Abstract
Positive public perceptions of academic quality and professional ethics are critical to the long-term legitimacy of American colleges and universities. Faculty codes of conduct are one mechanism whereby the professoriate can define acceptable practice, exercise social control, and maintain public confidence in higher education, yet the drivers of their adoption are not well understood. Building upon previous research into such organizational behavior by institutional type, this study examined the prevalence and content of publicly posted faculty codes of conduct within an organizational field of institutions that share a common religious identity but differ in their institutional types and employment structures. Faculty handbooks from American member institutions of the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities (CCCU), an international association of faith-based institutions, were gathered and analyzed. Although only 27% of CCCU member institutions in the U.S. (36/135) publicly posted faculty codes of conduct, the average number of tenets present in each code (n = 7.5) was higher than suggested by previous research. Study findings also revealed that membership category, institutional type, and employment structures influence the content of faculty codes of conduct, indicating that isomorphic pressures operate within this particular organizational field. The piece concludes by commending publicly posted codes of conduct as an affirmation of the personal responsibility, fairness, and care exercised by ethical professionals in the academy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achieving the Dream. (2020). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.achievingthedream.org/about-us
Agresti, A. (1992). A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Statistical Science, 7(1), 131–177.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2020). Mission & strategic plan. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/about/strategicplan
Austin, A. E. (1990). Faculty culture, faculty values. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Assessing academic climates and cultures. New Directions for Institutional Research (68). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bailey, J. J. (2000). Students as clients in a professional/client relationship. Journal of Management Education, 24(3), 353–365.
Baldridge, J., Curtis, D., Ecker, G., & Riley, G. (1978). Policy making and effective leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Baumgarten, E. (1982). Ethics in the academic profession: A socratic view. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(3), 282–295.
Benne, R. (2001). Quality with soul: How six premier colleges and universities keep faith with their religious traditions. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Braxton, J. M., & Bayer, A. E. (1999). Faculty misconduct in collegiate teaching. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Braxton, J. M., & Bayer, A. E. (2004). Toward a code of conduct for undergraduate teaching. In J. M. Braxton & A. E. Bayer (Eds.), Addressing faculty and student classroom improprieties, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (99). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Braxton, J. M., Bayer, A. E., & Noseworthy, J. A. (2002). Students as tenuous agents of social control of professorial misconduct. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(3), 101–124.
Braxton, J. M., Bayer, A. E., & Noseworthy, J. A. (2004). The Influence of teaching norm violations on the welfare of students as clients of college teaching. In J. M. Braxton & A. E. Bayer (Eds.), Addressing faculty and student classroom improprieties, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (99). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Braxton, J. M., Proper, E., & Bayer, A. E. (2011). Professors behaving badly: Faculty misconduct in graduate education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bray, N. J., & Del Favro, M. (2004). Sociological explanations for faculty and student classroom incivilities. J. M. Braxton & A. E. Bayer (Eds.), Addressing faculty and student classroom improprieties. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (99). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bray, N. J., Molina, D. K. & Swecker, B. A. (2012). “Organizational constraints and possibilities regarding codes of conduct.” In J. M. Braxton & N. J. Bray (Eds.), Codes of conduct in academia. New Directions for Higher Education (160), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, A. (2018). “Most Americans say higher ed is heading in wrong direction, but partisans disagree on why.” Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/07/26/most-americans-say-higher-ed-is-heading-in-wrong-direction-but-partisans-disagree-on-why/
Cahn, C. S. (1994). Saints and scamps: Ethics in academia (Rev.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2013). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/
Churchill, L. R. (1982). The teaching of ethics and moral values in teaching: Some contemporary confusions. Journal of Higher Education, 53(3), 296–306.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Council for Christian Colleges & Universities (2019a). List of CCCU institutions. Retrieved from https://www.cccu.org/members_and_affiliates/
Council for Christian Colleges & Universities (2019b). Our institutions. Retrieved from https://www.cccu.org/institutions/#heading-categories-3
Council for Christian Colleges & Universities. (2019c). Our work and mission. Retrieved from https://www.cccu.org/about/#heading-our-work-and-mission-0
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2), 147-160.
Dockery, D. S., & Morgan, C. W. (2018). Christian higher education: Faith, teaching, and learning in the evangelical tradition. Wheaton, IL: Crossway.
Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Finkelstein, M. J. (1984). The American academic profession: A synthesis of social scientific inquiry since World War II. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
Goode, W. (1969). The theoretical limits of professionalization. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), The semi-professions and their organization (pp. 266–313). New York, NY: Free Press.
Guthrie, D. C. (2018). Faith and teaching. In D. S. Dockery & C. W. Morgan (Eds.), Christian higher education: Faith, teaching, and learning in the evangelical tradition (pp. 149–168). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.
Harris, S., Lumsden, D. B., & Mahurin, R. (2006). Tenure policies and practices of American evangelical colleges and universities part 1: Introduction. Christian Higher Education, 5(3), 279–293.
Holmes, A. F. (1987). The idea of a Christian college (Rev.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Jacobsen, D. G., & Jacobsen, R. H. (2004). Scholarship and Christian faith: Enlarging the conversation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kerr, C. (1996). The ethics of knowledge. In L. Fisch (Ed.), Ethical dimensions of college and university teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kezar, A., DePaola, T., & Scott, D. T. (2019). The gig academy: Mapping labor in the neoliberal university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kilner, J. F. (2018). Made in the image of God. In D. S. Dockery & C. W. Morgan (Eds.), Christian higher education: Faith, teaching, and learning in the evangelical tradition (pp. 101–120). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.
Lomax, R. G. (2007). Introduction to statistical concepts (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lyken-Segosebe, D., Min, Y. M., & Braxton, J. M. (2012). The existence of codes of conduct for undergraduate teaching in teaching-oriented four-year colleges and universities In J. M. Braxton & N. J. Bray (Eds.), Codes of conduct in academia, New Directions for Higher Education (160) (pp. 61–72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lyken-Segosebe, D., Braxton, J. M., Hutchens, M. K., & Harris, E. (2018). Codes of conduct for undergraduate teaching in four types of colleges and universities. Innovative Higher Education, 43(4), 289–302.
Mannoia, V. J. (2000). Christian liberal arts: An education that goes beyond. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Marken, S. (2019, April 12). “A crisis in confidence in higher ed.” Gallup Blog. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/248492/crisis-confidence-higher.aspx
Markie, P. J. (1994). A Professor’s duties: Ethical issues in college teaching. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moser, D., Ream, T. C., & Braxton, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). Scholarship reconsidered (Expanded). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Murray, H., Gillese, E., Lennon, M., Mercer, P., & Robinson, M. (1996). Ethical principles for college and university teaching. In L. Fisch (Ed.), Ethical dimensions of college and university teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Parker, K. (2019). “The growing partisan divide in views of higher education.” Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/essay/the-growing-partisan-divide-in-views-of-higher-education/
Peterson, M. W., Cameron, K. S, Mets, I. A., & Ettington, D. (1986) The organizational context for teaching and learning: A review of literature. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Teaching and Learning. The University of Michigan.
Reynolds, C. H. (1996). Making responsible academic ethical decisions. In L. Fisch (Ed.), Ethical dimensions of college and university teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ruscio, K. P. (1987). Many sectors, many professions. In B. Clark (Ed.), The academic profession: National, disciplinary, and institutional settings (pp. 331-368). Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Scott, W. R. (1970). Professionals in organizations: Areas of conflict. In H. M. Vollmer & D. L. Mills (Eds.). Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Smith, D. I., & Smith, J. K. A. (2011). Teaching and Christian practices: Reshaping faith and learning. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Smith, R. A. (1996). Reflecting on the ethics and values of our practice. In L. Fisch (Ed.), Ethical dimensions of college and university teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Strike, K. A. (1994). The authority of ideas and the students’ right to autonomy. In P. J. Markie (Ed.), A professor’s duties: Ethical issues in college teaching (pp. 101–112). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Svinicki, M. (1994). Ethics in college teaching. In W. J. McKeachie, Teaching tips, pp. 269-77. 9th Ed. Lexington, MA: D. C. Health.
Toma, J. D., Dubrow, G., & Hartley, M. (2005). The uses of institutional culture: Strengthening identification and building brand equity in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. (2018), [Institutional Characteristics]. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data
Zuckerman, H. (1988). The sociology of science. In N. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 511–574). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rine, P.J., Wells, C.A., Braxton, J.M. et al. At the Intersection of Institutional Identity and Type. J Acad Ethics 20, 169–190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09403-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09403-7