Abstract
This study investigated the retractions of academic research in the Middle East in the past two decades from a bibliometric perspective. A total of 563 retractions in the Middle East were identified in the examined span of time. Results showed that both the numbers of publications and retractions in the Middle East increased significantly in the past two decades. It was also found that 79.21% of the retractions were due to misconducts, of which plagiarism accounted for the largest proportion. In addition, the number of retractions by authors from a certain country accounted for almost half of all retractions. Last, most retractions were in medicine-related disciplines. Based on the results, we proposed suggestions to address the issue. Particularly, we suggest the use of technology in article submission systems as well as enhanced education on academic integrity to help address the issue of academic misconduct.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For the definition of the Middle East countries, see the following webpage: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/which-are-the-middle-eastern-countries.html
References
Adams, J., King, C., Pendlebury, D., Hook, D., Wilsdon, J., & Zewail, A. (2011). Global research report: Middle east: Exploring the changing landscape of Arabian, Persian and Turkish research. Thomson Reuters Global Research Report, (February 2011). Accessed October 24, 2019.
Akhondzadeh, S. (2013). Iranian science shows world’s fastest growth: Ranks 17th in science production in 2012. Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology, 5(3), 139.
Alfaro-Toloza, P., Mayta-Tristan, P., & Rodriguez-Morales, A. J. (2013). Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A Latin American perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 29(2), 99–100. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2012.755504.
Almeida, R. M. V. R., Albuquerque Rocha, K., Catelani, F., Fontes-Pereira, A. J., & Vasconcelos, S. M. R. (2016a). Plagiarism allegations account for most retractions in major Latin American/Caribbean databases. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9714-5.
Almeida, R. M. V. R., Catelani, F., Fontes-Pereira, A. J., & Souza Gave, N. (2016b). Retractions in general and internal medicine in a high-profile scientific indexing database. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 134(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2014.00381601.
Ataie-Ashtiani, B. (2017). Chinese and Iranian scientific publications: fast growth and poor ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9766-1.
Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2018). Temporal characteristics of retracted articles. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1771–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2802-y
Borjian, M. (2013). English in post-revolutionary Iran: From indigenization to internationalization. Multilingual Matters.
Budd, J. M., Sievert, M. E., & Schultz, T. R. (1998). Phenomena of retraction. Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 296–297. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.296.
Budd, J. M., Sievert, M. E., Schultz, T. R., & Scoville, C. (1999). Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 87(4), 437–443.
Coghlan, A. (2011). Iran is top of the world in science growth. New Scientist.
Cokol, M., Iossifov, I., Rodriguez-Esteban, R., & Rzhetsky, A. (2007). How many scientific papers should be retracted? EMBO Reports, 8(5), 422–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400970.
Cokol, M., Ozbay, F., & Rodriguez-Esteban, R. (2008). Retraction rates are on the rise. EMBO Reports, 9(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401143
Corbyn, Z. (2009). Retractions up tenfold. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=407838&c=2.
Culbertson, S. (2019). The Middle East’s science revolution? CNN.
Resnik, D. B., & Dinse, G. E. (2013). Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100766.
Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
Fanelli, D. (2013). Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Medicine, 10(12), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563.
Fanelli, D. (2016). System for honest errors. Nature, 531, 415.
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
Grieneisen, M. L., & Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e44118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118.
Habibzadeh, F. (2011). Geopolitical changes and trends in Middle Eastern countries’ contributions to world science over the past three decades. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 14(5), 310–311.
He, T. (2013). Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010. Scientometrics, 96(2), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0906-3 .
Lei, L., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Lack of improvement in scientific integrity: An analysis of WoS retractions by Chinese researchers (1997–2016). Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9962-7.
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a.
Moiwo, J. P., & Tao, F. (2013). The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1031–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0846-y.
Nath, S. B., Marcus, S. C., & Druss, B. G. (2006). Retractions in the research literature: Misconduct or mistakes? Medical Journal of Australia, 185(3), 152–154. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00504.x.
Noorden, R. V. (2011). The trouble with retractions. Nature, 478, 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/478026a.
Ribeiro, M. D., & Vasconcelos, S. M. R. (2018). Retractions covered by Retraction Watch in the 2013–2015 period: Prevalence for the most productive countries. Scientometrics, 114(2), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2621-6.
Steen, R. G. (2010). Retractions in the scientific literature: Do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.038125.
Steen, R. G. (2011). Retractions in the medical literature: How many patients are put at risk by flawed research? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(11), 688–692. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2011.043133.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2017). Notices and policies for retractions, expressions of concern, errata and corrigenda: Their importance, content, and context. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(2), 521–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9769-y.
Zhang, H., Patton, D., & Kenney, M. (2013). Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 project. Research Policy, 42(3), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, W., Lei, L. Retractions in the Middle East from 1999 to 2018: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 126, 4687–4700 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03919-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03919-w