Skip to main content
Log in

Do you know your user group? Why it is essential to put your user-requirements analysis on a broad database

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When developing a novel technological system, it is important to meet the users’ needs and expectations to ensure that the product will be accepted and applied by future users. To achieve that, a broadly based qualitative user-requirements analysis is essential. Following a user-centered design approach, a qualitative analysis was conducted to identify users’ needs and expectations for a future TV system. A prototype of the system has been developed with a focus on accessibility for deaf consumers by providing sign language via a virtual interpreter inserted into the traditional TV picture. The requirements analysis based on three different methods: the user interviews, the online questionnaire and the workshop. The statements given in the different studies handle similar topics. The respective detailed expectations by young and elder signers are mostly complementary, but partly even contrary. The results highlight the importance to set a user-requirements analysis on a broad database when developing technological systems. Only asking individual representatives of the user group and only applying individual methods would give very limited insight into users’ expectations and needs toward a technical system. To gain a detailed and representative picture for the whole community, a multimethod approach should be followed allowing for a feedback of several subgroups of the targeted population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Two participants name both as their mother tongues: each the signed and the spoken national language of their country.

References

  1. Adrian, S., Hölig, S., Hasebrink, U., Bosse, I., Haage, A.: Mediennutzung von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen. Medienbezogene Handlungen, Barrieren und Erwartungen einer heterogenen Zielgruppe. Media-Perspektiven 3, 145–156 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barak, A., Sadovsky, Y.: Internet use and personal empowerment of hearing-impaired adolescents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 1802–1815 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bias, R.: The pluralistic usability walkthrough: Coordinated empathies. In: Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L. (eds.) Usability inspection methods, pp. 63–76. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bortz, J., Döring, N.: Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften, 5th edn. Heidelberg, Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bowe, F.: Deaf and hard of hearing Americans’ instant messaging and e-mail use: a national survey. Am. Ann. Deaf. 147, 6–10 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Sage, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Convention of the United Nations on the rights of persons with disabilities (2006). http://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF-Publikationen/a729-un-konvention.pdf?__blob=publicationFile Accessed 28 January 2021

  8. Das Erste (2019) Barrierefreie Angebote im Ersten. https://www.daserste.de/specials/service/barrierefreie-angebote-ard100.html Accessed 28 January 2021

  9. Debevc, M., Kosec, P., Holzinger, A.: Improving multimodal web accessibility for deaf people: sign language interpreter module. Multimed. Tools Appl. 54, 181–199 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0529-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deutscher Gehörlosenbund (German Deaf Association). Gehörlosenkultur. https://www.gehoerlosen-bund.de/faq/geh%C3%B6rlosenkultur Accessed 28 January 2021.

  11. Dey, I.: Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Die Medienanstalten (2017) Content-Bericht. Forschung, Fakten, Trends. https://www.die-medienanstalten.de/publikationen/content-bericht?tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=4621&cHash=fc8f892b7b3a86ec41a413c66f07fde7 Accessed 28 January 2021

  13. EBU Technical-Information (2004) EBU report on Access Services—includes recommendations I44–2004, https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/i/i044.pdf Accessed 28 January 2021

  14. German, U.P.A. (ed.): Accessibility-Universal Design, p. 2. Journals by the German UPA, Vol, Report by the accessibility working group (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gesetz zur Gleichstellung von Menschen mit Behinderung (2002) (Act on the Equality of Persons with Disabilities) https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgg/BGG.pdf Accessed 28 January 2021

  16. Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hanson, V.L.: Computing technologies for deaf and hard of hearing users. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J.A. (eds.) Human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, 2nd edn., pp. 885–893. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haualand H, Allen C (2009) Deaf People and Human Rights. https://www.rasit.org/files/Deaf-People-and-Human-Rights-Report.pdf Accessed 28 January 2021

  19. HBB4ALL consortium (ed.) (2017). Sign Language Interpretation in HbbTV. http://pagines.uab.cat/hbb4all/sites/pagines.uab.cat.hbb4all/files/sign_language_interpreting_in_hbbtv.pdf Accessed 28 January 2021

  20. ISO 9241–210 (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction–Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems

  21. Moser, C.: User experience design. Mit erlebniszentrierter softwareentwicklung zu produkten, die begeistern. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pilling, D., Barrett, P.: Text communication preferences of deaf people in the United Kingdom. J. Deaf. Stud. Deaf. Educ. 13, 92–103 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Power, M.R., Power, D., Horstmanshof, L.: Deaf people communicating via SMS, TTY, relay service, fax and computers in Australia. J. Deaf. Stud. Deaf. Educ. 12, 80–92 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quiring, O.: Methodische Aspekte der Akzeptanzforschung bei interaktiven Medientechnologien. Münchener Beiträge zur Kommunikationswissenschaft (2006). https://doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Upadrasta, V., Oehme, A., Böhm, S.: User-centered design for accessibility in media content–sign language and virtual signer. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds.) HCI International 2020–Late Breaking Papers: Universal Access and Inclusive Design. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer, 12426th edn. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60149-2_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. WHO (2020). Deafness and hearing loss. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss Accessed 28 January 2021

  27. WHO. Facts about deafness. https://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/facts/en/ Accessed 28 January 2021

  28. W3C World Wide Web Consortium (Ed.) (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Technical Report, W3C Working Draft. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/ Accessed 28 January 2021

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research presented was conducted in the project CONTENT4ALL, which received funding from the European Commission within the Horizon 2020 Program (H2020-ICT-2016-2, call ICT-19-2017) under the grant agreement no.° 762021. This publication reflects only the authors’ view and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. A big thank you goes to all participants for taking part in this research and to all project partners who strongly supported these studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Böhm.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Böhm, S. Do you know your user group? Why it is essential to put your user-requirements analysis on a broad database. Univ Access Inf Soc 21, 909–926 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00805-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00805-3

Keywords

Navigation