzen, & P. Weingart (Eds.), The sciences’ media connection-public communication and its repercussions. (pp. 35–57). Springer.
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353.
Brase, C. H., & Brase, C. P. (2013). Understanding basic statistics. Cengage Learning.
Cha, M., Mislove, A., & Gummadi, K. P. (2009). A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 721–730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1526709.1526806.
Chen, J., Hsu, W., Lee, M. L., & Ng, S. (2007). Labeling network motifs in protein interactomes for protein function prediction. In: 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering. Presented at the 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, 546–555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icde.2007.367900.
Cheng, J., Adamic, L. A., Kleinberg, J. M., & Leskovec, J. (2016). Do cascades recur? In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, 671–681. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2882993.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Chapter 3—absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation* *reprinted with permission © 1990 by Cornell University. In R. L. Cross & S. B. Israelit (Eds.), Strategic Learning in a knowledge economy. (pp. 39–67). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Crane, R., & Sornette, D. (2008). Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(41), 15649–15653. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803685105.
Fan, R., Xu, K., & Zhao, J. (2020). Weak ties strengthen anger contagion in social media. arXiv:2005.01924 [cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01924. Accessed from 18 Feb 2021.
Fedoroff, N. V. (2012). The global knowledge society. Science, 335(6068), 503–503. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219498.
Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users1. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x.
Goel, S., Anderson, A., Hofman, J., & Watts, D. J. (2015). The structural virality of online diffusion. Management Science, 62(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2158.
Goel, S., Watts, D. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2012). The structure of online diffusion networks. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 623–638. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2229012.2229058.
Goh, K.-I., & Barabási, A.-L. (2008). Burstiness and memory in complex systems. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 81(4), 48002. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/81/48002.
Grabowicz, P. A., Ramasco, J. J., Moro, E., Pujol, J. M., & Eguiluz, V. M. (2012). Social features of online networks: the strength of intermediary ties in online social media. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029358.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469.
Hargittai, E., Füchslin, T., & Schäfer, M. S. (2018). How do young adults engage with science and research on social media? Some preliminary findings and an agenda for future research. Social MediaSociety, 4(3), 2056305118797720. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118797720.
Herie, M., & Martin, G. W. (2002). Knowledge diffusion in social work: a new approach to bridging the gap. Social Work, 47(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/47.1.85.
Larson, J. M. (2017). The weakness of weak ties for novel information diffusion. Applied Network Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0034-3.
Lerman, K., & Ghosh, R. (2010). Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social Networks. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 4(1). https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14021. Accessed from 14 Feb 2021.
Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., Kleinberg, J. (2009). Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 497–506). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557077
Liu, J.-G., Zhou, Q., Guo, Q., Yang, Z.-H., Xie, F., & Han, J.-T. (2017). Knowledge diffusion of dynamical network in terms of interaction frequency. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 10755. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11057-8.
Liu, S.-Y., Xiao, J., & Xu, X.-K. (2020). Link prediction in signed social networks: From status theory to motif families. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 7(3), 1724–1735. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnse.2019.2951806.
Matsubara, Y., Sakurai, Y., Prakash, B. A., Li, L., & Faloutsos, C. (2012). Rise and fall patterns of information diffusion: model and implications. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery 6–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2339530.2339537.
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002). Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298(5594), 824–827. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5594.824.
Myers, S. A., & Leskovec, J. (2014). The bursty dynamics of the Twitter information network. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery 913–924. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568043.
Onnela, J. P., Saramki, J., Hyvnen, J., Szabó, G., & Barabási, A. L. (2007). Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Ences, 104(18), 7332–7336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610245104.
Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First monday. doi: 1592766041.
Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. Accessed 6 Apr 2021.
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001.
Wang, X., Chen, L., Shi, J., & Peng, T.-Q. (2019). What makes cancer information viral on social media? Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.024.
Weng, L., Karsai, M., Perra, N., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2018). Attention on weak ties in social and communication networks. In S. Lehmann & Y.-Y. Ahn (Eds.), Complex spreading phenomena in social Systems: Influence and contagion in real-world social networks. (pp. 213–228). Springer International Publishing.
Weng, L., Menczer, F., & Ahn, Y.-Y. (2013). Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific Reports, 3, 2522. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02522.
Yang, J., & Leskovec, J. (2011). Patterns of temporal variation in online media. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery 177–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1935826.1935863.
Yin, Y., Gao, J., Jones, B. F., & Wang, D. (2021). Coevolution of policy and science during the pandemic. Science, 371(6525), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe3084.
Zafarani, R., Abbasi, M. A., & Liu, H. (2014). Social media mining: An introduction. . Cambridge University Press.
Zakhlebin, I., & Horvát, E. -Á. (2020). Diffusion of scientific articles across online platforms. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14, 762–773.
Zhan, C., Wu, F., Huang, Z., Jiang, W., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Analysis of collective action propagation with multiple recurrences. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04756-3.
Zhao, J., Wu, J., & Xu, K. (2010). Weak ties: Subtle role of information diffusion in online social networks. Physical Review E, 82(1), 016105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.016105.
Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1959.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the Grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71673038, 61773091, 71974029), thank the anonymous reviewer for helpful comments, and thank Altmetric.com for providing the altmetric data of scientific publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, R., Wang, X., Xu, X. et al. Multiple bursts of highly retweeted articles on social media. Scientometrics 126, 5165–5179 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03970-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03970-7