Skip to main content
Log in

The chimera of the competency-based approach to teaching mathematics: a study of carpentry purchases for home projects

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The competency-based approach conceives mathematics as a necessary tool for dealing with daily-life tasks. Many studies have focused on examining the low math competency people show when solving problems in real-life contexts, but rarely characterize the type of mathematics needed in these contexts and how people use this mathematics. The current study was designed to analyze the mathematics utilized by 312 customers when purchasing carpentry products in a store specialized in home projects. Aspects of the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, especially the extended praxeological model, were employed to undertake the analysis. While the approach is primarily qualitative, quantitative aspects were also considered to elucidate the nature of the identified mathematics tasks, the techniques that customers employed to solve them, and the difficulties associated with the use of these techniques. The study reveals that having solid mathematical knowledge is insufficient when it comes to solving everyday tasks, because related contextual knowledge is also required. The nature of the tasks identified in this study and the didactic way in which the clerk guided the customers through the projects suggested that there are no only complex relationships between school mathematics and outside-school mathematics, but there exist also different didactics specific to the contexts. For elaborating the home carpentry projects, the customers needed to handle a set of carpentry knowledge and techniques as well as carpentry-related mathematics that are not necessarily taught at school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2012). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and learning, 5(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9073-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. (2014). Characterising and developing vocational mathematical knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9560-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castela, C., & Romo, A. (2011). Des mathématiques à l’automatique: étude des effets de transposition sur la transformée de Laplace dans la formation des ingénieurs [From mathematics to automatization: A study of transpositive effects on the Laplace transform in the training of engineers]. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 31(1), 79–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaachoua, H., Bessot, A., Romo, A., & Castela, C. (2019). Developments and functionalities in the praxeological model. In M. Bosch, Y. Chevallard, F. García, & J. Monaghan (Eds.), Working with anthropological theory of the didactic in mathematics education (pp. 41–59). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429198168-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique [The analysis of teaching practice in the anthropological theory of the didactic]. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19, 221–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing the anthropological theory of the didactic: An attempt at a principled approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covián, O., & Romo, A. (2014). Las matemáticas en la construcción: La vivienda maya, el levantamiento y trazo topográfico [The extended praxeological model: A tool to analyze mathematics in practice – the case of mayan house, survey and topographical drawing]. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática., 28(48), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v28n48a07

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diego-Mantecón, J., Blanco, T., Ortiz-Laso, Z., & Lavicza, Z. (2021). STEAM projects with KIKS format for developing key competences. [Proyectos STEAM con formato KIKS para el desarrollo de competencias clave]. Comunicar, 66, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diego-Mantecón, J. M., Arcera, O., Blanco, T. F., & Lavicza, Z. (2019). An engineering technology problem-solving approach for modifying student mathematics-related beliefs: Building a robot to solve a Rubik’s cube. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v26.2.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diego-Mantecón, J. M., Blanco, T. F., Búa, J. B., & González, P. (2019). Is the relationship between art and mathematics addressed thoroughly in Spanish secondary school textbooks? Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 13(1-2), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2018.1552068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union Council (Ed.) (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning. https://bit.ly/3epV571

  • Evans, J., Wedege, T., & Yasukawa, K. (2012). Critical perspectives on adults’ mathematics education. In M. A. K. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel-Kreidt, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 203–242). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • FitzSimons, G. E., & Boistrup, L. B. (2017). In the workplace mathematics does not announce itself: Towards overcoming the hiatus between mathematics education and work. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9752-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, F. J., Gascón, J., Ruíz-Higueras, L. & Bosch, M. (2006). Mathematical modelling as a tool for the connection of school mathematics. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 38(3), 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02652807

  • Grando, N. I. (1988). A matematica na agricultura e na escuela [Mathematics in agriculture and in school]. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.

  • Halász, G., & Michel, A. (2011). Key competences in Europe: Interpretation, policy formulation and implementation. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01491.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Gellert, U. (2007). Mathematisation - demathematisation. In U. Gellert & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Mathematisation and demathematisation: Social, philosophical and educational ramifications (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511609268

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Gomes, A. (2019). Learning and everyday life: Access, participation, and changing practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616416

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestre, J. (2002). Transfer of learning: Issues and research agenda. Report of a workshop held at the National Science Foundation. University of Massachusetts-Amherts.

  • Millroy, W. (1992). An ethnographic study of the mathematical ideas of a group of carpenters. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 1–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/749904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtaugh, M. (1985). The practice of arithmetic by American grocery shoppers. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 6(3), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1985.16.3.05x1484b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R., Bakker, A., Hoyles, C., & Kent, P. (2007). Situating graphs as workplace knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9058-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Pozzi, S. (2000). Working knowledge: Mathematics in use. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for Mathematics in the Workplace (pp. 17–35). London: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47226-0_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Carraher, D., & Schliemann, A. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills (PIAAC). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014). Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-9-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J., Hochmuth, R., & Schreiber, S. (2017). Applying an extended praxeological ATD-model for analyzing different mathematical discourses in higher engineering courses. In R. Göller, R. Biehler, R. Hochmuth, & H. G. Rück (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics in higher education as a scientific discipline – conference proceedings (pp. 172–178). Kassel: Universitätsbibliothek Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schliemann, A. D. (1984). Mathematics among carpenters and apprentices. In P. Damerow, B. F. Nebres, & B. Werry (Eds.), Mathematics for all (pp. 92–95). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solares, D., Solares, A., & Padilla, E. (2016). La enseñanza de las matemáticas más allá de los salones de clase. Análisis de actividades laborales urbanas y rurales. [Mathematics teaching beyond classrooms. Analysis of urban and rural activities]. Educación Matemática, 28(1), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.24844/em2801.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D., & Williams, J. (2014). Making abstract mathematics concrete in and out of school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9536-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez, R., Romo-Vázquez, A., Romo-Vázquez, R., & Trigueros, M. (2016). La separación ciega de fuentes: Un puente entre el álgebra lineal y el análisis de señales. [Blind source separation: A bridge between linear algebra and signal analysis]. Educación Matemática, 28(2), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.24844/em2802.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Manuel Diego-Mantecón.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diego-Mantecón, J.M., Haro, E., Blanco, T.F. et al. The chimera of the competency-based approach to teaching mathematics: a study of carpentry purchases for home projects. Educ Stud Math 107, 339–357 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10032-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10032-5

Keywords

Navigation