Abstract
Context
Movement of individuals and resources among habitat patches are key processes at the landscape scale. While these subsidies are primarily studied separately, coupled movement of species and resources, for example by animal vectors, may reinforce or dilute natural landscape heterogeneity, with consequences for the spatial distribution of biodiversity.
Objectives
We examine how transport of nutrients and seed by consumers’ feces corresponds to productivity gradients in the landscape, and whether herbivores and carnivores differ in the types of seeds they transport.
Methods
In California, we surveyed fecal deposition by vertebrates in 10 serpentine grassland fragments of varying productivities. We analyzed nitrogen content of feces before performing a germination assay to identify species transported therein.
Results
Herbivores deposited substantial amounts of nitrogen in serpentine grasslands via their feces, while carnivore scat was a high-quality but less predictable resource subsidy. Neither trophic group’s fecal deposition reinforced or diluted productivity gradients in the landscape. Rather, unproductive fragments received minimal nutrients, while more productive fragments had the chance of receiving higher resource inputs. Feces from both types of consumers contained viable seeds, but herbivores and carnivores transported non-overlapping subsets of plant species.
Conclusions
Consumers play different roles connecting plant communities in the landscape according to trophic level. Small herbivores are a continuous source of nutrient cycling, and their feces contains serpentine-adapted plant species, potentially serving as vectors for stepping-stone dispersal. While carnivores may be important vectors for long-distance seed dispersal, their movement patterns also make them more likely to deposit seeds in unsuitable environments.
Data availability
All data and code can be accessed via GitHub (doi: zenodo.4677770).
References
Anacker BL (2014) The nature of serpentine endemism. Am J Bot 101:219–224
Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Machler M, Bolker BM (2017) glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R Journal 9:378
Carbone C, Cowlishaw G, Isaac NJB, Rowcliffe JM (2005) How far do animals go? determinants of day range in mammals. Am Nat 165:290–297
Ellis-Soto D, Ferraro KM, Rizzuto M, Briggs E, Monk JD, Schmitz OJ (2020) A methodological roadmap to quantify animal-vectored spatial ecosystem subsidies
Fay PA, Prober SM, Harpole WS, Knops JM, Bakker JD, Borer ET, Lind EM, MacDougall AS, Seabloom EW, Wragg PD, Adler PB (2015) Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients. Nat Plants 1:15080
Fortin D, Beyer HL, Boyce MS, Smith DW, Duchesne T, Mao JS (2005) Wolves influence elk movements: behaviour shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86:1320–1330
Frank K, Brückner A, Hilpert A, Heethoff M, Blüthgen N (2017) Nutrient quality of vertebrate dung as a diet for dung beetles. Sci Rep 7:12141
Gallagher AJ, Creel S, Wilson RP, Cooke SJ (2017) Energy landscapes and the landscape of fear. Trends Ecol Evol 32:88–96
Gaynor KM, Brown JS, Middleton AD, Power ME, Brashares JS (2019) Landscapes of fear: spatial patterns of risk perception and response. Trends Ecol Evol 34:355–368
Germain RM, Jones NT, Grainger TN (2019) Cryptic dispersal networks shape biodiversity in an invaded landscape. Ecology 100:e02738
Germain RM, Strauss SY, Gilbert B (2017) Experimental dispersal reveals characteristic scales of biodiversity in a natural landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:4447–4452
Gittleman JL, Harvey PH (1982) Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:57–63
Gounand I, Harvey E, Little CJ, Altermatt F (2018a) Meta-ecosystems 2.0: rooting the theory into the field. Trends Ecol Evol 33:36–46
Gounand I, Little CJ, Harvey E, Altermatt F (2018b) Cross-ecosystem carbon flows connecting ecosystems worldwide. Nat Commun 9:1–8
Guzman LM, Germain RM, Forbes C, Straus S, O’Connor MI, Gravel D, Srivastava DS, Thompson PL (2019) Towards a multi-trophic extension of metacommunity ecology. Ecol Lett 22:19–33
Hämäläinen A, Broadley K, Droghini A, Haines JA, Lamb CT, Boutin S, Gilbert S (2017) The ecological significance of secondary seed dispersal by carnivores. Ecosphere 8:e01685
Jetz W, Carbone C, Fulford J, Brown JH (2004) The scaling of animal space use. Science 306:266–268
Larson RN, Morin DJ, Wierzbowska IA, Crooks KR (2015) Food habits of coyotes, gray foxes, and bobcats in a coastal southern California urban landscape. West N Am Nat 75:339–347
Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613
Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:5632–5636
Loreau M, Mouquet N, Holt RD (2003) Meta-ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology. Ecol Lett 6:673–679
Massol F, Gravel D, Mouquet N, Cadotte MW, Fukami T, Leibold MA (2011) Linking community and ecosystem dynamics through spatial ecology. Ecol Lett 14:313–323
McInturf AG, Pollack L, Yang LH, Spiegel O (2019) Vectors with autonomy: what distinguishes animal-mediated nutrient transport from abiotic vectors? Biol Rev 94:1761–1773
Mooney HA, Hamburg SP, Drake JA (1986) The Invasions of Plants and Animals into California. In: Mooney HA., Drake JA. (eds) Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis) 58. Springer, New York, NY
Myers JA, Vellend M, Gardescu S, Marks PL (2004) Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia 139:35–44
Pastor J, Moen R, Cohen Y (1997) Spatial heterogeneities, carrying capacity, and feedbacks in animal-landscape interactions. J Mammal 78:1040–1052
Richard OK, Codron D, Hagen KB, Südekum KH, Clauss M (2017) Little differences in digestive efficiency for protein and fat in mammals of different trophic guilds and digestive strategies: data constraints or fundamental functional similarity? J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 101:127–141
Riotte-Lambert L, Matthiopoulos J (2020) Environmental predictability as a cause and consequence of animal movement. Trends Ecol Evol 35:163–174
Saura S, Bodin Ö, Fortin MJ (2014) Stepping stones are crucial for species’ long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks. J Appl Ecol 51:171–182
Shen W, Lin Y, Jenerette GD, Wu J (2011) Blowing litter across a landscape: effects on ecosystem nutrient flux and implications for landscape management. Landsc Ecol 26:629
Sih A (2005) Predator-prey space use as an emergent outcome of a behavioral response race. Ecology of predator-prey interactions 240–255
Snyder RE, Ellner SP (2018) Pluck or luck: does trait variation or chance drive variation in lifetime reproductive success? Am Nat 191:E90–E107
Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press
Szojka MC, Germain RM (2021) Dispersal across habitat boundaries: uncovering the demographic fates of populations in unsuitable habitat. BioRxiv 03(22):436493
Toweill DE (1982) Winter foods of eastern Oregon bobcats. Northwest Sci 56:310–315
Traveset A, Robertson AW, Rodríguez-Pérez J (2007) A review on the role of endozoochory in seed germination. In: Dennis AJ, Schupp EW, Green RA, Westcott DA (eds) Seed dispersal: theory and its application in a changing world. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 78–103
Trebilco R, Baum JK, Salomon AK, Dulvy NK (2013) Ecosystem ecology: size-based constraints on the pyramids of life. Trends Ecol Evol 28:423–431
Yoshimura H, Qi H, Kikuchi DM, Matsui Y, Kazuya F, Kudo S, Ban K, Kusano K, Nagano D, Hara M, Sato Y, Takatsu K, Hirata S, Kinoshita K (2020) The relationship between plant-eating and hair evacuation in snow leopards (Panthera uncia). PLoS ONE 15:e0236635
Acknowledgements
We thank Cathy Koehler, Rachel Aine, Nick Eberle, and Elizabeth Fedewa for field assistance, JM and KN were funded through the UBC SURE program, CL was funded through a Killam Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, and costs of research were funded by an NSERC Discovery Grant (2019-04872) to RG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MS, KN, JM, and RG designed the experiment and performed fieldwork, MS, KN, JM, RG, and CL performed data analysis, JF performed GIS analysis, all authors contributed to writing, and MS was the primary mentor of KN and JM.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Authors Jenny Mackay and Kately Nikiforuk contributed equally; order determined by Doodle Jump competition
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mackay, J., Nikiforuk, K., Szojka, M. et al. Animals connect plant species and resources in a meta-ecosystem. Landscape Ecol 36, 1621–1629 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01244-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01244-4