Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behavior of braced wall embedded in saturated liquefiable sand under seismic loading

  • Technical Papers
  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that the generation of excess pore water pressure and/or liquefaction in foundation soils during an earthquake often cause structural failures. This paper describes the behavior of a small-scale braced wall embedded in saturated liquefiable sand under dynamic condition. Shake table tests are performed in the laboratory on embedded retaining walls with single bracing. The tests are conducted for different excavation depths and base motions. The influences of the peak magnitude of the ground motions and the excavation depth on the axial forces in the bracing, the lateral displacement and the bending moments in the braced walls are studied. The shake table tests are simulated numerically using FLAC 2D and the results are compared with the corresponding experimental results. The pore water pressures developed in the soil are found to influence the behavior of the braced wall structures during a dynamic event. It is found that the excess pore water pressure development in the soil below the excavation is higher compared to the soil beside the walls. Thus, the soil below the excavation level is more susceptible to the liquefaction compared to the soil beside the walls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggour MS and Zhang JX (2006), “Degradation of Sands due to Combined Sinusoidal Loading,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(12): 1628–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aminpour MM, Maleki M and Ghanbari A (2018), “Predicting Seismic Permanent Displacement of Soil Walls under Surcharge Based on Limit Analysis Approach,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(4): 747–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay S, Sengupta A and Reddy GR (2015), “Performance of Sand and Shredded Rubber Tire Mixture as a Natural Base Isolator for Earthquake Protection,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(4): 683–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee R, Konai S, Sengupta A and Deb K (2017), “Shake Table Tests and Numerical Modeling of Liquefaction of Kasai River Sand,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 35(4): 1327–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose SK and Som NN (1998), “Parametric Study of a Braced Cut by Finite Element Method,” Computers and Geotechnics, 22(2): 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Kutter BL, Brandenberg SJ, Singh P and Chang D (2003), “Pile Foundations in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground during Earthquakes: Centrifuge Experiments and Analyses,” Report No. UCD/CGM-03/01, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of California at Davis, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PM (1991), “A Cyclic Shear-Volume Coupling and Pore-Pressure Model for Sand,” Proceedings of Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, Paper No. 1.24: 47–55.

  • Callisto L and Soccodato FM (2007), “Seismic Analysis of an Embedded Retaining Structure in Coarse Grained Soils,” Proceeding of the Fourth International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callisto L, Soccodato FM and Conti R (2008), “Analysis of the Seismic Behavior of Propped Retaining Structures,” Proc. of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV GSP, 181: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattaraj R and Sengupta A (2016), “Liquefaction Potential and Strain Dependent Dynamic Properties of Kasai River Sand,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 90: 467–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YM, Zhang ZC and Liu HL (2017), “Study of the Seismic Performance of Hybrid A-Frame Micropile/MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) Wall,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16(2): 275–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury SS, Deb K and Sengupta A (2013), “Estimation of Design Parameters for Braced Excavation: A Numerical Study,” International Journal of Geomechanics, 13(3): 234–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury SS, Deb K and Sengupta A (2015), “Behavior of Underground Retaining Structure under Seismic Condition,” Earthquakes and Structures, 8(5): 1147–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury SS, Deb K and Sengupta A (2016), “Effect of Fines on Behavior of Braced Excavation in Sand: Experimental and Numerical Study,” International Journal of Geomechanics, 16(1): 04015018–1–04015018–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury SS, Deb K and Sengupta A (2017), “Estimation of Design Parameters for Braced Excavation in Clays,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering: An International Journal, 35(2): 857–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti R, Madabhushi GSP and Viggiani MB (2012), “On the Behaviour of Flexible Retaining Walls under Seismic Action,” Geotechnique, 62(12): 1081–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Narula PL, Acharyya SK and Banerjee J (2000), Seismotectonic Atlas of India and Its Environs, Geological Society of India, Kolkata, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finno RJ, Harahap IS and Sabatini PJM (1991), “Analysis of Braced Excavations with Coupled Finite Element Formulations,” Computers and Geotechnics, 12(2): 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finno RJ and Harahap IS (1991), “Finite Element Analysis of HDR-4 Excavation,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, 117(10): 1590–1609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giri D and Sengupta A (2009), “Dynamic Behavior of Small Scale Nailed Soil Slopes,” International Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 27(6): 687–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu LL, Zhang F, Bao XH, Shi ZM, Ye GL and Ling XZ (2018), “Seismic Behavior of Breakwaters on Complex Ground by Numerical Tests: Liquefaction and Post Liquefaction Ground Settlements,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(2): 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu Q, Liu YD, Lin Y and Liu C (2018), “Finite Element Response Sensitivity Analysis of Three-Dimensional Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction (SFSI) Systems,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(3): 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha IS, Olson SM, Seo MW and Kim MM (2011), “Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance Using Shaking Table Tests,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(4): 682–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO and Drnevich VP (1972), “Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 98(7): 667–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz RD and Kovacs WD (1981), Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering, Prentice-Hall Publishing, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiung BCB (2009), “A Case Study of Behavior of Deep Excavation in Sand,” Computers and Geotechnics, 36(4): 665–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S (1989), “Similitude for Shaking Table Tests on Soil-Structure-Fluid Model in 1g Gravitational Field,” Soils and Foundations, 29(1): 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS:1893 (2002), “Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1-General Provisions and Buildings,” Fifth Revision, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, India.

  • Ishibashi I and Zhang X (1993), “Unified Dynamic Shear Moduli and Damping Ratios of Sand and Clay,” Soils and Foundations, 33(1): 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itasca (2005), User’s Guide for FLAC-2D, Version 5.0, Itasca India Consulting, Nagpur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janbu N (1963), “Soil Compressibility as Determined by Oedometer and Triaxial Tests,” European Conference on Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, Wiesbaden, Germany, 1: 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsrud K and Andresen L (2005), “Loads on Braced Excavation in Soft Clay,” International Journal of Geomechanics, 5(2): 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosrojerdi M and Pak A (2015), “Numerical Investigation on the Behavior of the Gravity Waterfront Structures under Earthquake Loading,” Ocean Engineering, 106: 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konai S, Sengupta A and Deb K (2017), “Effect of Excavation Depths on Ground Surface Settlement for Embedded Cantilever Retaining Structure due to Seismic Loading,” Procedia Engineering, 199: 2342–2347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konai S, Sengupta A and Deb K (2018), “Behavior of Braced Excavation in Sand under a Seismic Condition: Experimental and Numerical Studies,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(2): 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konai S, Sengupta A and Deb K (2020), “Seismic Behavior of Cantilever Wall Embedded in Dry and Saturated Sand,” Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 14(3): 690–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koseki J, Munaf Y, Tatsuoka F, Tateyama M, Kojima K and Sato T (1998), “Shaking and Tilt Table Tests of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil and Conventional Type Retaining Walls,” Geosynthetic International, 5(1–2): 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kung GTC, Juang CH, Hsiao ECL and Hashash YMA (2007), “Simplified Model for Wall Deflection and Ground-Surface Settlement Caused by Braced Excavation in Clays,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(6): 731–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GB, Ng CWW and Wang ZW (2005), “Observed Performance of a Deep Multi-Strutted Excavation in Shanghai Soft Clays,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(8): 1004–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi D, Bhattacharya S, Scarpa F and Bianchi M (2015), “Dynamic Response of a Geotechnical Rigid Model Container with Absorbing Boundaries,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 69: 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long M (2001), “Database for Retaining Wall and Ground Movementsdue to Deep Excavations,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(3): 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin GR, Finn WDL and Seed HB (1975), “Fundamentals of Liquefaction under Cyclic Loading,” J. Geotech. Engg. Div., ASCE, 101(5): 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo O, Tsutsumi T, Yokoyama K and Saito Y(1998), “Shaking Table Tests and Analyses of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls,” Geosynthetic International, 5(1–2): 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meymand PJ (1998), “Shaking Table Scale Model Tests of Nonlinear Soil-Pile-Superstructure Interaction in Soft Clay,” PhD Dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, U.C. Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam AM, Ghalandarzadeh A, Moradi M, Towhata I and Hajialikhani P (2011), “Displacement Reducer Fuses for Improving Seismic Performance of Caisson Quay Walls,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9(4): 1259–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins JP, Arulanandan K, Mitchell JK, Chan CK and Seed HB (1977), “Effects of Sample Preparation on Sand Liquefaction,” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., ASCE, 103(2): 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakai T, Kawano H, Murata K, Banno M and Hashimoto T (1999), “Model Test and Numerical Simulation of Braced Excavation in Sandy Ground: Influences of Construction History, Wall Friction, Wall Stiffness, Strut Position and Strut Stiffness,” Soils and Foundations, 39(3): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pain A, Choudhury D and Bhattacharyya SK (2017), “Seismic Passive Earth Resistance Using Modified Pseudo-Dynamic Method,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16(2): 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao L, Yuan C, Miyajima M and Zhai E(2008), “Shake Table Testing and FLAC Modeling of Liquefaction-Induced Slope Failure and Damage to Buried Pipelines,” Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, May 18–22, Sacramento, California, United States.

  • Richards Jr R and Elms DG (1979), “Seismic Behavior of Gravity Retaining Walls,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 105(4): 449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli H, Kutanaei SS and Hosseini SH (2019), “Assessment of Seismic Amplification Factor of Excavation with Support System,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18(3): 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tefera TH, Nordal S, Grande L, Sandven R and Emdal A (2006), “Ground Settlement and Wall Deformation from a Large Scale Model Test on as Single Strutted Sheet Pile Wall in Sand,” International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 6(2): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricarico M, Madabhushi GSP and Aversa S (2016), “Centrifuge Modeling of Flexible Retaining Walls Subjected to Dynamic Loading,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 88: 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchida H (1970), “Prediction and Counter Measure Against the Liquefaction in Sand Deposits,” Proceedings of the Seminar of the Port and Harbour Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Yokosuka, Japan, 3: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZW, Ng CWW and Liu GB (2005), “Characteristics of Wall Deflections and Ground Surface Settlements in Shanghai,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42(5): 1243–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Chen G and Chen S (2015), “Experimental Study on Seismic Response of Geogrid Reinforced Rigid Retaining Walls with Saturated Backfill Sand,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43(1): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood DM (2004), Geotechnical Modeling, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Xie LT, Yan P, Lu WB, Chen M and Wang GH (2018), “Comparison of Seismic Effects During Deep Tunnel Excavation with Different Methods,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(3): 659–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye B, Ye G, Ye W and Zhang F (2013), “A Pneumatic Shaking Table and Its Application to a Liquefaction Test on Saturated Sand,” Nat. Hazards, 66(2): 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zekri A, Ghalandarzadeh A, Ghasemi P and Aminfar MH (2015), “Experimental Study of Remediation Measures of Anchored Sheet Pile Quay Walls using Soil Compaction,” Ocean Engineering, 93: 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X (2005), “Effect of Liquefaction on Stability of Retaining Walls,” Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, GSP, 133: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XF, Wang SG, Du DS and Liu WQ (2017), “Simplified Analysis of Frame Structures with Viscoelastic Dampers Considering the Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16(1): 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YG, Sun ZB, Chen J, Chen YM and Chen RP (2017), “Shear Wave Velocity-Based Evaluation and Design of Stone Column Improved Ground for Liquefaction Mitigation,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16(2): 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The funding for this study. provided by grant No. SR/S3/MERC-0029/2011 of SERB, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi (India), is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India

    Sanku Konai, Aniruddha Sengupta & Kousik Deb

Authors
  1. Sanku Konai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aniruddha Sengupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kousik Deb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kousik Deb.

Additional information

Supported by

Grant No. SR/S3/MERC-0029/2011 of SERB, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi, India

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konai, S., Sengupta, A. & Deb, K. Behavior of braced wall embedded in saturated liquefiable sand under seismic loading. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 20, 361–375 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2025-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2025-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation