Abstract
Mathematics self-schemas are students’ cognitive generalisations of their selves in learning mathematics (Ng in Educational Psychology, 34(6), 730–762, 2014). These salient subject-based self-conceptions are conceptualised as a cognitive frame guiding students’ coping responses when dealing with challenging mathematics tasks. In study 1, 271 Year 9 Australian students were classified into positive, average, and negative schematics based on their responses to a survey questionnaire. It was found that compared to the other two schematic groups, positive schematics were more motivated, used adaptive coping strategies to deal with difficult mathematical tasks, and were less likely to avoid challenging tasks. In study 2, positive and negative schematics’ performance in a difficult mathematics test was compared. These two groups of schematic participants (n = 74) were drawn from study 1. Prior to taking the test, compared to negative schematics, positive schematics had higher performance targets and held stronger intention to complete the test with goals focusing on learning and performance. During the free-choice session, more positive schematics than their negative counterparts attempted an additional set of test questions. On receiving negative feedback about their test performance, significantly more positive schematics considered the test inaccurate and were willing to retake the test. Positive schematics, as expected, performed significantly better than did their negative counterparts in the test. Convergent findings derived from these two studies showed that positive and negative schematic students coped with challenging mathematics in a self-congruent manner.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260.
Banting, L. K., Dimmock, J. A., & Lay, B. S. (2009). The role of implicit and explicit components of exerciser self-schema in the prediction of exercise behaviour. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 80–86.
Bettinger, E., Ludvigsen, S., Rege, M., Solli, I. F., & Yeager, D. (2018). Increasing perseverance in math: Evidence from a field experiment in Norway. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 146, 1–15.
Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Kaplan, A. (2015). Growth curve modeling analysis of social and academic coping during elementary school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 41, 99–109.
Berkman, E. T., Livingston, J. L., & Kahn, L. E. (2017). Finding the “self” in self-regulation: The identity-value model. Psychological Inquiry, 28(2–3), 77–98.
Brdar, I., Rijavec, M., & Loncaric, D. (2006). Goal orientations, coping with school failure and school achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(1), 53–70.
Brouwer, A. M. (2020). The self-as-doer identity and physical activity: The mediating effect of self-efficacy for managing physical activity barriers. Identity, 20(1), 22–36.
Cash, T. F., & Labarge, A. S. (1996). Development of the Appearance Schemas Inventory: A new cognitive body-image assessment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 37–50.
Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (1994). Self-schemas, possible selves, and competent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 423.
Darragh, L. (2016). Identity research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(1), 19–33.
Eccles, J. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational psychologist, 44(2), 78–89.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.
Froiland, J. M., & Davison, M. L. (2016). The longitudinal influences of peers, parents, motivation, and mathematics course-taking on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 252–259.
Friedel, J. M., Cortina, K. S., Turner, J. C., & Midgley, C. (2007). Achievement goals, efficacy beliefs and coping strategies in mathematics: The roles of perceived parent and teacher goal emphases. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 434–458.
Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Every unsuccessful problem solver is unsuccessful in his or her own way: Affective and cognitive factors in proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 71–90.
Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D. H. Schunk & B. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 127–153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Graven, M., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2019). Mathematics identity research: The state of the art and future directions. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 51, 361–377.
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J., & Yeung, A. S. (2015). Expectancy-value in mathematics, gender and socioeconomic background as predictors of achievement and aspirations: A multi-cohort study. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 161–168.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hannula, M. S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 165–178.
Karsenty, R. (2004). Mathematical self-schema: A framework for analyzing adults’ retrospection on high school mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(3), 325–349.
Kendzierski, D., Ritter, R. L., Stump, T. K., & Anglin, C. L. (2015). The effectiveness of an implementation intentions intervention for fruit and vegetable consumption as moderated by self-schema status. Appetite, 95, 228–238.
Kihlstrom, J. F., & Klein, S. B. (1994). The self as a knowledge structure. In R. Wyer & T. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition (pp. 153–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lazarides, R., Dietrich, J., & Taskinen, P. H. (2019). Stability and change in students’ motivational profiles in mathematics classrooms: The role of perceived teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 164–175.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
Lee, C.-K., Corte, C., & Stein, K. F. (2018). Relationships between early alcohol experiences, drinker self-schema, and drinking and smoking in college students. Substance Abuse, 39(4), 426–433.
León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156–163.
Lips, H. M. (1995). Through the lens of mathematical/scientific self-schemas: Images of students’ current and possible selves 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(19), 1671–1699.
Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 35(2), 63.
Markus, H. (1983). Self‐knowledge: An expanded view. Journal of Personality, 51(3), 543–565.
Markus, H. & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–1969.
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. K. (2019). The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy: Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 331–353.
Martinot, D., & Monteil, J.-M. (1995). The academic self-schema: An experimental illustration. Learning and Instruction, 5(1), 63–76.
McGee, E. O. (2015). Robust and fragile mathematical identities: A framework for exploring racialized experiences and high achievement among black college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 599–625.
Ng, C. (2005). Academic self-schemas and their self-congruent learning patterns: Findings verified with culturally different samples. Social Psychology of Education, 8(3), 303–328.
Ng, C. (2014). Examining the self-congruent engagement hypothesis: The link between academic self-schemas, motivational goals, learning approaches and achievement within an academic year. Educational Psychology, 34(6), 730–762.
Ng, C. (2018). High school students’ motivation to learn mathematics: The role of multiple goals. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 357–375.
Oyserman, D., Kemmelmeier, M., Fryberg, S., Brosh, H., & Hart-Johnson, T. (2003). Racial-ethnic self-schemas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(4), 333–347.
Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. N. (2015). Students’ motivation in the mathematics classroom. Revealing causes and consequences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 385–411.
Putwain, D. W., Daly, A. L., Chamberlain, S., & Sadreddini, S. (2015). Academically buoyant students are less anxious about and perform better in high-stakes examinations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 247–263.
Raftery-Helmer, J. N., & Grolnick, W. S. (2016). Children’s coping with academic failure: Relations with contextual and motivational resources supporting competence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(8), 1017–1041.
Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Theoretical considerations and empirical contributions. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 49(3), 307–322.
Seegers, G., Van Putten, C. M., & de Brabander, C. J. (2002). Goal orientation, perceived task outcome and task demands in mathematics tasks: Effects on students’ attitude in actual task settings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 365–384.
Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2015). Students' intentions to study non‐compulsory mathematics: The importance of how good you think you are. British Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 462–488.
Sigre-Leirós, V., Carvalho, J., & Nobre, P. (2016). Preliminary findings on men’s sexual self-schema and sexual offending: Differences between subtypes of offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 204–213.
Skaalvik, E. M. (2018). Mathematics anxiety and coping strategies among middle school students: Relations with students’ achievement goal orientations and level of performance. Social Psychology of Education, 21(3), 709–723.
Skaalvik, E. M., Federici, R. A., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Mathematics achievement and self-efficacy: Relations with motivation for mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 129–136.
Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J. R., & Steele, J. S. (2016). Can student engagement serve as a motivational resource for academic coping, persistence, and learning during late elementary and early middle school? Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 2099.
Skinner, E. A., & Saxton, E. A. (2019). The development of academic coping in children and youth: A comprehensive review and critique. Developmental Review, 53, 100870.
Tainio, L., & Laine, A. (2015). Emotion work and affective stance in the mathematics classroom: The case of IRE sequences in Finnish classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 67–87.
Warner, L. B., & Schorr, R. Y. (2019). Engagement structures and the development of mathematical ideas. In S. S. Chamberlin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Affect in mathematical modeling (pp. 67–85). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Wilkie, K. J., & Sullivan, P. (2018). Exploring intrinsic and extrinsic motivational aspects of middle school students’ aspirations for their mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 235–254.
Urdan, T., Ryan, A. M., Anderman, E. M., & Gheen, M. H. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and avoidance behaviors. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 55–83). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Voutsina, C., George, L., & Jones, K. (2019). Microgenetic analysis of young children’s shifts of attention in arithmetic tasks: Underlying dynamics of change in phases of seemingly stable task performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 47–74.
Funding
The completion of this paper was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (DP140101431)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ng, C. Self-schematic students in mathematics and their contrasting coping responses to mathematical challenges: a cluster analytic investigation. Educ Stud Math 107, 315–338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10031-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10031-6