Abstract
In a traffic flow, once congestion is initiated, the throughput to the downstream of the bottleneck tends to decrease from the maximum throughput in the free-flow state. It is known that the maximum throughput in the free-flow state varies according to the traffic conditions for the same study site. If we can correctly forecast the maximum throughput depending on the traffic conditions, traffic congestion can be prevented or mitigated through ramp-metering. In this study, the relationship between the maximum throughput and the on-ramp ratio is analyzed. It turns out that maximum throughput of each study site has different values with the change of on-ramp ratio and there exists a convex quadratic-polynomial relationship between them. The elasticity of the maximum throughput to the on-ramp ratio is influenced by the geometric highway design and operation factors. The results of this study confirm that the on-ramp ratio control can effectively minimize the capacity drop and prevent traffic congestion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abuamer IM, Celikoglu HB (2017) Local ramp metering strategy ALINEA: Microscopic simulation based evaluation study on Istanbul freeways. Transportation Research Procedia 22:598–606, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.050
Asgharzadeh M, Gubbala PS, Kondyli A, Schrock SD (2020) Effect of on-ramp demand and flow distribution on capacity at merge bottleneck locations. Transportation Letters 12(8):550–558, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2019.1665774
Asgharzadeh M, Kondyli A (2020) Effect of geometry and control on the probability of breakdown and capacity at freeway merges. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems 146(7):04020055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000381
Banks JH (1990) Flow processes at a freeway bottleneck. Transportation Research Record 1287:20–28
Banks JH (1991) The two-capacity phenomenon: Some theoretical issues. Transportation Research Record 1320:234–241
Bar-Gera H, Ahn S (2010) Empirical macroscopic evaluation of freeway merge-ratios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18(4):457–470, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.09.002
Bertini RL, Leal MT (2005) Empirical study of traffic features at a freeway lane drop. Journal of Transportation Engineering 131(6):397–407, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:6(397)
Bertini R, Malik S (2004) Observed dynamic traffic features on freeway section with merges and diverges. Transportation Research Record 1867:25–35, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1867-04
Cassidy MJ, Ahn S (2005) Driver turn-taking behavior in congested freeway merges. Transportation Research Record 1934:140–147, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193400115
Cassidy MJ, Bertini RL (1999) Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 33:25–42, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00023-X
Cassidy MJ, Rudjanakanoknad J (2005) Increasing the capacity of an isolated merge by metering its on-ramp. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 39:896–913, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.12.001
Cassidy MJ, Windover JR (1995) Methodology for assessing dynamics of freeway traffic flow. Transportation Research Record 1484:73–79
Cen D, Ahn S (2018) Capacity-drop at extended bottlenecks: Merge, diverge, and weave. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 108:1–20, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.12.006
Chen J, Lin L, Jiang R (2017) Assigning on-ramp flows to maximize capacity of highway with two on-ramps and one off-ramp in between. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 465:347–357, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.08.053
Chung K, Rudjanakanoknad J, Cassidy MJ (2007) Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 41:82–95, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2006.02.011
Hall FL, Agyemang-Duah K (1991) Freeway capacity drop and the definition of capacity. Transportation Research Record 1320:91–98
Han Y, Ahn S (2018) Stochastic modeling of breakdown at freeway merge bottleneck and traffic control method using connected automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 107:146–166, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.007
Hurdle VF, Datta PK (1983) Speeds and flows on an urban freeway: Some measurements and a hypothesis. Transportation Research Record 905:127–137
Jin W (2017) Kinematic wave models of lane-drop bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 105:507–522, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.09.015
Kerner BS (2012) Empirical macroscopic features of spatial-temporal traffic patterns at highway bottlenecks. Physical Review E 65(4): 046138, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.046138
Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 229(1178): 317–345, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0089
Newell GF (1993a) A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, Part I: General theory. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 27:281–287, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(93)90038-C
Newell GF (1993b) A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, Part II: Queueing at freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 27:289–303, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(93)90039-D
Oh S, Yeo H (2012) Estimation of capacity drop in highway merging sections. Transportation Research Record 2286:111–121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2286-13
Ramadan O, Sisiopiku V (2016) Impact of bottleneck merge control strategies on freeway level of service. Transportation Research Procedia 15:583–593, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.049
Richards PI (1956) Shock waves on the highway. Operations Research 4(1):42–51
Ringert J, Urbanik II (1993) Study of freeway bottlenecks in Texas. Transportation Research Record 1398:31–41
Srivastava A, Geroliminis N (2013) Empirical observations of capacity drop in freeway merges with ramp control and integration in a firstorder model. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 30:161–177, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.006
Sun J, Li Z, Sun J (2015) Study on traffic characteristics for a typical expressway on-ramp bottleneck considering various merging behaviors. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 440:57–67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.08.007
Transportation Research Board (2010) Highway capacity manual. National Research Council, Washington DC, USA, 11
Xie Y, Zhang H, Gartner NH, Arsava T (2017) Collaborative merging strategy for freeway ramp operations in a connected and autonomous vehicles environment. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 21(2):136–147, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2016.1248288
Yuan K, Knoop VL, Leclercq L, Hoogendoorn SP (2017) Capacity drop: A comparison between stop-and-go wave and standing queue at lane-drop bottleneck. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics 5(2):145–158, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2016.1245163
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (NRF-2016R1A2B4015824). A part of this paper was presented at the 99th TRB Annual Meeting.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J., Kim, T. & Son, B. Empirical Observation of Maximum Throughput Change in Isolated Merging Bottlenecks Depending on On-Ramp Traffic Flow Ratio. KSCE J Civ Eng 25, 1865–1873 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0496-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0496-9