Skip to main content
Log in

Geophysical Studies of the Visually Imperceptible Shekshovo-9 Medieval Necropolis in Suzdal Opolie

  • Published:
Moscow University Geology Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Searching for buried ancient objects that have no traces on the surface as a result of plowing of the topsoil for centuries is a challenge for archaeology. In this paper, the use of geophysical methods for mapping necropolises is illustrated by a geophysical survey of the Shekshovo-9 burial site (Suzdal Opolie). The main idea is to detect archaeological objects using geophysical data, regarding them as heterogeneities against the background.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The geological structure is determined from 2019 drilling data.

  2. Resistance is determined from 2D inversion.

  3. In May 2019, the electrical resistance of water in the Urda River was 16.5 to 17.5 Ohm m, 55 to 65 Ohm m, in puddles on the field and road, and 140 Ohm m in the swampy area.

REFERENCES

  1. Aleshinskaya, A.S., Kochanova, M.D., Makarov, N.A., and Spiridonova, E.A., Formation of agrarian landscape in the Suzdal’ Opol’ye in the Middle Ages (archeological and palaeobotanical data), Ross. Arkheol., 2008, no. 1, pp. 35–47.

  2. Babanin, V.F., Trukhin, V.I., Karpachevskii, L.O., et al., Magnetizm pochv (Soil Magnetism), Moscow: Yaroslavl. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., 1995.

  3. Bobachev, A.A., Gorbunov, A.A., Modin, I.N., and Shevnin, V.A., Electric tomography by resistance and induced polarization, Pribory Sist. Razved. Geofiz., 2006, no. 2, pp. 14–17.

  4. David, A., Linford, N., and Linford, P., Geophysical Survey in Archaeological Field Evaluation, Swindon: English Heritage, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dmitriev, E.A., Lipatov, D.N., and Milanovskii, E.Yu., Humus content and second humus horizons in gray forest soils of Vladimirskoe Opol’e, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2000, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Erokhin, S.A., Modin, I.N., Palenov, A.Yu., and Shevnin, V.A., Mapping relic cryogenic polygonal structures by geophysical methods, Inzh. Izysk., 2011, no. 11, pp. 30–34.

  7. Erokhin, S.A., Modin, I.N., and Pavlova, A.M., 3D electrical resistivity imaging and GPR to re-explore ancient mounds near Suzdal in Russia, Archaeol. Polona, 2015, vol. 53, pp. 448–452.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fedorina, A.N., Medieval rural sites of the Suzdal region on the basis of archaeology and geophysics: investigations of 2008, Kratk. Soobshch. Inst. Arkheol. RAN, 2012, no. 226, pp. 77–87.

  9. Fedorina, A.N., Krasnikova, A.M., and Mesnyankina, S.V., Localizing and studying homes and out-buildings at settlements Ves’ 5 and Shekshovo 2 with geophysical and archeological methods, Arkheol. Vladimiro-Suzdal. Zemli, 2008, no. 2, pp. 23–35.

  10. Garrison, E., Techniques in Archaeological Geology, Berlin: Springer, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg, P. and Macphail, R.I., Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology, Oxford: Blackwell Sci. Ltd, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaminskii, A.E., ZondRes2D: Software for Two-Dimensional Interpretation of Electrical Tomography Data by Resistivity and Induced Polarization (A Polygonal Variant), 2014. http://zond-geo.com/software/resistivity-imaging-ves/zondres2d/. Cited March 22, 2020.

  13. Krasnikova, A., Fedorina, A., Erokhin, S., et al., Shekshovo Burial Site: A Case of Geophysics’ Investigation of Medieval Cemetery, Barcelona, European Assoc. Archaeol., 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krasnikova, A., Erokhin, S., Medvedev, A., et al., In search of invisible burial mounds on the Lands of North-Eastern Rus’, in Abstr. Book 25th EAA Annu. Meet. (Bern, 2019), Bern, 2019.

  15. Krasnikova, A.M., Erokhin, S.A., Modin, I.N., et al., The problem of searching ground burials in the Sudal Opolye, Kratkie Soobshch. Inst. Arkheol. RAN, 2020, no. 259, pp. 30–48.

  16. Loke, M.H., Chambers, J.E., Rucker, D.F., et al., Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method, J. Appl. Geophys., 2013, no. 95, pp. 135–156.

  17. Makarov, N.A., At the cradle of northeastern Rus, Priroda (Moscow, Russ. Fed.), 2019, no. 1, pp. 78–87.

  18. Makarov, N.A., Krasnikova, A.M., and Karpukhin, A.A., Kurgan cemeteries of the Suzdal vicinities in the context of the studies of medieval settlement and burial traditions, in Velikii Novgorod i srednevekovaya Rus’: Sb. st.: K 80-letiyu akad. V.L. Yanina (Coll. Sci. Works to the 80th Anniversary of Akad. V.L. Yanin “Novgorod the Great and Medieval Rus”), Moscow: Pamyatniki Istor. Mysli, 2009, pp. 432–454.

  19. Makarov, N.A., Fedorina, A.N., and Shpolyanskii, S.V., Land and town: Medieval open settlements in Vladimir-on Klyaz’ma outskirts, Ross. Arkheol., 2013a, no. 4, pp. 64–80.

  20. Makarov, N.A., Krasnikova, A.M., and Zaitseva, I.E., The Shekshovo medieval burial ground in the Suzdal Field region: 160 years after excavations by A.S. Uvarov, Kratk. Soobshch. Inst. Arkheol. RAN, 2013b, no. 230, pp. 219–233.

  21. Makarov, N.A., Krasnikova, A.M., and Zaitseva, I.E., New investigations of medieval cemeteries in Suzdal land, Vestn. Ross. Gumanitar. Nauch. Fonda, 2014, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 156–177.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Makarov, N.A., Zaitseva, I.E., Krasnikova, A.M., and Ugulava, N.D., Investigations at the Shekhovo burial site in the Suzdal Opolye in 2016–2017, in Mater. nauch. sem. Arkheologiya Vladimiro-Suzdal’skoi zemli (Proc. Sci. Sem. “Archeology of the Vladimir–Suzdal Area”), 2017, vol. 7, pp. 7–18.

  23. Makarov, N.A., Krasnikova, A.M., Zaitseva, I.E., and Dobrovol’skaya, M.V., The Shekshovo medieval burial ground: “Vladimir mounds” in the light of new field research, Ross. Arkheol., 2021, no. 4, pp. 121–140.

  24. Modin, I.N., Erokhin, S.A., and Pavlova, A.M., Study of ancient Russian mounds using 3D ERT and GPR, in Proc. 10th EAGE Sci. Pract. Conf. Exhibition Eng. Geophys., 2014, EAGE, pp. 1–4.

  25. Nikolayev, V.A., Paragenesis of forested lowlands (Polesye) and high plains (Opolye) in Central Russia, Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser. 5: Geogr., 2013, no. 5, pp. 45–49.

  26. Papadopoulos, N.G., Tsourlos, P., Tsokas, G.N., and Sarris, A., Two-dimensional and three-dimensional resistivity imaging in archaeological site investigation, Archaeol. Prosp., 2006, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pavlova, A.M. and Shevnin, V.A., 3D-electrical resistivity tomography at studying glacial sediments, Geophys. J., 2013, no. 6, pp. 32–37.

  28. Pozdnyakov, A.I. and Pozdnyakova, A.D., Elektrofizika pochv (Soil Electrophysics), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2004.

  29. Schmidt, A., Electrical and magnetic methods in archaeological prospection, in Seeing the Unseen. Geophysics and Landscape Archaeology, London: Taylor, Francis Group, 2009, pp. 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schmidt, A., Linford, P., Linford, N., et al., EAC Guidelines for the Use of Geophysics in Archaeology: Questions to Ask and Points to Consider, Namur: Europae Archaeol. Consilium (EAC), 2015.

  31. Siart, C., Digital geoarchaeology, in New Techniques for Interdisciplinary Human-Environmental Res., Switzerland: Springer Int. Publ. AG, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stumpel, H., Geophysical Prospection in Suzdal, Russia. Kiel: Inst. Geosci., 2007.

  33. Velichko, A.A., Morozova, T.D., Nechaev, V.P., and Porozhnyakova, O.M., Paleokriogenez, pochvennyi pokrov i zemledelie (Palaeocryogenesis, Soil Cover, and Agriculture), Moscow: Nauka, 1996.

  34. Velichko, A.A., Morozova, T.D., Nechaev, V.P., et al., Loess/paleosol/cryogenic formation and structure near the northern limit of loess deposition, East European Plain, Russia, Quat. Int., 2006, nos. 152–153, pp. 14–30.

  35. Yang, X. and Lagmanson, M., Comparison of 2D and 3D electrical resistivity imaging methods. comparison of 2d and 3d electrical resistivity imaging methods, in Symp. on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 2006, pp. 585–594.

  36. Zhurbin, I.V. and Fedorina, A.N., Comprehensive geophysical studies at the Suzdal Opolye settlements, Arkheol., Etnogr., Antropol. Evrazii, 2017, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zolotaya, L.A., Kalisheva, M.V., and Khmelevskoi, V.K., Possibilities of geophysical methods for studying the composition and structure of the soil cover, Razved. Okhr. Nedr, 2004, no. 5, pp. 47–50.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to A.A. Pelevin, S.A. Akulenko, A.M. Pavlova, T.V. Topilina, A.Yu. Palenov, and P.S. Tolstov who participated in the geophysical survey and data processing and interpretation.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 19-18-00538).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to I. N. Modin, S. A. Erokhin, A. M. Krasnikova, I. G. Shorkunov, V. A. Shevchenko or A. D. Skobelev.

Additional information

Translated by B. Shubik

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Modin, I.N., Erokhin, S.A., Krasnikova, A.M. et al. Geophysical Studies of the Visually Imperceptible Shekshovo-9 Medieval Necropolis in Suzdal Opolie. Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull. 76, 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875221010087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875221010087

Keywords:

Navigation