Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility: External Stakeholder Involvement, Productivity and Firm Performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessing the impact of CSR initiatives can be a complex task for marketers given the variety of methods of communicating about CSR as well as the broad range of stakeholders that CSR initiatives might interest. Social media helps increase the visibility and credibility of CSR communication and provides new ways of reaching and involving stakeholders in CSR initiatives. Using data collected and coded from Facebook pages of the Top 100 Global Brands, the authors introduce a new measure of effectiveness for CSR communication; CSR communication productivity (CCP). The findings indicate that CCP has a positive impact on firm performance (Tobin’s Q). The authors also investigate the impact of External Stakeholder Involvement in CSR initiatives. The results suggest that when external stakeholders are involved in an organization’s CSR initiatives, both CCP and firm performance (Tobin’s Q) improve. In addition, third-party evaluations of CSR performance positively moderate the impact of External Stakeholder Involvement on CCP. These findings offer contributions to CSR communication and social media marketing theories. They also have implications for marketing managers regarding how to measure and benchmark CCP, and how to maximize returns by involving external stakeholders in CSR efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A. I., Lerme, C. S., & Seiford, L. M. (1995). Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 80, 462–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 136–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, C., & Tuten, T. (2015). Creative strategies in social media marketing: an exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychology & Marketing, 32(1), 15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. (2008). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Sureth, K., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boles, J. S., Donthu, N., & Lohtia, R. (1995). Salesperson evaluation using relative performance efficiency: The application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 15(3), 31–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, M. (2011). Smart business, social business: A playbook for social media in your organization. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Perry, S. (1994). Removing the financial performance halo from fortune’s “most admired” companies. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1347–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J., & Nuttall, R. (2013). Beyond corporate social responsibility: Integrated external engagement. The McKinsey Quarterly, April, pp. 1–11.

  • Capriotti, P. (2011). Communicating corporate social responsibility through the internet and social media. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Barlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. (pp. 358–378). Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M. (1995). Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer, R. J., Jr. (2013). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M. H., Furey, L. D., & Mohr, T. (2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility on social media: Strategies, stakeholders, and public engagement on corporate Facebook. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 52–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S., & Keh, H. T. (2006). Brand value creation: Analysis of the interbrand-business week brand value rankings. Marketing Letters, 17(4), 323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T.J., Rao, D. S. P., O'Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science and Business Media.

  • Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016). Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSRHub (https://www.csrhub.com/)

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donthu, N., & Yoo, B. (1998). Retail productivity assessment using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Retailing, 74(1), 89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, D., Berens, G., & Li, T. (2013). The impact of interactive corporate social responsibility communication on corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 731–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman. (2013). 2013 Edelman Trust Barometer. Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/research/2013-edelman-trust-barometer

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, P., Bendle, N. T., Pfeifer, P. E., & Reibstein, D. J. (2006). Marketing metrics: 50+ metrics every executive should master. Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatma, M., Rahman, Z., & Khan, I. (2015). Building company reputation and brand equity through CSR: The mediating role of trust. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(6), 840–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J. D., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Corporate and stakeholder responsibility: Making business ethics a two-way conversation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 375–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Governance and Accountability Institute. (2016). https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2016/03/15/819994/0/en/FLASH-REPORT-81-of-the-S-P-500-Index-Companies-Published-Corporate-Sustainability-Reports-in-2015.html

  • Haigh, D., & Perrier, R. (1997). Valuation of trademarks and brand names. In Raymond Perrier (Ed.), Brand valuation. (3rd ed., pp. 19–24). Premier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, S., & Havens, J. C. (2008). Tactical transparency: How leaders can leverage social media to maximize value and build their brand. Jossey-Bass.Hughey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, C., Germann, F., & Grewal, R. (2016). washing away your sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility, and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, T. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesavan, R., Bernacchi, M. D., & Mascarenhas, O. A. (2013). Word of mouse: CSR communication and the social media. International Management Review, 9(1), 58–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Kim, S. Y., & Sung, K. H. (2014). Fortune 100 companies’ facebook strategies: Corporate ability versus social responsibility. Journal of Communication Management, 18, 343–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. The Sage Commtext Series. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C.-S., Chiu, C.-J., Yang, C.-F., & Pai, D.-C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Kohler, J. (2010). Benchmarking and transparency: Incentives for the pharmaceutical industry’s corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 641–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. M., Park, S.-Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1716–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., et al. (2019). Financial performance and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(1), 61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. T., Wong, I. A., Shi, G., Chu, R., & Brock, J. L. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and perceived brand quality on customer-based brand preference. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(3), 181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Donthu, N. (2006). Marketing’s credibility: A longitudinal investigation of marketing communication productivity and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 70(October), 70–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Xueming, & Donthu, Naveen. (2005). Assessing advertising media spending inefficiencies in generating sales. Journal of Business Research, 58, 28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, T. J., Fehle, F., & Fournier, S. (2006). Brands matter: An empirical demonstration of the creation of shareholder value through branding. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 224–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangold, W. Glynn., & Faulds, David J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, P., Herrero, Á., del Mar García-de, M., & los Salmones. . (2020). Determinants of eWOM on hospitality CSR issues. In Facebook we trust? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(10), 1479–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey and Company. (2009). Valuing Corporate Social Responsibility: McKinsey Global Survey Results. McKinsey Quarterly, 1–9.

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, T., & Galan, J. I. (2011). Effects of corporate social responsibility on brand value. Journal of Brand Management, 18(6), 423–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S., & Kahn, B. E. (2003). Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: When do they impact perception of sponsor brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 316–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. R., Eden, L., & Li, D. (2020). CSR reputation and firm performance: A dynamic approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(3), 619–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder wealth: The role of marketing capability. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 26–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N. A., Katsikeas, C. S., & Vorhies, D. W. (2012). Export marketing strategy implementation, export marketing capabilities, and export venture performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2), 271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M. (2006). Strategic CSR communication: Telling Others how good you are. Management models for corporate social responsibility. (pp. 238–246). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 323–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L.. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might Deter ”Greenwashing”: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research?. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R. (2003). An introduction to data envelopment analysis: A tool for performance measurement. Sage Publications India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. R., Agarwal, M. K., & Dahlhoff, D. (2004). How is manifest branding strategy related to the intangible value of a corporation? Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 126–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rim, H., & Kim, S. (2016). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) skepticism and their impacts on public evaluations toward CSR. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(5–6), 248–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P., & Dowling, G. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), 1077–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalet, S., & Kelly, T. F. (2010). CSR rating agencies: What is their global impact? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19(3), 321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schons, L., & Steinmeier, M. (2016). Walk the talk? How symbolic and substantive CSR actions affect firm performance depending on stakeholder proximity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 358–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Tribó, J. A., & Verhoef, P. (2012). Generating global brand equity through corporate social responsibility to key stakeholders. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(1), 13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Chamber of Congress Foundation. (2017). Retrieved from: https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/reports/csr-effect-social-media-sentiment-and-impact-brands?cm_mc_uid=97433150831315028171801andcm_mc_sid_50200000=1502817180.

  • Vishwanathan, P., van Oosterhout, H., Heugens, P. P., Duran, P., & Van Essen, M. (2020). Strategic CSR: A concept building meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 314–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., & Googins, B. K. (2011). The Paradoxes of communicating corporate social responsibility. In O. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. (pp. 23–43). Wiley and Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. H. M., Chen, P. H., Yu, T. H. K., & Hsiao, C. Y. (2015). The Effects of corporate social responsibility on brand equity and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2232–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., & Kim, H. G. (2017). Can social media marketing improve customer relationship capabilities and firm performance? Dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, M. A., Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2012). The effect of brand acquisition and disposal on stock returns. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 38–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., & Basile, K. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on brand equity. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 37(1), 2–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Basile, K., & Letourneau, O. (2020). The impact of social media platform selection on effectively communicating about corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(1), 65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasser, Q. R., AlMamun, A., & Ahmed, I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(3), 210–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Management, Emmanuel College, 400 The Fenway, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Jing Yang & Kelly Basile

Authors
  1. Jing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kelly Basile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 7.

Table 7 Additional tests on specific types of external stakeholder involvement
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, J., Basile, K. Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility: External Stakeholder Involvement, Productivity and Firm Performance. J Bus Ethics 178, 501–517 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04812-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04812-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation