On the d-cluster generalization of Erdős-Ko-Rado
Introduction
For any with , we define , and , and we use to refer to the set of k-element subsets of a set X. Furthermore, if every element of a family contains some , we say that is a star (centered at x). We note that the maximum size of a star in is and recall the classical Erdős-Ko-Rado (EKR) theorem, which gives an upper bound on the size of “pairwise intersecting” set systems. Theorem 1 [5] Let and suppose that has the property that for all . Then where, excluding the case , equality is achieved only when is a maximum-sized star.
Definition 1 Let with and suppose that . Then, if we have such that and , we say that is a d-cluster. Furthermore, if contains no such , we say that is d-cluster-free.
Note here that in the case of , the union condition holds automatically. Thus, another way to state Theorem 1 would be to say that 2-cluster-free families can have size no greater than . In [14], Mubayi showed that 3-cluster-free families must also obey this bound, and conjectured that the same would hold for . The primary goal of this paper is to resolve Mubayi's conjecture. Theorem 2 Let and . Furthermore, suppose that is d-cluster-free. Then and, excepting the case when both and , equality implies is a maximum-sized star.
We note that the conditions and are in fact necessary; if we let then the problem is equivalent to one of the long-open hypergraph Turán problems, and a different bound applies. Furthermore, if , then any collection of d sets cannot have empty intersection. A number of previous results on this problem have been shown; Katona first proposed the problem as a version of the case, and Frankl and Füredi in [8] obtained the desired bound for and . Mubayi, in addition to resolving the case and proposing the more general problem in [14], showed in [15] that the theorem holds when and n is sufficiently large. Later, Mubayi and Ramadurai [16] and independently Özkahya and Füredi [11] showed that it also holds when and n is sufficiently large. In [12], Keevash and Mubayi solved another case of this problem, namely where both and are bounded away from zero. The case of (where, again, the union condition holds automatically) was resolved by Frankl in [6] (where the bound was established) and in [7] (where equality was characterized).
We note finally that the problem of d-clusters is closely related to several other old problems in extremal set theory, in particular the simplex and special simplex conjectures of Chvátal [3] and Frankl and Füredi [9], and more generally the so-called Turán problems for expansion. For a detailed historical account of these kinds of problems, as well as some exciting new results, we direct the interested reader to [13]. We also note that most remaining cases of Chvátal's conjecture were shown in a recent paper of the author [4], in which an alternative (but related) proof of Theorem 2 for a more limited range of parameters is also given. However, the present manuscript, and the techniques described here, appeared first.
Despite the success in tackling the problem of clusters for large values of n, techniques that could obtain the desired bound for and all have remained largely elusive. In this paper, we bridge the gap by giving a slightly more general result that is valid for all and , which in combination with the known results on will give us Theorem 2. Our more general theorem will give us more powerful inductive tools that we will leverage in our proof, and is based on a method of induction introduced in [15].
Theorem 3 Let . Furthermore, suppose that , and that has the property that any d-cluster in is contained entirely in . Then, Furthermore, excepting the case where both and , equality implies one of the following: and is a maximum-sized star, .
Note that Theorem 3 reduces to Theorem 2 for all if we set . The case of Theorem 3 is itself an interesting strengthening of Erdős-Ko-Rado, and has actually appeared before in the literature. To our knowledge, it was shown first by Borg in [1] using shadow techniques, and by Borg and Leader in [2] using cycle methods, and can also be seen as a consequence of a more general result in [10] (Theorem 9 with ). These results are all related to cross-intersecting families; that is, families such that for all and we have . In fact, the condition required for Theorem 3 to hold (in the case) is equivalent to requiring that and are cross-intersecting. The connection between Theorem 3 and the notion of cross-intersecting families is an interesting one and perhaps deserves further attention.
Section snippets
Proof of Theorem 3
Before we proceed with the proof of Theorem 3, we will need some auxiliary results and will use the following notation. For any and , we let
Furthermore, when , we write simply . Our proof will proceed by induction on d, and the following result will allow us to perform this induction. It is a stronger version of a proposition from [15] that was later stated more clearly in [16].
Proposition 1 Let and . Furthermore, suppose has the
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank my professors Dr. Shahriar Shahriari and Dr. Ghassan Sarkis as well as the Pomona College Research Circle for first introducing me to this problem, and working on it with me in the early stages. In particular, I would like to thank Archer Wheeler for continuing to work with me on this project (in its various forms) as well as Dr. Shahriar Shahriari, Dr. Richard Anstee, and Dr. Jozsef Solymosi for their support and helpful comments. Finally, I am very grateful to the
References (16)
A short proof of a cross-intersection theorem of Hilton
Discrete Math.
(2009)- et al.
Multiple cross-intersecting families of signed sets
J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A
(2010) On Sperner families satisfying an additional condition
J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A
(1976)- et al.
Exact solution of some Turán-type problems
J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A
(1987) - et al.
Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem for -vectors
J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A
(2018) - et al.
Unavoidable subhypergraphs: a-clusters
J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A
(2011) - et al.
The junta method in extremal hypergraph theory and Chvátal's conjecture
Electron. Notes Discrete Math.
(2017) Erdős-Ko-Rado for three sets
J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A
(2006)