Skip to main content
Log in

Weinberg’s Proposal of 1990: A Very Personal View

  • Letter
  • Published:
Few-Body Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My personal encounter with Weinberg’s proposal of 1990 was a really entertaining one: My collaborator David Entem and I had embarked to show that Weinberg’s idea, though smart and beautiful, was essentially useless in practice (like so many of those genius ideas of the 1980s where people claimed to have “derived the nuclear force from QCD”). However, in trying to do so, we showed the opposite; namely, we showed that Weinberg’s idea worked better than allowed by any reasonable means.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. H. Yukawa, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan 17, 48 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.E.S. Green, M.H. MacGregor, R. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 495 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Holinde, R. Machleidt, Nucl. Phys. A 247, 495 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Holinde, R. Machleidt, Nucl. Phys. A 256, 479 (1976)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Erkelenz, Phys. Reports 13C, 191 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Holinde, R. Machleidt, Nucl. Phys. A 280, 429 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Vinh Mau, “The Paris Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction”, in: Mesons in Nuclei, Vol. I, ed. by M. Rho, D.H. Wilkinson (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), pp. 151-196

  8. M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, J.M. Richard, R. Vinh Mau, J. Côté, P. Pirès, R. de Tourreil, Phys. Rev. C 21, 861 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Machleidt, K. Holinde, Ch. Elster, Phys. Reports 149, 1 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. T.A. DeGrand, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, J.E. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2060 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Isgur, G. Karl, Phys. Lett. B 72, 109 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. G.E. Brown, M. Rho, Phys. Lett. B 82, 177–180 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A.W. Thomas, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 13, 1–137 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.E. DeTar, Phys. Rev. D 17, 323-339 (1978) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 19, 1028-1029 (1979)]

  15. M. Oka, K. Yazaki, Phys. Lett. B 90, 41–44 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Harvey, Nucl. Phys. A 352, 301 (1981) [erratum: Nucl. Phys. A 481, 834 (1988)]

  17. A. Faessler, F. Fernandez, G. Lubeck, K. Shimizu, Phys. Lett. B 112, 201–205 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Maltman, N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1827 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Faessler, F. Fernandez, Phys. Lett. B 124, 145–148 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Oka, K. Yazaki, Int. Rev. Nucl. Phys. 1, 489–567 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O. Morimatsu, S. Ohta, K. Shimizu, K. Yazaki, Nucl. Phys. A 420, 573–590 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. C.W. Wong, Phys. Rep. 136, 1 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Myhrer, J. Wroldsen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 629 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Takeuchi, K. Shimizu, K. Yazaki, Nucl. Phys. A 504, 777–796 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Fernandez, A. Valcarce, U. Straub, A. Faessler, J. Phys. G 19, 2013–2026 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Vinh Mau, M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, W.N. Cottingham, P. Lisboa, Phys. Lett. B 150, 259–264 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Jackson, A.D. Jackson, V. Pasquier, Nucl. Phys. A 432, 567–609 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. I. Zahed, G.E. Brown, Phys. Rept. 142, 1–102 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. U.G. Meissner, I. Zahed, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 17, 143 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  30. T.S. Walhout, J. Wambach, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 1, 665–738 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett B251, 288 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Weinberg, Nucl. Phys. B 363, 3 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. B 295, 114 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Weinberg, Physica 96A, 327 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. C. Ordóñez, L. Ray, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1982 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. C. Ordóñez, L. Ray, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 53, 2086 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. N. Kaiser, R. Brockmann, W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A 625, 758 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. E. Epelbaum, W. Glöckle, U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A 637, 107 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. E. Epelbaum, W. Glöckle, U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A 671, 295 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. D.R. Entem, R. Machleidt, Phys. Lett. B 524, 93 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. D.R. Entem, R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 66, 014002 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. V.G.J. Stoks, R.A.M. Klomp, M.C.M. Rentmeester, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 48, 792 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. V.G.J. Stoks, R.A.M. Klomp, C.P.F. Terheggen, J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2950 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. R.B. Wiringa, V.G.J. Stoks, R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. N. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. C 64, 057001 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. N. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. C 65, 017001 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. D.R. Entem, R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 68, 041001 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FG02-03ER41270.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Machleidt.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contribution to Special Issue: Celebrating 30 years of Steven Weinberg’s papers on Nuclear Forces from Chiral Lagrangians

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Machleidt, R. Weinberg’s Proposal of 1990: A Very Personal View. Few-Body Syst 62, 21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01606-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01606-3

Navigation