On the effect of long corrosion defect and axial tension on the burst pressure of subsea pipelines
Introduction
Pressure pipes are of importance to high pressure hydrogen storage, oil and gas industry, chemical engineering etc. A great deal of research has been done on the burst pressure of subsea pipeline under high pressure ((Hasan et al, 2012; Gao et al., 2020; Netto et al., 2005; Fekete and Varga, 2012; Race et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020a; Guo et al., 2015; Keshtegar and Seghier, 2018). Numerical and experimental methods are widely used to analyze the burst pressure of pipelines with corrosion defects (Yeom et al., 2015; Fahed et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020b; Mondal and Dhar, 2019; Mohd et al., 2015; Chandra and Sutra, 2017). However, the burst pressure of subsea pipelines with axial tension and long corrosion defects are not fully studied. Therefore, we focus on the burst pressure of pipelines with axial tension and long corrosion defects in this paper.
Pipeline studied in this paper is high strength steel pipes. In service, these pipelines are unavoidably corroded by water, sediment, or chemical contaminants present in the multi-phase flow (Netto, 2009a). Internal corrosion is usually at or near the bottom of pipelines. With the continuation of service, it tends to form narrow and long corrosion defects at the bottom of pipelines. Besides, by reason of the difference in temperature between day and night, the pipeline will expand in heat and contract in cold. It will produce axial stretching and compression. Furthermore, many pipelines are buried in soil. The restraint from soil can also compress the pipelines. In this paper, we mainly research the effect of axial tension and long corrosion defects on the burst pressure of pipelines. Both axial tension and long corrosion defects will lower the burst pressure of pipelines (Ma et al., 2013; Tee and Wordu, 2020). In order to decide on replacing corroded pipeline in time, it is necessary to study the burst pressure of pipelines. In the calculation, the burst pressure denotes the ultimate bearing capability or residual strength of the pipes. Real corrosion defects can be any size and shape. Here, we consider only single and long corrosion defects in thick-walled pipes, where the defect length is greater than its width. Cracks and crack-like flaws are not considered in this paper.
Many scholars and associations have concerned the burst pressure of pipelines with corrosion defects (Law and Bowie, 2007; Keshtegar and Miri, 2014). Most of their research focuses on failure of corroded pipelines subjected to internal pressure (See Section 2 for representative studies). For subsea pipelines with long corrosion defects subjected to internal pressure and axial tension, DNV made initial explorations (DNV, 2017), which is based on literature (Sigurdsson et al., 1999). In addition, Benjamin (Benjamin, 2008) predict the failure pressure of corroded pipelines subjected to longitudinal load and internal pressure. The pipeline subjected to internal pressure and axial tension may burst or neck (Klever, 2006). Here, we will mainly discuss the pipe burst. A novel burst pressure equation of pipelines with axial tension and long corrosion defects is presented in this paper.
Section snippets
Burst pressure equations of pipelines subjected to internal pressure
Over a century, scholars have provided many burst pressure equations of pipes under only internal pressure. Twelve representative equations of the pipes without defects are summarized in Table 1. Faupel, API, Nadai (1), Nadai (2), Soderberg and maximum stress equations are based on the von Mises criterion. Turner, ASME, Maximum shear stress and Baily–Nadai equations are based on the Tresca criterion. Klever and Zhu–Leis equations are consistent with Tresca and von Mises criteria.
Burst pressure equations of corroded pipelines subjected to internal pressure
Some
Simplification of corroded pipelines
The corrosion defects sometimes existed in pressured pipelines (Akram et al., 2020; Chin et al., 2020). The geometric shape of corrosion defects is usually irregular (Oliveros et al., 2008). Infinitely long corrosion defects are generally simplified as a plane problem to solve (Chen et al., 2014). The infinitely long corrosion defect models can be mainly divided into three categories: groove model (Fig. 1(a)), crescent-shaped model (Fig. 1(b)), as well as Apollonius model (Fig. 1(c)). Each
Burst pressure of pipelines with long corrosion defects
As mentioned in literature (Lasebikan and Akisanya, 2014), the pipes under internal pressure and axial tension may burst or neck. The pipeline will neck immediately if the axial stress. If the axial stress , the pipelines will not neck. Here, we mainly research the burst behavior of pipelines with axial tension and long corrosion defects.
The burst behavior of pipes with axial tension and long corrosion defects is a typical strength problem rather than a
Comparison with experimental data
The only burst pressure experiment of the pipes under combined internal pressure and axial tension is conducted in literature (Lasebikan and Akisanya, 2014). Here, we briefly introduce the experiment procedure. The experiment was carried out by using a tubular structure shown in Fig. 4. A hydraulic pump was adopted to provide the internal pressure by compressing the hydraulic oil. A screw-driven testing machine was adopted to control the axial displacement. The forward speed is 0.5 mm/min,
Conclusions
Pressured pipelines are widely used in high pressure hydrogen storage, oil and gas transport, chemical engineering, etc. The burst pressure are important parameters of pipeline design and integrity assessment. In this paper, the burst pressure of thick-walled pipes with axial tension and long corrosion defects are examined. First, the Apollonius circle and Apollonius model are introduced. Then, a novel burst pressure equation of thick-walled pipes with long corrosion defects subjected multiple
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Zhan-Feng Chen: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Wen Wang: Visualization, Investigation. He Yang: Data curtion. Sun-Ting Yan: Validation. Zhi-Jiang Jin: Supervision.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51805127), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51175454).
References (60)
- et al.
Probability assessment of burst limit state due to internal corrosion
Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip.
(2012) - et al.
Burst pressure of steel reinforced flexible pipe
Mar. struct.
(2020) - et al.
The effect of corrosion defects on the burst pressure of pipelines
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2005) - et al.
The effect of the width to length ratios of corrosion defects on the burst pressures of transmission pipelines
Eng. Fail. Anal.
(2012) - et al.
Development of a novel approach for strain demand prediction of pipes at fault crossings on the basis of multi-layer neural network driven by strain data
Eng. Struct.
(2020) - et al.
Effect of burst pressure on vented hydrogen-air explosion in a cylindrical vessel
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
(2015) - et al.
Modified response surface method basis harmony search to predict the burst pressure of corroded pipelines
Eng. Fail. Anal.
(2018) - et al.
Integrity assessment of a corroded API X70 pipe with a single defect by burst pressure analysis
Eng. Fail. Anal.
(2015) - et al.
Burst pressure of corroded pipelines considering combined axial forces and bending moments
Eng. Struct.
(2019) On the effect of narrow and long corrosion defects on the collapse pressure of pipelines
Appl. Ocean Res.
(2009)
Assessment on failure pressure of high strength pipeline with corrosion defects
Eng. Fail. Anal.
Burst strength analysis of pressurized steel pipelines with corrosion and gouge defects
Eng. Fail. Anal.
Prediction of failure strain and burst pressure in high yield-to-tensile strength ratio linepipe
Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip.
Reliability analysis of corroded pipes using conjugate HL–RF algorithm based on average shear stress yield criterion
Eng. Fail. Anal.
Burst pressure analysis of pipes with geometric eccentricity and small thickness-to-diameter ratio
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
A comparative study on failure pressure estimations of unflawed cylindrical vessels
Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip.
Average shear stress yield criterion and its application to plastic collapse analysis of pipelines
Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip.
Uncertainty quantification of burst pressure models of corroded pipelines
Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip.
Numerical and theoretical analysis of burst pressures for casings with eccentric wear
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
Double circular arc model based on average shear stress yield criterion and its application in the corroded pipe burst
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
Effect of the Y/T on the burst pressure for corroded pipelines with high strength
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
Integrity assessment of the pipelines containing an isolated corrosion pit
Eng. Fail. Anal.
Burst pressure of super duplex stainless steel pipes subject to combined axial tension, internal pressure and elevated temperature
Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip.
Residual bending capacity for pipelines with corrosion defects
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
On the effect of narrow and long corrosion defects on the collapse pressure of pipelines
Appl. Ocean Res.
A simple procedure for the prediction of the collapse pressure of pipelines with narrow and long corrosion defects—correlation with new experimental data
Appl. Ocean Res.
Analytical prediction of failure pressure for pipeline with long corrosion defect
Ocean Eng.
A new methodology for the prediction of burst pressure for API 5L X grade flawless pipelines
Ocean Eng.
Integrity assessment of internally corroded pipelines rehabilitated with a Kevlar-reinforced flexible liner
J. Press. Vessel Technol.
An ANN-based failure pressure prediction method for buried high-strength pipes with stray current corrosion defect
Energy Sci. Eng.
Cited by (8)
Limit load prediction analysis of X80 pipeline containing corrosion in mountainous landslide section
2023, Geoenergy Science and EngineeringRisk analysis on corrosion of submarine oil and gas pipelines based on hybrid Bayesian network
2022, Ocean EngineeringCitation Excerpt :As the main tool of offshore oil and gas transportation, submarine pipeline plays an important role in the field of offshore oil and gas exploitation (Yu et al., 2019; Li et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2020; Motta Renato de et al., 2021). Because submarine pipeline is affected by sea mud, sea water and other factors, it has a relative high probability of corrosion (Li et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2021; Hasan et al., 2018; Shabarchin et al., 2017). Once the submarine pipeline fails, it will not only affect the normal transportation, but also produce marine environmental pollution and other serious accidents (Chen et al., 2020, 2021; Li et al., 2022; Yu et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2014).
Failure assessment of corroded ultra-high strength pipelines under combined axial tensile loads and internal pressure
2022, Ocean EngineeringCitation Excerpt :The integrity assessment becomes significantly complex when a pipe sustains high pressure in addition to axial loading and at the same time undergoes corrosion. In addition to internal pressure, a corroded pipeline may experience axial tension due to changes in temperature, which causes expansion and contraction (Chen et al., 2021). This will induce axial stretching and compression in the pipelines.
Structural integrity assessment of hydrogen-mixed natural gas pipelines based on a new multi-parameter failure criterion
2022, Ocean EngineeringCitation Excerpt :It helps the world to be carbon neutral. Although scholars have done more research on the integrity of natural gas transportation pipeline (Chen et al., 2021; Reyes et al., 2016; Shuai et al., 2018), hydrogen has a wider explosion range, greater diffusion coefficient, higher flame temperature. Moreover, the hydrogen can also cause corrosion and cracking in pipelines (Ghosh et al., 2018; González-Arévalo et al., 2021; Wen et al., 2018).