Skip to main content
Log in

Large eddy simulation of two-phase reacting turbulent flow in a pilot-scale pulverized coal combustion furnace with flamelet model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-dimensional numerical simulation was performed to investigate the physics and combustion characteristics of a two-phase reacting turbulent flow in a pilot-scale pulverized coal combustion furnace. This included an elementary reaction mechanism using an extended flamelet/progress variable (EFPV) method. The simulation was validated via comparison with an experiment in terms of the gaseous temperature and distribution of the gas mole fraction. The EFPV method predicted the flame structure and combustion characteristics of the pulverized coal. In the main reaction zone where the released gas combustion was dominant, two separate combustion regions were observed, and they were attributed to hydrocarbons and CO combustion. Gas flow characteristics such as mixing of low temperature gas and hot burnt gas were well described in the inner recirculation zone. The CO2 conversion reaction to CO occurred slowly and decreased the gaseous temperature beyond the main reaction zone in the low and zero oxygen environments. The simulation predicted the unburned CO combustion correctly beyond the flame when staged air was injected; however, the combustion rate was overestimated due to the fundamental assumption of the EFPV method, attributable to the limitations of the steady state flamelet approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD, OECD Factbook 2015–2016: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics, OECD Publishing, Paris (2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Kurose and H. Makino, Large eddy simulation of a solid-fuel jet flame, Combustion and Flame, 135 (1–2) (2003) 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Watanabe, K. Tanno, Y. Baba, R. Kurose and S. Komori, Large-eddy simulation of coal combustion in a pulverized coal combustion furnace with a complex burner, Proc. of the 6th International Symposium on Turbulence Heat and Mass Transfer, Rome, Italy (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Warzecha and A. Boguslawski, LES and RANS modeling of pulverized coal combustion in swirl burner for air and oxycombustion technologies, Energy, 66 (2014) 732–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O. Stein, G. Olenik, A. Kronenburg, F. C. Marincola, B. Franchetti, A. Kempf, M. Ghiani, M. Vascellari and C. Hasse, Towards comprehensive coal combustion modelling for LES, Flow, Turbul. Combust., 90 (4) (2013) 859–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Hashimoto, R. Kurose and H. Shirai, Numerical simulation of pulverized coal jet flame employing the TDP model, Fuel, 97 (2012) 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Hashimoto and H. Shirai, Numerical simulation of subbituminous coal and bituminous coal mixed combustion employing tabulated-devolatilization-process model, Energy, 71 (2014) 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Đugum and K. Hanjalić, Numerical simulation of coal-air mixture flow in a real double-swirl burner and implications on combustion anomalies in a utility boiler, Energy, 170 (2019) 942–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Ahn, H. Watanabe and T. Kitagawa, Numerical investigation on the detailed structure of a coaxial coal jet flame using largeeddy simulation with elementary reactions, Energy Fuels, 33 (5) (2019) 4621–4631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Watanabe and K. Yamamoto, Flamelet model for pulverized coal combustion, Proc. Combust. Inst., 35 (2) (2015) 2315–2322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Watanabe, T. Okazaki, K. Yamamoto, K. Kuramashi and A. Baba, Large eddy simulation of pulverized coal combustion using flamelet model, Proc. Combust. Inst., 36 (2) (2017) 2155–2163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Kurose, H. Makino and A. Suzuki, Numerical analysis of pulverized coal combustion characteristics using advanced low-nox burner, Fuel, 83 (6) (2004) 693–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Crowe, M. Sharma and D. Stock, The particle-source-in cell (psi-cell) model for gas-droplet flows, J. Fluid Eng., 99 (2) (1977) 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Watanabe, D. Uesugi and M. Muto, Effects of parcel modeling on particle dispersion and interphase transfers in a turbulent mixing layer, Adv. Powder Technol., 26 (6) (2015) 1719–1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Truelove, Discrete-ordinate solutions of the radiation transport equation, J. Heat Transf., 109 (4) (1987) 1048–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Fiveland, Three-dimensional radiative heat-transfer solutions by the discrete-ordinates method, J. Thermophys, Heat Transfer, 2 (4) (1988) 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Ahn, K. Tanno and H. Watanabe, Numerical analysis of particle dispersion and combustion characteristics on a piloted coaxial pulverized coal jet flame, Appl. Therm. Eng., 124 (2017) 1194–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Niksa, L. Heyd, W. Russel and D. Saville, On the role of heating rate in rapid coal devolatilization, Symp. (Int.) Combust., 20 (1985) 1445–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. P. Smith, D. M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N. W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C. T. Bowman, R. K. Hanson, S. Song, W. C. Gardiner Jr., V. V. Lissianski and Z. Qin, GRIMech 3.0, http://combustion.berkeley.edu/gri-mech (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Pitsch, Flamemaster: A C++ Computer Program for 0D Combustion and 1D Laminar Flame Calculations, CEFRC Combustion Summer School, Federal University of Technology, Owerri (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. D. Pierce and P. Moin, A dynamic model for subgrid-scale variance and dissipation rate of a conserved scalar, Phys. Fluids., 10 (12) (1998) 3041–3044.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. M. A. Field, Rate of combustion of size-graded fractions of char from a low-rank coal between 1200 K and 2000 K, Combust. & Flame, 13 (3) (1969) 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Ahn, K. Tainaka, H. Watanabe and T. Kitagawa, Experimental and numerical analysis of turbulent pulverized coal flame in a coaxial burner, Energy, 179 (2019) 727–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Ahn, H. Watanabe and T. Kitagawa, Effect of devolatilization model on flame structure of pulverized coal combustion in a jet-burner system, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 33 (4) (2019) 1973–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Zhang, K. Tainaka, S. Ahn, H. Watanabe and T. Kitagawa, Experimental and numerical investigation of effects of particle shape and size distribution on particles’ dispersion in a coaxial jet flow, Adv. Powder Technol., 29 (10) (2018) 2322–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Watanabe, S. Ahn and K. Tanno, Numerical investigation of effects of CO2 recirculation in an oxy-fuel IGCC on gasification characteristics of a two-stage entrained flow coal gasifier, Energy, 118 (2017) 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Kleissl, V. Kumar, C. Meneveau and M. B. Parlange, Numerical study of dynamic Smagorinsky models in large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: validation in stable and unstable conditions, Water Resour. Res., 42 (6) (2006) 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. V. Alekseenko, V. M. Dulin, Y. S. Kozorezov, D. M. Markovich, S. I. Shtork and M. P. dTokarev, Flow structure of swirling turbulent propane flames, Flow Turbul. Combust., 87 (4) (2011) 569–595.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. J. O’Connor and T. Lieuwen, Recirculation zone dynamics of a transversely excited swirl flow and flame, Phys. Fluids, 24 (7) (2012) 2893–2900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Stöhr, I. Boxx, C. D. Carter and W. Meier, Experimental study of vortex-flame interaction in a gas turbine model combustor, Combust. Flame, 159 (8) (2012) 2636–2649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. C. D. Pierce and P. Moin, Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion, J. Fluid Mech., 504 (2004) 73–97.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan) as a “Priority issue on Post-K computer” (Accelerated Development of Innovative Clean Energy Systems), Project ID: hp160220, hp170273, hp180203, and hp190166.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seongyool Ahn.

Additional information

Seongyool Ahn received a Ph.D. in 2013 from Pusan National University, Korea. He is a Research Professor at Pusan National University. His research interests include numerical simulation of multiphase turbulent combustion and recent energy system.

Panlong Yu received a Ph.D. in 2019 from Kyushu University, Japan. He is an Assistant Researcher at Department of Advanced Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyushu University from 2020. His research interests include modeling and simulation of turbulent combustion.

Hiroaki Watanabe received a Ph.D. in 2008 from Kyoto University, Japan. He is a Professor at Department of Advanced Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyushu University from 2019. His research interests include modeling and simulation of multiphase turbulent combustion.

Ryoichi Kurose received a Ph.D. in 1998 from Kyushu University, Japan. He is a Professor of Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Kyoto University. His research interests include turbulent combustion and multiphase flows.

Kenji Tanno received a Ph.D. in 2007 from Kyoto University, Japan. He is a Research Scientist at Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry. His research interests include numerical simulation and laser diagnostics of multiphase turbulent combustion.

Toshiaki Kitagawa received a Doctor of Engineering in 1989 from Kyushu University, Japan. He is a Professor, Reactive Gas Dynamics Lab, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Kyushu University. His research interests include laminar and turbulent flame properties and combustion in engines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahn, S., Yu, P., Watanabe, H. et al. Large eddy simulation of two-phase reacting turbulent flow in a pilot-scale pulverized coal combustion furnace with flamelet model. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 2209–2218 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0437-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0437-z

Keywords

Navigation