Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decoupling and decomposition analysis of environmental impact from economic growth: a comparative analysis of Pakistan, India, and China

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dispute between economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions is one of the major challenges of the twenty-first century. The central issue of the emerging economies revolves around the decoupling of economic growth and the rising carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. This study examines the decoupling the CO2 emissions from the economic growth through the employment of the Tapio decoupling index and decomposition of CO2 emissions into its pre-determined factors through the Log Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition technique for Pakistan, India, and China (PIC) for a time span of 1990–2014. The findings of the Tapio elasticity analysis depict that in a few years, environmental impact has been seen to be decoupled from the economic growth in the respective PIC countries. However, relatively Pakistan experienced expensive negative decoupling; India mostly experienced weak decoupling and expensive coupling, while China exhibited weak decoupling in multiple years. In addition, the analysis of Tapio decoupling elasticity showed that energy intensity is the key factor supporting the decoupling in PIC countries, while population, affluence (GDP per capita) and energy structure have weakened the progress of decoupling. Furthermore, the analysis of the LMDI decomposition suggested that population, energy structure and affluence in PIC countries increase the CO2 emissions, while energy intensity reduces CO2 emissions, while mixed effects are reflected by carbon intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC 2014)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Source of Data: World Bank, (2019)

Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam S (2010) Globalization, poverty, and environmental degradation: sustainable development in Pakistan. J Sustain Dev 3(3):103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali HS, Law SH, Zannah TI (2016) Dynamic impact of urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and trade openness on CO2 emissions in Nigeria. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:12435–12443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW (2004) Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: Which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32(9):1131–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW (2005) The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide. Energy Policy 33(7):867–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW, Choi KH (1997) Decomposition of aggregate energy and gas emission intensities for industry: a refined Divisia index method. Energy J 59–73

  • Aziz R, Ahmad MB (2015) Pakistan’s power crisis. Special report, Washington DC, United States Institute of Peace

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghesi S, Vercelli A (2003) Sustainable globalisation. Ecol Econ 44(1):77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briefing US (2013) International energy outlook 2013. US Energy Information Administration

  • British Petroleum (2019) British petroleum statistical review of world energy. British Petroleum: London UK. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html

  • Chang CC (2010) A multivariate causality test of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China. Appl Energy 87(11):3533–3537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema MA, Farooq M, Ahmad R, Munir H (2006) Climatic trends in Faisalabad (Pakistan) over the last 60 years (1945–2004). J Agric Soc Stud 2(1):42–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Climent F, Pardo A (2007) Decoupling factors on the energy–output linkage: the Spanish case. Energy Policy 35(1):522–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas LC, Kaneko S (2011) Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil. Ecol Econ 70(8):1459–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton F (2002) Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: why does gender matter? Gend Dev 10(2):10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich P, Holdren J (1970) The people problem. Satur Rev 4(42):42–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan T, Luo R, Xia H, Li X (2015) Using LMDI method to analyze the influencing factors of carbon emissions in China’s petrochemical industries. Nat Hazards 75(2):319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guivarch C, Mathy S (2012) Energy-GDP decoupling in a second best world—a case study on India. Clim Change 113(2):339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta M, Singh S (2016) Factorizing the changes in co2 emissions from Indian road passenger transport: a decomposition analysis. Stud Bus Econ 11(3):67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamering S (2012) Global climate risk index. Germanwatch, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Mitigation of climate change. Synthesis report, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014, synthesis report. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessmentreport/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf

  • Jackson K (2018) Asian contagion: the causes and consequences of a financial crisis. Routledge, Taylor & Franci Group, London

  • Jayanthakumaran K, Verma R, Liu Y (2012) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: a comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy 42:450–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang JJ, Ye B, Zhou N, Zhang XL (2019) Decoupling analysis and environmental Kuznets curve modelling of provincial-level CO2 emissions and economic growth in China: a case study. J Clean Prod 212:1242–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinke L, Hualing S, Dianming G (2008) Causality relationship between coal consumption and GDP: difference of major OECD and non-OECD countries. Appl Energy 85(6):421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Vu KM (2011) The rise of developing Asia and the new economic order. Journal of Policy Modeling 33(5):698–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamalapur GD, Udaykumar RY (2011) Rural electrification in India and feasibility of photovoltaic solar home systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(3):594–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya Y (1990) Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. IPCC, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Khan SA (2011) Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Pakistan: a sectoral analysis

  • Khan S, Majeed MT (2019) Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions from economic growth: a case study of Pakistan. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 13(4):868–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Majeed MT (2020) Drivers of decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: empirical analysis of ASEAN countries using decoupling and decomposition model. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 14(2):450–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Khan JA, Ali Z, Ahmad I, Ahmad MN (2016) The challenge of climate change and policy response in Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci 75(5):412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Jamil F, Khan NH (2019) Decomposition analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan. SN Appl Sci 1(9):1012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le HP, Ozturk I (2020) The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:22680–22697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Ahmad I (2017) Analysis of energy related carbon dioxide emission and reduction potential in Pakistan. J Clean Prod 143:278–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Raza MY (2019) Analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in Pakistan. J Clean Prod 219:981–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z (2013) Electric power and energy in China. Wiley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LC, Fan Y, Wu G, Wei YM (2007) Using LMDI method to analyze the change of China’s industrial CO2 emissions from final fuel use: an empirical analysis. Energy Policy 35(11):5892–5900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lolaksha Nagaveni P, Anand A (2017) Climate change and its impact on India: a comment. NLUO Law J 4:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Long X, Wu C, Zhang J (2017) Decoupling CO2 emissions from economic growth in agricultural sector across 30 Chinese provinces from 1997 to 2014. J Clean Prod 159:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Ayub T (2018) Information and communication technology (ICT) and economic growth nexus: a comparative global analysis. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 12(2):443–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Luni T (2019) Renewable energy, water, and environmental degradation: a global panel data approach. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 13(3):749–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Khan S, Tahir T (2020) Analytical tool for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impact: an IPAT analysis of Pakistan. GeoJournal 1–13

  • Majra JP, Gur A (2009) Climate change and health: Why should India be concerned? Indian J Occup Environ Med 13(1):11–16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malik A (2012) Power crises in Pakistan: a crises in governance. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, 1–39. https://pide.org.pk/pdf/publications/Monograph/Monograph-4-Afia%20Malik.pdf

  • Maplecroft (2010a) Global risks portfolio and services. Maplecroft’s climate change risk Atlas.http://www.maplecroft.com/about/news/climate_change_risk_list_highlights_vulnerable_nations_and_safe_havens_05.html.

  • Maplecroft (2010b) Global risks portfolio and services. Water security risk index. https://www.maplecroft.com/about/news/water-security.html

  • Munir S, Khan A (2014) Impact of fossil fuel energy consumption on CO2 emissions: evidence from Pakistan (1980–2010). Pak Dev Rev 53(4):327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naminse EY, Zhuang J (2018) Economic growth, energy intensity, and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Pol J Environ Stud 27(5):2193–2201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002) Sustainable development: Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. OECD, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning C (2007) Pakistan in the 21st century: vision 2030. Government of Pakistan, Islamabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi T, Weng Y, Zhang X, He J (2016) An analysis of the driving factors of energy-related CO2 emission reduction in China from 2005 to 2013. Energy Econ 60:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidur R, Rahim NA, Hasanuzzaman M (2010) A review on compressed-air energy use and energy savings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(4):1135–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samir KC, Lutz W (2017) The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob Environ Chang 42:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Ozturk I (2020) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Kenya: a multivariate analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 117:109481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Mahalik MK, Shah SH, Sato JR (2016) Time-varying analysis of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth nexus: statistical experience in next 11 countries. Energy Policy 98:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique HMA, Majeed MT (2015) Energy consumption, economic growth, trade and financial development nexus in South Asia. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 9(2):658–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique HMA, Majeed MT, Ahmad HK (2016) The impact of urbanization and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in South Asia. South Asian Stud 31(2):745–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Siping J, Wendai L, Liu M, Xiangjun Y, Hongjuan Y, Yongming C, Haiyun C, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Ahmad B (2019) Decoupling environmental pressures from economic growth based on emissions monetization: Case in Yunnan, China. J Clean Prod 208:1563–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taha SM (2012) Political instability explains political economy of Pakistan: a retrospective analysis. Int J Econ Bus Manag Stud 1(2):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Z, Shang J, Shi C, Liu Z, Bi K (2014) Decoupling indicators of CO2 emissions from the tourism industry in China: 1990–2012. Ecol Ind 46:390–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapio P (2005) Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp Policy 12(2):137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban F (2009) Reducing carbon emissions: China’s position. Climate Change and Development Centre

  • Viswanathan KG (2010) The global financial crisis and its impact on India. J Int’l Bus L 9:41

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Li R (2016a) Journey to burning half of global coal: trajectory and drivers of China׳ s coal use. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Li R (2016b) Drivers for energy consumption: a comparative analysis of China and India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:954–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Chen J, Zou J (2005) Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission in China: 1957–2000. Energy 30(1):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WW, Zhang M, Zhou M (2011) Using LMDI method to analyze transport sector CO2 emissions in China. Energy 36(10):5909–5915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Su M, Li R (2018a) Toward to economic growth without emission growth: the role of urbanization and industrialization in China and India. J Clean Prod 205:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Zhao M, Li R, Su M (2018b) Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions from economic growth: a comparative study of China and the United States. J Clean Prod 197:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warming Climate in India to Pose Significant Risk to Agriculture, Water Resources, Health, says World Bank Report’ (The World Bank, 19 June 2013). http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/pressrelease/2013/06/19/warming-climate-india-pose-significant-risk-agriculture-water-resources-health-says-worldbank-report. Accessed 19 Nov 2016

  • Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) Coal consumption and economic growth revisited. Appl Energy 87(1):160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2019) World development indicators. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resource Institute (2005) Navigating the numbers: green gas data and international climate policy. Retrieved July, 2009, from WTI web site via access: http://www.wri.org

  • Xu XY, Ang BW (2013) Index decomposition analysis applied to CO2 emission studies. Ecol Econ 93:313–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Yang Y, Li YW (2015) Recent development in converting coal to clean fuels in China. Fuel 152:122–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu SC, He ZX, Long RY, Chen H, Han HM, Zhang WW (2016) Comparative analysis of the regional contributions to carbon emissions in China. J Clean Prod 127:406–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You Q, Kang S, Aguilar E, Pepin N, Flügel WA, Yan Y, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Huang J (2011) Changes in daily climate extremes in China and their connection to the large scale atmospheric circulation during 1961–2003. Clim Dyn 36(11–12):2399–2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousuf I, Ghumman AR, Hashmi HN, Kamal MA (2014) Carbon emissions from power sector in Pakistan and opportunities to mitigate those. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:71–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Lahr ML (2014) China’s energy consumption change from 1987 to 2007: a multi-regional structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 67:682–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhao Y, Wang C, Wang F, Qiu F (2019) Decoupling effect and sectoral attribution analysis of industrial energy-related carbon emissions in Xinjiang, China. Ecol Ind 97:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Ma C, Hong D (2010) Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: decomposition and policy analysis. Energy Policy 38(3):1379–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Zhang X, Li N, Shao S, Geng Y (2017) Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions in China: a sectoral factor decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 142:3500–3516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou N, Levine MD, Price L (2010) Overview of current energy-efficiency policies in China. Energy Policy 38(11):6439–6452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Zhang M, Zhou M, Zhou M (2017) A comparative study on decoupling relationship and influence factors between China’s regional economic development and industrial energy-related carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 142:783–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilhan Ozturk.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Luiz Duczmal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozturk, I., Majeed, M.T. & Khan, S. Decoupling and decomposition analysis of environmental impact from economic growth: a comparative analysis of Pakistan, India, and China. Environ Ecol Stat 28, 793–820 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00495-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00495-3

Keywords

Navigation