Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Comprehensive Assessment of Geomorphodiversity and Geomorphological Heritage for Damavand Volcano Management, Iran

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of geomorphodiversity and geomorphological heritage is crucial for their use, conservation, and management. Therefore, this paper aims to assess the geomorphodiversity and geomorphological heritage in an integrated approach for the management of Damavand volcano and its surroundings. Damavand is the highest mountain in Iran and the highest volcano in Asia. In this research, the analyses were performed in five steps: (1) the assessment of geomorphodiversity; (2) the identification and selection of geomorphosites; (3) the assessment of geomorphosites; (4) the comparison and synthesis of results; (5) the determination of suitable visit routes. In these steps, the geomorphodiversity index elaborated by Melelli et al. in 2017 and a method developed by Reynard et al. in 2016 were used, with extensive fieldwork. The results showed the areas with high and very high geomorphodiversity values provide a rich set of different types of landforms and processes. Also, the intrinsic value of 66.66% of selected geomorphosites is more than 50 (from 100) and only 33.33% have a value of less than 50, while their use and management status are unsuitable (75%) and very unsuitable (5.6%). Moreover, where the value of geomorphodiversity is higher, the number of geomorphosites is also higher, but there is no correlation between the level of geomorphodiversity value and the level of the intrinsic value of the geomorphosites. Nevertheless, the Damavand volcano needs special attention for geotourism promotion, scientific and educational uses, world heritage, or geopark. Finally, the development of an integrated management plan to conservation is necessary. In this regards, the comprehensive assessment of geomorphodiversity and geomorphological heritage has been implemented as a first step in starting management and conservation strategies. Also, the suitable visit routes have been proposed as one of the management measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.skimountaineer.com/ROF/VolcanicSeven.html.

References

  • Aghanabati SA (2008) Geology of Iran. Geological Survey of Iran Publications, Tehran (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alahuhta J, Toivanen M, Hjort J (2020) Geodiversity–biodiversity relationship needs more empirical evidence. Nat Ecol Evol 4:2–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1051-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allenbach P (1970) Geology and petrography of Mt. Damavand and its environment (Central Alborz), Iran. Geological Survey of Iran. Report, No. 17 (in Persian)

  • Badman T (2010) World Heritage and geomorphology. In: Migoń P (ed) Geomorphological Landscapes of the World. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 357–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Bétard F (2016) Geodiversity hotspots: a proposed conceptual and methodological framework for defining geoconservation priorities. In: Geophysical Research Abstracts of the European Geosciences Union General Assembly, vol 18. EGU, Vienna, p 1825

    Google Scholar 

  • Bétard F, Peulvast J (2019) Geodiversity hotspots: concept, method and cartographic application for geoconservation purposes at a regional scale. Environ Manag 63:822–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01168-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J (2016) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 8(2):119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J (2018) Geoheritage and geoparks. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 323–336

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J, Gray M, Pereira DI, Pereira P (2018) Geodiversity an integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature. Environ Sci Pol 86:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canesin TS, Brilha J, Díaz-Martínez E (2020) Best Practices and constraints in geopark management: comparative analysis of two Spanish UNESCO global geoparks. Geoheritage. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00435-w

  • Clivaz M, Reynard E (2018) How to Integrate Invisible Geomorphosites in an Inventory: a Case Study in the Rhone River Valley (Switzerland). Geoheritage 10:527–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0222-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2015) Public perception of the hazards affecting geomorphological heritage—case study: the central area of Bucegi Mts. (Southern Carpathians, Romania). Environ Earth Sci 73:8487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-4007-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Hobléa F (2018) The specificities of geomorphological heritage. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Vandelli V, Fiorentini L, Paliaga G, Faccini F (2019) Bridging terrestrial and marine geoheritage: assessing geosites in Portofino Natural Park (Italy). Water 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102112

  • Davidson J, Hassanzadeh J, Berzins R, Stockli DF, Bashukooh B, Turrin B, Pandamouz A (2004) The geology of Damavand volcano, Alborz Mountains, northern Iran. Geol Soc Am Bull 116(1-2):16–29. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25344.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demek J, Kirchner K, Mackovčin P, Slavík P (2011) Geomorphodiversity derived by a GIS-based geomorphological map: case study the Czech Republic. Z Geomorphol 55(4):415–435. https://doi.org/10.1127/0372-8854/2011/0058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK, Newsome D (2010) Global geotourism perspectives. Goodfellow Publishers Limited, Woodeaton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • El Hadi H, Tahiri A, Brilha J, El Maidani A, Baghdad B, Zaidi A (2015) Geodiversity examples of Morocco: from inventory to regional geotourism development. Open J Ecol 5(9):409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikstad L (2013) Geoheritage and geodiversity management—the questions for tomorrow. Proc Geol Assoc 124:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farsani NT, Coelho COA, Costa CMM, Amrikazemi A (2014) Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage 6:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0099-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero E, Giardino M, Lozar F, Giordano E, Belluso E, Perotti L (2012) Geodiversity action plans for the enhancement of geoheritage in the Piemonte region (north-western Italy). Ann Geophys 55(3):487–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuillet T, Sourp E (2011) Geomorphological heritage of the Pyrenees National Park (France): assessment, clustering, and promotion of geomorphosites. Geoheritage 3:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuertes-Gutiérrez I, Fernández-Martínez E (2012) Mapping geosites for geoheritage management: a methodological proposal for the Regional Park of Picos de Europa (León, Spain). Environ Manag 50:789–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanavati E, Karam A, Fakhari S (2014) Evaluation of geoconservation with emphasis on geotourism (case study: Damavand region). Quantitat Geomorphol Res 3(2):77–89 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon JE, Barron HF (2013) The role of geodiversity in delivering ecosystem services and benefits in Scotland. Scott J Geol 49:41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon JE, Crofts R, Diaz-Martinez E, Woo KS (2018) Enhancing the role of geoconservation in protected area management and nature conservation. Geoheritage 10:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0240-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2012) Valuing geodiversity in an “ecosystem services” context. Scott Geogr J 128:177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2012.725858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2018) Geodiversity: the backbone of geoheritage and geoconservation. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 13–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gray M, Gordon JE, Brown EJ (2013) Geodiversity and the ecosystem approach: the contribution of geoscience in delivering integrated environmental management. Proc Geol Assoc 124(4):659–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon B, Viles H (2013) Beyond geomorphosites: trade-offs, optimization, and networking in heritage landscapes. Environ Syst Decis 33:272–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9448-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobléa F, Delannoy JJ, Jaillet S, Ployon E, Sadier B (2014) Digital tools for managing and promoting karst geosites in Southeast France. Geoheritage 6(2):113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0112-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2012) 3G’s for Modern Geotourism. Geoheritage 4:7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0052-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks GF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int Yearbook Cartogr 7:186–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenness JS (2004) Calculating landscape surface area from digital elevation models. Wildl Soc Bull 32(3):829–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness JS (2006) Topographic position index (tpi_jen.avx) extension for ArcView 3.x, v. 1.2. Jenness Enterprises, http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/tpi.htm. Accessed 24 October 2018

  • Kot R (2017) A comparison of results from geomorphological diversity evaluation methods in the Polish Lowland (Toruń Basin and Chełmno Lakeland). Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish J Geogr 118(1):17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima EA, Machado M, Guerreiro M, Nunes JC, Costa MP (2018) Geological heritage management in small islands: the example of the Azores UNESCO global geopark (Portugal). Geoheritage 10:659–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0328-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maghsoudi M, Moradi A, Moradipour F, Nezammahalleh MA (2019) Geotourism development in world heritage of the Lut desert. Geoheritage 11(2):501–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0303-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S (2014) Interactive visual media for geomorphological heritage interpretation. Theoretical approach and examples. Geoheritage 6(2):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melelli L (2014) Geodiversity: a new quantitative index for natural protected areas en-hancement. GeoJ Tour Geosites 13(1):2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Melelli L, Vergari F, Liucci L, Del Monte M (2017) Geomorphodiversity index: quantifying the diversity of landforms and physical landscape. Sci Total Environ 584–585:701–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migoń P, Pijet-Migoń E (2016) Overlooked Geomorphological component of volcanic geoheritage—diversity and perspectives for tourism industry, Pogórze Kaczawskie Region, SW Poland. Geoheritage 8:333–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0166-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migoń P, Pijet-Migoń E (2017) Viewpoint geosites – values, conservation and management issues. Proc Geol Assoc 128(4):511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghimi E (2013) Geomorphology of Iran. University of Tehran Press, 2nd Edn, Tehran (in Persian)

  • Moghimi E, Mansourian A, Zarei Nejad M, Moghimi SM (2008) Utilization of distributed architecture based on internet GIS for geomorphologic data and environmental management: case study of Damavand volcano conic, Iran. Am J Appl Sci 3(10):1300–1307

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradipour F, Moghimi E, Beglou MJ, Yamani M (2020) Assessment of urban geomorphological heritage for urban geotourism development in Khorramabad City, Iran. Geoheritage 12:40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00466-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosrati M (2002) Damavand, the mythical origin of Iran. Torbat Publication, Tehran (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey, chin. Sci Bull 46(4):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2009) The geomorphodiversity of the dolomites (Italy): a key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1(1):33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-009-0003-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D, Caetano Alves MI (2007) Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geogr Helv 62(3):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pica A, Luberti GM, Vergari F, Fredi P, del Monte M (2017) Contribution for an urban geomorphoheritage assessment method: proposal from three geomorphosites in Rome (Italy). Quaestiones Geogr 36(3):21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing the tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Geomorphol Relief Proc Environ 3:189–196. https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser CD, Burek CV, Evans DH, Gordon JE, Kirkbride VB, Rennie AF, Walmsley CA (2010) Conserving geodiversity sites in a changing climate: management challenges and responses. Geoheritage 2:123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0016-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2008) Scientific research and tourist promotion of geomorphological heritage. Geogr Fis Din Quat 31:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Coratza P (2016) The importance of mountain geomorphosites for environmental education, Examples from the Italian Dolomites and the Swiss Alps. Acta geogr Slov 56(2):291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing scientific and additional values of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica. Geogr Helv 62(3):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Perret A, Bussard J, Grangier L, Martin S (2016) Integrated approach for the inventory and management of geomorphological heritage at the regional scale. Geoheritage 8:43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0153-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Pica A, Coratza P (2017) Urban geomorphological heritage. An overview. Quaestiones Geogr 36(3):7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz JF, Nazari H, Ghassemi A, Salamati R, Shafei A, Solaymani S, Vernant P (2006) Active transtension inside central Alborz: a new insight into northern Iran–southern Caspian geodynamics. Geology 34(6):77–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rypl J, Kirchner K, Kubalíková L, Divíšek J (2020) Geological and Geomorphological conditions supporting the diversity of rock landforms in the Pohořská mountains (South Bohemia, Czech Republic). Geoheritage. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00430-1

  • Sadry BN (2009) Fundamentals of geotourism: with emphasis on Iran. Samt Organization Publishing, Tehran (in persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnyovsky D, Sachkov D, Tsvetkova I, Atanasova N (2020) Geomorphosite characterization method for the purpose of an aspiring geopark application dossier on the example of Maritsa cirque complex in Geopark Rila, Rila Mountain, SW Bulgaria. Geoheritage. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00451-w

  • Szepesi J, Harangi S, Ésik Z, Novák TJ, Lukács R, Soós I (2017) Volcanic geoheritage and geotourism perspectives in Hungary: a case of an UNESCO world heritage site, Tokaj wine region historic cultural landscape, Hungary. Geoheritage 9:329–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0205-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taha MMN, Al-Hashim MH, El-Asmar HM (2020) Geoarcheomorphosites under strong urbanization pressure at the Tineh Plain, NE of the Nile Delta, Egypt. Geoheritage. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00444-9

  • Testa B, Aldighieri B, Bertini A, Blendinger W, Caielli G, Franco R, Giordano D, Kustatscher E (2013) Geomorphodiversity of the San Lucano Valley (Belluno Dolomites, Italy): A well-preserved heritage. Geoheritage 5:151–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas MF (2012) A geomorphological approach to geodiversity – its aplications to geoconservation and geotourism. Quaestiones Geogr 31(1):81–89. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-012-0005-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss A (2001) Topographic Position and Landforms Analysis. ESRI User Conference, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamani M, Moghimi E, Goorabi A, Zamanzadeh S, Mohamadi A (2019) The relationship of the last Damavand eruptions and the sequence of lava barrage lakes. Quantitat Geomorphol Res 7(3):196–215 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarnetske PL, Read QD, Record S, Gaddis KD, Pau S, Hobi ML, Malone SL, Costanza J, M. Dahlin K, Latimer AM, Wilson AM, Grady JM, Ollinger SV, Finley AO (2019) Towards connecting biodiversity and geodiversity across scales with satellite remote sensing. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 28:548–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zgłobicki W, Baran-Zgłobicka B (2013) Geomorphological heritage as a tourist attraction. a case study in Lubelskie Province, SE Poland. Geoheritage 5:137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-013-0076-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwoliñski Z (2010) The routine of landform geodiversity map design for the Polish Carpathian Mts. Landform Analy 11:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwoliński Z, Stachowiak J (2012) Geodiversity map of the Tatra National Park for geotourism. Quaestiones Geogr 31(1):99–107. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-012-0012-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwoliński Z, Najwer A, Giardino M (2018) Methods for assessing geodiversity. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: assessment, protection and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 27–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the manuscript.

Funding

This work is part of a PhD thesis that funded by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF). We also thank the financial and spiritual support of the Research Institute of Cultural Heritage & Tourism.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Azin Alley, Vesal Street, Tehran, Iran

    Anvar Moradi

  2. Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Azin Alley, Vesal Street, Tehran, Iran

    Mehran Maghsoudi, Ebrahim Moghimi & Mojtaba Yamani

  3. Department of Tourism, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage & Tourism, 30 Tir Street, Imam Khomeini Square, Tehran, Iran

    Nasser Rezaei

Authors
  1. Anvar Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehran Maghsoudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ebrahim Moghimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mojtaba Yamani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nasser Rezaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anvar Moradi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moradi, A., Maghsoudi, M., Moghimi, E. et al. A Comprehensive Assessment of Geomorphodiversity and Geomorphological Heritage for Damavand Volcano Management, Iran. Geoheritage 13, 39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00551-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00551-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation