Skip to main content
Log in

Interrogating the 5’UTR tandem repeats of retrotransposon roo of Drosophila about horizontal transfer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Horizontal transfer in Drosophila has been inferred for several families of transposable elements. Specifically, the retroelement roo has been suggested to have been horizontally transferred between the species D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. yakuba. The inferences were based on the observation that divergence between transposable elements in different species was lower than the divergence found in typical nuclear genes and in the incongruence of phylogenies of the species and their TEs. Here, we address the question of the possible horizontal transfer of roo between species of the Drosophila genus by studying the presence absence of a duplication of 99 bp in the 5’UTR of the transposon, as well as comparing the sequences of the paralogous and orthologous duplicated repeats within and between species. First, the repeats were only found in five species of the melanogaster subgroup. Second, the date of occurrence of the duplication event originating the repeats was posterior to the split of the subgroup. The duplication date suggests an origin previous to the split of D. simulans and D. sechellia and close to the divergence of D. melanogaster from the D. simulans complex. These data point to horizontal transfer to the afrotropical species D. yakuba and D. erecta from one of the cosmopolitan species D. melanogaster or D. simulans. We propose that the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina could have been the vector of horizontal transfer after the observation that a sequence of 845 bp with high homology to a fragment of roo was isolated from this wasp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

taken from Obbard et al. (2012) and estimates of the age of the roo duplication obtained in this work. In bold are the estimates of Tamura et al (2004) and in normal font the estimates based on mutation rate. Bounds are ± 2 × the standard error

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Every reference to data are provided.

References

  • Bartolomé C, Bello X, Maside X (2009) Widespread evidence for horizontal transfer of transposable elements across Drosophila genomes. Genome Biol 10:R22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargues N, Lerat E (2017) Evolutionary history of LTR-retrotransposons among 20 Drosophila species. Mob DNA 8:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen NJ, McDonald JF (2001) Drosophila euchromatic LTR retrotransposons are much younger than the host species in which they reside. Genome Res 11:1527–1540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carton Y, Bouletreau M, van Alphen JJM, van Lenteren JC (1986) The Drosophila parasitic wasps. In: Ashburner M, Carson L, Thompson JN (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, London, pp 347–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter AD (2008) Divergence times in Caenorhabditis and Drosophila inferred from direct estimates of the neutral mutation rate. Mol Biol Evol 25:778–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De la Chaux N, Wagner A (2009) Evolutionary dynamics of the LTR retrotransposons roo and rooA inferred from twelve complete Drosophila genomes. BMC Evol Biol 9:205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-González J, Domínguez A, Albornoz J (2010) Genomic distribution of retrotransposons 297, 1731, copia, mdg1 and roo in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Genetica 138:579–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-González J, Domínguez A, Albornoz J (2020) Different structural variants of roo retrotransposon are active in Drosophila melanogaster. Gene 741:144546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence-limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houck MA, Clark JB, Peterson KR, Kidwell MG (1991) Possible horizontal transfer of Drosophila genes by the mite Proctolaelaps regalis. Science 253:1125–1128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminker JS, Bergman CM, Kronmiller B, Carlson J, Svirskas R, Patel S, Frise E, Wheeler DA, Lewis SE, Rubin GM, Ashburner M, Celniker SE (2002) The transposable elements of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin: a genomics perspective. Genome Biol 3:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keightley PD, Trivedi U, Thomson M, Oliver F, Kumar S, Blaxter ML (2009) Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. Gnome Res 19:1195–1201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell MG (1992) Horizontal transfer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2:868–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerat E, Rizzon C, Biemont C (2003) Sequence divergence within transposable element families in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Res 13:1889–1896

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li W (1997) Molecular evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreto ELS, Carareto CM, Capy P (2008) Revisiting horizontal transfer of transposable elements in Drosophila. Heredity 100:545–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mérel V, Boulesteix M, Fablet M, Vieira C (2020) Transposable elements in Drosophila. Mob DNA 11:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milan NF, Schlenke TA (2012) Extensive horizontal gene transfer between Drosophila melanogaster and its endoparasitoid wasps. Unpublished. GenBank JQ666319

  • Modolo L, Picard F, Lerat E (2014) A new genome-wide method to track horizontally transferred sequences: application to Drosophila. Genome Biol Evol 6:416–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obbard DJ, Maclennan J, Kim KW, Rambaut A, O’Grady PM, Jiggins FM (2012) Estimating divergence dates and substitution rates in the Drosophila phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol 29:3459–3473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rambaut A (2006) FigTree: tree figure drawing tool, version 1.4.2. Institute of evolutionary biology. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Gracia A, Maside X, Charlesworth B (2005) High rate of horizontal transfer of transposable elements in Drosophila. Trends Genet 21:200–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Subramanian S, Kumar S (2004) Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks. Mol Biol Evol 21:36–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thurmond J, Goodman JL, Strelets VB, Attrill H, Gramates LS, Marygold SJ, Matthews BB, Millburn G, Antonazzo G, Trovisco V, Kaufman TC, Calvi BR, the FlyBase Consortium (2019) FlyBase 2.0: the next generation. Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1):D759–D765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Fernando Rodríguez for his critical reading of the manuscript and Sara de Albornoz for the correction and improvement of my English.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Domínguez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that she has no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Domínguez, A. Interrogating the 5’UTR tandem repeats of retrotransposon roo of Drosophila about horizontal transfer. Genetica 149, 171–177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-021-00120-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-021-00120-y

Keywords

Navigation