Research paper
Use of geostatistical modeling to improve the understanding of permeability upscaling in isotropic and anisotropic burrowed reservoirs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105067Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Computer models (75 models) of different burrow morphology and range of bioturbation intensity.

  • The models provide a framework to investigate how burrow connectivity affect permeability anisotropy.

  • Examples to select an averaging method for permeability in upscaling burrow-related reservoirs.

Abstract

Coarse materials filling burrows in reservoirs can provide permeable pathways through an otherwise impermeable host rock matrix —thus enhancing fluid flow properties. However, understanding permeability anisotropy and permeability-upscaling under such conditions represents a challenge in the exploration and development of reservoirs. Herein, we examined 75 hypothetical models that represent diverse types and amounts of bioturbation. The aim is to understand the impacts of burrows on petrophysical characteristics, including upscaling of permeability where the matrix is isotropic. These models were simulated in a high-resolution 1-m3 grid (8 × 106 cells) using multipoint statistics (MPS) modeling techniques to systematically vary burrow morphology and bioturbation intensity in the same host rock matrix. The modeled burrow morphologies (vertical, horizontal, and boxwork morphologies) and bioturbation intensity―expressed as burrow percentage (BP, ranging from 2% to 50%)― show burrow connectivity trends increasing with increasing BP. In each trend, there is a burrow-morphology-dependent critical BP at which burrows develop connected permeability pathways. Accordingly, three unique patterns of burrow connectivity were identified among the 75 models. These include when burrows are: 1) just isolated volumes (isotropic system); 2) create unidirectional flow (anisotropic system); and 3) create omnidirectional flow (isotropic system). These connectivity patterns determine whether the permeability of the burrow-related reservoir is isotropic or anisotropic. Thus, identifying each of these connectivity patterns in burrowed reservoirs would help determine the appropriate averaging method to upscale permeability. The results of this study bridge an essential gap in reservoir modeling and simulation of hydrocarbon reservoirs and aquifers with burrowed strata.

Introduction

Burrowed strata occur worldwide and are associated with numerous hydrocarbon reservoirs and aquifers (e.g., Gingras et al., 1999; 2004; 2012; Cunningham, 2004; Cunningham et al., 2009; 2012; Hovikoski et al., 2007; Volkenborn et al., 2007; Tonkin et al., 2010; Baniak et al., 2013; 2014; 2015; La Croix et al., 2013). The reservoir quality in burrowed strata is mainly controlled by burrow fillings and their connections to one another (e.g., Gingras et al., 1999; Pemberton and Gingras, 2005; La Croix et al., 2012; Baniak et al., 2013, 2014, 2015; Eltom et al., 2019; Eltom et al., 2019). Thus, understanding the flow properties of bioturbated reservoirs requires consistent prediction of the spatial distribution of burrows and their effect on petrophysical properties.

Previous studies indicated that the degree of contrast between the permeabilities of the host rock matrix (matrix) and burrow filling is an important factor that determines the overall petrophysical characteristics and flow behavior in bioturbated strata (Gingras et al., 1999, 2004; Pemberton and Gingras, 2005; Baniak et al., 2013, 2014, 2015). Accordingly, these studies introduced the concept of dual-permeability and dual-porosity fluid flow media (D-PermFFM, and D-PorFFM, respectively) for bioturbated strata. The terms D-PermFFM and D-PorFFM are used in ichnological studies. They are fundamentally different from the previously understood dual-permeability in which matrix and fractures contribute to fluid flow (Baniak et al., 2015).

Based on previous ichnological studies (e.g., Gingras et al., 1999, 2004), D-PermFFM exhibits a high permeability contrast between matrix and burrow filling (experimentally estimated to be a difference of three orders of magnitude, whereas D-PorFFM exhibits a lower permeability contrast between burrow matrix and filling (experimentally estimated as a difference of one order of magnitude, Gingras et al., 1999, 2004). These two end-member conceptual models of bioturbated strata have served as guidance for permeability upscaling in burrow-related reservoirs (Gingras et al., 2012; Baniak et al., 2013, 2014, 2015; La Croix et al., 2013; Eltom et al., 2019; Eltom 2020).

The impact of burrow connectivity on permeability anisotropy in such burrow-related reservoirs remains poorly investigated. In particular, it remains uncertain what appropriate permeability-upscaling method (geometric, harmonic, or arithmetic) can be used for these types of reservoirs, considering that these reservoirs exhibit permeability anisotropy or isotropy. Answering such questions will provide guidelines for the characterization and modeling of hydrocarbon reservoirs and aquifers in bioturbated strata.

In this context, the objective of this study is to explore the connectivity pattern of burrows with different morphologies to allow accurate prediction of the upscaled permeability of burrow-related reservoirs. To achieve this objective, this study tests the hypotheses that burrow connectivity varies with burrow morphology and bioturbation intensity. If correct, the upscaled permeability (which is a function of burrow connectivity) depends on these two variables (bioturbation intensity and burrow morphology). The results suggest that constraining the upscaling process of permeability with the burrow morphology, bioturbation intensity, and matrix properties provides reservoir modeling guidelines for bioturbated reservoirs.

Section snippets

Methods

To test the hypotheses of this study, three variables were modeled: 1) burrow morphology (three end-member burrow morphologies― boxwork, vertical and horizontal); 2) bioturbation intensity expressed as burrow volume percentage (BP) (25 intensities, ranging from 2% to 50%); and 3) matrix properties held consistent for all models. These variables were simulated in a high-resolution 1-m3 geocellular grid (8 × 106 cells), resulting in 75 models. Details about the construction of these 75 models are

Variation of burrow connectivity with BP and morphology

In the MPS models, boxwork, vertical and horizontal burrows (Thalassinoides, Skolithos, and Planolites, respectively; Fig. 1) show various changes in connectivity when BP is increased (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5). In each MPS model we progressively increase BP and track the change in the volume of the largest connected burrow volume (LCBV) and the second-largest connected burrow volume (SLCBV) to help understand connectivity patterns of the burrows (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4).

In runs with low

Permeability anisotropy in bioturbated strata

Unlike the permeability in bedded reservoirs, the permeability in burrowed strata are not easy to predict (Baniak et al., 2013, 2014; Ben-Awuah and Padmanabhan, 2014). In part because of the various factors that control the distribution of the burrow porosity, such as the burrow morphology, burrow filling, and bioturbation intensity, among others. Hence, direct lab measurements of the permeability of bioturbated strata provide little insight into the underlying relationship between the pore

Conclusions

A total of 75 MPS models with different BPs and burrow morphologies allowed assessing the impact of burrow connectivity on permeability upscaling in burrow-related reservoirs. These models assume that the burrow filling is more porous than the matrix and that the burrow filling provides more permeable flow pathways in an otherwise less permeable medium. Analysis of the results revealed how burrow connectivity increases with increasing burrow percentage. Accordingly, this study defined critical

Credit author statement

Hassan A. Eltom: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Robert H. Goldstein: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This study is part of a research project (SF19031) funded by the College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia. The authors would like to thank Dr. Luis Buatois, Associate Editor, Dr. Greg Baniak and the anonymous reviewer for their comments to enhance the scientific content of this article. Planolites specimen was provided by the KU Division of Invertebrate Paleontology. We thank Bruce Lieberman (Curator) and Natalia Lopez

References (26)

  • K.J. Cunningham et al.

    Prominence of ichnologically influenced macroporosity in the karst Biscayne aquifer: stratiform “super-K” zones

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (2009)
  • M.L. Droser et al.

    A semiquantitative field classification of ichnofabric

    J. Sediment. Res.

    (1986)
  • H.A. Eltom

    Limitation of laboratory measurements in evaluating rock properties of bioturbated strata: a case study of the Upper Jubaila Member in central Saudi Arabia

    Sediment. Geol.

    (2020)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Scale dependence of petrophysical measurements in reservoirs with Thalassinoides: Insights from CT scans

      2023, Marine and Petroleum Geology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is evident from these observations that in the case discussed herein, bioturbation index of Taylor and Goldring (1993) is not particularly useful in predicting burrow connectivity, and therefore permeability. The shortcomings in predicting burrow connectivity from bioturbation index was discussed by Eltom and Goldstein (2021) who stated that “The classical classification schemes of bioturbation seem to have shortcomings in predicting the patterns of burrow connectivity. To capture the difference in connectivity pattern of burrows, there is a need for classification schemes to include finer grades than the traditional classification schemes of bioturbation intensity (e.g., Taylor and Goldring, 1993), or to not use grades at all but to quantify BP and morphology.”

    • Bioturbation enhanced petrophysical properties in the Ordovician carbonate reservoir of the Tahe oilfield, Tarim Basin, NW China

      2022, Journal of Palaeogeography
      Citation Excerpt :

      The organism–sediment interaction alters the primary sedimentary fabrics through excavation, overturn and backfill, resulting in variations in petrophysical properties between the burrow-fills and the host sediments, thus decreasing or enhancing the porosity and permeability of the primary strata, influencing reservoir petrophysical properties and fluid flow characteristics (Gingras et al., 2004a, 2012; Corlett and Jones, 2012; Baniak et al., 2014a; Ben-Awuah and Padmanabhan, 2014; Dey and Sen, 2017; Golab et al., 2017a). In general, the texture of burrow-fills are more unconsolidated than that in the host sediments and will serve as a preferential pathway for subsequent diagenetic fluids or hydrocarbons (Gingras et al., 2004a, 2004b, 2014; Baniak et al., 2014b, 2014c; Golab et al., 2017a; Niu et al., 2020a), resulting in a much more variant or different diagenetic transition of the burrow-fills than the host sediments and amplifying the initial textural and fabric distinctions, which is very important in enhancing the reservoir capacity of tight reservoirs (Pemberton and Gingras, 2005; Cunningham et al., 2009; Gordon et al., 2010; Tonkin et al., 2010; Bednarz and McIlroy, 2012, 2015; Baniak et al., 2013, 2014b, 2015; La Croix et al., 2013; Ben-Awuah and Eswaran, 2015; Eltom et al., 2019, 2020, 2021a, 2021b; Liu et al., 2019; Knaust et al., 2020; Oliveira De Araújo et al., 2021). Whereby, carbonate reservoirs with porosity and permeability below 4% and 10✕10-3 μm2, respectively, are referred to as tight reservoirs according to the industry standard of “Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs” of the People's Republic of China (SY/T 6285-2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text