Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of NEMO simulated surface current with HF radar along Andhra Pradesh coast

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulating upper layer of Bay of Bengal through three-dimensional ocean circulation models is a challenging task. In this study, the surface current from the Nucleus European Modelling of Ocean (NEMO) based global ocean assimilation system is assessed against the high frequency (HF) radar data along the Andhra Pradesh coast on a daily scale during southwest monsoon 2016. The temporal variation of NEMO simulated surface current with HF radar data shows that the NEMO model captures the zonal current better than the meridional current. Both NEMO and HF radar show that the mean surface current average over latitude (15.8°–16.3°N) is westward for zonal surface current and southward for meridional current with maximum at 40–60 km away from the coast. Further, the monthly mean HF radar derived surface current indicates the strong south-westward flow of surface current dominated during July 2016 with speed more than 50 cm/s which is also well simulated by NEMO analysis. It also captures the cold core eddy during 15–25 July 2016 with very small north-eastward shift with respect to HF radar. The scatter plot of collocated surface zonal and meridional current average over the box (81.5–82.5°E; 15.5–16.5°N) clearly shows that NEMO analysis has the correlation of more than 0.5 for both zonal and meridional current.

Research highlights

  • The simulation of upper layer of Bay of Bengal (BoB) through three dimensional ocean circulation models is a challenging task. In this study, the surface current from the high resolution NEMO based global ocean assimilation system is compared against the observed High Frequency (HF) radar data along the Andhra Pradesh Coast during the southwest monsoon 2016.

  • NEMO analysis captures the mean and variability of surface current very well with HF radar. However, it underestimates the mean surface current which may be due to coarser model resolution and complex non-linear processes in the coastal region.

  • The strong cold core eddy during 15–25 July 2016 is observed along the coast which is well simulated in NEMO model with small north-eastward shift with respect to HF radar.

  • The scatter plot of collocated surface current from NEMO analysis and HF radar data average over the Andhra Pradesh Coast (APCO; 81.5–82.5°E; 15.5–16.5°N) clearly shows that NEMO analysis has the correlation of more than 0.5 for surface current.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnier B, Madec G, Penduff T, Molines J-M, Treguier A-M, Le Sommer J, Beckmann A, Biastoch A, Böning C, Dengg J, Derval C, Durand E, Gulev S, Remy E, Talandier C, Theetten S, Maltrud M, McClean J and De Cuevas B 2006 Impact of partial steps and momentum advection schemes in a global ocean circulation model at eddy-permitting resolution; Ocean Dyn. 56 543–567, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-006-0082-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick D E, Evens M W and Weber B L 1977 Ocean surface currents mapped by radar; Science 198 138–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman R D and Graber H C 1997 Validation of HF radar measurements; Oceanography 10 76–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery B M, Washburn L and Harlan J A 2004 Evaluating radial current measurements from CODAR high-frequency radars with moored current meters; J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 21 1259–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch A S and Weber B L 1980 A new technique for measuring tidal currents by using a two-site HF Doppler Radar System; J. Geophys. Res. 85 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar P, Gregoris Y and Lefevre J M 1990 A simple eddy kinetic energy model for simulations of the ocean vertical mixing: Tests at station Papa and long-term upper ocean study site; J. Geophys. Res. 95 16,179–16,193, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC095iC09p16179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girishkumar M S, Joseph J, Thangaprakash V P, Pottapinjara V and McPhaden M J 2017 Mixed layer temperature budget for the northward propagating summer Monsoon Intraseasonal Oscillation (MISO) in the Central Bay of Bengal; J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122 8841–8854.

  • Gupta A, Ashis K Mitra and Rajagopal E N 2019 Implementation of unified model based global coupled modelling system at NCMRWF; NCMRWF Technical Report, NMRF/TR/01/2019, 59p, https://www.ncmrwf.gov.in/Reports-php/Implementation%20of%20Unified%20Model%20based%20Global%20Coupled%20Modelling%20System%20at%20NCMRWF.php.

  • Han W and McCreary Jr J P 2001 Modeling salinity distributions in the Indian Ocean; J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 106 859–877.

  • Hyder P, Storkey D, Blockley E W, Guiavarc’h C, Siddorn J R, Martin M J and Lea D 2012 Assessing equatorial surface currents in the FOAM Global and Indian Ocean models against observations, including the global tropical moored buoy array; J. Oper. Oceanogr. 5(2) 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jena B K, Arunraj K S, Suseentharan V, Tushar Kukadiya and Karthikeyan T 2019 Indian coastal ocean radar network; Curr. Sci. 116(3) 372–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen T G 2001 Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal exchange of salt and tracers in an ocean model; Geophys. Res. Lett. 28(20) 3967–3969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jithin A K, Francis P A, Abhisek Chatterjee, Suprit K and Vijayan Fernando 2017 Validation of the simulations by the High-resolution Operational Ocean Forecast and reanalysis System (HOOFS) for the Bay of Bengal; INCOIS Technical Report, http://moeseprints.incois.gov.in/4418/1/ESSO-INCOIS-ISG-TR-01-2017.pdf, ESSO/INCOIS/ISG/TR/01(2017).

  • Kay S, Caesar J and Janes T 2018 Marine dynamics and productivity in the Bay of Bengal; In: Ecosystem services for well-being in deltas: Integrated assessment for policy analysis (eds) Nicholls R J, Hutton C W, Adger W N, Hanson S E, Rahman M M and Salehin M, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 263–275, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71093-8_14.

  • Kohut J T and Glenn S M 2003 Improving HF radar surface current measurements with measured antenna beam patterns; J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 20 1303–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Large W G and Yeager S G 2004 Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean and sea ice models: The data sets and flux climatologies; NCAR Technical Report, NCAR/TN-460+STR, NCAR, 10 5p., http://www.clivar.org/sites/default/files/documents/wgomd/Large%2526Yeager2004.pdf.

  • Madec G and the NEMO team 2008 NEMO ocean engine, Note du Pôle de modélisation’, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), France, No. 27, ISSN No 1288-161.

  • Mahadevan A, Theresa Paluszkiewicz, Ravichandran M, Debasis Sengupta and Tandon Amit 2016 Bay of Bengal: From Monsoons to Mixing; Oceanography 29(2) 14–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreary J P, Han W, Shankar D and Shetye S R 1996 Dynamics of the East India coastal current: Part 2. Numerical solutions; J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 101(13) 13,993–14,010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momin I M, Mitra A K, Waters J, Martin M J and Rajagopal E 2020 Impact of Altika Sea Level Anomaly data on variational assimilation system; In: Oceanic and Coastal Processes of the Indian Seas (eds) Sheela Nair L, Prakash T N, Padmalal D and Kumar Seelam J, J. Coast. Res., Special Issue 89 46–51.

  • Mukherjee A, Shankar D, Fernando V, Amol P, Aparna S G, Fernandes R, Michael G S, Khalap S T, Satelkar N P, Agarvadekar Y, Gaonkar M G, Tari A P, Kankonkar A and Vernekar S 2014 Observed seasonal and intraseasonal variability of the East India Coastal Current on the continental slope; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 123(6) 1197–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlmann C, White P, Washburn L, Terrill E, Emery B and Otero M 2006 Interpretation of Coastal HF radar-derived surface currents with high-resolution drifter data; J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech. 24 666–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oke P R, Allen J S, Miller R N, Egbert G D and Kosro P M 2002 Assimilation of surface velocity data into a primitive equation coastal ocean model; J. Geophys. Res. 107(C9) 3122, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paduan J D, Kim K C, Cook M S and Chavez F P 2006 Calibration and validation of direction-finding high frequency radar ocean surface current observations; IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 31(4) 862–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paduan J D and Rosenfeld L K 1996 Remotely sensed surface currents in Monterey Bay from shore-based HF radar (Coastal Ocean Dynamics Application Radar); J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 101 20,669–20,686, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC01663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paduan J D and Shulman I 2004 HF radar data assimilation in the Monterey Bay area; J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakhi R, Jaykumar A, Sreevathsa M N R and Rajagopal E N 2016 Implementation and upgradation of NCUM in Bhaskara HPC, NCMRWF Technical Report, NMRF/TR/03/2016, 22p, https://www.ncmrwf.gov.in/NMRF_TR3_2016.pdf.

  • Rubio A, Mader J, Corgnati L, Mantovani C, Griffa A, Novellino A, Quentin C, Wyatt L, Schulz-Stellenfleth J, Horstmann J, Lorente P, Zambianchi E, Hartnett M, Fernandes C, Zervakis V, Gorringe P, Melet A and Puillat I 2017 HF radar activity in European coastal seas: Next steps toward a pan-European HF radar network; Front. Mar. Sci. 4 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samanta D, Saji N H, Dachao J, Vishnu T, Malay G, Suryachandra R A and Medha D 2018 Impact of a narrow coastal Bay of Bengal sea surface temperature front on an Indian summer monsoon simulation; Sci. Rep. 8 17694, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35735-3.

  • Schott F, Reppin J, Fisher J and Quadfasel D 1994 Currents and transports of the Monsoon Current south of Sri Lanka; J. Geophys. Res. 99(C12) 25,127–25,141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shetye S R, Gouveia A D, Shankar D, Shenot S S C, Vinayachandran P N, Sundar D, Michael G S and Nampoothiri G 1996 Hydrography and circulation in the western Bay of Bengal during the northeast monsoon; J. Geophys. Res. 101 14,011–14,025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart R H and Joy J W 1974 HF radio measurements of surface currents; Deep Sea Res. 21 1039–1049.

  • Vinayachandran P N, Matthew A J, Vijay Kumar K, Sanchez-Franks A, Thushara V, George J, Vijith V, Webber B G M, Queste B Y, Roy R, Sarkar A, Baranowski D B, Bhat G S, Klingaman N P, Peatman S C, Parida C, Heywood K J, Hall R, King B, Kent E C, Nayak A A, Neema C P, Amol P, Lotliker A, Kankonkar A, Gracias D G, Vernekar S, D’Souza A C, Valluvan G, Pargaonkar S M, Dinesh K, Giddings J and Joshi M 2018 BOBBLE (Bay of Bengal Boundary Layer Experiment): Ocean–atmosphere interaction and its impact on the South Asian Monsoon; Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 99(8) 1569–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinayachandran P N, Shankar D, Vernekar S, Sandeep K K, Amol P, Neema C P and Chatterjee A 2013 A summer monsoon pump to keep the Bay of Bengal salty; Geophys. Res. Lett. 40(1) 1777–1782, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters J, Daniel L, Matthew J M, David S and James W 2013 Describing the development of the new foam-nemovar system in the global 1/4 degree configuration; Technical Report 578, Met Office, UK.

  • Waters J, Daniel J L, Matthew J M, Isabelle M, Anthony W and James W 2014 Implementing a variational data assimilation system in an operational 1/4 degree global ocean model; Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 141 333–349.

  • Wijesekera H W, Shroyer E L, Tandon A, Ravichandran M, Sengupta D, Jinadasa S U P, Fernando H J S, Agrawal N, Arulananthan K, Bhat G S, Baumgartner M F, Buckley J, Centurioni L R, Conry P, Farrar J T, Gordon A L, Hormann V, Jarosz E, Jensen T G, Johnston T M S, Lankhorst M, Lee C M, Leo L S, Lozovatsky I, Lucas A J, MacKinnon J A, Mahadevan A, Nash J D, Omand M M, Pham H, Pinkel R, Rainville L, Ramachandran S, Rudnick D L, Sarkar S, Send U, Sharma R, Simmons H L, Stafford K M, St Laurent L C, Venayagamoorthy S K, Venkatesan R, Teague W J, Wang D W, Waterhouse A F, Weller R A and Whalen C B 2016 ASIRI: An ocean–atmosphere initiative for Bay of Bengal; Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 97 1859–1884, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00197.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkin J L, Arango H G, Haidvogel D B, Lichtenwalner C S, Glenn S M and Hedström K S 2005 A regional ocean modeling system for the long-term ecosystem observatory; J. Geophys. Res., https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Head, NCMRWF for their constant encouragement; the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. Authors would also like to thank the National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT) and the Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS) for HF radar observations data. We also like to thank the NEMOVAR consortium for support. This work was carried out under the MoES-NERC BoBBLE project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Imranali M Momin: Methodology, data assessment, and writing original draft. Ashis K Mitra: Helped in writing original draft and editing. R Bhatla: Contributed in writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imranali M Momin.

Additional information

Communicated by C Gnanaseelan

This article is part of the topical collection: Advances in Coastal Research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Momin, I.M., Mitra, A.K. & Bhatla, R. Assessment of NEMO simulated surface current with HF radar along Andhra Pradesh coast. J Earth Syst Sci 130, 69 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01553-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01553-x

Keywords

Navigation