Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Urban classification using preserved information of high dimensional textural features of Sentinel-1 images in Tabriz, Iran

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monitoring urban land through satellite images has rapidly developed with the advent of modern technologies, and the increasing number of satellites plays a contributing role. While optical images have a high capability in urban monitoring, they still have some limitations, including their dependence on climatic conditions and spectral information, which lead to difficulty in making a distinction between bare land, buildings and other features. The impossibility of optical imagery at night is another issue that can make the land cover classification difficult. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) allows imaging in all climatic conditions and at nighttime, with an ability to detect phenomena based on their geometry, roughness, and location, making the land cover classification much easier. In the present study, radar Sentinel-1 images with polarization VV and VH were used for the land classification in Tabriz. Sentinel-2 images for the same time were applied as a reference for the calibration and accuracy assessment. Maximum likelihood (ML) and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were also employed for supervised classification. In both algorithms, the classification was performed in windows with different sizes once by the SAR backscattering coefficient (σ0) and then by combining the backscattering coefficients with the statistical data obtained from the texture. The results showed that the use of radar images only with backscattering intensity resulted in poor performance while using the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) of texture features increased the accuracy. The transmitted frequencies of radar images have different redistributions to different phenomena. The numerical results obtained from the radar image classification show that using only the radar image redistribution led to low accuracies at both VV and VH polarization, but the use of the textural analysis significantly increased the accuracy of the classifications. The statistical results obtained from the ML and SVM classifications for radar images at VV and VH polarization indicated that the latter performed better than the former. When texture analysis was not used in the classes, the classification accuracy was low with kappa values of 0.37 and 0.42 for VV and VH polarization, respectively. The use of texture analysis and obtaining the optimum window size is increase the classification accuracy with a better performance for VH polarization. The SVM classification method with a kappa coefficient of 0.72% showed better performance than the ML one with a kappa coefficient of 0.61%. Conclusively, in the absence of Sentinel-2 datasets, Sentinel-1 images are good alternatives if the preserved texture information is available for the land cover classification. Results of this research are of great importance for developing the remote sensing methods and their techniques can be considered as progressive research in the domain of remote sensing sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Ahmadi FS, Hames AS (2009) Comparison of four classification methods to extract land use and land cover from raw satellite images for some remote arid areas. Earth Sci 20(1):167–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Anyamba A, Eastman JR (1996) Interannual variability of NDVI over Africa and its relation to El Nino/southern oscillation. Int J Remote Sens 71(3):2533–2548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argenti F, Lapini A, Alparone T et al (2013) A tutorial on speckle reduction in synthetic aperture radar images.IEEE. Trans Geosci Remote Sens 1(3):6–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arxi P, Adibnejad M (2011) Internship experience of support vector machine algorithms for land use classification using ETM + Landsat satellite data (case study: Ilam dam area). Iranian J Range Desert Res 18(3):420–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Augusteijn MF, Clemens LE, Shaw KA (1995) Performance evaluation of texture measures for ground cover identification in satellite images by means of a neural network classifier. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 33:616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta B (2010) Analysis of urban growth and sprawl from remote sensing data. Springer-Verlag

  • Bolstad PV, Lillesand TM (1992) Rule-based classification models: flexible integration of satellite imagery and thematic spatial data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 58(7):965–971

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C, Ying Y (2011) Learning with support vector machines. In: Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Claypool

  • Cao H, Zhang H, Wang C et al (2018) Operational built-up areas extraction for cities in China using Sentinel-1 SAR data. Remote Sens 10(6):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavur M, Duzgun HS, Kemec S et al (2019) Land use and land cover classification of Sentinel-2-a: ST Petersburg case study. International archives of the photogrammetry. Remote Sens Spatial InformaSci XLII-1(W2):16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavur M, Kemec S, Nabdel L, Duzgun HS (2017) An evaluation of land use land cover (LULC) classification for urban applications with Quickbird and WorldView2 data. Urban Remote Sens Event (JURSE) 1–4

  • Chang CC, Lin CJ (2013) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst 2(3):22

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatziantoniou A, Psomiadis E, Petropoulos GP (2017) Co-orbital sentinel 1 and 2 for LULC mapping with emphasis on wetlands in a mediterranean setting based on machine learning. Remote Sens 9(12):1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CH, Pau LF, Wang PSP (1999) The handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision. World Scientific

  • Dell'Acqua F, Gamba P (2006) Discriminating urban environments using multiscale texture and multiple SAR images. Int J Remote Sens 12(18):3797–3812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon B, Candade N (2008) Multispectral land use classification using neural networks and support vector machines: one or the other, or both. Int J Remote Sens 29(4):1185–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du P, Samat A, Waske B et al (2015) Random Forest and rotation Forest for fully polarized SAR image classification using polarimetric and spatial features. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 105:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgesh KS, Lekha B (2010) Data classification using support vector machine. J Theor Appl Info Technol 12(1):1–7

  • Feizizadeh, B., Kazamei, M., Blaschke, T., Lakes, T (2021) An object based image analysis applied for volcanic and glacial landforms mapping in Sahand Mountain, Iran, Catena, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105073

  • Gamba P, Aldrighi M, Stasolla M (2011) Robust extraction of urban area extents in HR and VHR SAR images. IEEE J Select Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 4(1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RC, Woods ER (1992) Digital Image Processing. Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumma MK, Thenkabail PS, Hideto F, Nelson A, Dheeravath V, Busia D, Rala A (2011) Mapping irrigated areas of Ghana using fusion of 30 m and 250 m resolution remote-sensing data. Remote Sens 3(4):816–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haralick R, Shanmugan K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. StudMedia Commun SMC:610–621

  • Hashiba H, Kameda K, Uesugi S, Tanaka S (2000) Land-use change analysis of Tama of river basin with different spatial resolution sensor data by land sat MSS and TM. Adv Space Res 26(7):1069–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami F (2001) Monitoring urban changes using remote sensing data ( case study: Kerman city ). University of Tehran, Tehran, pp 120–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedge S (2003) Modeling land cover change: a fuzzy approach. Unpublished Thesis, ITC The Netherlands

  • Hsu CW, Chang CC, Lin CJ (2015) A practical guide to support vector classification. National Taiwan University Taipei 1396-1400

  • Huertas A, Gebejes R (2013) Texture characterization based on grey-level co-occurrence matrix. Conference of informatics and management sciences. Slovakia: Sci. 375-378

  • Hussain M, Chen D, Cheng A, Wei H, Stanley D (2013) Change detection from remotely sensed images: from pixel-based to object-based approaches. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 80:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR (2005) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimzadeh S, Miyajima M, Hassanzadeh R, Amiraslanzadeh R, Kamel B (2014) A GIS-based seismic hazard, building vulnerability and human loss assessment for the earthquake scenario in Tabriz. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimzadeh S, Matsuoka M, Ogushi F (2018) Spatiotemporal deformation patterns of the Lake Urmia causeway as characterized by multisensor InSAR analysis. Scientific Report 8:5357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi F (2013) Change detection approaches by using optical and SAR images. K.N.Toosi University of Technology, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarz A, Ghasemian Yazdi M (2005) A fast algorithm based on backup vector machine for classifying hyperspectral images using spatial correlation. Electrical engineering and computer engineering of Iran 37-44

  • Koch F, Krellenberg K (2018) How to Contextualize SDG 11? Looking at Indicators for Sustainable urban development in Germany. ISPRS Int Geo-Inform Sustain Develop Goals 7(12): 464

  • Kraak M, Ricker B, Engelhardt Y (2018) Challenges of Mapping Sustainable Development Goals Indicators Data. ISPRS Int Geo-Inform Sustain Develop Goals 7(12):482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lardeux C, Frison PL, Tison C, Souyris JC, Stoll B, Fruneau B, Rudant JP (2009) Support vector machine for multifrequency SAR polarimetric data classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47(12):4143–4152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazecky M, Comut FC, Qin Y et al (2017) Sentinel-1 interferometry system in the high-performance computing environment. In: Ivan I, Singleton A, Horák J, Inspektor T (eds) The rise of big spatial data. Springer, pp 131–139

  • Lee JS, Grunes MR, Pottier E (2001) Quantitative comparison of classification capability: fully polarimetric versus dual and single-polarization SAR. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(11):2343–2351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JS, Grunes MR, Grandi GD (1999) Polarimetric SAR speckle filtering and its implication for classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37(5):2363–2373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JS (1986) Speckle suppression and analysis for synthetic aperture radar images. Opt Eng 25(5):255636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre A, Sannier C, Corpetti T (2016) Monitoring urban areas with sentinel-2A data: application to the update of the Copernicus high resolution. Remote Sens 8(7):606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes A, Touzi R, Nezry E (1990) Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28(6):992–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maghsoudi Y (2015) Basics of remote sensing of radar. K. N. Toosi University of Technology

  • Mantero P, Moser G, Serpico SB (2005) Partial supervised classification of remote sensing images through SVM based probability density estimation. IEEE transactions. Geosci Remote Sens 43(3):559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martensc B, Lambin EF (2000) Land-cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon. Annals Am Assoc Geographers 90(3):467–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchiorri M, Florczyk A, Freire S et al (2018) Megacities spatiotemporal dynamics monitored with the global human settlement layer. Real corp (CORP–competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning) 285-294

  • Maleknejad A, Ghasemian H, Mirzapour F (2015) Measurement of texture features in increasing the classification accuracy of images resulting from the integration of single-band and hyperspectral images of residential and industrial areas south of Tehran. J Geomatics Sci Technol 5(1):55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Molch K (2009) Radar earth observation imagery for urban area characterisation. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports; European Commission, Luxembourg, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosotti M, Campanini R (2008) Texture classification using invariant Ranklet features. Pattern Recogn Lett 29:1980–1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Karimzadeh S, Valizadeh Kamran K, Matsuoka M (2020) Extraction of land information, future landscape changes and seismic Hazard assessment: a case study of Tabriz, Iran. Sensors 20(24):7010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountrakis G, Im J, Ogole C (2011) Support vector Machines in Remote Sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 66(3):247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi P, Feizizadeh B, Navid H (2021) A comparative approach of fuzzy object based image analysis and machine learning techniques which are applied to crop residue cover mapping by using Sentinel-2 satellite and UAV imagery. Remote Sens 13:937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oommen T (2008) An objective analysis of support vector machine based classification for remote sensing. Math Geosci 40:409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paneque-Gálvez J, Mas JF, Moré G, Cristóbal J, Orta-Martínez M, Luz AC, Guèze M, Macía MJ, Reyes-García V (2013) Enhanced land use/cover classification of heterogeneous tropical landscapes using support vector machines and textural homogeneity. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 23:372–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C, Van Genderen JL (1998) Review article multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods, and applications. Int J Remote Sens 19(5):823–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radoux J, Chomé G, Jacques DC, Waldner F, Bellemans N, Matton N, Lamarche C, d’Andrimont R, Defourny P (2016) Sentinel-2’s potential for sub-pixel landscape feature detection. Remote Sens 8(6):488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei Motlag A, Shahriari G, Ebrahimi A et al. (2012) Classification of satellite images based on texture-based models using the neural network. Iran Electrical and Electronics News Conference, Gonabad Islamic University: 1486–1483

  • Richards JA (2013) Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 192–195

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shalaby A, Tateishi R (2007) Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring LC and land-use changes in the northwestern coastal zone of Egypt. Appl Geogr 27:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y, Fan X, Liu H, Xiao J, Ross S, Brisco B, Brown R, Staples G (2001) Rice monitoring and production estimation using multitemporal RADARSAT. Remote Sens Environ 76(3):310–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z, Fung KB (1994) A comparison of digital speckle filters. IGARSS'94. IEEE Int Geosci Remote Sens Symposium 4:2129–2133

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim S, Im J, Park H et al (2018) Icing detection over East Asia from geostationary satellite data using machine learning approaches. Remote Sens 10(4):631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sisodia PS, Tiwari V, Kumar A (2014) Analysis of supervised maximum likelihood classification for remote sensing image. International conference on recent advances and innovations in engineering 1-4

  • Skriver H (2012) Crop classification by multitemporal C- and L-band single- and dual-polarization and fully polarimetric SAR. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 50(6):2138–2149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small C, A. A. Okujeni S, Linden VD et al (2018) Remote sensing of urban environments. Remote Sens 93:96–127

  • Sohrabi Mofrad M, Kia B (2020) Detecting impervious urban surfaces using the textural properties of radar imagery. J Spatial Plann 10(1):85–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PK, Han D, Rico-Ramirez MA, Bray M, Islam T (2012) Selection of classification techniques for land use. Land cover change investigation. Adv Space Res 50(9):1250–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava D, Bhambhu L (2009) Data classification using support vector machine. J Theor Appl Inf Technol 12(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler H (1980) The use of prior probabilities in maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens 66:135–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Szuster BW, Chen Q, Borger M (2011) A comparison of classification techniques to support land cover and land use analysis in tropical coastal zones. Appl Geogr 31(2):525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeharu K, Shunji M (1997) The affection of the vegetation change on the eroded soil in south-east Asia, " Asian association remote sensing. 8

  • Touzi R (2002) A review of speckle filtering in the context of estimation theory. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40(11):2392–2404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai YH, Stow D, Chen HL, Lewison R, An L, Shi L (2018) Mapping vegetation and land use types in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve using Google earth engine. Remote Sens 10(6):927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuia D, Volpi M, Mura D et al (2014) Automatic feature learning for Spatio-spectral image classification with sparse SVM. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(10):6062–6074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V (1992) Principles of risk minimization for learning theory. In: Moody J, Hanson S, Lippmann R (eds) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 4.Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA,  pp 831–838

  • Vapnik V, Chervonenkis A (1991) The necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency in the empirical risk minimization method. Pattern Recognition, Image Anal 1(3):283–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Waske B, Benediktsson JA (2007) Fusion of support vector machines for the classification of multisensor data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 45(12):3858–3866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood D, Brown RJ, McNairn H (1998) Operational consideration in using RADARSAT data for agricultural monitoring. 20th Canadian remote sensing symposium, Calgary, Alberta Canada

  • Wu Q, Li HQ, Wang RS, Paulussen J, He Y, Wang M, Wang BH, Wang Z (2006) Monitoring and predicting land-use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS. Landsc Urban Plan 78(4):322–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao M, He Z, Jia Y (2007) Fusion of multisensor images based on the curvelet transform. Remotely Sensed Data Inform 67520:67529

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Porwal A, Holden EJ, Dentith MC (2012) Towards automatic lithological classification from remote sensing data using support vector machines. Comput Geosci 45:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri H, Yamazaki F, Liu W (2017) Texture analysis and land cover classification of Tehran using polarimetric synthetic aperture radar imagery. Appl Sci 7(5):452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Zhang Y, Van Genderen JL (2010) Image fusion for land cover change detection. Int J Image Data Fusion 1(2):193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Lin H, Li Y, Zhang Y, Fang C (2016a) Mapping urban impervious surface with dual-polarimetric SAR data: an improved method. Landsc Urban Plan 151:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZX, Wang X, Wen QK et al (2016b) Research progress of remote sensing application in land resources. Remote Sens 20(5):1243–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Li P, Wang J (2014) Urban built-up area extraction from Landsat TM/ETM+ images using spectral information and multivariate texture. Remote Sens 6(8):7339–7359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (1999) Optimization of building detection in satellite images by combining multispectral classification and texture filtering. Photogramm Remote Sens 54(1):50–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank European Space Agency (ESA) for providing SAR Sentinel-1 and MSI Sentinel-2 images in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 5166616471, Iran

    Mohammad Ghasemi, Sadra Karimzadeh & Bakhtiar Feizizadeh

  2. Institute of Environment, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 5166616471, Iran

    Sadra Karimzadeh & Bakhtiar Feizizadeh

Authors
  1. Mohammad Ghasemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sadra Karimzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadra Karimzadeh.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, M., Karimzadeh, S. & Feizizadeh, B. Urban classification using preserved information of high dimensional textural features of Sentinel-1 images in Tabriz, Iran. Earth Sci Inform 14, 1745–1762 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00617-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00617-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation