Abstract
The second-hand goods exchange matching problem with intelligent exchange platform is a valuable research topic, while research in the related field is relatively lacking. Thus, the goal of this paper is to develop a two-sided matching method for the second-hand goods exchange matching. In the method, not only the characteristic of loss aversion of buyers/sellers and the benefit of e-brokerage are considered, but also the suggested exchange prices that meet the requirements of buyers and sellers are determined. Specifically, the description of second-hand goods exchange matching problem is firstly presented, in which the 2-tuple including the ideal level and the lowest acceptable level is used to quantify the expected demands of buyers and sellers for attributes. Then, several models maximizing the perceived values of buyers and sellers are derived to determine the suggested exchange price of goods. Next, according to the expectation information of buyers and sellers, and the real information of goods, the perceived value matrix for each attribute of buyers and sellers can be obtained by using the prospect theory. Furthermore, a model can be constructed and solved to determine the maximum number of exchange of buyers and sellers in e-brokerage, and an optimization model with the constraint of the exchange number threshold is constructed, and the optimal exchange matching results can be obtained by solving the optimization model. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the practicality of the proposed method. The method can be used to improve the operational performance of intelligent exchange platforms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abualigah LM, Khader AT, Hanandeh ES (2018) Hybrid clustering analysis using improved krill herd algorithm. Appl Intell 48:4047–4071
Alaei S, Jain K, Malekian A (2016) Competitive equilibria in two-sided matching markets with general utility functions. Oper Res 64(3):638–645
Andersson T, Svensson L-G (2016) Strategy-proof house allocation with price restrictions. J Econ Theory 163:167–177
Azevedo EM (2014) Imperfect competition in two-sided matching markets. Games Econ Behav 83:207–223
Bhattacherjee A (2000) Acceptance of E-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A 30:411–420
Chen Y, Hu M (2020) Pricing and Matching with Forward-Looking Buyers and Sellers. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 22(4):717–734
Chen X, Li ZW, Fan Z-P, Zhou XY, Zhang X (2016) Matching demanders and suppliers in knowledge service: a method based on fuzzy axiomatic design. Inf Sci 346:130–145
Chen X, Wang J, Liang H, Han J (2019) Hesitant multi-attribute two-sided matching: a perspective based on prospect theory. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(6):6343–6358
Fan Z-P, Li M-Y, Zhang X (2018) Satisfied two-sided matching: a method considering elation and disappointment of agents. Soft Comput 22:7227–7241
Gale D, Shapley L (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 69:9–15
Genesove D, Mayer C (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market. Q J Econ 116:1233–1260
He XD, Zhou XY (2011) Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: an analytical treatment. Manag Sci 57:315–331
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:73–87
Jiang ZZ, Ip WH, Lau HCW, Fan Z-P (2011) Multi-objective optimization matching for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges with quantity discounts in E-brokerage. Expert Syst Appl 38:4169–4180
Jiang ZZ, Zhang RY, Fan Z-P, Chen XH (2015) A fuzzy matching model with Hurwicz criteria for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges in E-brokerage. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 14:77–97
Jiang ZZ, Fan Z-P, Ip WH, Chen XH (2016) Fuzzy multi-objective modeling and optimization for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges with indivisible demand. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 24:708–723
Jiang Y-P, Fan Z-P, Liang H-M, Sun M (2018) An optimization approach for existing home seller-buyer matching. J Oper Res Soc 70(2):237–254
Jung JJ, Jo GS (2000) Brokerage between buyer and seller agents using constraint satisfaction problem models. Decis Support Syst 28(4):293–304
Kahneman D, Tversky A (2013). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I. pp 99–127
Klaus B, Klijn F (2016) Median stable matching for college admissions. Int J Games Theory 34:1–11
Lau HCW, Jiang ZZ, Ip WH, Wang DW (2010) A credibility-based fuzzy location model with Huriwicz criteria for the design of distribution systems in B2C e-commerce. Comput Ind Eng 59:873–886
Li B, Zhang Y-X, Xu Z (2019) The aviation technology two-sided matching with the expected time based on the probabilistic linguistic preference relations. J Oper Res Soc China 8(1):45–77
Merlo A, Ortalo-Magne F, Rust J (2015) The home selling problem: theory and evidence. Int Econ Rev 56(2):457–484
Miao Y, Du R, Li J, Westland JC (2019) A two-sided matching model in the context of B2B export cross-border e-commerce. Electron Commer Res 19(4):841–861
Muylle S, Basu A (2008) Online support for business processes by electronic intermediaries. Decis Support Syst 45:845–857
Pais J (2018) Random matching in the college admissions problem. Econ Theory 35:99–116
Parguel B, Lunardo R, Benoit-Moreau F (2017) Sustainability of the sharing economy in question: when second-hand peer-to-peer platforms stimulate indulgent consumption. Technol Forecast Soc Change 125:48–57
Roth AE (1985) Common and conflicting interests in two-sided matching markets. Eur Econ Rev 27:75–98
Sim KM, Chan R (2000) A brokering protocol for agent-based e-commerce. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 30:474–484
Tan C, Ip WH, Chen X (2014) Stochastic multiple criteria decision making with aspiration level based on prospect stochastic dominance. Knowl Based Syst 70:231–241
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5:297–323
Wang R, Xu L, Zameer H, Solangi YA (2010) Modeling two-sided matching considering agents’ psychological behavior based on regret theory. SAGE Open 10(2):21582440209
Wang L, Zhang ZX, Wang YM (2015) A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making. Expert Syst Appl 42:9379–9388
Wang S, Suo J, Ma J, Yu J (2018) Sharing economy: China's opportunities, challenges and suggestions on governance. In: 2018 International conference on social science and education reform (ICSSER 2018). Atlantis Press
Xu Z (2012) Linguistic decision making: theory and methods. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Yu DJ, Xu Z (2020) Intuitionistic fuzzy two-sided matching model and its application to personnel-position matching problems. J Oper Res Soc 71(2):312–321
Yue Q, Zhang L (2020) Two-sided matching for hesitant fuzzy numbers in smart intelligent technique transfer. Mech Syst Signal Process 139:106643
Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17:46–55
Zhang Z, Kou X, Palomares I, Yu W, Gao J (2019) Stable two-sided matching decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations: a disappointment theory based approach. Appl Soft Comput 84(11):105730
Zhao R, Jin M, Ren P, Zhang Q (2020) Stable two-sided satisfied matching for ridesharing system based on preference orders. J Supercomput 76(2):1063–1081
Zimmermann HJ (1978) Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):45–55
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Project No. 72031002), the 111 Project (Project No. B16009), the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (Project No. 19YJA630037) and Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (Project No. LQN201922).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that they has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This work does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Theorem 1
Let \(f_{1} (p_{ij}^{{}} ) = (e_{i1} - p_{ij} )^{\alpha } + (p_{ij} - \overline{e}_{j} )^{\alpha }\) be the function about the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij}\), \(\overline{e}_{j} \le p_{ij} \le e_{i1}\), the first derivative function \(f_{1} ^{\prime}\) can be shown as
Let \(f_{1} ^{\prime}(p_{ij} ) = 0\), we have \(p_{ij} = \frac{{e_{i1} + \overline{e}_{j} }}{2}\). The second derivative function \(f_{1} ^{\prime\prime}\) satisfies
Thus, if \(\overline{e}_{j} \le p_{ij} \le e_{i1}\), the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij} = \frac{{e_{i1} + \overline{e}_{j} }}{2}\) maximizes the agents' PVs.
Proof of Theorem 2
Let \(f_{2} (p_{ij}^{{}} ) = (e_{i1} - p_{ij} )^{\alpha } - \lambda (\overline{e}_{j} - p_{ij} )^{\beta }\) be the function about the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij}\), \(p_{ij} < e_{i1}\). The first derivation function \(f_{2} ^{\prime}\) satisfies.
\(f_{2}^{\prime } \left( {p_{ij} } \right) = - \alpha \left( {e_{i1} - p_{ij} } \right)^{\alpha - 1} + \lambda \beta \left( {\overline{e}_{j} - p_{ij} } \right)^{\beta - 1} > 0.\)
Thus, the maximum PV \(Z_{ij}^{(1)}\) can be obtained if \(p_{ij} = e_{i1}\).
Proof of Theorem 3
Let \(f_{3} (p_{ij}^{{}} ) = - \lambda (p_{ij} - e_{i1} )^{\beta } - \lambda (\overline{e}_{j} - p_{ij} )^{\beta }\) be the function about the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij}\), \(e_{i1} < p_{ij} < \overline{e}_{j}\), \(\overline{a}_{j} \le p_{ij} \le a_{i1}\). The first derivative function \(f_{3} ^{\prime}\) is:
Let \(f_{3} ^{\prime}(p_{ij} ) = 0\), we have \(p_{ij} = \frac{{e_{i1} + \overline{e}_{j} }}{2}\). The second derivative function \(f_{3} ^{\prime\prime}\) satisfies
Thus, if \(e_{i1} < p_{ij} < \overline{e}_{j}\), the price \(p_{ij} = \frac{{e_{i1} + \overline{e}_{j} }}{2}\) maximizes the agents' PVs.
Proof of Theorem 4
Let \(f_{4} (p_{ij}^{{}} ) = - \lambda (p_{ij} - e_{i1} )^{\beta } + (p_{ij} - \overline{e}_{j} )^{\alpha }\) be the function about the suggested exchange price \(p_{ij}^{{}}\), \(p_{ij} \ge \overline{e}_{j}\). The first derivation \(f_{4} ^{\prime}\) satisfies
Thus, the maximum PV \(Z_{ij}^{(3)}\) can be obtained if \(p_{ij} = \overline{e}_{j}\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, MY., Fan, ZP., Li, B. et al. A matching method for second-hand goods exchange considering loss aversion of buyer and seller in e-brokerage. Soft Comput 25, 7041–7057 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05652-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05652-1