Abstract
Parrot egg seizure is frequent, and its impact on the population cannot be quantified due to difficulties in identifying the transportation of the eggs by traffickers. Morphological identification of species in eggs is difficult, especially when the embryos are not viable. In this context, DNA barcoding is an alternative for species identification. In May 2018, 31 eggs were seized at the Manaus/AM airport, Brazil and suspected to be parrot eggs. These eggs did not hatch and were sent for species genetic identification. After DNA extraction with the salting-out protocol, fragments of the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene were amplified. DNA barcodes were sequenced, and the results were compared with cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequences deposited at the Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD). All eggs, except for one, were identified as Graydidascalus brachyurus, a neotropical parrot considered “not threatened” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), but this species is highly trafficked. Calculating the threshold for each generated sequence was fundamental for the reliability of species identification, as the traditional 98–99% sequence similarity pattern is not applicable to all taxa. Each country has specific legislations concerning wildlife trafficking, and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) regulates wildlife trade internationally. In Brazil, the penalty is higher in case of species threatened by illegal trade, but it is still not effective. Findings of this study highlight the need for strategies to protect non-threatened species, thereby preventing more species from becoming endangered.
Clinical Trials Registration
Not applicable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
DNA sequences and SPIDER script are available.
References
Alacs E, Georges A (2008) Wildlife across our borders: a review of the illegal trade in Australia. Aust J Forensic Sci 40:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450610802491382
Aljanabi SM, Martinez I (1997) Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4692–4693. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.22.4692
Bártolo RM de OR de F (2013) Cães Detetores de Vida Selvagem: Utilidade e eficácia no combate ao tráfico de espécies. Relatório Científico Final do Trabalho de Investigação Aplicada
BirdLife International (2016) Graydidascalus brachyurus In: IUCN Red List Threat. Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22686172/93101087#population Accessed 30 Nov 2020
Brown SDJ, Collins RA, Boyer S et al (2012) Spider: an R package for the analysis of species identity and evolution, with particular reference to DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 12:562–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03108.x
Burgio KR, Davis KE, Dreiss LM et al (2019) Phylogenetic supertree and functional trait database for all extant parrots. Data Br 24:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103882
Butchart SHM, Lowe S, Martin RW et al (2018) Which bird species have gone extinct? A novel quantitative classification approach. Biol Conserv 227:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.08.014
Cai Y, Yue B, Jiang W et al (2010) DNA barcoding on subsets of three families in Aves. Mitochondrial DNA 21:132–137. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2010.494726
Carvalho CBV (2012) Identificação genética de aves vítimas do tráfico de animais silvestres. Atual Ornitol On-Line 165:40–44
Challender DWS, Harrop SR, MacMillan DC (2015) Understanding markets to conserve trade-threatened species in CITES. Biol Conserv 187:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.015
Charity S, Ferreira JM (2020) Wildlife Trafficking in Brazil. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge
Chávez-Treviño A, Canales-del-Castillo R, Ruvalcaba-Ortega I et al (2017) Primer development for amplification of toll-like genes for the assessment of adaptive genetic diversity in vulnerable grassland bird species. Conserv Genet Resour 9:385–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-017-0690-8
Coghlan ML, White NE, Parkinson L et al (2012) Egg forensics: an appraisal of DNA sequencing to assist in species identification of illegally smuggled eggs. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:268–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.06.006
Collins RA, Cruickshank RH (2013) The seven deadly sins of DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 13:969–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12046
da Silva CF, Daneluz CM, Camacho-Oliveira RB et al (2019) DNA Barcode reveals mislabelling in the identification of marine fish swimming bladders for commercialization. Forensic Sci Int 299:41–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.001
Frank EG, Wilcove DS (2019) Long delays in banning trade in threatened species. Science 363:686–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav4013
Gaur A, Singh CS, Sreenivas A, Singh L (2012) DNA-based identification of a snake in a wine bottle using universal primers: a case of mistaken identity. Forensic Sci Int 214:51–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.045
Gonçalves PFM, Oliveira-Marques AR, Matsumoto TE, Miyaki CY (2015) DNA Barcoding Identifies Illegal Parrot Trade. J Hered 106:560–564. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esv035
Grzywacz A, Wyborska D, Piwczyński M (2017) DNA barcoding allows identification of European Fanniidae (Diptera) of forensic interest. Forensic Sci Int 278:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.023
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Halle BO (2018) Bird’s-eye view: lessons from 50 years of bird trade regulation & conservation in Amazon countries 198
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270:313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004) Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312
Ibáñez H, Grisolia MJ, Marrero AR, LF (2020) Tráfico ilegal de huevos de fauna silvestre: ¿un problema regional? Biodivers Neotrop 1:1–5
Iyengar A (2014) Forensic DNA analysis for animal protection and biodiversity conservation: a review. J Nat Conserv 22:195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2013.12.001
Johnson RN (2010) The use of DNA identification in prosecuting wildlife-traffickers in Australia: do the penalties fit the crimes? Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6:211–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9174-9
Kerr KCR, Lijtmaer DA, Barreira AS et al (2009) Probing evolutionary patterns in neotropical birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE 4:e4379–e4379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004379
Lijtmaer DA, Kerr KCR, Stoeckle MY, Tubaro PL (2012) DNA Barcoding Birds: from Field Collection to Data Analysis. In: Kress WJ, Erickson DL (eds) DNA Barcodes: methods and protocols. Humana Press, Washington, pp 127–152
Nijman V, Langgeng A, Birot H et al (2018) Wildlife trade, captive breeding and the imminent extinction of a songbird. Glob Ecol Conserv 15:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00425
Olah G, Butchart SHM, Symes A et al (2016) Ecological and socio-economic factors affecting extinction risk in parrots. Biodivers Conserv 25:205–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-1036-z
Ribeiro J, Reino L, Schindler S et al (2019) Trends in legal and illegal trade of wild birds: a global assessment based on expert knowledge. Biodivers Conserv 28:3343–3369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01825-5
Sas-Rolfes M, Challender DWS, Hinsley A et al (2019) Illegal wildlife trade: scale, processes, and governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 44:201–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033253
Symes WS, McGrath FL, Rao M, Carrasco LR (2018) The gravity of wildlife trade. Biol Conserv 218:268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.007
UNODC (2016) World Wildlife Crime Report: Trafficking in protected species. United Nations, New York
Urantoẃka AD, Mackiewicz P, Strzaał T (2014) Phylogeny of Amazona barbadensis and the yellow-headed Amazon complex (Aves: Psittacidae): a new look at South American parrot evolution. PLoS ONE 9:e97228–e97228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097228
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the financial support (studentship) provided by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). We also would like to thank the Brazilian Federal Police and Amazonian Research National Institute (INPA), specially for Mario Cohn-Haft and Gisiane Rodrigues Lima, for the availability of egg samples, and the Professor Cristina Yumi Miyaki and the Avian Genetics and Molecular Evolution Lab (LGEMA) of the University of São Paulo (USP) for sharing essential DNA sequences for our in silico analysis. We are also grateful to the Wildlife Recovery Center, in Department of Water and Electric Energy (DAEE) of the Government of São Paulo/SP/Brazil for cession of important quantitative information on bird eggs illegal trade in Brazil and to the Multi-user Laboratory of Biology Studies (LAMEB) of the Biological Sciences Center (CCB) in Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) for the technical support.
Funding
Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Leandra Formentão—Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Visualization. Alexandre Silva Saraiva—Resources, Writing – Original Draft. Andrea R. Marrero—Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The approval of the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals of the Federal University of Santa Catarina was not necessary because samples of animals from police apprehension were used, thus, the researchers did not collect live animals.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Plant Reproducibility
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Formentão, L., Saraiva, A.S. & Marrero, A.R. DNA barcoding exposes the need to control the illegal trade of eggs of non-threatened parrots in Brazil. Conservation Genet Resour 13, 275–281 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-021-01209-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-021-01209-4