Skip to main content
Log in

New Dynamic Group DEMATEL Decision-Making Method Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method is comprehensively applied in the complicated socioeconomic system. Existing literatures on DEMATEL focus on static decision environment at single time node. However, due to the increasingly complex and rapidly changing socioeconomic environment, decision-making has become more complex and dynamic. In this paper, dynamic group DEMATEL method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs) is proposed. In the view of the multi-stage, multi-factor and multi-expert complex decision-making situation, the method fully integrates the decision-making information of different periods from the perspective of dynamic evolution mechanism which can effectively link multi rounds DEMATEL decision-making process and reflect the time evolution of dynamic decision-making. Meanwhile, the TOPSIS method is applied to determine the weight of experts, which can effectively solve the influence of the best choice (positive ideal solution) and the worst choice (negative ideal solution) on the decision results in aggregation of group experts' preference information, and fully consider the influence of hesitation and fuzziness of expert preference representation on expert weight. Finally, a numerical comparison is given to verify validity and effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shieh, J.I., Wu, H., Huang, K.: A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowl. Based Syst. 23(9), 277–282 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sujak, B., Shahadat, K., Kamrul, A., Shams, R.: Exploring the critical determinants of environmentally oriented public procurement using the DEMATEL method. J Environ. Manage. 225, 325–35 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dharmalingam, R., Shivasankarappa, A., Neelamegam, A.: A novel approach for optimizing governance, risk management and compliance for enterprise information security using DEMATEL and FoM. Procedia Comput. Sci. 134, 365–370 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gülçin, B., Sezin, G.: An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey. Int. J. Pro. Econ. 182, 435–448 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Du, Y.W., Zhou, W.: DSmT-based group DEMATEL method with reaching consensus. Group Decis. Negot. 28(6), 1201–1230 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han, W., Sun, Y.H., Xie, H., Che, Z.M.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic group DEMATEL method with multi-granular evaluation scales. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(7), 2187–2201 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, H.B., Jiang, L., Martínez, L.: A dynamic multi-criteria decision making model with bipolar linguistic term sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 95, 104–112 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baykasoğlua, A., Gölcük, İ: A dynamic multiple attribute decision making model with learning of fuzzy cognitive maps. Comput. Ind. Eng. 135, 1063–1076 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan, S., Liu, S., Liu, J., Wu, L.: Dynamic grey target decision making method with grey numbers based on existing state and future development trend of alternatives. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28(5), 2159–2168 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transl. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 109–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, Z.H., Li, M.Y., Gao, F., Wang, X.Y.: Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on body parts’ weight coefficients towards sitting comfort based on AHP to limit entropy method. Math. Probl. Eng. 2019, 1–11 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, X.J., Yan, L.L., Zeng, L.: How to handle uncertainties in AHP: the Cloud Delphi hierarchical analysis. Inf. Sci. 222(222), 384–404 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, M., Ren, R.R., Qiu, Y.H.: Experts’ weights method and computational experiment analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures. Control Decis. 30(7), 1233–1238 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, Y.J., Wang, H.M.: Distance measure for linguistic decision making. Syst. Eng. Procedia 1, 450–456 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: Hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni means. Inf. Sci. 205, 72–85 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Wei, C.P., Zhao, N., Tang, X.J.: Operators and comparisons of hesitant linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(3), 575–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J., Merigó, J.M.: Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl. Based Syst. 76, 127–138 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Found. Intell. Syst. 122, 287–295 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J.: Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 271, 125–142 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, Z.S.: An approach based on similarity measure to multiple attribute decision making with trapezoid fuzzy linguistic variables. Fuzzy Syst. Knowl. Disc. 36(13), 110–117 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu, Z.S.: Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33(3), 249–254 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hung, W.L., Yang, M.S.: Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 25, 1603–1611 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S.: A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 12(4), 373–392 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci 181(11), 2128–2138 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S.: Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(1), 35–45 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dutta, B., Singha, T., Goha, M., Lamata, M. T., Verdegay, J. L.: Post factum analysis in TOPSIS based decision making method. Expert Syst. Appl. 138. (2019)

  28. Campanella, G., Ribeiro, R.A.: A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making. Decis. Support Syst. 52(1), 52–60 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Science Research Foundation of Yunnan Provincial Education Department of China (No. 2017ZZX164), and Yunnan Provincial Talent Training Project of China (No. 14119073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Xie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, H., Ren, Q., Duan, W. et al. New Dynamic Group DEMATEL Decision-Making Method Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 23, 2118–2131 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01081-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01081-2

Keywords

Navigation