Skip to main content
Log in

Critical Barriers to Environmental Management System Implementation in the Nigerian Construction Industry

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of different hazardous substances of the construction industry being released to the environment is alarming. This constitutes an adverse effect on the quality of life of construction workers and the populace at large. To reduce this menace, Environmental Management System (EMS) was put in place. Meanwhile, the implementation of EMS in the Nigerian construction industry (NCI) is not certain. This study, therefore, investigated the barriers to EMS implementation in the NCI to group them into a smaller form, i.e., fewer numbers. A questionnaire survey was developed and administered to construction professionals in Nigeria using a purposive sampling technique. The retrieved 106 copies of the questionnaires were subjected to both descriptive and inferential statistics such as mean score, standard deviation, analysis of variance test, post hoc test and exploratory factor analysis. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted three times to identify the critical barriers to EMS implementation in the NCI. The study findings reveal three main categories of barriers affecting EMS implementation, namely; (1) knowledge barrier; (2) process barrier; and (3) culture and management barrier. The study concluded that the three factors indicate the major cardinal barriers that could describe the impediment of EMS in the NCI. It was recommended that the training of construction professionals is important to enhance improvement culture in the NCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeniyi O, Ojo LD, Idowu OA, Kolawole SB (2020) Compliance with the stipulated procurement process in local governments: a case from a developing nation. Int J Procure Manag 13(5):678–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinradewo OF, Akinola JA, Ojo LD (2017) A regression equation for determining completion period of construction projects in Ondo State. Niger J Niger Inst Quant Surveyors 63:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ametepey SO, Ansah SK (2014) Impacts of construction activities on the environment: the case of Ghana. J Constr Proj Manag Innov 4(Supplement 1):S934–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Babatunde SO, Awodele OA, Adeniyi O (2018) Opportunities and challenges of foreign direct investment utilisation and its impact on construction sector in developing countries. J Financ Manag Prop Constr 23(2):239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball J (2002) Can ISO 14000 and eco-labelling turn the construction industry green? Build Environ 37(4):421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos LMS, Trierweiller AC, de Carvalho DN, Šelih J (2016) Environmental management system in construction industry: a review. Environ Eng Manag J 15(2):453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Li X, Zhu Y, Zhang Z (2015) A comparative study of environmental performance between prefabricated and traditional residential buildings in China. J Clean Prod 109:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen PH, Ong CF, Hsu SC (2016) Understanding the relationships between environmental management practices and financial performances of multinational construction firms. J Clean Prod 139:750–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z (1997) Green technology and environmental standards. In: Proceedings of CIRP International Symposium—advanced design and manufacture in the global manufacturing era, 21–22

  • Christini G, Fetsko M, Hendrickson C (2004) Environmental management systems and ISO 14001 certification for construction firms. J Constr Eng Manag 130(3):330–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira Neves F, Salgado EG, Beijo LA (2017) Analysis of the Environmental Management System based on ISO 14001 on the American continent. J Environ Manag 199:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel P, Kesidou E (2011) Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: government policies and firm motivations. Ecol Econ 70(8):1546–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dkhili H (2018) Environmental performance and institution quality: evidence from developed and developing countries. Mark Manag Innov 3:333–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebohon OJ, & Rwelamila PD (2001) Sustainable construction in Sub-Saharan Africa: relevance, rhetoric, and the reality. Agenda 21 for sustainable construction in developing countries, pp 1–16. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pantaleo_Rwelamila/publication/237732514_Sustainable_Construction_in_Sub-Saharan_Africa_Relevance_Rhetoric_and_the_Reality/links/00b7d53634a68aeddf000000.pdf

  • Edwards AJ (2003) ISO 14001 Environmental certification step by step: Revised Edition. Elsevier

  • Enshassi A, Mohamed S, Abushaban S (2009) Factors affecting the performance of construction projectsin the Gaza strip. Journal of Civil engineering and Management 15(3):269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin D, Wu J, Khanna M, Jones C, Wirkkala T (2013) Motivations and barriers to corporate environmental management. Bus Strategy Environ 22(6):390–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagbenle OI, Makinde FA, Oluwunmi AO (2011) Factors influencing construction clients’/contractors’ choice of subcontractors in Nigeria. J Sustain Dev 4(2):254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Finstad K (2010) Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. J Usability Stud 5(3):104–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn B, Pagell M, Fugate B (2018) Survey research design in supply chain management: the need for evolution in our expectations. J Supply Chain Manag 54(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gálvez-Martos JL, Styles D, Schoenberger H, Zeschmar-Lahl B (2018) Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resour, Conserv Recycl 136:166–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez A, Rodriguez MA (2011) The effect of ISO 14001 certification on toxic emissions: an analysis of industrial facilities in the north of Spain. J Clean Prod 19(9–10):1091–1095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González P, Sarkis J, Adenso‐Díaz B (2008) Environmental management system certification and its influence on corporate practices. Int J Oper Prod Manag 28(11):1021–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadi NU, Abdullah N, Sentosa I (2016) An easy approach to exploratory factor analysis: marketing perspective. J Educ Soc Res 6(1):215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ, & Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th ed., Prentice Hall, NJ

  • Harada T, Abe T, Kato F, Matsumoto R, Fujita H, Murai S, Miyajima N, Tsuchiya K, Maruyama S, Kudo K, Shinohara N (2015) Five-point Likert scaling on MRI predicts clinically significant prostate carcinoma. BMC Urol 15(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson RK, Roberts JK (2006) Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychological Meas 66(3):393–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herghiligiu IV, Robu IB, Pislaru M, Vilcu A, Asandului AL, Avasilcăi S, Balan C (2019) Sustainable environmental management system integration and business performance: a balance assessment approach using fuzzy logic. Sustainability 11(19):5311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill BD (2011) Sequential Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin procedure as an alternative for determining the number of factors in common-factor analysis: a Monte Carlo Simulation. An Unpublished PhD Thesis of Oklahoma State University, USA

  • Hillary R (2004) Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J Clean Prod 12(6):561–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilson G, Nayee V (2002) Environmental management system implementation in the mining industry: a key to achieving cleaner production. Int J Miner Process 64(1):19–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang TC, Black MC, Knuteson SL, Roberts AP (2019) Environmental pollution, management, and sustainable development: strategies for Vietnam and other developing countries. Environ Manag 63:433–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui I, Chan A, Pun K (2001) A study of the environmental management system implementation practices. J Clean Prod 9(3):269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussin JM, Rahman IA, Memon AH (2013) The way forward in sustainable construction: issues and challenges. Int J Adv Appl Sci 2(1):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Idang GE, Afia UU (2017) African cultures and values. In: Ozumba GO, John EO (eds) Times and thought of African political thinkers. Edioms Research and Innovation Centre, United Kingdom, p 226–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Iraldo F, Testa F, Frey M (2009) Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European Union. J Clean Prod 17(16):1444–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isa RB, Jimoh RA, Achuenu E (2013) An overview of the contribution of construction sector to sustainable development in Nigeria. Net J Bus Manag 1(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyalomhe F, Cirella G, Russo A, Jensen A, Idogho P (2017) Environmental Management System for Nigeria’s higher education: two ­year pilot analysis cosilience. J Sustain Dev 18(2):84­110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir Z, Khan I (2020) Environmental impact assessment of waste to energy projects in developing countries: general guidelines in the context of Bangladesh. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 37:100619

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale Y (2019) Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSME) national survey 2017 report. Presentation of Statistician-General of the Federation/CEO National Bureau of Statistics, Abuja, Nigeria

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliba C, Muya M, Mumba K (2009) Cost escalation and schedule delays in road construction projects in Zambia. Int J Proj Manag 27(5):522–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehbila AG, Ertel J, Brent AC (2009) Strategic corporate environmental management within the South African automotive industry: motivations, benefits, hurdles. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 16(6):310–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen Jr DJ, Craighead CW, Cheng L (2018) Achieving research design excellence through the pursuit of perfection: toward strong theoretical calibration. J Supply Chain Manag 54(1):16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniaz S, Zaiats O, Shayda O, Danko T, Baidala N, Merezhko N, Holovina O (2020) Development of environmental management system by industrial enterprises. ARCTIC 73(3):56–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kola-Lawal C, Wood M, Alo B, Clark A (2014) Factors in organisational environmental management system implementation-developed vs. developing country contexts. J Sustain Dev Energy Water Environ Syst 2(4):408–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari CR, Garg G (2014) Research methodology: methods and techniques, 3rd Ed. New Age, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam PT, Chan EH, Chau CK, Poon CS, Chun KP (2011) Environmental management system vs green specifications: how do they complement each other in the construction industry? J Environ Manag 92(3):788–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Wu K (2017) Environmental management system adoption and the operational performance of firm in the textile and apparel industry of China. Sustainability 9(6):992–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo-Iacono-Ferreira VG, Torregrosa-López JI, Capuz-Rizo SF (2016) Use of Life Cycle Assessment methodology in the analysis of Ecological Footprint Assessment results to evaluate the environmental performance of universities. J Clean Prod 133:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loste N, Roldán E, Lomba L, Giner B (2019) Green chemistry and environmental management systems: relationships, synergies, advantages and barriers of joint implementation at universities. Environ Manag 64(6):783–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marczyk G, DeMatteo D, & Festinger D (2005) Essentials of research design and methodology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Matuszak-Flejszman A (2009) Benefits of Environmental Management System in Polish companies compliant with ISO 14001. Pol J Environ Stud 18:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzi A, Toniolo S, Mason M, Aguiari F, Scipioni A (2016) What are the benefits and difficulties in adopting an environmental management system? The opinion of Italian organizations. J Clean Prod 139:873–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuteleers S, Engelen B (2015) Talking money: how market-based valuation can undermine environmental protection. Ecol Econ 117:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofori G (1998) Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment-comment. Constr Manag Econ 16(2):141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofori G, Briffett IV C, Gang G, Ranasinghe M (2000) Impact of ISO 14000 on construction enterprises in Singapore. Constr Manag Econ 18(8):935–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofori G, Gang G, Briffett C (2002) Implementing environmental management systems in construction: lessons from quality systems. Build Environ 37(12):1397–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojo E, Mbowa C, & Akinlabi, ET (2014) Barriers in implementing green supply chain management in construction industry. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Bali, Indonesia 1974-1981.

  • Ojo LD (2018) Development of a framework for the adoption of value management in the Nigerian construction industry. An Unpublished Master Thesis of Department of Quantity Surveying, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria

  • Ojo LD, Ibrahim B, Oke A, Akindeinde A (2020) Mitigating strategies of threats to quantity surveying profession in the Nigerian construction industry. J Constr Proj Manag Innov 10(2):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojo LD, Ogunsemi DR (2019) Critical Drivers (CDs) of value management adoption in the Nigerian construction industry: a Delphi study. J Eng Des Technol 17(1):250–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Oke AE, Aighimien DO (2018) Drivers of value management in the Nigerian construction industry. J Eng Des Technol 16(2):270–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Oke AE, & Ogunsemi DR (2013) Key competencies of value managers in Lagos state, Nigeria. In: Proceedings of 5th West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference, pp 773–778

  • Oladinrin TO, Ho CMF & Chiang YH (2015) Evaluating codes of ethics implementation for a sustainable construction organization. In: Proceedings of the first international conference for sustainable development and management (ICSDM, 28–30 June 2015, Hong Kong)

  • Oladinrin TO, Ogunsemi DR, Aje IO (2012) Role of construction sector in economic growth: empirical evidence from Nigeria. FUTY J Environ 7(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olawumi TO, Chan DW (2020) Concomitant impediments to the implementation of smart sustainable practices in the built environment. Sustain Prod Consum 21:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osuizugbo IC (2018) Traditional building–construction problems: need for espousal of sustainable construction in Nigeria. Int J Sci Res Publ 8(12):194–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Owolana VO, Booth CA (2016) Stakeholder perceptions of the benefits and barriers of implementing environmental management systems in the Nigerian construction industry. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 24(2):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacana A, Lew G, Kulpa W (2017) Rating the quality of implementation of environmental management systems. J Bus Retail Manag Res 11(2):165–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant J (2011) SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4th ed. Everbest Printing Company, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant J (2011) SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4th ed. Everbest Printing Company, Guangzhou

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer W (2012) Incentive and disincentive: will they affect performance. J Bus Manag 14(3):32–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash A, Potoski M (2014) Global private regimes, domestic public law: ISO 14001 and pollution reduction. Comp Political Stud 47(3):369–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi GY, Zeng SX, Tam CM, Yin HT, Wu JF, Dai ZH (2011) Diffusion of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in China: rethinking on stakeholders’ roles. J Clean Prod 19(11):1250–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reio Jr TG, Shuck B (2015) Exploratory factor analysis: implications for theory, research, and practice. Adv Dev Hum Resour 17(1):12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakr DA, Sherif A, El-Haggar SM (2010) Environmental management systems’ awareness: an investigation of top 50 contractors in Egypt. J Clean Prod 18(3):210–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan M, Liu WQ, Hwang BG, Lye JM (2020) Critical success factors for small contractors to conduct green building construction projects in Singapore: identification and comparison with large contractors. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(8):8310–8322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen LY, Tam VW (2002) Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong construction industry. Int J Proj Manag 20(7):535–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Q, Liu G (2003) Critical success factor for value management studies in construction. J Constr Eng Manag 129(5):485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):936–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siew RY (2015) A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). J Environ Manag 164:180–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh N, Jain S, Sharma P (2015) Motivations for implementing environmental management practices in Indian industries. Ecol Econ 109:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg IF, Buchan GD, Englefield R (2004) Need a university adopt a formal environmental management system? Int J Sustainability High Educ 5(2):125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens PA, Batty WJ, Longhurst PJ, Drew GH (2012) A critical review of classification of organizations in relation to the voluntary implementation of environmental management systems. J Environ Manag 113:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam CM, Tam VW, Tsui WS (2004) Green construction assessment for environmental management in the construction industry of Hong Kong. Int J Proj Manag 22(7):563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarka P (2018) An overview of structural equation modeling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness, and controversies in the social sciences. Qual Quant 52(1):313–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa F, Rizzi F, Daddi T, Gusmerotti NM, Frey M, Iraldo F (2014) EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance. J Clean Prod 68:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse RY (2001) The implementation of EMS in construction firms: case study in Hong Kong. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 3(02):177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine S (2010) The green onion: a corporate environmental strategy framework. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 17(5):284–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnäs A, Balfors B, Faith-Ell C (2009) Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry. J Clean Prod 17(13):1214–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waxin MF, Knuteson SL, Bartholomew A (2019) Drivers and challenges for implementing ISO 14001 environmental management systems in an emerging Gulf Arab country. Environ Manag 63(4):495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willard B (2002) The sustainability advantage: seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line. New Society Publishers, British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin H, Schmeidler PJ (2009) Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Bus Strategy Environ 18(7):469–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SX, Tam CM, Deng ZM, Tam VW (2003) ISO 14000 and the construction industry: survey in China. J Manag Eng 19(3):107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhang Z, Ballesteros-Pérez P, Skitmore M, Yang G, Philbin SP, Lu Q (2021) Factors influencing environmental performance: a bibliometric review and future research agenda. Int J Urban Sci 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1899845

  • Zhang Z, Shen L, Love P, Treloar G (2000) A framework for implementing ISO 14000 in construction. Environ Manag Health 11(2):139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Cordeiro J, Sarkis J (2013) Institutional pressures, dynamic capabilities and environmental management systems: investigating the ISO 9000—Environmental management system implementation linkage. J Environ Manag 114:232–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler A, & Rennings K (2004). Determinants of environmental innovations in Germany: do organizational measures matter? ZEW—Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, 4–30

  • Zutshi A, Sohal A (2004) Environmental management system adoption by Australasian organizations: part 1: reasons, benefits and impediments. Technovation 24(4):335–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olugbenga T. Oladinrin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ojo, L.D., Oladinrin, O.T. & Obi, L. Critical Barriers to Environmental Management System Implementation in the Nigerian Construction Industry. Environmental Management 68, 147–159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01473-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01473-y

Keywords

Navigation