Skip to main content
Log in

A matching method for second-hand goods exchange considering loss aversion of buyer and seller in e-brokerage

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The second-hand goods exchange matching problem with intelligent exchange platform is a valuable research topic, while research in the related field is relatively lacking. Thus, the goal of this paper is to develop a two-sided matching method for the second-hand goods exchange matching. In the method, not only the characteristic of loss aversion of buyers/sellers and the benefit of e-brokerage are considered, but also the suggested exchange prices that meet the requirements of buyers and sellers are determined. Specifically, the description of second-hand goods exchange matching problem is firstly presented, in which the 2-tuple including the ideal level and the lowest acceptable level is used to quantify the expected demands of buyers and sellers for attributes. Then, several models maximizing the perceived values of buyers and sellers are derived to determine the suggested exchange price of goods. Next, according to the expectation information of buyers and sellers, and the real information of goods, the perceived value matrix for each attribute of buyers and sellers can be obtained by using the prospect theory. Furthermore, a model can be constructed and solved to determine the maximum number of exchange of buyers and sellers in e-brokerage, and an optimization model with the constraint of the exchange number threshold is constructed, and the optimal exchange matching results can be obtained by solving the optimization model. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the practicality of the proposed method. The method can be used to improve the operational performance of intelligent exchange platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abualigah LM, Khader AT, Hanandeh ES (2018) Hybrid clustering analysis using improved krill herd algorithm. Appl Intell 48:4047–4071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaei S, Jain K, Malekian A (2016) Competitive equilibria in two-sided matching markets with general utility functions. Oper Res 64(3):638–645

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson T, Svensson L-G (2016) Strategy-proof house allocation with price restrictions. J Econ Theory 163:167–177

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo EM (2014) Imperfect competition in two-sided matching markets. Games Econ Behav 83:207–223

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A (2000) Acceptance of E-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A 30:411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Hu M (2020) Pricing and Matching with Forward-Looking Buyers and Sellers. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 22(4):717–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Li ZW, Fan Z-P, Zhou XY, Zhang X (2016) Matching demanders and suppliers in knowledge service: a method based on fuzzy axiomatic design. Inf Sci 346:130–145

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Wang J, Liang H, Han J (2019) Hesitant multi-attribute two-sided matching: a perspective based on prospect theory. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(6):6343–6358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Z-P, Li M-Y, Zhang X (2018) Satisfied two-sided matching: a method considering elation and disappointment of agents. Soft Comput 22:7227–7241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale D, Shapley L (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 69:9–15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Genesove D, Mayer C (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market. Q J Econ 116:1233–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He XD, Zhou XY (2011) Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: an analytical treatment. Manag Sci 57:315–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:73–87

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang ZZ, Ip WH, Lau HCW, Fan Z-P (2011) Multi-objective optimization matching for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges with quantity discounts in E-brokerage. Expert Syst Appl 38:4169–4180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang ZZ, Zhang RY, Fan Z-P, Chen XH (2015) A fuzzy matching model with Hurwicz criteria for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges in E-brokerage. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 14:77–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang ZZ, Fan Z-P, Ip WH, Chen XH (2016) Fuzzy multi-objective modeling and optimization for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges with indivisible demand. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 24:708–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y-P, Fan Z-P, Liang H-M, Sun M (2018) An optimization approach for existing home seller-buyer matching. J Oper Res Soc 70(2):237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung JJ, Jo GS (2000) Brokerage between buyer and seller agents using constraint satisfaction problem models. Decis Support Syst 28(4):293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (2013). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I. pp 99–127

  • Klaus B, Klijn F (2016) Median stable matching for college admissions. Int J Games Theory 34:1–11

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lau HCW, Jiang ZZ, Ip WH, Wang DW (2010) A credibility-based fuzzy location model with Huriwicz criteria for the design of distribution systems in B2C e-commerce. Comput Ind Eng 59:873–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Zhang Y-X, Xu Z (2019) The aviation technology two-sided matching with the expected time based on the probabilistic linguistic preference relations. J Oper Res Soc China 8(1):45–77

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Merlo A, Ortalo-Magne F, Rust J (2015) The home selling problem: theory and evidence. Int Econ Rev 56(2):457–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao Y, Du R, Li J, Westland JC (2019) A two-sided matching model in the context of B2B export cross-border e-commerce. Electron Commer Res 19(4):841–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muylle S, Basu A (2008) Online support for business processes by electronic intermediaries. Decis Support Syst 45:845–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais J (2018) Random matching in the college admissions problem. Econ Theory 35:99–116

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Parguel B, Lunardo R, Benoit-Moreau F (2017) Sustainability of the sharing economy in question: when second-hand peer-to-peer platforms stimulate indulgent consumption. Technol Forecast Soc Change 125:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE (1985) Common and conflicting interests in two-sided matching markets. Eur Econ Rev 27:75–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim KM, Chan R (2000) A brokering protocol for agent-based e-commerce. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 30:474–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan C, Ip WH, Chen X (2014) Stochastic multiple criteria decision making with aspiration level based on prospect stochastic dominance. Knowl Based Syst 70:231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5:297–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Xu L, Zameer H, Solangi YA (2010) Modeling two-sided matching considering agents’ psychological behavior based on regret theory. SAGE Open 10(2):21582440209

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Zhang ZX, Wang YM (2015) A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making. Expert Syst Appl 42:9379–9388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Suo J, Ma J, Yu J (2018) Sharing economy: China's opportunities, challenges and suggestions on governance. In: 2018 International conference on social science and education reform (ICSSER 2018). Atlantis Press

  • Xu Z (2012) Linguistic decision making: theory and methods. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yu DJ, Xu Z (2020) Intuitionistic fuzzy two-sided matching model and its application to personnel-position matching problems. J Oper Res Soc 71(2):312–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Q, Zhang L (2020) Two-sided matching for hesitant fuzzy numbers in smart intelligent technique transfer. Mech Syst Signal Process 139:106643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Kou X, Palomares I, Yu W, Gao J (2019) Stable two-sided matching decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations: a disappointment theory based approach. Appl Soft Comput 84(11):105730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R, Jin M, Ren P, Zhang Q (2020) Stable two-sided satisfied matching for ridesharing system based on preference orders. J Supercomput 76(2):1063–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ (1978) Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):45–55

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Project No. 72031002), the 111 Project (Project No. B16009), the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (Project No. 19YJA630037) and Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (Project No. LQN201922).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-Ping Fan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This work does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Proof of Theorem 1

Let \(f_{1} (p_{ij}^{{}} ) = (e_{i1} - p_{ij} )^{\alpha } + (p_{ij} - \overline{e}_{j} )^{\alpha }\) be the function about the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij}\), \(\overline{e}_{j} \le p_{ij} \le e_{i1}\), the first derivative function \(f_{1} ^{\prime}\) can be shown as

$$ f_{1}^{\prime } \left( {p_{ij} } \right) = - \alpha \left( {e_{i1} - p_{ij} } \right)^{\alpha - 1} + \alpha \left( {p_{ij} - \overline{e}_{j} } \right)^{\alpha - 1} $$

Let \(f_{1} ^{\prime}(p_{ij} ) = 0\), we have \(p_{ij} = \frac{{e_{i1} + \overline{e}_{j} }}{2}\). The second derivative function \(f_{1} ^{\prime\prime}\) satisfies

$$ f_{1}^{\prime \prime } \left( {p_{ij} } \right) = \alpha (\alpha - 1)\left( {e_{i1} - p_{ij} } \right)^{\alpha - 2} + \alpha (\alpha - 1)\left( {p_{ij} - \overline{e}_{j} } \right)^{\alpha - 2} < 0 $$

Thus, if \(\overline{e}_{j} \le p_{ij} \le e_{i1}\), the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij} = \frac{{e_{i1} + \overline{e}_{j} }}{2}\) maximizes the agents' PVs.

Proof of Theorem 2

Let \(f_{2} (p_{ij}^{{}} ) = (e_{i1} - p_{ij} )^{\alpha } - \lambda (\overline{e}_{j} - p_{ij} )^{\beta }\) be the function about the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij}\), \(p_{ij} < e_{i1}\). The first derivation function \(f_{2} ^{\prime}\) satisfies.

\(f_{2}^{\prime } \left( {p_{ij} } \right) = - \alpha \left( {e_{i1} - p_{ij} } \right)^{\alpha - 1} + \lambda \beta \left( {\overline{e}_{j} - p_{ij} } \right)^{\beta - 1} > 0.\)

Thus, the maximum PV \(Z_{ij}^{(1)}\) can be obtained if \(p_{ij} = e_{i1}\).

Proof of Theorem 3

Let \(f_{3} (p_{ij}^{{}} ) = - \lambda (p_{ij} - e_{i1} )^{\beta } - \lambda (\overline{e}_{j} - p_{ij} )^{\beta }\) be the function about the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij}\), \(e_{i1} < p_{ij} < \overline{e}_{j}\), \(\overline{a}_{j} \le p_{ij} \le a_{i1}\). The first derivative function \(f_{3} ^{\prime}\) is:

$$ f_{3}^{\prime } \left( {p_{ij} } \right) = - \lambda \beta \left( {p_{ij} - e_{i1} } \right)^{\beta - 1} + \lambda \beta \left( {\overline{e}_{j} - p_{ij} } \right)^{\beta - 1} $$

Let \(f_{3} ^{\prime}(p_{ij} ) = 0\), we have \(p_{ij} = \frac{{e_{i1} + \overline{e}_{j} }}{2}\). The second derivative function \(f_{3} ^{\prime\prime}\) satisfies

$$ f_{3}^{\prime \prime } \left( {p_{ij} } \right) = - \lambda \beta (\beta - 1)\left( {p_{ij} - e_{i1} } \right)^{\beta - 2} - \lambda \beta (\beta - 1)\left( {\overline{e}_{j} - p_{ij} } \right)^{\beta - 2} < 0 $$

Thus, if \(e_{i1} < p_{ij} < \overline{e}_{j}\), the price \(p_{ij} = \frac{{e_{i1} + \overline{e}_{j} }}{2}\) maximizes the agents' PVs.

Proof of Theorem 4

Let \(f_{4} (p_{ij}^{{}} ) = - \lambda (p_{ij} - e_{i1} )^{\beta } + (p_{ij} - \overline{e}_{j} )^{\alpha }\) be the function about the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij}^{{}}\), \(p_{ij} \ge \overline{e}_{j}\). The first derivation \(f_{4} ^{\prime}\) satisfies

$$ f_{4}^{\prime } \left( {p_{ij} } \right) = - \lambda \beta \left( {p_{ij} - e_{i1} } \right)^{\beta - 1} + \alpha \left( {p_{ij} - \overline{e}_{j} } \right)^{\alpha - 1} < 0 $$

Thus, the maximum PV \(Z_{ij}^{(3)}\) can be obtained if \(p_{ij} = \overline{e}_{j}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, MY., Fan, ZP., Li, B. et al. A matching method for second-hand goods exchange considering loss aversion of buyer and seller in e-brokerage. Soft Comput 25, 7041–7057 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05652-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05652-1

Keywords

Navigation