Conformity to group norms: How group-affirmation shapes collective action☆
Section snippets
Self-affirmation, group-affirmation and conformity to social norms
Recent studies based on self-affirmation theory have examined the consequences of threats to social identity in terms of intergroup relations (Badea & Sherman, 2019). The basic tenet of self-affirmation theory (Steele, 1988; see also Cohen & Sherman, 2014) is that people strive to maintain self-integrity, a global image of the self as being capable, morally adequate, and adaptive. Threats to a social identity—to the extent that the social identity is connected to the individual's self—can
Collective action in connection with the Roma minority
In this research we focus on the example of individuals' intention to engage in collective action in connection with Roma minority and on the role of descriptive norms (Cialdini, Reno, & Kallgren, 1990) in shaping support for pro-Roma and anti-Roma collective action. Roma people are a traditionally itinerant ethnic group of people, who originated in northern India, but in contemporary times live throughout the European continent. They mostly live in East-Central Europe, where they make up 5 to
Study 1
In Study 1, we conducted an experiment to examine how self-affirmation, group-affirmation, and no-affirmation (control condition) would affect the association between perceived discriminatory norms and pro-Roma versus anti-Roma collective action. As noted above, Binning et al. (2015) found that self-affirmation freed people from the influence of descriptive group norms and allowed them to base their judgments on evidentiary data. Extending this logic to the present research, self-affirmation
Study 2
Study 2 sought to examine further questions as to whether group-affirmation results in conformity to salient group norms and the impact this may have for collective action on behalf of a group experiencing societal discrimination. In this study, rather than measuring perceived norms, we experimentally manipulated the salience of discriminatory norms whereby participants read information that described that most Romanians had negative attitudes (vs. control) towards the Roma. In addition, Study
Study 3
In Study 3, we examine how group-affirmation moderates the impact of non-discriminatory norms on individuals' intentions to engage in collective action in connection with the Roma minority. Specifically, we manipulate non-discriminatory norms to be cognitively salient, before the induction of the affirmation procedure. We also test a psychological mechanism of conformity to groups' norms: increased group identification.
We hypothesize that non-discriminatory norms increase individuals'
General discussion
The aim of this research was to examine the link between social norms and collective action in relation to a minority group by analyzing the conformity to group norms after different aspects of self-concept have been experimentally affirmed. We took the example of pro-Roma and anti-Roma collective action among citizens from two European countries (France and Romania). Results of affirming participants' personal identity (self-affirmation) were inconclusive, as self-affirmation did not reduce
Conclusion
The act of conforming to a social norm is considered a rational choice that people make if they want to avoid rejection by other members of their group (Deutsch & Gerard, 1955). Some empirical studies showed that in-group members who display in-group favoritism elicit more spontaneous positive reactions than those who behave in an egalitarian way (Carraro & Castelli, 2010). Promoting in-group positive identity by discriminating against others (Tajfel & Turner, 1986) can be perceived as a norm
Funding
This research was founded by the Justice Programme of the European Union (2014–2020) (Grant number: 808062).
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References (46)
- et al.
Threat to national identity continuity: When affirmation procedures increase the acceptance of Muslim immigrants
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
(2020) - et al.
In the aftermath of terrorism: Effects of self- versus group-affirmation on support for discriminatory policies
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2018) - et al.
Going along versus getting it right: The role of self-integrity in political conformity
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2015) - et al.
Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification
Journal of Experimental SocialPpsychology
(2007) - et al.
Anti-Roma attitudes as expressions of dominant social norms in Eastern Europe
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
(2017) - et al.
Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception
- et al.
Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
(1991) Amnesty International Report 2010–Romania
- et al.
Self-affirmation and prejudice reduction: When and why
Current Directions in Psychological Science
(2019) - et al.
Self-affirmation, political values congruence, and support for refugees
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
(2017)
The implicit and explicit effects of negative political campaigns: Is the source really blamed?
Political Psychology
Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Roma fear there is no place for them as Romania's cities modernize
The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention
Annual Review of Psychology
Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Changing norms following the 2016 US presidential election: The trump effect on prejudice
Social Psychological and Personality Science
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Native Canadians, first nations, or aboriginals: The effect of labels on attitudes toward native peoples
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science
The politics of affirmation theory: When group- affirmation leads to greater ingroup bias
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Roma
Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (11)
Private provisioning of public adaptation: Integration of cognitive-behavioral, adaptive capacity, and institutional approaches
2024, Global Environmental ChangeReflexive or reflective? Group bias in third-party punishment in Chinese and Western cultures
2022, Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyCitation Excerpt :For instance, in an experimental study of 178 American undergraduates, Ehrlich and Gramzow (2015) found that affirming one's own political party increased biased evaluative judgments, favoring the ingroup over the outgroup. Similar results were yielded in a sample of 371 French college students, such that experimentally enhancing one's group affirmation led to a greater intention to engage in collective action against the outgroup (Badea, Binning, Sherman, Boza, & Kende, 2021). On the other hand, high group identifiers display ingroup regulation.
The violent turn in non-violent collective action: What happens?
2024, Asian Journal of Social PsychologyThe effects of descriptive and injunctive social norms on workplace incivility
2024, Journal of Applied Social PsychologySelf-affirmation and intergroup biases: Changing the narrative and the potential for conflict reduction
2023, Psychological Intergroup Interventions: Evidence-based Approaches to Improve Intergroup Relations
- ☆
This paper has been recommended for acceptance by Dr Ernestine Gordijn.