Skip to main content
Log in

Immigration and the (Ir)relevance of the South African Racial Classification System: Towards Transforming the Official Racial Categories

  • Social Science and Public Policy
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholars examining the South African racial classification system have suggested that apartheid-era racial categories continue to officially classify the South African population. However, there is little discussion about the extent to which the South African racial classification configuration is relevant to new immigrants and refugees (or their descendants) and whether the system will endure or undergo transformation in the face of a growing immigration-induced racial and ethnic diversity. It is palpable that new immigrants and refugees will continue to find apartheid-era South African racial categories incompatible with identities they brought from their home countries. I draw on some empirical works conducted in South Africa and examples in other national contexts such as the USA to argue that the rigid quaternary South African racial classification system, which is based on White, Black, Indian, and Colored racial categories, might be transformed or re-configured due to shifts and transformations in the racial and ethnic makeup of the South African population owing to immigration. Furthermore, such re-configuration might occur if immigrant and refugee communities or their descendants lobby the South African state to create identities for them. Currently, and in the context of widespread public and institutional xenophobia and exclusion of non-citizens, it is paramount to create categories that refer to “foreign-origin” to tackle systemic discrimination based on foreign origin and accelerate institutional integration of refugees and immigrants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Within this paper, the concepts “racial classification”, “race”, or racial categories, such as “Black”, “Colored”, “White”, and “Indian”, refer to socio-political constructions rather than biological or objective.

  2. The term “immigrant” refers to persons who move to another country to reside permanently

  3. Most refugees and immigrants in South Africa do not come through a quota system or authorized entry as practiced by most Western countries such as the USA. Most of post-apartheid refugees and immigrants to South Africa, the majority of Black African refuges, enter the country through border ports of entry. Some do not require a visa such as those from Malawi, Zimbabwe, Zambia, an dMozambique, while others are smuggled in as they require a visa such as those from Somalia, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

  4. An asylum seeker is “someone whose request for sanctuary has yet to be processed” (UNHCR 2017b).

  5. A “refugee is someone who has been forced to flee his or her country because of persecution, war or violence and who has a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group” (UNHCR 2017a).

  6. In post-apartheid South Africa, the function of the census in South Africa is, among others, to ensure equitable distribution of government services and funds and evaluating discrimination. Such was not the function during the era of apartheid as the apartheid system was solely interested in apportioning economic and political power to White Europeans.

  7. The post-apartheid state retained apartheid-era racial categories to ensure that previously disadvantaged racial groups classified as “Black” are given preferential treatment in sectors such as government jobs and tertiary education. In post-apartheid period and for affirmative action purposes, the term “Black” encompasses Africans and racial groups previously defined as “Colored” and “Indian”.

Further Reading

  • Abdi, C. 2015. Elusive Jannah: The Somali Diaspora and a Borderless Muslim Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari, M. 2006. “Hope, fear, shame, frustration: Continuity and change in the expression of coloured identity in white supremacist South Africa, 1910–1994.” Journal of Southern African Studies 32(3): 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinomona, E. and Maziriri, E.T. 2015. “Examining the phenomenon of xenophobia as experienced by African immigrant entrepreneurs in Johannesburg, South Africa: Intensifying the spirit of ubuntu.” International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 2 (6), 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, A. J. 2002. “To Define the Indefinable”: Population Classification and the Census in South Africa. Royal Geographical Society 34(4): 401–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Farred, G. 2000. The Midfielder’s Moment: Coloured Literature and Culture in Contemporary South Africa. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.T. 2002. The racial state. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammett, D. 2010. “Ongoing contestations: The use of racial signifiers in post-apartheid South Africa.” Social Identities 16(2): 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hino, H., M. Leibbrandt, R. Machema, M. Shifa, and C. Soudien. 2018. Identity, inequality and social contestation in the post-apartheid South Africa. Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit. Working Paper Series, number 233. University of Cape Town.

  • Itzigsohn, J., Giorguli, S. and Vazquez, O. 2005. “Immigrant incorporation and racial identity: Racial self-identification among Dominican immigrants.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (1): 50–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/0141984042000280012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusow, A.M. 2006. “Migration and racial formations among Somali immigrants in North America.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32(3): 533–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langa, M. and Kiguwa, P. 2016. Race-ing xenophobic violence: Engaging social representations of the black African body in post-apartheid South Africa. Agenda 30 (2): 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maré, G. 2014. Declassified. Johannesburg: Jacana Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, H. 2003. “To be or not to be (Hispanic or Latino): Brazilian racial and ethnic identity in the United States.” Ethnicities 3 (4): 427–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsinhe, D. 2011. “Africa’s Fear of Itself: The Ideology of Makwerekwere in South Africa.” Third World Quarterly 32 (2): 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, J., and Lourenco, C. 2009. “‘You’re Brazilian, right? What kind Of Brazilian are you?’ The racialization of Brazilian immigrant women.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 32.2: 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mngxitama, A. 2008. We are not all like that: Race,Class and Nation after Apartheid. In Go Home or Die Here: Violence, Xenophobia and the Reinvention of Difference in South Africa, edited by Shireen Hassim, Tawana Kupe and Eric Worby, Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

  • Neocosmos, M. 2006. From ‘Foreign Natives’ to ‘Native Foreigners’: Explaining Xenophobia in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Dakar: CODESRIA.

  • Newby, C. A.; Dowling, J A. 2007. “Black and Hispanic: The Racial Identification of Afro-Cuban Immigrants in the Southwest”. Sociological Perspectives 50 (3): 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, A. D., and Hirschman, C. 2009. “The Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition of the U.S. Population: Emerging American Identities.” Population and Development Review 35: 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posel, D. 2001a. “Race as common sense: racial classification in twentieth-century South Africa”, African Studies Review 44(2): 87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posel, D. 2001b. “What is in a name: racial categorisations under apartheid and their Afterlife.” Transformation 47: 50–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridd, R. 1993. Creating ethnicity in the British colonial Cape: Coloured and Malay contrasted. Cape Town: Centre for African Studies. University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. 2000. Changing race: Latinos, the census, and the history of ethnicity in the United States. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekings, J. 2008. “The continuing salience of race: Discrimination and diversity in South Africa.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 26(1): 1-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seekings, J., and Nattrass, N. 2005. Class, race and inequality in South Africa. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tafira, K. 2011. “Is xenophobia racism?” Anthropology Southern Africa 34 (3 & 4): 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewolde, A.I. 2019. “‘What is Your Race?’ Eritrean Migrant Encounters with Racial Identification Questions in South Africa.” African Studies Quarterly 18 (3): 29-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations data. 2017. Table with data on refugees. http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=UNHCR&f=indID%3AType-Ref. Accessed 20 Sept 2019.

  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2017a. “What Is a Refugee.” UN Refugee Agency. http://www.unrefugees.org/what-is-a-refugee/. Accessed 31 July 2019.

  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2017b. “Asylum-Seekers.” UN Refugee Agency. http://www.unhcr.org/asylum-seekers.html. Accessed 31 July 2019.

  • Vandeyar, S. 2012. “Immigrant students’ shifting identifications in South African schools.” International Journal of Educational Development 32(2): 232-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Ramos, C. 2014. “Migrating race: migration and racial identification among Puerto Ricans.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37.3: 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanuel Isak Tewolde.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tewolde, A.I. Immigration and the (Ir)relevance of the South African Racial Classification System: Towards Transforming the Official Racial Categories. Soc 58, 54–59 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00563-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00563-1

Keywords

Navigation