Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of solidification models on predicting susceptibility of carbon steels to solidification cracking

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Welding in the World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon steels can be sensitive to solidification cracking. Predicting their susceptibility to solidification cracking can save cost and time compared to testing, and it can be very useful for designing new steels or welds. Crack susceptibility predictions were made for carbon steels using the recently proposed simple susceptibility index for cracking during solidification, maximum │dT/d(fS)1/2 near the end of solidification (T temperature and fs fraction solid). T vs. (fS)1/2 curves of the carbon steels were calculated by three different solidification models: equilibrium, Scheil, and Scheil with back diffusion of the available commercial thermodynamic software. The crack susceptibility predictions based on these solidification models were compared to various crack susceptibility test results of carbon steels, and the predictions based on Scheil with back diffusion were found consistent with the most of the crack susceptibility test results. Solidification temperature ranges of the carbon steels, determined based on the solidification models of equilibrium, Scheil, and Scheil with back diffusion, were used to explain the crack susceptibility predictions. The role of the alloying elements of the carbon steels in solidification cracking susceptibility was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data that support to the findings of this study is available upon the reasonable request from the author.

References

  1. Kou S (2020) Welding metallurgy, 3th edn. J. Wiley and Sons, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lippold JC (2014) Welding metallurgy and weldability. J. Wiley and Sons, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell J (2003) Castings, 2nd edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kannengiesser T, Boellinghaus T (2014) Hot cracking tests-an overview of present technologies and applications. Weld World 58:397–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuda F, Nakagawa H, Nakada K, Okada H (1979) The VDR cracking test for solidification cracking susceptibility of weld metals and its application to aluminum alloys. Trans JWRI 8:85–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coniglio N, Cross CE, Michael T, Lammers M (2008) Defining a critical weld dilution to avoid solidification cracking in aluminum. Weld J 87:237-s to 247-s.

  7. Coniglio N, Cross CE (2009) Mechanisms for solidification crack initiation and growth in aluminum welding. Metal Mater Trans A 40A:2718–2728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kou S (2015) A criterion for cracking during solidification. Acta Mater 88:366–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schempp P, Cross C.E, Schwenk C et al (2012) Influence Of Ti And B additions on grain size and weldability of aluminium alloy 6082. Weld World 56:95–104.

  10. Kou S (2015) A simple index for predicting the susceptibility to solidification cracking. Weld J 94:374-s to 388-s.

  11. Liu J, Kou S (2016) Crack susceptibility of binary aluminum alloys during solidification. Acta Mater 110:84–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu J, Kou S (2015) Effect of diffusion on susceptibility to cracking during solidification. Acta Mater 100:59–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Kou S (2017) Susceptibility of ternary aluminum alloys to cracking during solidification. Acta Mater 125:513–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Soysal T, Kou S (2018) A simple test for assessing solidification cracking susceptibility and checking validity of susceptibility prediction. Acta Mater 143:181–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Soysal T, Kou S (2019) Predicting effect of filler metals on solidification cracking susceptibility of 2024 Al and 6061 Al. Sci Technol Weld Join 24:559–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Soysal T, Kou S (2020) Role of liquid backfilling in reducing solidification cracking in aluminum welds. Sci Technol Weld Join 25:415–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Soysal T, Kou S (2017) A simple test for solidification cracking susceptibility and filler metal effect. Weld J 96:389-s–401-s

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu K, Kou S (2020) Susceptibility of magnesium alloys to solidification cracking. Sci Technol Weld Join 25:251–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xia C, Kou S (2020) Evaluating susceptibility of Ni-base alloys to solidification cracking by transverse-motion weldability test. Sci Technol Weld Join 25:690–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rappaz M, Drezet JM, Gremaud M (1999) A new hot-tearing criterion. Metal Mater Trans A 30:449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clyne TW, Davies GJ (1981) Influence of composition on solidification cracking susceptibility in binary alloy systems. Br Foundryman 74:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soysal T (2021) A criterion to find crack-resistant aluminum alloys to avoid solidification cracking. Sci Technol Weld Join 26:99–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bordreuil C, Niel A (2014) Modelling of hot cracking in welding with a cellular automaton combined with an intergranular fluid flow model. Comput Mater Sci 82:442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Flemings MC (1974) Solidification processing. In: Solidification processing. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu J, Duarte HP, Kou S (2017) Evidence of back diffusion reducing cracking during solidification. Acta Mater 122:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Geng S, Jiang P, Shao X, Mi G, Wu H, Ai Y, Wang C, Han C, Chen R, Liu W, Zhang Y (2018) Effects of back-diffusion on solidification cracking susceptibility of Al-Mg alloys during welding: a phase-field study. Acta Mater 160:85–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo J, Wen G (2019) Influence of alloy elements on cracking in the steel ingot during its solidification. Metals. 9:836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Xia C, Kou S (2021) Calculating the susceptibility of carbon steels to solidification cracking during welding. Metall Mater Trans B 52:460–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen Q, Sundman B (2002) Computation of partial equilibrium solidification with complete interstitial and negligible substitutional solute back diffusion. Mater Trans 43:551–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schaffnit P, Stallybrass C, Kondrad J et al (2015) A Scheil-Gulliver model dedicated to the solidification of steel. CALPHAD 48:184–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thermo-Calc Limited Version 2020b Software FEDEMO: Iron Demo Database Version 2.0/MFDEMO: Fe-Alloys Mobility Database Version 2.0. Accessed 25 November 2020.

  32. MatWeb, Material Data Property, MatWeb LLC. Accessed 26 November 2020. http://www.matweb.com/search/QuickText.aspx?SearchText=carbon%20steel

  33. Kumar S, Ghosh PK, Kumar R (2017) Surface modification of AISI 4340 steel by multi-pass TIG arcing process. Jour Mater Process Tech 249:394–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Clyne TW, Kurz W (1981) Solute redistribution during solidification with rapid solid state diffusion. Metal Trans A 12:965–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Clyne TW, Wolf M, Kurz W (1982) The effect of melt composition on solidification cracking of steel with particular reference to continuous casting. Metall Trans B 13:259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xia C, Kou S (2020) Evaluating susceptibility of carbon steels to solidification cracking by transverse-motion weldability test. Sci Technol Weld Join 25:706–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Matsuda F, Nakagawa H, Tomita S (1986) Quantitative evaluation of solidification brittleness of weld metal during solidification by in-situ observation and measurement (Report III). Trans JWRI 15:297–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Senda T, Matsuda F, Takano G et al (1971) Fundamental investigations on solidification crack susceptibility for weld metals with trans-varestraint test. Trans Jpn Weld Soc 2:141–162

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shankar V, Devletian JH (2005) Solidification cracking in low alloy steel welds. Sci Technol Weld Join 10:236–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Savage WF, Lundin CD (1965) The Varestraint test, Weld Jour 44:433-s to 442-s.

  41. Coniglio N, Cross CE (2020) Effect of weld travel speed on solidification cracking behavior, Part 1: Weld Metal Characteristics. Int Journal of Advanced Manuf Tech 107:5011–5023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Coniglio N, Cross CE (2020) Effect of weld travel speed on solidification cracking behavior, Part 2: Testing Conditions and Metrics. Int Journal of Advanced Manuf Tech 107:5025–5038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Coniglio N, Cross CE (2020) Effect of weld travel speed on solidification cracking behavior, Part 3: Modeling. Int Journal of Advanced Manuf Tech 107:5039–5051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Smith RB (1993) ASM Handbook. Welding, brazing and soldering, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 6:641–61.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tayfun Soysal.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended for publication by Commission IX - Behaviour of Metals Subjected to Welding

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soysal, T. Effect of solidification models on predicting susceptibility of carbon steels to solidification cracking. Weld World 65, 1943–1954 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-021-01132-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-021-01132-0

Keywords

Navigation