A 3D model for simulating spatial and temporal fluctuations in grape berry temperature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108431Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A new 3D structure-resolving model was developed to predict grape berry temperature

  • Model validation used a new data set measuring berry temperature in four vineyards

  • Intermittent temperature increases from sun exposure were accurately reproduced

  • Modeled berry heat storage reduced errors by damping excessive fluctuations

Abstract

Recent shifts in climatic patterns have influenced the frequency, timing, and severity of heat waves in many wine grape growing regions, which has introduced challenges for viticulturists. Growing the same varieties under these altered climatic conditions often requires mitigation strategies, but quantitative, generalized understanding of the impacts of such strategies can be difficult or time consuming to determine through field trials. This work developed and validated a detailed three-dimensional (3D) model of grape berry temperature that could fully resolve spatial and temporal heterogeneity in berry temperature, and ultimately predict the impacts of potential high berry temperature mitigation strategies such as the use of alternative trellis systems. A novel experimental data set was generated in which the temperature of exposed grape berry clusters was measured with thermocouples at four field sites with different trellis systems, topography, and climate. Experimental measurements indicated that the temperature of shaded berries closely followed the ambient air temperature, but intermittent periods of direct solar radiation could generate berry temperatures in excess of 10C above ambient. Validation results indicated that by accurately representing the 3D vine structure, the model was able to closely replicate rapid spatial and temporal fluctuations in berry temperature. Including berry heat storage in the model reduced the errors by dampening extreme temporal swings in berry temperature.

Introduction

Increasing temperatures and temperature variability associated with a changing climate have become a major concern for grape producers due to the sensitivity of grape quality to climate, particularly in wine grape production (Jones, 2007, Mira de Ordua, 2010, Pathak, Maskey, Dahlberg, Kearns, Bali, Zaccaria, 2018, Van Leeuwen, Darriet, 2016, White, Diffenbaugh, Jones, Pal, Giorgi, 2006). Short-term temperature extremes associated with heat waves, along with longer-term shifts in seasonal temperature patterns are known to create significant challenges in managing grape quality. Diurnal fluctuations in solar irradiance and air temperature have been shown to affect amino acid and phenylpropanoid berry metabolism at hourly time scales (Reshef et al., 2019). Elevated temperatures during daily or weekly time periods have been shown to decrease anthocyanin concentration around véraison (Gouot et al., 2018). Furthermore, the duration of the elevated temperatures not only has an effect on berry composition but also on berry skin appearance. Exposed berries can be damaged by sunburn, and even a few minutes of high temperature exposure can result in cellular damage (Hulands, Greer, Harper, et al., 2014, Krasnow, Matthews, Smith, Benz, Weber, Shackel, 2010, Wahid, Gelani, Ashraf, Foolad, 2007). Moderate temperatures can also result in berry injury or death after long-term exposure (Wahid et al., 2007).

Grape producers have begun to implement a number of canopy design and management strategies in an attempt to mitigate the negative effects of elevated berry temperatures, including the use of shade cloth (Greer, Weston, Weedon, 2010, Martínez-Lüscher, Chen, Brillante, Kurtural, 2017), trellis design (Kliewer, Wolpert, Benz, 2000, Nicholas, Durham, 2012), and cluster height (Reynolds, Heuvel, 2009, Reynolds, Wardle, Naylor, 1996). However, grape berry microclimate is complex and highly heterogeneous due to interactions between the vine architecture and the environment, making it difficult to understand and predict the integrated effects of mitigation efforts. Experimental field trials are complicated by the fact that measurement of light and temperature at the berry level is labor-intensive and expensive (Zorer et al., 2013). Furthermore, the relatively slow development of grapevine systems means that field trials are costly and may require many years of data collection.

Because it is not feasible to independently vary every parameter that determines berry temperature in field experiments (e.g., radiation load, bunch exposure, climate, topography, latitude, trellis system), crop models provide a means for understanding, and ultimately optimizing, how grapevine design and management practices can be used to mitigate elevated berry temperatures. Previous process-based models have been developed to predict berry radiative fluxes (Pieri, 2010, Zorer, Moffat, Strever, Hunter, 2013) and berry temperatures from environmental parameters (Cola et al., 2009). However, in these models the calculation of absorbed radiation and the parameters to represent specific geometrical canopy structure are often simplified. Therefore, the models cannot account for the vertical and horizontal variability within the cluster or canopy, making it difficult to represent different design or management choices such as using altered trellis designs or pruning practices. Previous work has developed models for individual grape (Smart and Sinclair, 1976) and apple fruits (Saudreau, Sinoquet, Santin, Marquier, Adam, Longuenesse, Guilioni, Chelle, 2007, Thorpe, 1974), and the work of Saudreau et al. (2011) successfully developed a 3D model of apple fruit temperature. However, to the authors’ knowledge, previously developed 3D grapevine structural models (e.g., Iandolino, Pearcy, Williams, 2013, Louarn, Lecoeur, Lebon, 2008) have yet to be coupled with a physically-based berry temperature model.

This work develops and tests a new 3D model for grape berry temperature based on the Helios modeling framework (Bailey, 2019). The berry temperature model was validated using a unique data set that spans four different canopy geometries. The spatially-explicit nature of the model allows for robust representation of varying canopy architectures and their effect on berry temperature. The objective of this study was to accurately simulate the spatial and temporal grape berry temperature fluctuations from different vineyard designs, such that model predictions are robust to changes in vineyard configuration such as row spacing, trellis system, and row orientation.

Section snippets

Model of 3D vineyard geometry

The 3D geometry of the ground, woody tissues, leaves, and grape berries were represented using a mesh of triangular and rectangular elements within the Helios 3D modeling framework (Bailey, 2019). The procedural plant model generator in Helios allows the user to specify average and random geometric parameter values in order to create a given canopy geometry. Grape berries were represented in 3D as tessellated spheres composed of triangular elements, the ground surface was represented as a

Field experiment materials and methods

To validate the 3D model, field experiments were conducted in four Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon vineyards from Sept 19th to Oct 10th (post-véraison to harvest) during the 2018 and 2019 seasons. Two study vineyards were located in Davis, CA (38.53194 N, 121.7528 W) and two others were located in Napa, CA (38.41694 N, 122.4071 W), with each vineyard having a different trellis type. At the research site in Davis, the vines were on a flat terrain, and in Napa the vines were terraced

Ambient berry microclimate

An average characterization of weather conditions during the roughly 3-week period in which the weather stations were deployed is provided in Table 3. A more detailed graphical depiction of the measured air temperature, air relative humidity, wind speed, and of the calculated specific humidity time series data for the different experimental vineyard designs over the chosen validation period is shown in Fig. 2.

During the 3-week period, the daily average air temperature was similar in VSP and

Canopy architecture and berry microclimate

The experimental data collected in this study corresponded to four field sites with different climatic and geographic conditions, and vineyard designs. The average within-canopy ambient microclimate is driven both by the local weather/climate at the site and by the canopy architecture. While it is difficult to directly compare the two Davis experiments (VSP and Wye) because they were conducted during different years, the two Napa plots (Goblet and Unilateral) experienced virtually the same

Conclusion

During periods in which berries are in the shade or during the night time, it is appropriate to assume that the berry temperature is equal to the ambient air temperature. Accurate prediction of large, intermittent increases in berry temperature during periods of solar exposure not only requires a correct application of the berry energy balance, but also accurate representation of the 3D vine structure which determines the transition between sunlit and shaded conditions. Applying the energy

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

Financial support of this work was provided by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project 1013396. The authors wish to acknowledge Harlan Estate for their gracious collaborative and financial support of the Napa field site experiments.

References (47)

  • B.N. Bailey

    A reverse ray-tracing method for modelling the net radiative flux in leaf-resolving plant canopy simulations

    Ecol. Model.

    (2018)
  • B.N. Bailey

    Helios: A scalable 3D plant and environmental biophysical modeling framework

    Front. Plant Sci.

    (2019)
  • M. Bindi et al.

    A simple model for simulation of growth and development in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). II. Model validation

    Vitis

    (1997)
  • T.N. Buckley et al.

    Simple models for stomatal conductance derived from a process model: cross-validation against sap flux data

    Plant Cell Environ.

    (2012)
  • B. Choudhury et al.

    Analysis of an empirical model for soil heat flux under a growing wheat crop for estimating evaporation by an infrared-temperature based energy balance equation

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (1987)
  • S.D. Cohen et al.

    Assessing the impact of temperature on grape phenolic metabolism

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2008)
  • G. Cola et al.

    Berrytone-A simulation model for the daily course of grape berry temperature

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (2009)
  • G. Due et al.

    Modelling grapevine phenology against weather: Considerations based on a large data set

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (1993)
  • J.C. Gouot et al.

    Grape berry flavonoids: a review of their biochemical responses to high and extreme high temperatures

    J. Exp. Bot.

    (2018)
  • D.H. Greer et al.

    Shoot architecture, growth and development dynamics of Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon vines grown in an irrigated vineyard with and without shade covering

    Funct. Plant Biol.

    (2010)
  • C.A. Gueymard

    REST2: High-performance solar radiation model for cloudless-sky irradiance, illuminance, and photosynthetically active radiation - Validation with a benchmark dataset

    Sol. Energy

    (2008)
  • R. Hamman et al.

    Seasonal carbohydrate changes and cold hardiness of chardonnay and riesling grapevines

    Am. J. Enol. Vitic.

    (1996)
  • S. Hulands et al.

    The interactive effects of temperature and light intensity on Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Semillon’grapevines. II. Berry ripening and susceptibility to sunburn at harvest

    Eur. J. Hortic. Sci

    (2014)
  • A. Iandolino et al.

    Simulating three-dimensional grapevine canopies and modelling their light interception characteristics

    Aust. J. Grape Wine R.

    (2013)
  • G.V. Jones

    Climate change: Observations, projections, and general implications for viticulture and wine production

    Econ. Depart. Working paper

    (2007)
  • W.M. Kliewer et al.

    Trellis and vine spacing effects on growth, canopy microclimate, yield and fruit composition of Cabernet Sauvignon

    Acta Hortic.

    (2000)
  • M. Krasnow et al.

    Distinctive symptoms differentiate four common types of berry shrivel disorder in grape

    Calif. Agric.

    (2010)
  • W.P. Kustas et al.

    Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (1999)
  • A. López et al.

    Determining the emissivity of the leaves of nine horticultural crops by means of infrared thermography

    Sci. Hortic.

    (2012)
  • G. Louarn et al.

    A three-dimensional statistical reconstruction model of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) simulating canopy structure variability within and between cultivar/training system pairs

    Ann. Bot.

    (2008)
  • J. Martínez-Lüscher et al.

    Partial solar radiation exclusion with color shade nets reduces the degradation of organic acids and flavonoids of grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.)

    J. Agric. Food Chem.

    (2017)
  • K.A. Nicholas et al.

    Farm-scale adaptation and vulnerability to environmental stresses: Insights from winegrowing in northern california

    Glob. Environ. Change

    (2012)
  • P. Nobel

    Effective thickness and resistance of the air boundary layer adjacent to spherical plant parts

    J. Exp. Bot.

    (1975)
  • View full text