Powdered activated carbon amendment in percolate tank enhances high-solids anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.04.033Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite many studies recently investigated the addition of conductive materials for enhancing biomethane recovery in anaerobic digestion, there have been limited efforts to adopt this strategy in high-solids anaerobic digestion (HSAD) with percolate recirculation. In this study, two identical lab-scale mesophilic (36 °C) HSAD systems were operated with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) under similar operating conditions, including food to microorganism ratio and daily percolate recirculation rate. The percolate tank of the test HSAD system was amended with 15 g/L of powdered activated carbon (PAC). After 30 days of operation, the cumulative biomethane yield for the test reactor was 17 % higher than the control reactor (109 vs. 93 L CH4/kg VS). Furthermore, PAC addition showed additional benefits by lowering free ammonia nitrogen (FAN) and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) concentrations that can inhibit anaerobic digestion. Nonetheless, the preliminary economic analysis suggested that the HSAD amended with PAC is practically challenging and will only be economically feasible if PAC can be recycled and reused for the long-term operation or several cycles.

Introduction

The ongoing increase of the world’s population growth and urbanization would cause a 70 % increment of annual solid waste generation from ∼2.0 billion tons in 2016 to 3.4 billion tons in 2050 (Hoornweg and Bhada-Tata, 2012; WorldBank, 2017, 2018). Moreover, the rising trend of the population would have led to the further global food demand and duplication or even triplication of current universal demand for biomass-based renewable energy by 2050 (Johansson et al., 2012). Moreover, growing population and urbanization would also instigate the landfilling of municipal solid waste (MSW) due to a lack of sustainable waste management practices and policies. Reportedly, the extensive open-air processing and storage of wastes in landfills cause emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), which poses serious risks to human well-being and global warming (WHO, 2018). So far, various efforts have been attempted to study and implement different practical and economic pathways to mitigate the menaces mentioned above. One of the most practical ways of diverting MSW from landfills is its valorization using thermochemical and biochemical technologies into various value-added products, such as compost, chemicals, and biofuels (Kumar and Samadder, 2020; Lim et al., 2016; Olatunji et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019).

Among various biochemical technologies, high-solids anaerobic digestion (HSAD) has been accepted as a practical and eco-friendly approach in addressing both environmental challenges and energy crisis through the waste diversion from landfills and the recovery of bioenergy (Dastyar et al., 2015; Guilford, 2009; Rezaee et al., 2020). Various advantages of HSAD include: (i) lower water consumption and energy demand, (ii) capability of handling higher organic loading rates (OLRs), and (iii) alleviating the requirement of dewatering of residuals (Fagbohungbe et al., 2015). However, compared to wet-type digesters (also known as low-solids anaerobic digestion, LSAD), heterogeneous and variable characteristics of the feedstock often lead to inferior process kinetics, lower energy recovery and solids removal from HSAD process (Fagbohungbe et al., 2015). The evolutionary timeline of the HSAD process reveals that, to date, numerous studies have aimed to investigate the significance of various operating parameters for HSAD systems, including temperature, food to microorganism (F/M) ratio, external and/or internal mixing, recirculation of percolate and biogas, etc. (Chen et al., 2018; Guilford et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2018; Westerholm et al., 2020). Notably, designs of several commercial HSAD systems adopted percolate/leachate recirculation to eliminate mass transfer limitations in the process via homogenization of organics and nutrients (Fagbohungbe et al., 2015).

The process of AD consists of a series of biochemical reactions: hydrolysis, acidification, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis (Ai et al., 2018; Elyasi et al., 2015). The initial hydrolysis and fermentation of organics materialize acetate and other electron carriers that can function as the precursors for methanogenesis (Stams and Plugge, 2009). The electron carriers like formate or hydrogen are transformed into biomethane via the interaction between bacteria and methanogens via indirect or mediated interspecies electron transfer (MIET), which is a very slow process indeed. Recently, the amendment of anaerobic digesters with conductive additives has shown significant potential to boost the biochemical process kinetics, enhance organics degradation, and improve biomethane recovery (Guo et al., 2018; Tsui et al., 2020). Conductive materials could promote direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET), a syntrophic partnership that streamlines the direct transfer of electrons from the bacterium to the methanogen (Baek et al., 2018; Barua and Dhar, 2017; Ren et al., 2020; Sharma et al., 2019). Various conductive additives, such as graphite, granular activated carbon (GAC), powder activated carbon (PAC), biochar, magnetite, carbon fibers, carbon cloth, etc., have been explored to enhance the AD process (Barua et al., 2019; Cheng et al., 2019; Indren et al., 2020; Lei et al., 2018). However, there have been limited studies on the application of conductive materials to improve the performance of HSAD processing the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Moreover, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no studies investigated the amendment of conductive additives in HSAD systems with percolate recirculation.

The present work investigates the effects of PAC on biomethane recovery from OFMSW in an HSAD system with percolate recirculation. The first objective of this research is to explore how the addition of PAC material influences HSAD process kinetics and degradation of OFMSW, compared to an unamended control reactor. The second objective is to examine the impact of PAC on the potentially inhibitory factors, including pH, accumulation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs), and free ammonia nitrogen (FAN) levels. In this study, PAC was added to the percolate tank of an HSAD system, while in previous studies, conductive additives were directly added into the digester tank along with feedstock and inoculum (Chowdhury et al., 2019a; Cuetos et al., 2017; Pan et al., 2020b; Ryue et al., 2019b; Xu et al., 2015b; Zhang et al., 2017c). Thus, this present study investigates whether recirculation of percolate amended with conductive materials can enhance the HSAD system.

Section snippets

Organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW)

The organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) was obtained from the Edmonton Waste Management Centre (EWMC) located in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The collected sample was stored in plastic buckets in a cold room (at 4 °C) prior to use. The sample collected from the facility was mainly composed of a mixture of grass clippings, food waste, fruit and vegetable wastes, wood, paper wastes, as well as some minor particles of plastic, styrofoam, glass, and metals (see Supplementary

Effect of PAC addition on biomethane productivity

The daily biomethane production and cumulative methane yield from both configurations are shown in Fig. 2. As shown in Fig. 2a, during the initial lag phase of approximately 7 days, both reactors showed almost similar daily biomethane production rates. Over this commencing period, minimal biomethane production was observed from both digesters, which resulted in roughly the same amounts of cumulative biomethane yields (L CH4/kg VS) (Fig. 2b). However, in both reactors, an appreciable biomethane

Conclusions

The PAC addition had a significant impact on enhancing mesophilic HSAD of OFMSW and resulted in a 17 % higher cumulative biomethane yield than an identical unamended control reactor. The daily biomethane production patterns demonstrated similar trends over the initial 7 days and final 13 days; whereas, during day 8 to day 16, the PAC-amended digester exhibited significantly higher daily biomethane production rates over the control. Thus, these results suggested that the amendment of conductive

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Alberta Innovates (CCITF Clean Technology Development Program), City of Edmonton, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant), University of Alberta (Faculty of Engineering Start-up Grant), Future Energy Systems (Early Career Researcher Grant), and Canadian Foundation of Innovation (John R. Evans Leaders Fund). Special thanks go to Dr. Ibrahim Karidio and Dr. Hamid Zaman from the City of Edmonton for their kind assistance. The authors

References (77)

  • Y. Dang et al.

    Enhancing anaerobic digestion of complex organic waste with carbon-based conductive materials

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • W. Dastyar et al.

    Investigation of affecting parameters on treating high-strength compost leachate in a hybrid EGSB and fixed-bed reactor followed by electrocoagulation–flotation process

    Process. Saf. Environ. Prot.

    (2015)
  • B.R. Dhar et al.

    Techno-economic evaluation of ultrasound and thermal pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion of municipal waste activated sludge

    Waste Manag.

    (2012)
  • M.O. Fagbohungbe et al.

    High solid anaerobic digestion: operational challenges and possibilities

    Environ. Technol. Innov.

    (2015)
  • H.-G. Guo et al.

    High-solid anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with lignite promotes methane production

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2020)
  • A.J. Guwy et al.

    Neural network and on-off control of bicarbonate alkalinity in a fluidised-bed anaerobic digester

    Water Res.

    (1997)
  • K.H. Hansen et al.

    Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: inhibition by ammonia

    Water Res.

    (1998)
  • M. Indren et al.

    Effects of biochar parent material and microbial pre-loading in biochar-amended high-solids anaerobic digestion

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2020)
  • A. Kumar et al.

    Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: a review

    Energy

    (2020)
  • Y. Lei et al.

    Magnetite enhances anaerobic digestion and methanogenesis of fresh leachate from a municipal solid waste incineration plant

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • S.L. Lim et al.

    Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2016)
  • C. Pan et al.

    Effects of conductive carbon materials on dry anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: process and mechanism

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2020)
  • J.-H. Park et al.

    Direct interspecies electron transfer via conductive materials: a perspective for anaerobic digestion applications

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2018)
  • E. Rouches et al.

    Solid-state anaerobic digestion of wheat straw: impact of S/I ratio and pilot-scale fungal pretreatment

    Waste Manag.

    (2019)
  • J. Ryue et al.

    Comparative effects of GAC addition on methane productivity and microbial community in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste

    Biochem. Eng. J.

    (2019)
  • J. Ryue et al.

    Comparative effects of GAC addition on methane productivity and microbial community in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste

    Biochem. Eng. J.

    (2019)
  • I. Siegert et al.

    The effect of volatile fatty acid additions on the anaerobic digestion of cellulose and glucose in batch reactors

    Process. Biochem.

    (2005)
  • S. Sung et al.

    Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic anaerobic digestion

    Chemosphere

    (2003)
  • T.-H. Tsui et al.

    Food waste leachate treatment using an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Bed (UASB): effect of conductive material dosage under low and high organic loads

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2020)
  • G. Wang et al.

    Two-phase high solid anaerobic digestion with dewatered sludge: improved volatile solid degradation and specific methane generation by temperature and pH regulation

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2018)
  • A.J. Ward et al.

    Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2008)
  • M. Westerholm et al.

    Comparative study of industrial-scale high-solid biogas production from food waste: process operation and microbiology

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2020)
  • S. Xu et al.

    Comparing activated carbon of different particle sizes on enhancing methane generation in upflow anaerobic digester

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • S.Y. Xu et al.

    Comparing activated carbon of different particle sizes on enhancing methane generation in upflow anaerobic digester

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • R.M. Xue et al.

    Simultaneous removal of ammonia and N-nitrosamine precursors from high ammonia water by zeolite and powdered activated carbon

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2018)
  • W. Yan et al.

    Enhanced anaerobic phenol degradation by conductive materials via EPS and microbial community alteration

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • N. Yang et al.

    Quantification of regional leachate variance from municipal solid waste landfills in China

    Waste Manag.

    (2015)
  • O. Yenigün et al.

    Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review

    Process. Biochem.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text