Skip to main content
Log in

Carbon Calculators as a Tool for Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Livestock

  • GEOECOLOGY
  • Published:
Doklady Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon calculators are programs for calculating greenhouse gas emissions (a carbon footprint) from agricultural production on the farm scale. They are created on the base of the IPCC methods but have not been used in Russia yet. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of their application to assess emissions from livestock production and to develop recommendations for their reduction. The four most common calculators, i.e., the Cool Farm Tool, the AgRE-Calc, the Farm Carbon Calculator, and Ex-Act, were selected as the study objects. Among them, the Cool Farm Tool is recognized as the most convenient and effective, while the AgRE-Calc and the Farm Carbon Calculator do not fully present the technological features of animal husbandry. Ex-Act is ill-suited for the livestock sector because it is based on changes of land use. According to model experiments, the most efficient type of farming in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions is full grazing, in which manure is left in the fields, and there are no expenses for production of additional feed. In this case, the emissions are reduced by 2.45 and 0.84 t СО2-eq./head-yr for cows and horses, respectively (the Cool Farm Tool); as well as by 0.53 and 0.42 t СО2-eq./head-yr for cows and horses, respectively (the Farm Carbon Calculator). However, this leads to extensive farm management. The second variant is changing the diet, including expenses for feed production: exclusion of green crops from the diet in case of keeping in stalls will reduce emissions by 0.05 (the AgRE-Calc) to 0.14 (the Cool Farm Tool) t СО2-eq./head-yr, and exclusion of silage will lead to a decrease by 0.96 t CO2-eq./head-yr, although such decisions may worsen the diet balance. To reduce greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production, it is recommended that the number of domestic animals be gradually decreased. The Farm Carbon Calculator, the AgRE-Calc, and Ex-Act significantly overestimate the intensity of greenhouse gas sequestration by forests. Because of the discrepancy in the estimates between the calculators, they should be used comprehensively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T. T. Gridneva, Vestn. VNIIMZh, No. 4 (8), 61–69 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Report “Implementation Risks of Paris Climate Agreement for Russian Economy and National Safety”: Abstract and Thesis. The Institute for Natural Monopolies Research. http://ipem.ru/files/files/other/doklad_riski_realizacii_parizhskogo_klimaticheskogo_soglasheniya_dlya_ekonomiki_i_nacionalnoy_bezopasnosti_rossii.pdf.

  3. D. G. Zamolodchikov, V. I. Grabovskii, and V. Kurts, Ustoich. Lesopol’zovanie, No. 2 (39), 23–31 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The 1st Two-Year Russian Federation Report Given according to the Framework Convention on Climate Change 1/SR.16 Solution (Rosgidromet, Moscow, 2014), p. 27 [in Russian].

  5. J. Bellarby, C. Stirling, S. H. Vetter, M. Kassie, F. Kanampiu, K. Sonder, P. Smith, and J. Hillier, Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 197, 137–146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Bernoux, G. Branca, A. Carro, L. Lipper, G. Smith, and L. Bockel, Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.) 67 (1), 31–40 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Forabosco, F. A. Canu, and R. Mantovani, Int. J. Global Warming 15 (4) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2018.093748

  8. J. Hillier, C. Walter, D. Malin, T. Garcia-Suarez, L.  Mila-i-Canals, and P. Smith, Environ. Modell. Software 26 (9), 1070‒1078 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. H. Martineau, A. G. Williams, D. Chadwick, and A. Thomson, in Environment and Rural Affairs Monitoring & Modelling Programme (ERAMMP): Sustainable Farming Scheme Evidence Review. Report to Welsh Government (Contract C2) (Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, 2019), Project NEC06297.

  10. V. Sejian, J. P. Ravindra, L. Samal, N. Haque, M. Bagath, I. Hyder, V. P. Maurya, R. Bhatta, C. S. Prasad, and R. Lal, in Climate Change Impact on Livestock: Adaptation and Mitigation (Springer (India) Private Ltd., 2015), pp. 359–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2265-1_22

  11. A. J. Sykes, C. F. E. Topp, R. M. Wilson, G. Reid, and R. M. Rees, J. Cleaner Prod., No. 164, 398‒409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.197

  12. S. H. Vetter, T. B. Sapkota, J. Hillier, C. M. Stirling, J.  I.  Macdiarmid, L. Aleksandrowicz, R. Greene, E. J. M. Joy, A. D. Dangour, and P. Smith, Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 237, 234–241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. H. Vetter, D. Malin, P. Smith, and J. Hillier, J. Cleaner Prod. 202, 1068–1076 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.199

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 20-76-00023, and was carried out under a State Assignment of the Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, project no. 0148-2019-0009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. E. Sukhoveeva.

Additional information

Translated by L. Mukhortova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sukhoveeva, O.E. Carbon Calculators as a Tool for Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Livestock. Dokl. Earth Sc. 497, 266–271 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X21030119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X21030119

Keywords:

Navigation