Elsevier

Anthropocene

Volume 34, June 2021, 100295
Anthropocene

Of marsh and mangrove: coupled biophysical and anthropogenic drivers of 20th century wetland conversion in Tampa Bay Estuary, Florida (USA)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2021.100295Get rights and content

Abstract

Dense mangrove swamps currently dominate tidal wetlands of the Tampa Bay Estuary System on the central peninsular Gulf Coast of Florida (USA). Late-19th century Coast and Geodetic Survey topographical charts and Government Land Office surveys, however, depict wetland systems dominated by salt marsh—therefore suggesting mangrove dominance as a product of 20th century encroachment. To clarify the primary drivers of ecosystem change, this study integrates sedimentological, paleobotanical, and radiometric analyses of sediment cores collected in 2018 with analyses of aerial photography taken between 1940 and 1997. Results empirically ground truth the wetland conversions inferred through analytical comparisons of historical and modern mapping and establish a high-resolution chronology for coastal environmental change. These results showed that salt marsh and salt prairie habitats persisted within Tampa Bay study areas until the mid-20th century. Mangrove forest rapidly encroached the study areas over a 20 year interval, between 1960 and 1980, immediately following intensive ditching for mosquito control. The findings demonstrate how coastal geoengineering, mangrove autoecology, and sea-level rise interacted across the late-20th century to accelerate the creation of novel seascapes.

Introduction

Across the neotropics, coastal wetlands are transforming in response to climate change and sea-level rise (Harley et al., 2006). At various global locales, mangroves are encroaching into salt marshes and transforming the ecology of tidal ecosystems (Saintilan et al., 2014). While oscillations between woody and herbaceous vegetation boundaries are common and well-documented in many ecosystems (Knapp et al., 2008, Van Auken, 2000), widespread marsh-to-mangrove conversion has accelerated in recent decades. Such conversion has caused alarm among ecologists and coastal resource managers (e.g., Armitage, 2015; Everitt et al. 2010; Perry and Mendelssohn, 2009; Williamson et al., 2011), who recognize that major shifts in foundation vegetation taxa will likely drive commensurate qualitative and quantitative changes in the ecosystem services provided by coastal habitats (see Engle, 2011). Further, salt marsh and salt prairie environments are widely recognized as critical habitats for terrestrial mammals, reptiles, amphibians, mollusks, migratory birds, and waterfowl not typically found in mangrove forest (Montague and Wiegert, 1990:508−512; Odum and McIvor, 1990:542−543).

Workers have identified various drivers of mangrove expansion and encroachment, including sea-level rise (Krauss et al., 2011, Lopez-Medellin et al., 2011, Rogers et al., 2006, Smith et al., 2013), warming winter temperatures (Duke et al., 1998, Osland et al., 2013), elevated atmospheric CO2 (McKee et al., 2012), precipitation (Saintilan and Wilton, 2001), droughts (Rogers et al., 2006), and sedimentation (Woodroffe et al., 1985). At local- to meso-scales, however, patterns of mangrove expansion into adjacent habitats may be influenced substantively by interactions between climate change and direct anthropogenic impacts (He and Silliman, 2019, Patterson et al., 1997, Patterson and Mendelssohn, 1991). Such interactions will likely produce novel types of tidal wetlands (sensu Hobbs et al., 2013; Lugo et al., 2014), characterized by new species combinations and biophysical interactions that lack local historical analogs.

In 2012, Raabe et al. (2012) compared 19th century survey documents with contemporary aerial photography to infer a previously undocumented estuary-wide pattern of marsh to mangrove conversion within the tidal zone of Tampa Bay Estuary on the central peninsular Gulf Coast of Florida. The authors reviewed historical Coast and Geodetic Survey (CGS) Topographical Charts (T-Sheets) and General Land Office (GLO) survey records to generate models of late-19th century coastal vegetation cover within four areas of Tampa Bay Estuary. They compared these historical models to modern vegetation cover assessments based on 1999 aerial imagery (SWFWMD, 2005) and documented a dramatic trend of mangrove encroachment in each of the study areas (Raabe et al., 2012:1153). While latitudinal temperature gradients are known to condition the physiographic distributions of mangrove and salt marsh along the Florida peninsula and the Gulf of Mexico (Kangas and Lugo, 1990, Osland et al., 2013, Stevens et al., 2006), the latitudinal pattern of wetland conversion documented by Raabe et al. (2012:1155) within Tampa Bay Estuary does not implicate temperature change as a major factor. Instead, their interpretation broadly attributes mangrove encroachment to sea-level rise and suggests that impacts of coastal urbanization (e.g., drawdowns of local aquifers, damming of streams, and shoreline alteration) also functioned as important drivers (Raabe et al., 2012:1156).

While the comparative historical analyses by Raabe et al. (2012) is both rigorous and compelling, to date there are no published sediment records that ground-truth tidal wetland conversion in Tampa Bay Estuary. Further, while 19th century survey documents provide essential points of historical reference, they are not particularly suitable for investigating the chronology or process of mangrove encroachment across the 20th century. In their discussion, Raabe et al. (2012:1156) called for further comparative analyses of historical aerial photography to understand better the nature and timing of habitat transformation. As a complement to the research reviewed above, the present study integrates sedimentological and remote-sensing approaches to clarify 20th century marsh-to-mangrove conversion. We focus on two study sites located within Old Tampa Bay—the western basin of Tampa Bay Estuary. Building on Raabe et al. (2012), we provide new data from sediment core samples that ground-truth wetland conversion patterns observed in historical map comparisons. These new data enable refinement of the chronology of habitat transformation. To contextualize the sediment records and investigate the processes driving marsh-to-mangrove conversion we analyzed sequences of 20th century aerial photography at each study site and correlated sediment core records with changes apparent on the larger seascapes.

This article thus addresses the following research questions. First, what near-historical (20th century) changes in habitat type do the tidal wetland sediments of Old Tampa Bay reveal, and how consistent are these records with current understanding of marsh-to-mangrove conversion? Second, what is the precise chronology of these transformations as recorded in the sedimentary record? In our discussion of these results, we evaluate the major factors that drove the process of wetland conversion at the study sites in Old Tampa Bay (sections 5.1 and 5.2). Additionally, we discuss the implications of marsh-to-mangrove conversion processes for the conservation and management of coastal wetlands (section 5.3).

Section snippets

Tampa Bay Estuary

Tampa Bay is a large (1000 km2), shallow (4 m mean depth) microtidal estuary system on Florida’s Central peninsular Gulf Coast.It comprises seven major sub-divisions, including: Old Tampa Bay, Hillsborough Bay, Boca Ciega Bay, Terra Ceia, Middle Tampa Bay, Lower Tampa Bay, and the tidal Manatee River mouth (Fig. 1) (Morrison and Yates, 2011). Tampa Bay is situated near the northern extent of the West Central Barrier Chain, a mixed-energy barrier island-inlet system that extends from the Anclote

Methods

To empirically reconstruct 20th century habitat transformation and ground-truth the wetland conversion phenomenon inferred through remote sensing, we collected sediment core samples from each study site and conducted sedimentological and macrofossil analyses. Particle size distributions and total organic matter values, as well as botanical and molluscan macrofossil identifications, were utilized to demarcate sedimentary facies representing distinct depositional environments within the wetland

Surface Sediments

Reference surface sediment data demonstrate that tidal wetland habitats within Old Tampa Bay may be differentiated from one another by physical sedimentological characteristics, which result from complex interactions between energy regimes, tidal inundation, vegetation community dynamics, and elevation. Mangrove forest surface sediments were highest in total organic matter (mean = 35.7 %) and fine particle content (mean = 28.4 %). Salt prairie habitats contained very low organic matter (mean =

DISCUSSION

Ground-truthing previous work by Raabe et al. (2012), this study confirms the inference that Tampa Bay’s coastal wetlands converted from salt marsh/salt prairie mosaics to mangrove forests over the 20th century. The PB-210/ Cs-137 chronology on core PP-1 sediments indicates that marsh-to-mangrove conversion began to substantially alter sedimentary conditions at Philippe Point Tidal Creek in the 1970s. Such alterations culminated in the establishment of homogenous mangrove forest by 1980. A

Conclusions

Analyses of sediment core samples and sequences of historical aerial photography at two study sites within Old Tampa Bay produced the following answers to the research questions posed in this paper. First, at both study sites (Philippe Point Tidal Creek and Feather Sound) sediment records document relatively dramatic transformations in habitat type. In both cores, gleyed estuarine muddy sand beds containing marsh-associated botanical macrofossils are overlain by mangrove associated organic

Funding

This research was made possible through funding provided by the 2018 Florida SeaGrant Student Scholar Program, and by the University of South Florida Anthropology Department.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper

Acknoledgments

We express utmost gratitude to University of South Florida St. Petersburg Conservation Biology and University of South Florida Anthropology for access to facilities and instrumentation. We thank Dr. Thomas J. Pluckhahn, Heather Draskovich, and Amy Spurling Gatenbee for assistance with strenuous and muddy fieldwork. We thank Pinellas County Parks and Conservation Resources and Upper Tampa Bay Park for granting permission for sample collection and working tirelessly to protect and manage

References (102)

  • P.G. Appleby et al.

    The Assessment of 210PB Data from Sites with Varying Sediment Accumulation Rates

    Hydrobiologia

    (1983)
  • A.R. Armitage

    The contribution of mangrove expansion to salt marsh loss on the Texas Gulf Coast

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • M.W. Binford

    Calculation and uncertainty analysis of 210PB dates for PIRLA project lake sediment cores

    J. Paleolimnol.

    (1990)
  • M.F. Boyd
    (1949)
  • J.L. Breithaupt et al.

    Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: strengthening the global budget

    Global Biogeochem. Cycles

    (2012)
  • D. Brothwell

    Voracious Skeeters Cost City Residents, Visitors

    (1956)
  • R.B. Brown et al.

    Soils

  • E. Chen et al.

    Climate

  • Y. Choi et al.

    Vegetation succession and carbon sequestration in a coastal wetland in Northwest Florida: evidence from carbon isotopes

    Global Biogeochem. Cycles

    (2001)
  • G. Cicchetti et al.

    Estuarine biotope mosaics and habitat management goals: an application in Tampa Bay, FL, USA

    Estuaries Coasts

    (2011)
  • R.C. Clement

    Mosquito control and the ecosystem

    Proc. NJ Mosq. Exterm. Soc.

    (1965)
  • A.F. Clewell

    Vegetation

  • S.S. Corman et al.

    Salt marsh mosquito-control ditches: sedimentation, landscape change, and restoration implications

    J. Coast. Res.

    (2012)
  • C.M. Crain et al.

    Secondary succession dynamics in estuarine marshes across landscape-scale salinity gradients

    Ecology

    (2008)
  • P.E.R. Dale et al.

    Managing salt marshes for mosquito control: impacts of runnelling, open water marsh management and grid-ditching in sub-tropical australia

    Wetland Ecol. Manag.

    (2006)
  • B.E. Davies

    Loss on ignition as an estimate of soil organic matter

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.

    (1974)
  • J.H. Davis

    Publication 517. Tortugas laboratory paper

    (1940)
  • J.H. Davis

    The natural features of South Florida, Especially the vegetation and the Everglades

    Florida Geological Survey Bulletin

    (1943)
  • R.A. Davis

    Beaches, barrier Islands, and inlets of the Florida Gulf Coast

  • W.E. Dean

    Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods

    J. Sediment. Petrol.

    (1974)
  • C.L. Doughty et al.

    Mangrove range expansion rapidly increases coastal wetland carbon storage

    Estuaries Coasts

    (2016)
  • N.C. Duke et al.

    Factors influencing biodiversity and distribtutional gradients in mangroves

    Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. Let.

    (1998)
  • V.D. Engle

    Estimating the provision of wetland services by Gulf of Mexico coastal wetlands

    Wetlands

    (2011)
  • W.K. Fehring

    NWRC Open-file report

    Data Bases for Use in Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Planning in Tampa Bay, Florida: project Summary

    (1986)
  • R.L. Folk

    Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphills, Austin

    (1965)
  • K.D. Haddad et al.

    Management

  • C.D.G. Harley et al.

    The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2006)
  • Q. He et al.

    Climate change, human impacts, and coastal ecosystems in the anthropocene

    Curr. Biol.

    (2019)
  • P.J. Hogarth

    The Biology of Mangroves

    (2005)
  • C.W. Holmes

    Short-Lived Radioisotopes in Sediments: A Tool for Accessing Sedimentary Dynamics. USGS Open File Report 01-xxx

    (2001)
  • A. Janicki

    A Summary of Emergent Vegetation Habitat Coverage Data for Tampa Bay. Tampa Bay Estuary Program Technical Report

    (2000)
  • A.J. Janicki et al.

    Habitat Protection and Restoration Targets for Tampa Bay

    (1995)
  • A. Janicki et al.

    Model-Based Estimates of Total Nitrogen Loading to Tampa Bay—Current Conditions and Updated 2010 Conditions

    (2001)
  • P.D. Jones et al.

    Hemispheric and large-scale surface air temperature variations: an extensive revision and an update to 2001

    J. Clim.

    (2003)
  • C.L. Jordan

    Florida’s weather and climate: implications for Water

  • P.C. Jowsey

    An improved peat sampler

    New Phytol.

    (1966)
  • P.C. Kangas et al.

    The distribution of mangroves and Saltmarsh in Florida

    Trop. Ecol.

    (1990)
  • A.K. Knapp et al.

    Shrub encroachment in North American Grasslands: Shifts in growth form dominance rapidly alters control of ecosystem carbon inputs

    Glob. Change Biol.

    (2008)
  • C.C. Koenig et al.

    Mangroves as essential nursery habitat for goliath grouper (Epinephelus itajara)

    Bull. Mar. Sci.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Soils and sediments of coastal ecology: A global carbon sink

      2021, Ocean and Coastal Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Global net estuarine ecosystem production is estimated to be as high as 3000 Tg yr−1 (Duarte et al., 2002). Mangroves and marshes are among the most significant vegetations of estuarine wetlands whereas presence of seagrass beds is common in the seaside end (Odum, 1971; Cai, 2011; Ricart et al., 2020; Jackson et al., 2021). In general, mangroves are distributed in pan-tropical and equatorial coastlines while tidal marshes are mainly prominent from middle to upper latitudes (Roman et al., 2001; Giri et al., 2011).

    • Climate drives coupled regime shifts across subtropical estuarine ecosystems

      2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    View full text