Skip to main content
Log in

Direct evaluation method for load-deformation curve of precast prestressed concrete frame with different tendon forces

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To establish a more accurate, flexible, and practical performance evaluation method for unbonded precast prestressed concrete (PCaPC) frames, a macro model was illustrated based on the exterior beam–column sub-assemblages of unbonded PCaPC frames, which considers different tensile forces of the post-tensioned tendons (i.e. unsymmetrical tendon forces) and high-strength concrete. Based on the macro model, closed-form equations of beam axial shortening were provided by precisely considering the deformation compatibility and force equilibrium conditions along the beam. In this study, the iteration method for the comprehensive evaluation of different performance limit states, as well as the load–deformation relationship of the beam–column sub-assemblages, were constructed and simplified. Accuracy and superiority of the proposed evaluation methods were verified by comparison with experimental data and evaluation results of previous methods. Both damage tolerance and self-centering performance of unbonded PCaPC frames can be more accurately measured by the proposed methods. Meanwhile, the consideration of unsymmetrical tendon forces makes the methods more flexible for different types of unbonded PCaPC frames. In addition, parametric study was conducted to understand the effects of critical design parameters on the performance limits. Preliminary design advices were given to show the application potential of this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

A p :

Sectional area of tendons

C cx :

Distance from extreme compression fiber to compressive resultant force

D :

Beam depth

d :

Distance between tendons on compression and tension sides

d p :

Distance from extreme compression fiber to tendon position on tensile side

d pt,t :

Distance from tendon position on tension side to tendon tensile resultant force

E p 1 :

Elastic stiffness of tendon

E p 2 :

Stiffness of tendon between elastic limit and yield point

E p 3 :

Stiffness of tendon after yielding point

e nx :

Concrete compressive strain at extreme tension fiber of beam section in the range of L2

L 1 :

Horizontal distance from beam–column interface to point A

L 2 :

Horizontal distance from point A to inflection point

l :

Horizontal distance from beam–column interface to inflection point

l c 0 :

Initial axial shortening of beam concrete by prestressing force

l p :

Length of tendon going through beam and beam–column joint

M :

Bending moment at beam–column interface

P :

External force applied on the sub-assemblage

R ro :

Rotation angle at beam–column interface

R b :

Deflection angle of beam

T c :

Axial force of tendon on compression side

T p :

Tendon force

T p 0 :

Initial prestressing force of tendon

T t :

Axial force of tendon on tension side

V :

Beam shear force

X :

Horizontal distance from beam–column interface to arbitrary point between the beam–column interface and inflection point

X 1 :

Horizontal distance from beam–column interface to arbitrary point between the beam–column interface and point A

X 2 :

Horizontal distance from point A to arbitrary point between point A and inflection point

x n :

Neutral axis depth at beam end connecting to column

x nx :

Neutral axis depth at arbitrary beam section in the range of L1

β :

Coefficient defined as ratio of dpt,t to d

γ :

Neutral axis depth normalized by beam depth

Δc , cp :

Beam axial shortening at tendon position on compressive side

Δc , ex :

Beam concrete axial shortening at extreme compression fiber

Δ* c , ex :

Approximated beam concrete axial shortening at extreme compression fiber

δ d , tp :

Crack opening distance at tendon position on tensile side

ε cu :

Ultimate strain of concrete

ε n :

Concrete compressive strain at extreme compression fiber of beam end connecting to column

ε nL 1 :

Concrete compressive strain at extreme compression fiber of point A section

ε nx :

Concrete compressive strain at extreme compression fiber

ε p :

Strain of tendons

ε pe :

Elastic limit strain of tendon according to 0.01% offset method

ε py :

Yield strain of tendon according to 0.2% offset method

ε p 0 :

Initial tensile strain of tendons by prestressing force

ε p ,c :

Strain of tendons on compression side

ε p ,t :

Strain of tendons on tension side

ξ :

Modification factor for beam deflection angle

σ B :

Ultimate compressive stress of concrete

σ p :

Stress of tendons

σ pe :

Elastic limit stress of tendon according to 0.01% offset method

σ py :

Yield stress of tendon according to 0.2% offset method

χ :

Distance from extreme compression fiber of concrete to tensile resultant force of tendons normalized by the beam depth

References

  • American Concrete Institute (ACI) (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (metric), ACI 318–14. Farmington Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2000) Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 356. Washington, DC, USA

  • Applied Technology Council (ATC), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2005) Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, FEMA 440. Washington, DC, USA

  • Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ) (2015) Guidelines for structural design and construction of prestressed concrete buildings based on performance evaluation concept (draft). Tokyo, Japan

  • Bahrami S, Madhkhan M, Shirmohammadi F, Nazemi N (2017) Behavior of two new moment resisting precast beam to column connections subjected to lateral loading. Eng Struct 132:808–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ban S, Muguruma H (1958) Ultimate strength of post-tensioned unbonded beams, part 1: study on bending behaviors of post-tensioned unbonded beams. Trans Archit Inst Jpn 60(1):641–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eatherton MR, Hajjar JF (2014) Hybrid simulation testing of a self-centering rocking steel braced frame system. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43:1725–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sheikh MT, Sause R, Pessiki S, Lu L-W (1999) Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete frames. PCI J 44:54–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng D-C, Wu G, Lu Y (2018) Finite element modelling approach for precast reinforced concrete beam-to-column connections under cyclic loading. Eng Struct 174:49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garlock MM, Ricles JM, Sause R (2005) Experimental studies of full-scale posttensioned steel connections. J Struct Eng 131:438–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanli R, ElGawady MA, Mills JE (2016) Experimental investigation of in-plane cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned masonry walls. J Struct Eng 142:04015171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawileh R, Tabatabai H, Rahman A, Amro A (2006) Non-dimensional design procedures for precast, prestressed concrete hybrid frames. PCI J 51:110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho TX, Dao TN, Aaleti S, van de Lindt JW, Rammer DR (2017) Hybrid system of unbonded post-tensioned CLT panels and light-frame wood shear walls. J Struct Eng 143:04016171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal A, Smith T, Pampanin S, Fragiacomo M, Palermo A, Buchanan AH (2016) Experimental performance and structural analysis of plywood-coupled LVL walls. J Struct Eng 142:04015123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin K, Song S, Kitayama K, Hao L (2019) Detailed evaluation of the ultimate flexural states of beams in unbonded precast prestressed concrete frames. Bull Earthq Eng 17:1495–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Christopoulos C (2008) Friction damped posttensioned self-centering steel moment-resisting frames. J Struct Eng 134:1768–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz HH, Tankut T (2005) Performance of a precast concrete beam-to-beam connection subject to reversed cyclic loading. Eng Struct 27:1392–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurama YC (2002) Hybrid post-tensioned precast concrete walls for use in seismic regions. PCI J 47:36–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurama YC, Weldon BD, Shen Q (2006) Experimental evaluation of posttensioned hybrid coupled wall subassemblages. J Struct Eng 132:1017–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu L, Luo J, Lu X (2015) Shaking table test of controlled rocking reinforced concrete frames. In: 6th International conference on advances in experimental structural engineering. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL

  • Matsumora M, Koshikawa T, Kikuchi M (2014) Evaluation of ultimate strength and rotation angle for unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete beams by using section analysis. J Struct Constr Eng AIJ 79:1005–1013 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midorikawa M, Azuhata T, Ishihara T, Wada A (2006) Shaking table tests on seismic response of steel braced frames with column uplift. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:1767–1785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto K, Moriguchi Y, Kono S, Watanabe H, Obara T, Takenaka H, Takamori N, Hirata N, Fujii A (2015) Damage evaluation of precast concrete beams post-tensioned with unbonded tendons, part 1: outline and experimental results. Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), Kanto, Japan, pp 733–734 (in Japanese)

  • Morgen BG, Kurama YC (2007) Seismic design of friction-damped precast concrete frame structures. J Struct Eng 133:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgen BG, Kurama YC (2008) Seismic response evaluation of posttensioned precast concrete frames with friction dampers. J Struct Eng 134:132–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakaki SD, Stanton JF, Sritharan S (1999) An overview of the PRESSS five-story precast test building. PIC J 44:26–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazari M, Sritharan S, Aaleti S (2014) Shake table testing of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. In: 10th National conference in earthquake engineering. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Anchorage, AK

  • Pampanin S, Priestley MN, Sritharan S (2001) Analytical modelling of the seismic behavior of precast concrete frames designed with ductile connections. J Earthq Eng 5:329–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Parastesh H, Hajirasouliha I, Ramezani R (2014) A new ductile moment-resisting connection for precast concrete frames in seismic regions: an experimental investigation. Eng Struct 70:144–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez FJ, Sause R, Pessiki S (2007) Analytical and experimental lateral load behavior of unbonded posttensioned precast concrete walls. J Struct Eng 133:1531–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN (1991) Overview of PRESSS. Res Program 36:50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MN, Macrase GA (1996) Seismic tests of precast beam-to-column joint subassemblages with unbonded tendons. PIC J 41:64–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MN, Tao JR (1993) Seismic response of precast prestressed concrete frames with partially debonded tendons. PCI J 38:58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MA, Sritharan S (2007) Performance-based seismic evaluation of two five-story precast concrete hybrid frame buildings. J Struct Eng 133:1489–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenboom OA, Kowalsky MJ (2004) Reversed in-plane cyclic behavior of posttensioned clay brick masonry walls. J Struct Eng 130:787–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sause R, Ricles JM, Roke DA, Chancellor NB, Gonner NP (2010) Seismic performance of a self-centering rocking concentrically-braced frame. In: Proceeding of the 9th US National and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, pp 25–29

  • Song S, Jin K, Kitayama K (2016) Macro model to evaluate ultimate strength and deflection for beam in unbonded precast prestressed concrete frame. J Struct Constr Eng AIJ 81:1121–1131 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Kurimoto K, Jin K, Kitayama K, Kanemoto K, Tajima Y (2014) Seismic performance of unbonded precast prestressed reinforced concrete frame with different lengths of tendon. Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), Kobe, Japan, pp 745–746 (in Japanese)

  • Stanton JF, Nakaki SD (2002) Design guidelines for precast concrete seismic structural systems. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington

  • Stanton JS, Stone WC, Cheok GS (1997) A hybrid reinforced precast frame for seismic regions. PCI J 42:20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuda K (2015) A study on the calculation method for flexural behavior of unbonded pre-stressed concrete beam. J Struct Const Eng AIJ 710:659–668 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twigden KM, Henry RS (2019) Shake table testing of unbonded post-tensioned concrete walls with and without additional energy dissipation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 119:375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Marino EM, Pan P, Liu H, Nie X (2018) Experimental study of a novel precast prestressed reinforced concrete beam-to-column joint. Eng Struct 156:68–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon BD, Kurama YC (2010) Experimental evaluation of posttensioned precast concrete coupling beams. J Struct Eng 136:1066–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita H, Mizokuchi M, Koshikawa T, Kikuchi M (2009) Cyclic loading test on unbonded PCaPC interior beam-column joint with steelband. Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), Sendai, Japan, pp 865–866 (in Japanese)

  • Yan Q, Chen T, Xie Z (2018) Seismic experimental study on a precast concrete beam-column connection with grout sleeves. Eng Struct 155:330–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The financial support of the JSPS (Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Category (C), Grant No: 15K06302, Principal Investigator: Kazuhiro Kitayama) is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linfei Hao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Based on the deformation compatibility shown in Fig. 2b, the concrete axial shortening Δc,cp at the tendon position on the compression side and the opening distance δd,tp at the tendon position on the tension side can be expressed as follows:

$$ \Delta_{c,cp} = \Delta_{c,ex} \frac{{x_{n} - \left( {D - d_{p} } \right)}}{{x_{n} }} - l_{c0} = \left( {\varepsilon_{p0} - \varepsilon_{p,c} } \right)l_{p} ,$$
(17)
$$ \delta_{d,tp} = \Delta_{c,ex} \frac{{d_{p} - x_{n} }}{{x_{n} }} + l_{c0} = \left( {\varepsilon_{p,t} - \varepsilon_{p0} } \right)l_{p} , $$
(18)

where the tendon deformations are given as products of the strains and lengths of the tendons. By solving Eqs. (17) and (18), the strain of the tendons on the compression and tension sides can be expressed as Eqs. (1) and (2).

Appendix 2

As shown in Fig. 6, when the concentrated force V is applied at the inflection point, the distribution of the sectional bending moment from the beam–column interface to the inflection point is triangular. Because the tendons are unbonded, their axial forces and the position of resultant force dpt,t are constant along the beam. Therefore, the position of the concrete compressive resultant force changes linearly along the beam. Meanwhile, the compressive and tensile resultant forces meet at the inflection point. Therefore, at an arbitrary beam section from the beam end to the inflection point, distance Ccx from the concrete compressive resultant force to the extreme compression fiber can be expressed as follows:

$$ C_{cx} \left( X \right) = \frac{{3\left( {d_{p} - \beta d} \right) - x_{n} }}{3l}X + \frac{{x_{n} }}{3}\quad {\text{for}}\quad 0 \le X \le l,$$
(19)

where X is the horizontal distance from the beam–column interface to an arbitrary point between the beam–column interface and inflection point.

Figure 6 shows that the concrete compressive strain has a triangular distribution from the beam end to point A, where the neutral axis position coincides just with the extreme tension fiber of the beam section. If the distance from the beam end to point A is represented by L1, and the distance to an arbitrary point within point A is represented by X1, then the neutral axis depth at an arbitrary beam section xnx equals three times the value of Ccx in the range of L1. Furthermore, the concrete compressive resultant force is constant at an arbitrary beam section in the range of L1, and can be expressed as follows:

$$ \frac{1}{2}x_{n} \varepsilon_{n} E_{c} b = \frac{1}{2}\left[ {\frac{{3\left( {d_{p} - \beta d} \right) - x_{n} }}{l}X_{1} + x_{n} } \right]\varepsilon_{nx} E_{c} b\quad {\text{for}}\quad 0 \le X_{1} \le L_{1}. $$
(20)

Then, in the range of L1, the concrete compressive strain at the extreme compression fiber εnx can be obtained.

$$ \varepsilon_{nx} \left( {X_{1} } \right) = \frac{{x_{n} \varepsilon_{n} }}{{{{\left( {3d_{p} - 3\beta d - x_{n} } \right)X_{1} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {3d_{p} - 3\beta d - x_{n} } \right)X_{1} } l}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} l} + x_{n} }}\quad {\text{for}}\quad 0 \le X_{1} \le L_{1}. $$
(21)

At point A, xnx equals D, and εnx is defined as εnL1 = xnεn/D, where εn represents εnx at the beam end. The concrete compressive strain has a triangular distribution, and Ccx equals D/3. The value of Ccx also changes linearly from point A to the inflection point. At the inflection point, the compressive and tensile resultant forces meet each other, and Ccx equals (dpβd). If the distance from point A to the inflection point is represented by L2, and the distance to an arbitrary point between point A and the inflection point by X2, Ccx can then be expressed in the range of L2 as follows:

$$ C_{cx} \left( {X_{2} } \right) = \frac{{3\left( {d_{p} - \beta d} \right) - D}}{{3L_{2} }}X_{2} + \frac{D}{3}\quad {\text{for}}\quad 0 \le X_{2} \le L_{2}. $$
(22)

As shown in Figs. 6 and

Fig. 20
figure 20

Distribution of concrete compressive strain in the range of L2

20, the distribution of the concrete compressive strain becomes trapezoidal in the range of L2. Considering that the compressive resultant force remains constant at an arbitrary beam section, and also the trapezoid calculation formula, if the concrete compressive strain at the extreme tension fiber of the beam section is enx, and εnx at point A is εnL1, εnx equals (εnL1 − enx) in the range of L2.

Considering the definition of the resultant force, as shown in Fig. 20, the trapezoidal distribution of the concrete compressive strain is divided into the triangular and rectangular parts. By taking the bending moment about the extreme compression fiber, the sum of the bending moments contributed by the rectangular and triangular parts equal the bending moment of the compressive resultant force as follows:

$$ e_{nx} \left( {X_{2} } \right)D\frac{D}{2} + \frac{1}{2}\left( {\varepsilon_{nL1} - 2e_{nx} \left( {X_{2} } \right)} \right)D\frac{D}{3} = \frac{{\varepsilon_{nL1} D}}{2}C_{cx} \quad {\text{for}}\quad 0 \le X_{2} \le L_{2} . $$
(23)

By substituting εnL1 = xnεn/D, and Eq. (22) into Eq. (23), enx can be obtained; and εnx in the range of L2 can be expressed as follows:

$$ \varepsilon_{nx} \left( {X_{2} } \right) = \varepsilon_{nL1} - e_{nx} \left( {X_{2} } \right) = \frac{{x_{n} \varepsilon_{n} }}{D} - \frac{{x_{n} \varepsilon_{n} \left( {3d_{p} - 3\beta d - D} \right)}}{{D^{2} L_{2} }}X_{2} \quad {\text{for}}\quad 0 \le X_{2} \le L_{2} .$$
(24)

The concrete compressive strain εnx at the extreme compression fiber of an arbitrary section thus has been determined along the beam length by Eqs. (21) and (24). Because the concrete axial shortening Δc,ex at the beam–column interface is considered as an accumulation of εnx along the beam length, Δc,ex can be calculated by the integral of εnx as follows:

$$ \Delta_{c,ex} = \int_{0}^{{L_{1} }} {\frac{{x_{n} \varepsilon_{n} }}{{\left( {3d_{p} - 3\beta d - x_{n} } \right)X_{1} {/}l + x_{n} }}dX_{1} } + \int_{0}^{{L_{2} }} {\left[ {\frac{{x_{n} \varepsilon_{n} }}{D} - \frac{{x_{n} \varepsilon_{n} \left( {3d_{p} - 3\beta d - D} \right)}}{{D^{2} L_{2} }}X_{2} } \right]dX_{2} } . $$
(25)

The integral boundary L1 can be obtained by substituting Ccx = D/3 into Eq. (21), and solving for X. The integral boundary L2 equals (lL1). After L1 and L2 are determined, Δc,ex can be calculated and expressed as Eq. (5).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, K., Hao, L. & Kitayama, K. Direct evaluation method for load-deformation curve of precast prestressed concrete frame with different tendon forces. Bull Earthquake Eng 19, 3597–3626 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01109-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01109-w

Keywords

Navigation