Abstract
The name Lamarck is very well known in the teaching of biology, being associated with an early effort to explain evolution. Nevertheless, when evolution is taught in the classroom, the only Lamarckian ideas that stand out are related to the ‘inheritance of acquired characters’, invariably illustrated by the example of the lengthening of giraffes’ necks, as a way of contrasting Lamarckian ideas with Darwinian natural selection. Our aim here is to argue that there are other important ideas in Lamarck’s work that are directly related to the origin and transformation of species. These concepts, causal explanations of organic nature, can be taught to students who are learning about the sources and development of evolutionary thought and will moreover provide the student with properly justified reasons as to why Lamarck’s explanation is considered to be the first wide-ranging and well-argued explanation of biological evolution. The Lamarckian concepts that we consider important for teaching evolutionary thought are the following: (1) the species as an arbitrary concept, directly related to the Lamarckian concept of the continuous transformation of species, (2) the ancestor–descendant relationship, and organic diversification from a common plan of organisation to a branching series, (3) gradual change, related to changes in environmental conditions, and (4) the controversy concerning the origin of life (that is, having either a natural cause or a divine origin), life’s transformation, and the natural origin of human beings, including our moral capacity, subjects which were related to Lamarck’s other political and philosophical interests.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References and quotations were consulted in Philosophie zoologique, in the University of Granada’s digital library: Volume I: https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/7712 and Volume II: https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/7711
‘C’est surtout dans les corps vivans, et principalement dans les animaux, qu’on a cru apercevoir un but aux opérations de la nature. Ce but cependant n’y est là, comme ailleurs, qu’une simple apparence et non une réalité’ (Lamarck, 1815, T. I., p. 324).
‘Adaptation’ was not a word used by Lamarck.
It is important to note that for Lamarck ‘natural’ means ‘material’. That is, he explains natural phenomena in terms of material causes. On the varieties of naturalism in historical terms, see Harrison and Roberts, 2019, 1–6.
This avoids continually repeating a story with the same authors, and it can be shown that scientific practice is much more complex in terms of its development, construction of knowledge, and the complex relationships established between different actors in the same scientific community.
In the closing decades of the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth, Lamarck’s ideas were widely known in academic settings in various countries, in parallel with the introduction, dissemination, and appropriation of Darwinism (Glick, 2010; Glick et al., 2001). With the emergence of the Modern synthesis, Lamarck’s ideas were reduced to an example of an incorrect scientific explanation and, while it was recognised by the authors of the synthesis that Lamarck’s contributions were broader than simply the notion of inheritance of acquired characters, his notions of inheritance and evolution were already outdated and were downgraded to a marginal status (Dobzhansky, 1942, 392), no more than a scientific anecdote. Dobzhansky’s position was more or less similar to that taken in various English-speaking countries, though not in others where Lamarck continued to figure centrally in biology textbooks, sharing credit with Darwin for ideas about the inheritance of acquired characters (Todes, 1989). In the former Soviet Union and other socialist countries, it was practically compulsory for a Marxist to adopt the ideas of the inheritance of acquired characters (Gaissinovitch, 1980, 6), in an environment that Zirkle (1959) and other authors referred to as ‘Marxist biology’. Under the influence of Russian biology, even at the height of the synthetic theory, the durability of the idea of inheritance of acquired characters as a valid scientific explanation was evident in textbooks that were prepared for biology teaching until almost the nineteen-sixties (Argueta Villamar et al., 2003).
‘Ainsi, cette Philosophie zoologique présent les résultats de mes études sur les animaux, leurs caractères généraux et particuliers, leur organisation, les causes de ses développemens et de sa diversité, et facultés qu´ils en obtiennent;’ (Lamarck, 1809a, 1809b, T. I, p. viii). [Thus, this Zoological Philosophy presents the results of my studies on animals, their general and particular characters, their organisation, the causes of their development and diversity, and the faculties they obtain from it;].
On Lamarck, irritability and sentience see Giglioni, 2013.
Lamarck assumes that there is no spontaneous generation of organisms per se but of organised matter having present certain properties of life, such as irritability and reproduction, forms that would later give rise to organisms in the full sense of the word (Lamarck, 1802, pp. 36–37).
On the issue of morality, the French philosopher Pierre Jean George Cabanis is a strong influence (1757–1808), in particular, Rapports du physique et du moral de l’homme (1802).
References
Almeida, A. V. D., & Falcão, J. T. D. R. (2010). As teorias de Lamarck e Darwin nos livros didáticos de Biologia no Brasil. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 16(3), 649–665.
Álvarez Pérez, E., & Ruiz Gutiérrez, R. (2016). Proposal for teaching evolutionary biology: A bridge between research and educational practice. Journal of Biological Education, 50(2), 123–146.
Andreasen, R. O. (2007). Biological conceptions of race. In M. Matthen & C. Stephens (Eds.), Philosophy of biology: Handbook of the philosophy of science (pp. 455–481). Elsevier.
Argueta Villamar, A., Noguera, R., Ruiz, G., & R. . (2003). La recepción del lysenkismo en México. Asclepio, 55(1), 235–262.
Ausubel, D. P. (1966). An evaluation of the BSCS approach to high school biology. The American Biology Teacher, 28(3), 176–186.
Ayala, F. J., & Arp, R. (Eds.). (2010). Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Wiley-Blackwell.
Blom, P. (2011). A wicked company: The forgotten radicalism of the European enlightenment. McClelland & Stewart.
Browne, B. (2011). Charles Darwin: The power of place. Random House.
Buffon, G. L. L. (1749). Histoire Naturelle: Histoire générale des Animaux, Histoire naturelle de l’Homme. Imprimerie royale.
Burkhardt, R. W. (1972). The inspiration of Lamarck’s belief in evolution. Journal of the History of Biology, 5(2), 413–438.
Cabanis, P. J. G. (1802). Rapports du physique et du moral de l’homme. Caille et Ravier.
Charles Lyell to Charles Darwin, March 15, 1863. Darwin Correspondence Project, ‘Letter no. 4041’. Accessed on 24 Sep 2020, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-4041.xml.
Cannon, H. G. (1957). What Lamarck really said. Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of London, 168, 70–87.
Coffin, V. (1917). Censorship and literature under Napoleon I. The American Historical Review, 22(2), 288–308.
Coleman, W. (1962). Lyell and the reality of species: 1830–1833. Isis, 53, 325–338.
Corsi, P. (1987). After the revolution: Scientific language and French politics, 1795–1802. Nuncius, 2, 89–144.
Corsi, P. (2006). Biologie. In P. Corsi, J. Gayon, G. Gohau, & S. Tirard (Eds.), Lamarck, philosophe de la nature (pp. 37–64). Presses Universitaires de France.
Corsi, P. (2011). Jean-Baptiste Lamarck: From myth to history. In Gissis, S., Gissis, S. B., & Jablonka, E. (Eds.). Transformations of Lamarckism: From subtle fluids to molecular biology (9–20). MIT press.
Corsi, P. (2012). Idola Tribus: Lamarck, politics and religion in the early nineteenth century. In A. Fasolo (Ed.), The theory of evolution and its impact (pp. 11–39). Springer-Verlag Italia.
D’Holbach, P. H. T. B. (2010). Superstition in all ages. Knoop, Anna (trad). Lulu. com.
Dobzhansky, T. (1942). Biological adaptation. The Scientific Monthly, 55(5), 391–402.
Enderle, P. J., Smith, M. U., & Southerland, S. (2009). Does prior knowledge matter? Do Lamarckian misconceptions exist? A critique of Geraedts and Boersma. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2527–2532.
Fouad, K. E., Masters, H., & Akerson, V. L. (2015). Using history of science to teach nature of science to elementary students. Science & Education, 24(9–10), 1103–1140.
Gaissinovitch, A. E. (1980). The origins of Soviet genetics and the struggle with Lamarckism, 1922–1929. Journal of the History of Biology, 13(1), 1–51.
Giglioni, G. (2013). Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and the place of irritability in the history of life and death. In S. Normandin & Ch. Wolfe (Eds.), Vitalism and the scientific image in post-enlightenment life science, 1800–2010 (pp. 19–49). Springer.
Gillispie, Ch. C. (1958). Lamarck and Darwin in the history of science. American Scientist., 46(4), 388–409.
Ginsburg, S., & Jablonka, E. (2019). The evolution of the sensitive soul: Learning and the origins of consciousness. MIT Press.
Glick, T. F., & Kohn, D. (Eds.). (1996). On evolution: The development of the theory of natural selection. Hackett Publishing Company Inc.
Glick, T. F. (2010). The comparative reception of Darwinism: A brief history. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 693–703.
Glick, T. F., Puig-Samper, M. A., & Ruiz, R. (Eds.). (2001) The reception of Darwinism in the Iberian world: Spain, Spanish America and Brazil (Vol. 221). Springer Science & Business Media.
Harrison, P., & Roberts, J. H. (Eds.). (2019). Science without God? Rethinking the history of scientific naturalism. Oxford University Press.
Hodge, M. J. S. (1971). Lamarck’s science of living bodies. The British Journal for the History of Science, 5(4), 323–352.
Hull, D. (2014). Darwinism as an historical entity: A historiographic proposal. In D. Kohn (Ed.), The Darwinian heritage (pp. 773–812). Princeton University Press.
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2014). Evolution in four dimensions, revised edition: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT press.
Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79(2), 147–166.
Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1996). Changes in students’ understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 879–900.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. J. (1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: A look at textbooks and teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 519–535.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1996). Darwinian and Lamarckian models used by students and its representation. Knowledge acquisition organization and use in biology. Dordrecht, 65–77.
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2007). Students’ preconceptions about evolution: How accurate is the characterization as ‘Lamarckian’ when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Science & Education, 16(3–5), 393–422.
Kampourakis, K. (Ed.). (2013). The philosophy of biology: A companion for educators. Springer Science & Business Media.
Kampourakis, K., & Nehm, R. H. (2014) History and philosophy of science and the teaching of evolution: Students’ conceptions and explanations. In International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 377–399). Springer.
Kutschera, U. (2011). From the scala naturae to the symbiogenetic and dynamic tree of life. Biology direct, 6(1), 33.R.
Lamarck, J. B. (1794). Recherches sur les causes des principaux faits physiques, tome premier. Maradan.
Lamarck, J. B., (1802). Recherches sur l’organisation des corps vivans, et particulièrement sur son origine, sur la cause de ses développemens et des progrès de sa composition… : l’an X de la République. Chez l’auteur, au Muséum d’histoire naturelle.
Lamarck, J. B. (1809a). Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des considérations relatives à l’histoire naturelle des animaux. Tome premier. Dentu. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/7712‘‘ https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/7712.
Lamarck, J. B. (1809b). Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des considérations relatives à l’histoire naturelle des animaux. Tome second. Dentu. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/7711.
Lamarck, J. B. (1820). Système analytique des connaissances positives de l’homme. Chez l’Auteur et Belin.
Lamarck, J. B. (1914). Zoological philosophy: An exposition with regard to the natural history of animals. Hugh Elliot, trans., Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
Lamarck, J. B. (1815). Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres, Tome premier, Paris: Vèrdiere, Libraire. Disponible en: https://archive.org/search.php?query=Lamarck.
Lamarck, J. B. (2017). Filosofía zoológica. La Oveja Roja.
Lyell, C. (1832). Principles of Geology (Vol. 2). John Murray.
Matthews, M. R. (1989). A role for history and philosophy in science teaching. Interchange, 20(2), 3–15.
Mayr, E. (1972). Lamarck revisited. Journal of the History of Biology, 55–94.
Mayr, E. (2002). The biology of race and the concept of equality. Daedalus, 131(1), 89–94.
Meslier, J. (1864) [1733]. Le testament. V. 1 Georg Olms Verlag.
McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17, 249–263.
Numbers, R. L., & Kampourakis, K. (Eds.). (2015). Newton’s apple and other myths about science. Harvard University Press.
Onfray, M. (2007). Les Ultras des Lumières, contre-histoire de la philosophie. Grasset & Fasquelle.
Panchen, A. L. (1992). Classification, evolution, and the nature of biology. University Press.
Pigliucci, M., & Kaplan, J. (2003). On the concept of biological race and its applicability to humans. Philosophy of Science, 70(5), 1161–1172.
Poiani, A. (Ed.). (2012). Pragmatic evolution: Applications of evolutionary theory. Cambridge University Press.
Polowetzky, M. (1993). A bond never broken: The relations between Napoleon and the authors of France. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press.
Radick, G. (2016). Teach students the biology of their time. Nature, 533, 293.
Recker, D. (1990). There’s more than one way to recognize a Darwinian: Lyell’s Darwinism. Philosophy of Science, 57, 459–478.
Settlage, J., Jr. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 449–457.
Sloan, P. R. (1987). From logical universals to historical individuals: Buffon’s idea of biological species. In J. Roger & Fischer, J. L. (Ed.), Histoire du Concept d’Espèce dans les Sciences de la Vie (pp. 101–140). Fondation Singer-Polignac.
Tassy, P. (2011). Trees before and after Darwin. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 49(2), 89–101.
Todes, D. P. (1989). Darwin without Malthus: The struggle for existence in Russian evolutionary thought. Oxford University Press.
Wilkins, J. S. (2009). Species: A history of the idea. University of California Press.
Zirkle, C. (1959). Evolution, Marxian biology, and the social scene. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noguera-Solano, R., Rodríguez-Caso, J.M. & Ruiz-Gutiérrez, R. The Evolutionary Thought of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck. Sci & Educ 30, 909–929 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00215-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00215-0