Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the Role of Community-Managed Forest in Carbon Sequestration and Climate Change Mitigation of Tripura, India

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community-based forest management provides an opportunity to build a sustainable link with ecology for meeting future needs. A study was carried out to understand the effect of management strategies on the biodiversity, soil nutrient, and carbon stock of two community forests practiced by Jamatia (JCF) and Halam (HCF) tribes of Tripura, northeast India. The forest managed by Jamatia is community conserved, whereas the Joint Forest Management (JFM) regulation issued by the Government of India was implemented in Halam community-based forest. JCF showed higher tree diversity (2.741) than HCF (2.176), while there was no significant variation in the total number of species in these forests. Anogeissus acuminata, Schima wallichii, and Terminalia bellirica were the most dominant species in JCF and HCF. A relatively higher amount of organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus content was found in JCF soils. JCF showed higher carbon stock (342.9 Mg C ha–1) than HCF (158.7 Mg C ha–1). A positive and significant correlation of SOC concentration was observed with soil moisture, SOM, and soil nutrient content. The results show that both stands were at developmental stages; however, regular extraction of biomass from HCF was attributable to lower carbon stock. We found that the Jamatia communities are proactively involved in the conservation of forests and sustainable management of biodiversity under their control. The results reveal that the agent of management can play a vital role in enhancing tree diversity, soil properties, and carbon stock in community forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All the data are available with the paper. Additional field data can be provided upon request, after publication.

Code Availability

Not applicable

References

  • Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society, 29, 485–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., & Hardin, R. (2008). Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science, 320(5882), 1460–1462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahirwal, J., Nath, A., Brahma, B., Deb, S., Sahoo, U. K., & Nath, A. J. (2021). Patterns and driving factors of biomass carbon and soil organic carbon stock in the Indian Himalayan region. Science of the Total Environment, 770, 145292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, A. B. (2012). Soil compactness on skid trails after selective logging in moist evergreen forest of Ghana. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 3(6), 262–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrov, G. A. (2007). Carbon stock growth in a forest stand: The power of age. Carbon Balance and Management, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-2-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. M., & Ingram, J. S. I. (1993). Tropical soil biology and fertility- A handbook of methods (2nd ed.). Wallingford: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anup, K. C., Koirala, I., & Adhikari, N. (2015). Cost-benefit analysis of a community forest in Nepal. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 34(3), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, R. J. (2019). Sustainable development goals and the forestry sector-A complex relationship. Forests, 10(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, E., & Ingram, V. (2011). Impact of community forest on the livelihoods in Cameroons: Lessons from two case studies. International Forestry Review, 13, 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554811798811371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyene, A. D., Bluffstone, R., & Mekonnen, A. (2016). Community forests, carbon sequestration and REDD+: Evidence from Ethiopia. Environment and Development Economics, 21(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X15000297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta, S. P., & Devkota, A. (2020). Carbon stock in the community managed sal (Shorea robusta) forests of Dadeldhura district, western Nepal. Southern Forestry, 82(5), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2019.1686690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Healy, J. R., Jones, J. P. G., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2012). Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improving local welfare? Frontier in Ecology and The Environment, 10, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1890/110040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brahmachari, D. (2019). Ethnicity and violent conflicts in northeast India: Analysing the trends. Strategic Analysis, 43(4), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2019.1623497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, R. H., & Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science, 59(1), 39–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Gillespie, A. J. R., & Lugo, A. E. (1989). Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science, 35, 881–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burivalova, Z., Allnutt, T. F., Rademacher, D., Schlemm, A., Wilcova, D. S., & Butler, R. A. (2019). What works in tropical forest conservation, and what does not: Effectiveness of four strategies in terms of environmental, social and economic outcomes. Conservation Science and Practice, 1(6), e28. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, M. A., Brown, S., Helmer, E. H., & Baumgardner, G. A. (1997). Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia, 111, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J. Q., dos Santos, J., Riberio, R. J., & Highuchi, N. (2001). Tree damage, allometric relationships and aboveground net primary production in central Amazon forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 152, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00591-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, L. R., Gupta, S., Pandey, V., & Singh, N. (2016). Impact of forest vegetation on soil characteristics: A correlation between soil biological and physico-chemical properties. 3 Biotech, 6, 188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0510-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chattarjee, S., Ghosh, S., Sarma, J., Barik, S. K., Tiwari, B. K., & Das, K. C. (2011). Community conserved areas in northeast India: Some observations in Assam, Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh. The Indian Forester, 126513335.

  • Chhabra, A., Palriab, S., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2002). Growing stock-based forest biomass estimate for India. Biomass and Bioenergy, 22(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00068-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devi, L. S., & Yadava, P. S. (2015). Carbon stock and rate of carbon sequestration in Dipterocarpus forests of Manipur, Northeast India. Journal of Forestry Research, 26(2), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0070-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. K., Brown, S., Houghton, R. A., Solomon, A. M., Trexler, M. C., & Wisniewski, J. (1994). Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 263, 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5144.185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, W. D., Pokomy, B., Katila, P., Galloway, G., & Pacheco, P. (2018). Community forestry and sustainable development goals: A two way street. Forests, 9(6), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9060331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsell, N., Turkovska, O., Gusti, M., Obersteiner, M., Den Elzen, M., & Havlik, P. (2016). Assessing the INDCs’ land use, land use change, and forest emission projections. Carbon Balance and Management, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0068-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortmann, L., Sohngen, B., & Southgate, D. (2017). Assessing the role of group heterogeneity in community forest concessions in Guatemala’s Maya Biosphere reserve. Land Economics, 93, 503–526. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.93.3.503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebeyehu, G., Soromessa, T., Bekele, T., & Teketay, D. (2019). Carbon stocks and factors affecting their storage in dry Afromontane forests of Awi Zone, northwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 43, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-019-0105-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi, A., Ahirwal, J., & Sahoo, U. K. (2021). Plant biodiversity and carbon sequestration potential of the planted forest in Brahmaputra flood plains. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, E. (1996). Climate change 1995: The science of climate change: Contribution of working group I to the second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.

  • Khanal, Y., Sharma, R. P., & Upadhyaya, C. P. (2010). Soil and vegetation carbon pools in two community forests of Palpa district, Nepal. Banko Janakari., 20(2), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v20i2.4800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharkongor, B. M., & Tiwari, B. K. (2015). Sacred groves of Meghalaya: A review. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(3), 346–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khumbongmayum, A., Khan, M. L., & Tripathi, R. S. (2005). Sacred groves of Manipur, northeast India: Biodiversity value, status and strategies for their conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(7), 1541–1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0530-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibria, M. G., & Saha, N. (2011). Analysis of existing agroforestry practices in Madhupur Sal forest: An assessment based on ecological and economic perspectives. Journal of Forestry Research, 22(4), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-011-0196-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldahl, J. (1883). Neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Stickstoffs in organischen Körpern (New method for the determination of nitrogen in organic substances). Zeitschrift für Analytische Chemie, 22(1), 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, P., Ramakrishnan, R., Saigal, S., Nagar, S., Faizi, S., Panwar, H. S., et al. (2012). Conservation across landscape: India’s approaches to biodiversity governance. New Delhi: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuramochi, T., Fekete, H., Luna, M., Casac de Villafranca, Nascimento, L., Hans, F., et al. (2018). Greenhouse gas mitigation scenarios for major emitting countries-Analysis of current climate policies and mitigation commitments: 2018 update (New Climate Institute December 2018 Report), P. 133. Retrieved on January 12, 2021, from http://newclimate.org/publications/.

  • Luintel, H., Bluffstone, R. A., & Scheller, R. M. (2018). The effect of the Nepal’s community forestry program on biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. PLoS One, 13(6), e0199526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199526.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maharanjan, M.R. (1998). Flow and distribution of costs and benefits in the Chuliban community forest, Dhankuta District, Nepal. Rural development Forestry Network Paper 23e. ODI, pp 1-12.

  • Mahato, S., Dasgupta, S., & Todaria, N. P. (2016). Tree and soil carbon stock by community managed forests in Garhwal Himalaya. Plant Archives, 16(2), 805–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, R. A., Dutta, I. C., Jha, P. K., & Karmacharya, S. B. (2016). Carbon sequestration potential in community and collaborative forests in Terai, Nepal. Tropical Ecology, 57(4), 655–662.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, R. A., Dutta, K., Jha, P. K., & Karmacharya, S. (2013). Relationship between carbon stock and plant biodiversity in collaborative forests in Terai, Nepal. ISRN Botany, 625767. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/625767.

  • Margalef, R. (1958). Information theory in ecology. International Journal of General Systems, 3, 36–71. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajss-2-5-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. G., Paré, D., Thiffault, E., Lafleur, B., Hogg, K. E., & Kishchuk, B. (2014). How do natural disturbances and human activities affect soils and tree nutrition and growth in the Canadian boreal forest? Environmental Reviews, 22(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2013-0057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medhi, P., & Borthakur, S. K. (2013). Sacred groves and sacred plants of the Dimasas of North Cachar Hills of Northeast India. African Journal of Plant Science, 7(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS12.038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, R. (1968). Ecology Workbook. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munishi, P. K. T., Mringi, S., Shirima, D. D., & Linda, S. K. (2010). The role of the Miombo Woodlands of the Southern Highlands of Tanzania as carbon sinks. Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment, 2(12), 261–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdiyarso, D., & Skutsh, M. (Eds.). (2006). Community forest management option: Case studies. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Bagor: Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtem, G., & Chaudhary, P. (2014). Sacred groves of Arunachal Pradesh: Traditional way of biodiversity conservation in Eastern Himalaya of India. Journal of Biodiversity Management and Forestry, 3, 2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2372-4417.1000125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murty, D., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., McMurtrie, R. E., & McGilvray, H. (2002). Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen? A review of literature. Global Change Biology, 8, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00459.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H. (2002). Tenure and forest conditions: Community forestry in Nepal Terai. Environmental Conservation, 29(4), 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P.K. (2002). Community-based forest management in India: The issue of tenurial significance. Paper presented for the 9th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Society of Common Property, 17-21 June 2002, Zimbabwe, 35 pages.

  • Nongkynrih, A. K. (2001). Ka Shnong the microcosm of Hynniewtrep society. Indian Horticulture, 48, 121–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S. S., Maraseni, T. N., & Cockfield, G. (2014). Carbon stock dynamics in different vegetation dominated community forests under REDD+: A case study of Nepal. Forest Ecology and Management, 327, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pariyal, S., Volkova, L., Sharma, R. P., Sunam, R., & Weston, C. J. (2019). Aboveground carbon of community managed Chirpine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) forests of Nepal based on stand types and geographic aspects. Peer Journal, 7, e6496. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak, S. K., Wunder, S., & Ferraro, P. J. (2010). Show me the money: Do payments supply environmental services in developing countries? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(2), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/req006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, L., Dutschke, M., Streck, C., & Estrade, P. M. (2008). Creative incentives for avoiding further deforestation. The nested approach. Climate Policy, 8.

  • Pelletier, J., Gelinas, N., & Skutsch, M. (2016). The place of community forest management in the REDD+ landscape. Forests, 7, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7080170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger, M. (2015). Restoring and conserving Khasi forests: A community-based REDD strategy from northeast India. Forests, 6, 4477–4494. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6124382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger, M., Darlong, V., Choudhary, D., Barik, S.K., Tiwari, B.K., Gupta, V., et al. (2016). Forest sector review of northeast India. Background paper No. 12, Draft for discussion March 2016.

  • Pragasan, L. A. (2020). Tree carbon stock and its relationship to key factors from a tropical hill forest of Tamil Nadu, India. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2020.1742510.

  • Putraditama, A., Kim, Y., & Meador, A. J. S. (2019). Community forest management and forest cover change in Lampung, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101976.

  • Schreckenberg, K., & Luttrell, C. (2009). Participatory forest management: A role to poverty reduction? International Forestry Review, 11, 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.11.2.221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., & Weiner, W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, S., & Shresthra, U. B. (2017). Beyond money: Does REDD+ payment enhance household’s participation in forest governance and management in Nepal’s community forests? Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163(4148), 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitaula, B. K., Raut, N., Dahal, N. M., Bhattacharya, R. M., & Lal, R. (2019). Soil organic carbon stocks as influenced by forest management and socioeconomic characteristics of community forest use groups in three districts of central Nepal. Indian Forester, 154(9), 863–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swai, G., Ndangalasi, H. J., Munishi, P., & Shirima, D. D. (2014). Carbon stocks of Hanang forest, Tanzania: An implication for climate mitigation. Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment, 6(3), 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa-Magar, K. B., & Shresthra, B. B. (2015). Carbon stock in community managed Hill sal (Shorea robusta) forests of central Nepal. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2015.1031251.

  • Tiwari, B. K., Tynsong, H., & Lynser, M. B. (2010). Forest management practices of the tribal people of Meghalaya, north-east India. Journal of Tropical Forestry, 22, 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, B. K., Tynsong, H., Lynrah, M. M., Lapsam, M., Deb, S., & Sharma, D. (2013). Institutional arrangement and typology of community forests of Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland of North-East India. Journal of Forestry Research, 24(1), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0337-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (1993). The United Framework Convention on Climate Change of United Nations.

  • Upadhaya, K., Thapa, N., & Barik, S. K. (2015). Tree diversity and biomass of tropical forests under two management regimes in Garo hills of north-eastern India. Tropical Ecology, 56, 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2016). EPA fact sheet “Social cost of carbon”. Retrieved on April 01, 2021, from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-12/documents/social_cost_of_carbon_fact_sheet.pdf.

  • Villela, D. M., Nascimento, M. T., Aragao, L. E. O. C., & Gama, D. M. (2006). Effect of selective logging on forest structure and nutrient cycling in a seasonally dry Brazilian Atlantic forest. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01453.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A., Tolera, M., Snell, M., O’Hara, P., & Hailu, A. (2019). Community forest management (CFM) in south-west Ethiopia: Maintaining forests, biodiversity and carbon stocks to support wild coffee conservation. Global Environmental Change, 59, 101980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by a grant received from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, India (Grant No. DST/MRDP/190/2019). The authors are immensely grateful to both Jamatia and Halam community people who actively participated and extended full cooperation during the collection of field data.

Funding

This work was partly supported by a grant received from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, India (Grant No. DST/MRDP/190/2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry and Biodiversity, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, Agartala, Tripura, India

    Dipankar Deb, Mary Jamatia, Jaba Debbarma & Sourabh Deb

  2. Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl, India

    Jitendra Ahirwal & Uttam Kumar Sahoo

Authors
  1. Dipankar Deb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary Jamatia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jaba Debbarma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jitendra Ahirwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sourabh Deb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Uttam Kumar Sahoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DD, SD, and UKS conceived the ideas; SD and UKS designed the methodology; DD, MJ, and JD collected the data; DD, SD, JA, and UKS analyzed the data; DD, MJ, JA, and SD wrote the first draft; all authors contributed to the final draft and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uttam Kumar Sahoo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable

Consent to Participate

Not applicable

Consent for Publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deb, D., Jamatia, M., Debbarma, J. et al. Evaluating the Role of Community-Managed Forest in Carbon Sequestration and Climate Change Mitigation of Tripura, India. Water Air Soil Pollut 232, 166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05133-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05133-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation