Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Subsurface Deformation and Strain of Soft Hydrogel Interfaces Using an Embedded Speckle Pattern With 2D Digital Image Correlation

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Subsurface mechanisms can greatly affect the mechanical behavior of biological materials, but observation of these mechanisms has remained elusive primarily due to unfavorable optical characteristics. Researchers attempt to overcome these limitations by performing experiments in biological mimics like hydrogels, but measurements are generally restricted due to the spatio-temporal limitations of current methods.

Objective

Utilization of contemporary 3D printing techniques into soft, transparent, aqueous yield-stress materials have opened new avenues of approach to overcoming these roadblocks. By incorporating digital image correlation with such 3D printing techniques, a method is shown here that can acquire full-field deformation of a hydrogel subsurface in real-time.

Methods

Briefly, the method replaces the solvent of a transparent and low polymer concentration yield-stress material with an aqueous hydrogel precursor solution, then a DIC speckle plane is 3D printed into it. This complex is then polymerized using photoinitiation thereby locking the speckle plane in place.

Results

Full-field deformation measurements are made in real-time as the embedded speckle plane (ESP) responds with the bulk to the applied load. Example results of deformation and strain fields associated with indentation, relaxation, and sliding contact experiments are shown.

Conclusions

This method has successfully observed the subsurface mechanical response in the bulk of a hydrogel and has the potential to answer fundamental questions regarding biological material mechanical behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Derler S, Gerhardt LC (2012) Tribology of skin: Review and analysis of experimental results for the friction coefficient of human skin. Tribol Lett 45:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Der Heide E, Zeng X, Masen MA (2013) Skin tribology: Science friction? 1 Skin friction in daily life. Friction 1:130–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-013-0015-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarkar A, Andablo-Reyes E, Bryant M et al (2019) Lubrication of soft oral surfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 39:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore AC, Schrader JL, Ulvila JJ, Burris DL (2017) A review of methods to study hydration effects on cartilage friction. Tribol - Mater Surfaces Interfaces 11:202–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/17515831.2017.1397329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McCutchen CW (1959) Mechanism of animal joints: Sponge-hydrostatic and weeping bearings. Nature 184:1284–1285. https://doi.org/10.1038/1841284a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mow VC, Kuei SC, Lai WM, Armstrong CG (1980) Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: Theory and experiments. J Biomech Eng 102:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ateshian GA (2009) The role of interstitial fluid pressurization in articular cartilage lubrication. J Biomech 42:1163–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore AC, Burris DL (2017) Tribological rehydration of cartilage and its potential role in preserving joint health. Osteoarthr Cartil 25:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graham BT, Moore AC, Burris DL, Price C (2018) Mapping the spatiotemporal evolution of solute transport in articular cartilage explants reveals how cartilage recovers fluid within the contact area during sliding. J Biomech 71:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peppas NA, Huang Y, Torres-Lugo M et al (2000) Physicochemical foundations and structural design of hydrogels in medicine and biology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2:9–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rivest C, Morrison DWG, Ni B et al (2007) Microscale hydrogels for medicine and biology: Synthesis characteristics and applications. J Mech Mater Struct 2:1103–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirschner CM, Anseth KS (2013) Hydrogels in healthcare: From static to dynamic material microenvironments. Acta Mater 61:931–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oyen ML (2014) Mechanical characterisation of hydrogel materials. Int Mater Rev 59:44–59. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galli M, Comley KSC, Shean TAV, Oyen ML (2009) Viscoelastic and poroelastic mechanical characterization of hydrated gels. J Mater Res 24:973–979. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.0129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schulze KD, Hart SM, Marshall SL et al (2017) Polymer osmotic pressure in hydrogel contact mechanics. Biotribology 11:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2017.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan EP, Hu Y, Johnson PM et al (2012) Spherical indentation testing of poroelastic relaxations in thin hydrogel layers. Soft Matter 8:1492–1498. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sm06514a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reale ER, Dunn AC (2017) Poroelasticity-driven lubrication in hydrogel interfaces. Soft Matter 13:428–435. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sm02111e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cai S, Hu Y, Zhao X, Suo Z (2010) Poroelasticity of a covalently crosslinked alginate hydrogel under compression. J Appl Phys 108:113514. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3517146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhattacharyya A, O’Bryan C, Ni Y et al (2020) Hydrogel compression and polymer osmotic pressure. Biotribology 22:100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2020.100125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Talesnick M (2013) Measuring soil pressure within a soil mass. Can Geotech J 50:716–722. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sallaway L, Magee S, Shi J et al (2014) Detecting solid masses in phantom breast using mechanical indentation. Exp Mech 54:935–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-013-9786-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Muth JT, Vogt DM, Truby RL et al (2014) Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors within highly stretchable elastomers. Adv Mater 26:6307–6312. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Estrada JB, Luetkemeyer CM, Scheven UM, Arruda EM (2020) MR-u: Material characterization using 3D displacement-encoded magnetic resonance and the virtual fields method. Exp Mech 60:907–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00595-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burguete RL, Patterson EA (1997) A photoelastic study of contact between a cylinder and a half-space. Exp Mech 37:314–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02317424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buffiere JY, Maire E, Adrien J et al (2010) In situ experiments with X ray tomography: An attractive tool for experimental mechanics. Proc Soc Exp Mech Inc 67:289–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-010-9333-7

  26. Yang J, Hazlett L, Landauer AK, Franck C (2020) Augmented lagrangian digital volume correlation (ALDVC). Exp Mech C: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00607-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Buljac A, Jailin C, Mendoza A et al (2020) Digital volume correlation: progress and challenges. Conf Proc Soc Exp Mech Ser C:113–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30009-8_17

  28. Bay BK, Smith TS, Fyhrie DP, Saad M (1999) Digital volume correlation: Three-dimensional strain mapping using x-ray tomography. Exp Mech 39:217–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bar-Kochba E, Toyjanova J, Andrews E et al (2015) A fast iterative digital volume correlation algorithm for large deformations. Exp Mech 55:261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9874-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Patel M, Leggett SE, Landauer AK et al (2018) Rapid, topology-based particle tracking for high-resolution measurements of large complex 3D motion fields. Sci Rep 8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23488-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Franck C, Hong S, Maskarinec SA et al (2007) Three-dimensional full-field measurements of large deformations in soft materials using confocal microscopy and digital volume correlation. Exp Mech 47:427–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9037-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hall MS, Long R, Hui CY, Wu M (2012) Mapping three-dimensional stress and strain fields within a soft hydrogel using a fluorescence microscope. Biophys J 102:2241–2250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang J, Cramer HC, Franck C (2020) Extracting non-linear viscoelastic material properties from violently-collapsing cavitation bubbles. Extrem Mech Lett 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2020.100839

  34. Upadhyay K, Subhash G, Spearot D (2020) Hyperelastic constitutive modeling of hydrogels based on primary deformation modes and validation under 3D stress states. Int J Eng Sci 154:103314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103314

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. DeVries M, Subhash G, Mcghee A et al (2018) Quasi-static and dynamic response of 3D-printed alumina. J Eur Ceram Soc 38:3305–3316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Naresh K, Shankar K, Velmurugan R, Gupta NK (2020) High strain rate studies for different laminate configurations of bi-directional glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy composites using DIC. Structures 27:2451–2465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pierron F, Sutton MA, Tiwari V (2011) Ultra high speed dic and virtual fields method analysis of a three point bending impact test on an aluminium bar. Exp Mech 51:537–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-010-9402-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Johannes KG, Calahan KN, Qi Y et al (2019) Three-dimensional microscale imaging and measurement of soft material contact interfaces under quasi-static normal indentation and shear. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee D, Rahman MM, Zhou Y, Ryu S (2015) Three-dimensional confocal microscopy indentation method for hydrogel elasticity measurement. Langmuir 31:9684–9693. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schreier H, Orteu J-J, Sutton MA (2009) Image correlation for shape. Motion and Deformation Measurements, Springer, US, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  41. McGhee A, Bennett A, Ifju P et al (2018) Full-field deformation measurements in liquid-like-solid granular microgel using digital image correlation. Exp Mech 58:137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0337-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bhattacharjee T, Zehnder SM, Rowe KG et al (2015) Writing in the granular gel medium. Sci Adv 1:e1500655. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pitenis AA, Urueña JM, Schulze KD et al (2014) Polymer fluctuation lubrication in hydrogel gemini interfaces. Soft Matter 10:8955–8962. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4sm01728e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou P (2001) Subpixel displacement and deformation gradient measurement using digital image/speckle correlation (DISC). Opt Eng 40:1613. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1387992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Crammond G, Boyd SW, Dulieu-Barton JM (2013) Speckle pattern quality assessment for digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 51:1368–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhao J, Hussain M, Wang M et al (2020) Embedded 3D printing of multi-internal surfaces of hydrogels. Addit, Manuf, p 32

    Google Scholar 

  47. Krick BA, Vail JR, Persson BNJ, Sawyer WG (2012) Optical in situ micro tribometer for analysis of real contact area for contact mechanics, adhesion, and sliding experiments. Tribol Lett 45:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-011-9870-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Blaber J, Adair B, Antoniou A (2015) Ncorr: Open-source 2D digital image correlation matlab software. Exp Mech 55:1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0009-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Johnson K, Johnson K (1987) Contact mechanics

  50. Urueña JM, Pitenis AA, Nixon RM et al (2015) Mesh size control of polymer fluctuation lubrication in gemini hydrogels. Biotribology 1–2:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2015.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Grimm M, Bigger R, Freitas C (2017) High-speed dic on inside perma-gel during ballistic peneration. In: International Digital Imaging Correlation Society, Springer, Cham, pp 259-262

  52. Nalam PC, Gosvami NN, Caporizzo MA et al (2015) Nano-rheology of hydrogels using direct drive force modulation atomic force microscopy. Soft Matter 11:8165–8178. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM01143D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mikami H, Harmon J, Kobayashi H et al (2018) Ultrafast confocal fluorescence microscopy beyond the fluorescence lifetime limit. Optica 5:117. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.5.000117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. O’Bryan CS, Bhattacharjee T, Marshall SL et al (2018) Commercially available microgels for 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting 11:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. O’Bryan CS, Bhattacharjee T, Niemi SR et al (2017) Three-dimensional printing with sacrificial materials for soft matter manufacturing. MRS Bull 42:571–577. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2017.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen S, Tan WS, Bin Juhari MA et al (2020) Freeform 3D printing of soft matters: recent advances in technology for biomedical engineering. Biomed Eng Lett 10:453–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-020-00171-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Garcia M, Schulze KD, O’Bryan CS et al (2017) Eliminating the surface location from soft matter contact mechanics measurements. Tribol - Mater Surfaces Interfaces 11:187–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/17515831.2017.1397908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Garcia M, Angelini TE (2019) A method for eliminating the need to know when contact is made with soft surfaces: Data processing and error analysis. Biotribology 20:100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2019.100109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7:1564–1583. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. O’Bryan CS, Schulze KD, Angelini TE (2019) Low force, high noise: Isolating indentation forces through autocorrelation analysis. Biotribology 20:100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2019.100110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pan B (2011) Recent Progress in Digital Image Correlation. Exp Mech 51:1223–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-010-9418-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Pitenis AA, Urueña JM, McGhee EO et al (2017) Challenges and opportunities in soft tribology. Tribol - Mater Surfaces Interfaces 11:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17515831.2017.1400779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ateshian GA, Wang H (1995) A theoretical solution for the frictionless rolling contact of cylindrical biphasic articular cartilage layers. J Biomech 28:1341–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(95)00008-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bonnevie ED, Baro VJ, Wang L, Burris DL (2011) In situ studies of cartilage microtribology: Roles of speed and contact area. Tribol Lett 41:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-010-9687-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Bonnevie ED, Baro VJ, Wang L, Burris DL (2012) Fluid load support during localized indentation of cartilage with a spherical probe. J Biomech 45:1036–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Barquins M, Courtel R (1975) Rubber friction and the rheology of viscoelastic contact. Wear 32:133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(75)90263-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. McGhee EO, Pitenis AA, Urueña JM et al (2018) In Situ measurements of contact dynamics in speed-dependent hydrogel friction. Biotribology 13:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2017.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Schulze KD, Bennett AI, Rowe KG, Gregory Sawyer W (2014) L’Escargot rapide: Soft contacts at high speeds. Tribol Lett 55:65–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-014-0332-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Mak AF (1986) The apparent viscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage—the contributions from the intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and interstitial fluid flows. J Biomech Eng 108:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Blum MM, Ovaert TC (2012) Experimental and numerical tribological studies of a boundary lubricant functionalized poro-viscoelastic PVA hydrogel in normal contact and sliding. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 14:248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Esteki MH, Alemrajabi AA, Hall CM et al (2020) A new framework for characterization of poroelastic materials using indentation. Acta Biomater 102:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Rennie AC, Dickrell PL, Sawyer WG (2005) Friction coefficient of soft contact lenses: measurements and modeling. Tribol Lett 18:499–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-005-3610-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. W. Gregory Sawyer and Prof. Peter J. Ifju for their helpful conversations and insight in the development of this method and manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program for Alexander McGhee, Eric McGhee, and Jack Famiglietti under Grant No. DGE- 1842473.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. D. Schulze.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that is relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 35 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

Materials and Supplies

Poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate Mn 480 (PEG-A), Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate Mn 700 (PEG-DA), sodium hydroxide 10 N, and 2-Hydroxy-4′-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone (Irgacure) were supplied by Sigma Aldrich. The granular microgel which forms the LLS is Ashland™ 980 carbomer purchased from Chempoint. UV irradiation is preformed using a MelodySusie 36 W UV Nail Lamp Dryer purchased from Amazon (ASIN: B012MEZP2E).

mLLS Preparation

  1. 1.

    Create PEG stock solution.

    1. (a)

      Create a PEG-A stock solution by dissolving 6.15 g of PEG-A into 3.85 g of ultra pure DI H2O

    2. (b)

      Create a PEG-DA stock solution by dissolving 4 g of PEG-DA into 6 g of ultra pure DI H2O

    3. (c)

      Create an Irgacure solution by dissolving 1.25 g 2-Hydroxy-4′-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone into 10 mL of ethanol

  2. 2.

    Create LLS stock solution

    1. (a)

      Combine 0.25 g Ashland 980 to 100 g ultrapure DI H20 and mix vigorously until dissolved.

      1. 1

        Allow the mixture to rest overnight to fully hydrate

    2. (b)

      Pass the carbomer solution through a 40 µm mesh filter to remove all undissolved clumps.

    3. (c)

      Add 1 mL of 10 N NaOH and shake vigorously

      1. 1

        The resulting mixture should be a highly jammed solid with many air bubbles

  3. 3.

    Create the PEG stock + LLS mixture according to the following table (increasing DA% corresponds to increasing elastic modulus)

 

0.05% DA

0.1% DA

0.15% DA

PEG-A (mL)

7.9

7.5

7.0

PEG-DA (mL)

0.415

0.83

1.2

Irgacure (mL)

2.6

2.6

2.6

LLS (mL)

25

25

25

  1. 4.

    Mix vigorously and wrap the container in foil to prevent the initiation of free radical polymerization

  2. 5.

    Place the mixture in a vacuum chamber reaching a gauge pressure of -85 kPa for 10 minutes, then centrifuge the mixture to remove all entrapped air.

  3. 6.

    Irradiate a small sample of the resulting mixture with UV light for 5–15 min at a low power to ensure sample polymerization

Prepare Polymeric Speckles

This procedure is adapted from Mcghee et al. [41]

  1. 1.

    Create a monomer mixture from the prepared mLLS according to the table above, but replace the LLS component with ultrapure DI H2O

  2. 2.

    Add a small amount of water soluble paint and mix thoroughly

  3. 3.

    Place the mixture into a fine misting spray bottle and spray the mixture onto a foil surface

  4. 4.

    Irradiate the sprayed surface with UV for 1 h on a low power setting

  5. 5.

    Wash the surface while collecting the effluent into a large container.

  6. 6.

    Allow the particles to settle to the bottom of the container and dump the excess water

  7. 7.

    Repeat this process until the water is clear of excess paint

  8. 8.

    Collect all of the particles into a centrifuge tube, spin the particles down into a puck, and drain the excess water.

  9. 9.

    Mix a small amount of mLLS with the particle puck and mix thoroughly to form the mLLS-speckle mixture for use as printing ink

    1. (a)

      Try to obtain a high-density speckle printing mixture

3D Printing

  1. 1.

    Place a printing container onto the printing bed, and preform a dry run of the expected print to ensure correct positioning and alignment

  2. 2.

    Load the mLLS-speckle mixture into the syringe

  3. 3.

    Choose a needle gauge that is close to the same diameter as the largest particle in the syringe

  4. 4.

    Begin the print

    1. (a)

      Follow guidelines associated with McGhee et al. [41]

Photocure

  1. 1.

    After the print is complete, place the UV irradiator on top of the sample and irradiate on a low power setting for 15–30 min

  2. 2.

    If the sample is somewhat translucent then it has cured correctly

  3. 3.

    Allow the sample to rest for 1 h

Swell the Sample in Ultrapure DI H2O

  1. 1.

    Remove the sample from the glass container by placing a small flat plastic spatula on the edge of the gel and gently pry the gel from the bottom

  2. 2.

    Place the gel block into a large container of ultrapure DI H20 and allow it to swell for 48–72 h until the polymer has become transparent

    1. (a)

      Expect a significant volume change

Once the sample has swollen it is ready for testing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGhee, A.J., McGhee, E.O., Famiglietti, J.E. et al. Dynamic Subsurface Deformation and Strain of Soft Hydrogel Interfaces Using an Embedded Speckle Pattern With 2D Digital Image Correlation. Exp Mech 61, 1017–1027 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00713-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00713-w

Keywords

Navigation