Skip to main content
Log in

The Risk-Sharing Problem Under Limited Liability Constraints in a Single-Period Model

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work provides analysis of a variant of the Risk-Sharing Principal-Agent problem in a single period setting with additional constant lower and upper bounds on the wage paid to the Agent. The effect of the extra constraints on optimal contract existence is studied and leads to conditions on the underlying utility functions under which an optimum may be attained. Solution characterization is then provided along with the derivation of a Borch rule for Limited Liability. Finally, some applications, including the CARA utility case, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This “one-sided” optimization for the Principal may, with good reason, seem unfair. This problem is in fact a benchmark problem that is often used as a measure of comparison with other Principal-Agent problems such as Moral Hazard where optimization for the Agent also comes into play. One may also note that in our increasingly digitalized economies with an ever growing use of machines, analysis of optimal contracting without Moral Hazard (and thus in a Risk-Sharing setting) is increasingly relevant in itself too.

  2. These are variants on classical utility functions whose validity has been extensively studied.

  3. \(x \mapsto \frac{U''(x)}{U'(x)}\) is increasing up to 0 and is worth 1 beyond 0. On \({\mathbb {R}}^-\) it thus exposes “IARA” (increasing absolute risk aversion).

References

  1. Borch, K.: Equilibrium in a reinsurance market. Econometrica 30(3), 424–444 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brezis, H.: Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cvitanić, J., Zhang, J.: Contract Theory in Continuous-Time Models. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Dewatripont, M., Matthews, S.A., Legros, P.: Moral Hazard and Capital Structure Dynamics. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 1(4), 890–930 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friend, I., Blume, M.: The Demand for Risky Assets. Am. Econ. Rev. 65(5), 900–922 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holmström, B.: Moral Hazard and Observability. Bell J. Econ. 10(1), 74–91 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Innes, R.: Limited liabilities and incentive contracting with ex-ante action choices. J. Econ. Theory 52(1), 45–67 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jewitt, I., Kadan, O., Swinkels, J.M.: Moral hazard with bounded payments. J. Econ. Theory 143(1), 59–82 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kadan, O., Reny, P., Swinkels, J.M.: Existence of optimal mechanisms in principal agent problems. Econometrica 85(3), 769–823 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadan, O., Swinkels, J.M.: Minimum Payments and Induced Effort in Moral Hazard Problems. Games Econ. Behav. 82, 468–489 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, S.K.: Limited liability and bonus contracts. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 6(4), 899–913 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurdila, A., Zabarankin, M.: Convex Functional Analysis. Birkhäuser (2005)

  13. Luenberger, D.: Optimization by Vector Space Methods. Wiley (1967)

  14. Martin, J., Réveillac, A.: Analysis of the Risk-Sharing Principal-Agent problem through the Reverse-Hölder inequality. arXiv:1809.07040v3 (2019)

  15. Matthews, S.A.: Renegotiating moral hazard contracts under limited liability and monotonicity. J. Econ. Theory 97(1), 1–29 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mirrlees, J.: The optimal structure of incentives and authority within an organization. Bell J. Econ. 7(1), 105–131 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller, H.: The first-best sharing rule in the continuous-time principal-agent problem with exponential utility. J. Econ. Theory 79(2), 276–280 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Page, F.: The existence of optimal contracts in the principal-agent model. J. Math. Econ. 16(2), 157–167 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Park, E.-S.: Incentive contracting under limited liability. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 4(3), 477–490 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ross, S.: The economic theory of agency: the principal’s problem. Am. Econ. Rev. 63(2), 134–139 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sannikov, Y.: A continuous-time version of the principal-agent problem. Rev. Econ. Stud. 75(3), 957–984 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Sappington, D.: Limited liability contracts between principal and agent. J. Econ. Theory 29(1), 1–21 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Tihonov, A.N.: On the solution of ill-posed problems and the method of regularization. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 151(3), 501–504 (1963)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Stéphane Villeneuve for the introduction to Principal-Agent problems and for many interesting discussions on the subject. She is also extremely grateful to Frédéric de Gournay for numerous discussions on optimization, and to the anonymous reviewer for his insightful remarks on this work. Finally, she thanks the ANR Pacman for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Martin.

Additional information

Communicated by Nizar Touzi.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, J. The Risk-Sharing Problem Under Limited Liability Constraints in a Single-Period Model. J Optim Theory Appl 189, 854–872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-021-01861-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-021-01861-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation