Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic Screening of Distribution Pattern of Roaches Rutilus rutilus and R. lacustris (Cyprinidae) in Broad Range of Secondary Contact (Volga Basin)

  • ICHTHYOLOGY
  • Published:
Inland Water Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the distribution of mitochondrial lineages of two species—the common roach Rutilus rutilus and Ponto-Caspian roach R. lacustris—in the broadest zone of their secondary contact, the Volga basin. For the purpose of species identification, we applied the approach of multiplex PCR based on species-specific divergences in sequences of the first subunit of cytochrome oxidase (COI) of mtDNA. A total of 1120 samples from 82 localities are analyzed. The distribution of certain mitochondrial lineages and their sympatric co-occurrence clarified for the Volga basin. Our study shows that R. rutilus is significantly predominant in the Upper Volga, while the Middle and Lower Volga is dominated by R. lacustris. The various hypotheses of formation of the broad spatial pattern of secondary contact are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Abbott, R.J., Barton, N.H., and Good, J.M., Genomics of hybridization and its evolutionary consequences, Mol. Ecol., 2016, vol. 25, no. 11, p. 2325. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aljanabi, S.M. and Martinez, I., universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques, Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, vol. 25, no. 22, p. 4692. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.22.4692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg, L.S., Ryby presnykh vod SSSR i sopredel’nykh stran (Freshwater Fishes of the USSR and Neighboring Countries), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1949, part 2.

  4. Bogutskaya, N.G. and Naseka, A.M., Katalog beschelyustnykh i ryb presnykh i solonovatykh vod Rossii s nomenklaturnymi i taksonomicheskimi kommentariyami (Catalogue of Agnatha and Fishes of Fresh and Brackish Waters of Russia with Nomenclature and Taxonomic Comments), Moscow: Tov. Nauchn. Izd. KMK, 2004.

  5. Borovikova, E.A., Alekseeva, Y.I., Schreider, M.J., et al., Morphology and genetics of the Ciscoes (Actinopterygii: Salmoniformes: Salmonidae: Coregoninae: Coregonus) from the Solovetsky Archipelago (White Sea) as a key to determination of the taxonomic position of Ciscoes in Northeastern Europe, Acta Ichthyol. Piscatoria, 2013, vol. 41, no. 7. https://doi.org/10.3750/aip2013.43.3.02

  6. Butorin, N.V. and Mordukhai-Boltovskoi, F.D., Volga i ee zhizn’ (The Volga and its Life), Moscow: Nauka, 1978.

  7. Ermakov, O.A., Levina, M.A., Titov, S.V., et al., mtDNA-based identification of two widespread roach species (Rutilus, Cyprinidae) characterized by sympatric zone, Inl. Water Biol., 2017, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 112. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1995082917010060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ermakov, O.A., Faizulin, A.I., Zaks, M.M., et al., Distribution of the “western” and “eastern” forms of the marsh frog Pelophylax ridibundus s.l. in the Samara and Saratov regions (according to the analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA), Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2014, vol. 16, no. 5 (1), p. 409.

  9. Foote, A.D., Sympatric speciation in the genomic era, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2018, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fricke, R., Eschmeyer, W.N., and Van der Laan, R., Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References, 2020. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. Accessed October 10, 2020.

  11. Harrison, R.G., Hybrids and Hybrid Zones: Historical Perspective. Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1994.7050631.x

  12. Ivanov, A.Yu., Molecular genetic and ecological characteristics of the distribution of cryptic forms of the marsh frog in the eastern part of the range, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Pensa: Penz. Gos. Univ., 2019.

  13. Ketmaier, V., Bianco, P.G., and Durand, J.D., Molecular systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of roaches (Rutilus, Teleostei, Cyprinidae), Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2008, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.07.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kotlik, P., Markova, S., Choleva, L., et al., Divergence with gene flow between Ponto-Caspian refugia in an anadromous cyprinid Rutilus frisii revealed by multiple gene phylogeography, Mol. Ecol., 2008, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03638.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kottelat, M. and Freyhof, J., Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes, Cornol: Publications Kottelat, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1643/ot-08-098a.1

  16. Kusznierz, J., Paśko, Ł., and Tagayev, D., On the variation and distribution of the lake minnow, Eupallasella percnurus (Pall.), Fish. Aquat. Life, 2011, vol. 41, no. 7, p. 161. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10086-011-0020-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kvasov, D.D., Pozdnechetvertichnaya istoriya krupnykh ozer i vnutrennikh morei Vostochnoi Evropy (Late Quaternary History of Large Lakes and Inland Seas of Eastern Europe), Leningrad: Nauka, 1975.

  18. Lajbner, Z., Šlechtová, V., Šlechta, V., et al., Rare and asymmetrical hybridization of the endemic Barbus carpathicus with its widespread congener Barbus barbus, J. Fish. Biol., 2009, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02098.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Levin, B.A., Simonov, E.P., Ermakov, O.A., et al., Phylogeny and phylogeography of the roaches, genus Rutilus (Cyprinidae), at the eastern part of its range as inferred from mtDNA analysis, Hydrobiologia, 2017, vol. 788, no. 1, p. 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2984-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Levin, B.A., Gandlin, A.A., Simonov, E.S., et al., Phylogeny, phylogeography and hybridization of Caucasian barbels of the genus Barbus (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae), Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2019a, vol. 135, p. 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.02.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levin, B.A., Casal-López, M., Simonov, E.S., et al., Adaptive radiation of barbs of the genus Labeobarbus (Cyprinidae) in an East African river, Freshwater Biol., 2019b, vol. 64, no. 10, p. 1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Linke, S., Lehner, B., Dallaire, C.O., et al., Global hydro-environmental sub-basin and river reach characteristics at high spatial resolution, Sci. Data, 2019, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0300-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Litvinchuk, S.N., Ivanov, A.Yu., Lukonina, S.A., et al., A record of alien Pelophylax species and widespread mitochondrial DNA transfer in Kaliningradskaya oblast' (the Baltic Coast, Russia), BioInvasions Records, 2020, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 599. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2020.9.3.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lyapkov, S.M., Ermakov, O.A., and Titov, S.V., Distribution and origin of two forms of the marsh frog Pelophylax ridibundus complex (Anura, Ranidae) from Kamchatka based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data, Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2018, vol. 45, no. 7, p. 699. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1062359018070117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mangerud, J., Jakobsson, M., Alexanderson, H., et al., Ice-dammed lakes and rerouting of the drainage of northern Eurasia during the last glaciation, Quat. Sci. Rev., 2004, vol. 23, nos. 11–13, p. 1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meier, J.I., Marques, D.A., Mwaiko, S., et al., Ancient hybridization fuels rapid cichlid fish adaptive radiations, Nat. Commun., 2017, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mironovsky, A.N. and Kasyanov, A.N., The structure of the species Rutilus rutilus in the Caspian Sea basin, Zool. Zh., 1986, vol. 65, no. 7, p. 1024.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nizovtsev, V.A., Postnikov, A.V., Snytko, V.A., et al., Istoricheskie vodnye puti Severa Rossii (XVII-XX vv.) i ikh rol' v izmenenii ekologicheskoi obstanovki (Historical Waterways of the North of Russia (17th–20th Centuries) and Their Role in Changing the Environmental Situation), Moscow: Tipografiya Paradiz, 2009.

  29. Reshetnikov, Yu.S., Popova, O.A., Sokolov, L.I., et al., Atlas presnovodnykh ryb Rossii (Atlas of Freshwater Fishes in Russia), Moscow: Nauka, 2003, vol. 1.

  30. Slynko, Yu.V., Dgebuadze, Yu.Yu., Novitskiy, R.A., et al., Invasions of alien fishes in the basins of the largest rivers of the Ponto-Caspian Basin: composition, vectors, invasion routes, and rates, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2010, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 74. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2075111711010085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, J.F., Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, New York: Freeman, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sousa-Santos, C., Pereira, A.M., Branco, P., et al., Mito-nuclear sequencing is paramount to correctly identify sympatric hybridizing fishes, Acta Ichthyol. Piscatoria, 2018, vol. 48, no. 2, p. 123. https://doi.org/10.3750/aiep/02348

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank M.Ya. Borisov, A.A. Bolotovskii, N.I. Dudkovskii, D.P. Karabanov, A.S. Golubtsov, D.V. Pilin, O.A. Polumordvinov, Yu.A. Malinina, I.F. Galanin, and V.A. Chernyshov for providing material as well as Yu.V. Gerasimov for providing historical DNA samples of roach from the collection of Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences. We also thank an anonymous reviewer for valuable criticism and advice on the first edition of our manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported as part of government research assignment AAAA-A18-118012690102-9.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. N. Artaev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by A. Lisenkova

Abbreviations: PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Artaev, O.N., Ermakov, O.A., Vekhov, D.A. et al. Genetic Screening of Distribution Pattern of Roaches Rutilus rutilus and R. lacustris (Cyprinidae) in Broad Range of Secondary Contact (Volga Basin). Inland Water Biol 14, 205–214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082921020024

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082921020024

Keywords:

Navigation