Skip to main content
Log in

Risk assessment for landslide of FAST site based on GIS and fuzzy hierarchical method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of circular high steep slopes within a 500-m aperture spherical radio telescope (FAST) site in Pingtang, Guizhou Province in southwest China, a pertinent small-area karst landslide risk assessment is carried out based on geographic information system and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Results show the following: (a) The AUC value of hazard assessment is 0.826, which means a good adaptability and a relatively higher accuracy, and the AUC value of risk assessment is 0.803, which means the accuracy of landslide risk assessment is within acceptable level. (b) The slopes of FAST area are generally at the medium or low-hazard level, with high-hazard region accounting for only 3.17% of the total area. High-hazard regions are primarily found in two locations, one is located in nearby the Guangmingding slope where the dangerous rock masses were basically cleared away, the other is located in nearby feed tower 5H where potentially unstable rock masses were reinforced to improve the stability of slope. (c) High-vulnerability area of FAST accounts for approximately 43.62%. As a direct result, the high-risk area of FAST site accounts for 34.36% based on the overlap of vulnerability and hazard. The high risk is concentrated in the surrounding areas such as the feed tower, support pillar, and telescope mirror, and the high-risk area overlaps most of the fault fracture zone in the study area. Our findings provide meaningful references for landslide prevention and monitoring of FAST areas and are instructive in theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babanouri N, Dehghani H (2017) Investigating a potential reservoir landslide and suggesting its treatment using limit-equilibrium and numerical methods. J Mt Sci 14:432–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-3898-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao L, Deng QL, Geng D, Wan F, Tan J (2013) Risk evaluation of the geological hazards of sichuan-east gas pipeline based on fuzzy logic method and GIS. Saf Environ Eng 20(6):38-42+48 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao PY, Hu S, Qiu HJ, Yang DD, Cao MM (2017) Evaluation of geological hazards and its validation in Xi’an City based on FAHP. J Arid Land Resour Environ 31(8):136–142. https://doi.org/10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2017.259(in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LX, Yin KK, Wang Y (2008) Discussion on risk prediction for single landslide. J Nat Disaster 17(2):65–70 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Huang R, Xu Q, Li TB, Zhu ML (2013) Progressive modelling of the gravity-induced landslide using the local dynamic strength reduction method. J Mt Sci 10:532–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2367-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XK, Xu JX, Hu JP, Zhang ZZ, Huang X (2015) Feature of spatial and temporal variation of extreme precipitation in Guizhou Province from 1961 to 2012 [J]. J Water Resour Water Eng 26(04):50–56 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30:451–472. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007172.62651.2b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corominas J, Van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Mavrouli O, Agliardi F, Pitilakis K, Winter MG, Pastor M, Ferlisi S, Tofani V, Hervas J, Smith JT (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:209–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahal RK, Bhandary NP, Hasegawa S, Yatabe R (2014) Topo-stress based probabilistic model for shallow landslide susceptibility zonation in the Nepal Him alaya. Environ Earth Sci 71:3879–3892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2774-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan YX, Gao PH, Wang HJ (2003) Theoretical model for fuzzy evaluation of vulnerability of regional hazard bearing body. J Catastrophol 18(3):20–23 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan XY, Qiao JP, Chen YB (2004) Application of analytic landslide danger degree. J Nat Disaster 13(1):72–76 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell R (1994) Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Can Geotech J 31(2):261–272. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao YH (2006) The regional earthquake destructive assessment and the slope stability research on the five-hundred-meter aperture spherical telescope site. Guizhou University (in Chinese)

  • Gao ZQ, Xue CD, Yin F, He HZ, Zhu CB (2010) GIS-based information acquisition analysis and its application to assessment of areas prone to geological hazards a case study of Jinning County, Central Yunnan Province. Geol Explor 46(6):1112–1118 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao B, Zhang MS, Jia J, Zhang CH (2016) Risk assessment and formation mechanism for typical soil landslide in South Qinling Mountain of Shaanxi Province—taking Shanyang school landslide as an example. Bull Soil Water Conserv 36(6):97–101 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao LY, Yu JK, Zhang YY, Cheng J (2017) Application of GIS-based analytic hierarchy process in geological hazards assessment in ningxia region. J Inst Disaster Prev 19(4):8–15 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y (2005) Review of the research on hazard vulnerability. J Catastrophol 20(4):92–96 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu SW (2011) GIS method of evaluation on geo-hazards based on fuzzy theory and typical route. Sci Surv Mapp 36(4):86-88+65 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Yang CY, Zhang HX, Mao YJ, Wang YT (2017) Analysis on spatial and temporal evolution of extreme climate in Guizhou Province [J]. Yangtze River 48(S1):109-114+159 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal RK, Thomas T, Galkate RV, Ghosh NC, Singh S (2014) Watershed prioritization using Saaty’s AHP based decision support for soil conservation measures. Water Resour Manage 28:475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0494-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur J, Kumar A (2013) A new method to find the unique fuzzy optimal value of fuzzy linear programming problems. J Optim Theory Appl 156:529–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-012-0132-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Dhital MR, DeSmedt F (2013) Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal. Comput Geosci 52:398–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Anbalagan R (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in Tehri reservoir rim region, Uttarakhand. J Geol Soc India 87:271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-016-0395-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme KL (1999) Recent directions and developments in geographical information systems. J Archaeol Res 7:153–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02446276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2013) Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping in the Sagimakri area, Korea using KOMPSAT-1 and weight of evidence technique. Environ Earth Sci 70:3197–3215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2385-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Won JS, Jeon SW, Park I, Lee MJ (2015) Spatial landslide hazard prediction using rainfall probability and a logistic regression model. Math Geosci 47:565–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9560-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li HY (2010) Slope stability analysis of longjiang river large bridge based on 3-D fast lagrangian method (FLAC3D). J Wuhan Univ Technol 32(3):61–64 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Yang SQ, Li TL, Yang LP (2005) Strength reduction FEM applied to landslide stability analysis. Coal Geol Explor 33(5):48–50 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao HM, Yang XG, Xu FG, Xu H, Zhou JW (2018) A fuzzy comprehensive method for the risk assessment of a landslide-dammed lake. Environ Earth Sci 77:750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7946-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv YQ, Liu HF, Li XC (2011) Risk assessment system for geologic disasters based on tendency analysis method. Bull Soil Water Conserv 31:155–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma YS, Zhang YC, Zhang CS, Wang JS (2004) Theory and approaches to the risk evaluation of geological hazards. J Geomech 10(1):7–18 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng HJ, Jiang YJ, Zhang SX, Zhang XY, Li HB, Zhao WK (2017) Analysis on the change of influence factors on slipping displacement of landslides in Dujiangyan area before and after the Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. J Geomech 23(06):904–913 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meten M, Bhandary NP, Yatabe R (2015) GIS-based frequency ratio and logistic regression modelling for landslide susceptibility mapping of Debre Sina area in central Ethiopia. J Mt Sci 12:1355–1372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3464-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer BC, Mutlu B, Nefeslioglu HA, Sezer EA, Rouai M, Dekayir A, Gokceoglu C (2020) On the use of hierarchical fuzzy inference systems (HFIS) in expert-based landslide susceptibility mapping: the central part of the Rif Mountains (Morocco). Bull Eng Geol Environ 79:551–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01548-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal’chunov DE, Yakhyaeva GE (2015) Fuzzy logics and fuzzy model theory. Algebra Logic 54:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-015-9326-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan WS, Lu YD, Guo JY (2014) Risk assessment and management of geological disaster based on risk period analysis and GIS in loess areas. In: 2nd International conference on renewable energy and environmental technology (REET), conference date: AUG 19–20, Conference Location: Dalian, PEOPLES R CHINA.

  • Pradhan SP, Vishal V, Singh TN (2018) Finite element modelling of landslide prone slopes around Rudraprayag and Agastyamuni in Uttarakhand Himalayan terrain. Nat Hazards 94:181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3381-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pun WK, Chung PWK, Wong TKC, Lam HWK, Wong LA (2020) Landslide risk management in Hong Kong-experience in the past and planning for the future. Landslides 17:243–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01291-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodposhti MS, Rahimi S, Beglou MJ (2014) PROMETHEE II and fuzzy AHP: an enhanced GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Nat Hazards 73:77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0523-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen ZP (2018) Research on key technologies and security of FAST excavation system. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh K, Kumar V (2018) Hazard assessment of landslide disaster using information value method and analytical hierarchy process in highly tectonic Chamba region in bosom of Himalaya. J Mt Sci 15:808–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4634-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240(4857):1285–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan ZJ, Luo YM, Wang J (1995) The earthquakes and the latest divisions of seismic intensity in Guizhou Province[J]. J Guizhou Norm Univ (Natural Science) 03:59–72 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Guo D, Xu B (2015) A geospatial information quantity model for regional landslide risk assessment. Nat Hazards 79:1385–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1909-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian B, Tong FG, Dai HC (2005) Stability analysis of guanshubao landslide in qingjiang river with nonlinear finite element method during rainfall. Chin J Rock Mechan Eng S2:5301–5307 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Liu DY (2001) Study on evaluation of damage susceptibility and failure loss in analysis landslide disaster. Geotech Investig Surv 3:7-11+34 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang NQ, Zhang ZY, Wang JD (2003) Forecasting method of sliding distance on typical loess landslides. J Northw Univ (Natural Science Edition) 33(1):111–114 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Liu DS, Song QH, Qin XH (2016a) Slope stability reliability analysis based on limit equilibrium methods. Chin J Undergr Sp Eng 12(3):839–844 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Li DL, Qin W (2016b) Geo-hazard susceptibility zoning based on GIS and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in Chongqing Fuling District. J Chongqing Three Gorges Univ 32(3):81–86 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SY, Liang C, Ji XX, Luo YH (2017) Geologic structure background of the earthquake on Sep.14, 1819 in Guiding Guizhou. Guizhou Sci 35(06):72–74 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Liu DS, Li MJ (2011) Impact energy calculation for rock slope and quantitative assessment of vulnerability for element an risk. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(5):901–909 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Da QL (2001) A common compatibility index of judgement matrices. J Southeast Univ (Natural Science Edition) 31(6):94–97 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Ge H, Gao YC (2016) The risk evaluation of Erdaoqiao landslide in Kangding. Sci Technol Eng 16(6):29–36 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye H, Pei LX, Liu CL, Jiang JM, Dong H, Zhang Y, Hou HB (2008) Risk assessment on debris flow in the Luoyugou drainage basin in Tianshui City, Gansu Province. Chin J Geol Hazard Control 19(4):13–17 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JJ (2000) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Syst Math 14(2):80–88 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Wan ZM (2016) Division of incident geological disaster zone in Meihekou city based on analytic hierarchy process. J Shandong Agric Univ (Natural Science Edition) 47(2):250–253 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZC, Chen X, Wang W, Shi P (2007) Analysis of rainfall trend and extreme events in Guizhou[J]. Earth Environ 35(4):351–356 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Fan YQ, Xin CP (2014) Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in hazard evaluation of landslide in the plateau mountains. Environ Eng 32(10):133-136+144 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Major Research Project for Creative Group of Guizhou Provincial Department of Education (Grant numbers QJH-KY [2016]054), the Foundation Research Project of Guizhou Provincial Department of Science and Technology (Grant numbers QKH-JC [2018]1416), the growth project of youth scientific talents for general universities and colleges in Guizhou Province (QJH-KY [2019]210).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wangsheng Pan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, W., Fu, L., Xiao, H. et al. Risk assessment for landslide of FAST site based on GIS and fuzzy hierarchical method. Environ Earth Sci 80, 320 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09571-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09571-0

Keywords

Navigation