Skip to main content
Log in

Chrysophyllum albidum stem bark extract coated tillite adsorbent for the uptake of Cr(VI): thermodynamic, kinetic, isotherm, and reusability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, a novel green tillite-based adsorbent (CMT) was synthesized by modifying the surface of natural/pristine tillite (PT) with Chrysophyllum albidum stem bark extract for the efficient removal of Cr(VI) from water. The physicochemical characteristics of PT and CMT were assessed by the use of the FTIR, XRD, BET, TGA, and SEM techniques. Cardinal adsorptive parameters such as solution pH, contact time, adsorbent dose, and initial concentration were used to optimize the efficiency of PT and CMT for Cr(VI) adsorption. The Elovich kinetic model was noticed to best describe the uptake of Cr(VI) onto PT and CMT. Hence, chemisorption was the rate-controlling step for Cr(VI) uptake onto both PT and CMT. Meanwhile, the Langmuir maximum adsorption capacity of PT and CMT was 51.06 and 291.8 mg g−1 respectively, which was higher than those obtained for most materials used for Cr(VI) uptake. The Langmuir and Freundlich models best describe the equilibrium adsorption data for PT and CMT respectively. The reusability assessment of PT and CMT showed over 90% of the initial Cr(VI) uptake even after the fifth cycle of reuse. Electrostatic interaction and reduction of Cr(VI) were responsible for the removal of Cr(VI) from water onto the green material. The uptake of Cr(VI) was thermodynamically feasible, entropy-driven, and endothermic on both PT and CMT. The outcome of this study revealed that the anchoring of Chrysophyllum albidum stem bark extract on tillite produced a green adsorbent, which was highly efficient for the removal of Cr(VI) from polluted water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun H et al (2018) Structure-enhanced removal of Cr (vi) in aqueous solutions using MoS 2 ultrathin nanosheets. New J Chem 42(11):9006–9015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pradhan SK, Panwar J, Gupta S (2017) Enhanced heavy metal removal using silver-yttrium oxide nanocomposites as novel adsorbent system. J Environ Chem Eng 5(6):5801–5814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saha B, Orvig C (2010) Biosorbents for hexavalent chromium elimination from industrial and municipal effluents. Coord Chem Rev 254(23-24):2959–2972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan TA et al (2017) Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution using guar gum–nano zinc oxide biocomposite adsorbent. Arab J Chem 10:S2388–S2398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Medeiros M et al (2003) Elevated levels of DNA–protein crosslinks and micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes of tannery workers exposed to trivalent chromium. Mutagenesis 18(1):19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Das AK (2004) Micellar effect on the kinetics and mechanism of chromium(VI) oxidation of organic substrates. Coord Chem Rev 248(1):81–99

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Mondal NK, Basu S (2019) Potentiality of waste human hair towards removal of chromium (VI) from solution: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Appl Water Sci 9(3):49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baral A, Engelken RD (2002) Chromium-based regulations and greening in metal finishing industries in the USA. Environ Sci Pol 5(2):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pagilla KR, Canter LW (1999) Laboratory studies on remediation of chromium-contaminated soils. J Environ Eng 125(3):243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kongsricharoern N, Polprasert C (1996) Chromium removal by a bipolar electro-chemical precipitation process. Water Sci Technol 34(9):109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aksu Z et al (1996) Investigation of biosorption of chromium (VI) on Cladophora crispata in two-staged batch reactor. Environ Technol 17(2):215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zwiener C, Frimmel F (2003) Short-term tests with a pilot sewage plant and biofilm reactors for the biological degradation of the pharmaceutical compounds clofibric acid, ibuprofen, and diclofenac. Sci Total Environ 309(1):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hartig C, Ernst M, Jekel M (2001) Membrane filtration of two sulphonamides in tertiary effluents and subsequent adsorption on activated carbon. Water Res 35(16):3998–4003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heberer T (2002) Occurrence, fate, and removal of pharmaceutical residues in the aquatic environment: a review of recent research data. Toxicol Lett 131(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heberer T et al (2002) Production of drinking water from highly contaminated surface waters: removal of organic, inorganic, and microbial contaminants applying mobile membrane filtration units. CLEAN Soil Air Water 30(1):24–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-401X(200207)30:1<24::AID-AHEH24>3.0.CO;2-O

  16. Nghiem LD, Schäfer AI, Elimelech M (2005) Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. Environ Sci Technol 39(19):7698–7705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nghiem LD, Schäfer AI, Elimelech M (2004) Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 38(6):1888–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tiravanti G, Petruzzelli D, Passino R (1997) Pretreatment of tannery wastewaters by an ion exchange process for Cr(III) removal and recovery. Water Sci Technol 36(2):197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou X et al (1993) A process monitoring/controlling system for the treatment of wastewater containing chromium(VI). Water Res 27(6):1049–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zwiener C, Frimmel F (2000) Oxidative treatment of pharmaceuticals in water. Water Res 34(6):1881–1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ternes TA et al (2002) Removal of pharmaceuticals during drinking water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 36(17):3855–3863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ternes TA et al (2003) Ozonation: a tool for removal of pharmaceuticals, contrast media and musk fragrances from wastewater? Water Res 37(8):1976–1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang S-D, Fann C-F, Hsieh H-S (1982) Foam separation of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution. J Colloid Interface Sci 89(2):504–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rani N, Singh B, Shimrah T (2017) Chromium (VI) removal from aqueous solutions using Eichhornia as an adsorbent. J Water Reuse Desalin 7(4):461–467. https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2016.094

  25. Aslani H, Kosari TE, Naseri S, Nabizadeh R, Khazaei M (2018) Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution using functionalized chitosan as a novel nano-adsorbent: modeling and optimization, kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamic studies, and toxicity testing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(20):20154–20168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2023-1

  26. Banerjee S et al (2018) Application of zirconium caged activated biochar alginate beads towards deionization of Cr (VI) laden water in a fixed bed column reactor. J Environ Chem Eng

  27. Bibi I et al (2018) Chromium (VI) removal by siderite (FeCO 3) in anoxic aqueous solutions: an X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigation. Sci Total Environ 640:1424–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen Y-W et al (2018) Utilization of coal fly ash and drinking water sludge to remove anionic As (V), Cr (VI), Mo (VI) and Se (IV) from mine waters. J Environ Chem Eng 6(2):2470–2479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fang W et al (2018) Synthesis of graphene/SiO2@ polypyrrole nanocomposites and their application for Cr (VI) removal in aqueous solution. Chemosphere 197:594–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Neolaka YA, Supriyanto G, Kusuma HS (2018) Adsorption performance of Cr (VI)-imprinted poly (4-VP-co-MMA) supported on activated Indonesia (Ende-Flores) natural zeolite structure for Cr (VI) removal from aqueous solution. J Environ Chem Eng 6(2):3436–3443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mikhaylov VI, Maslennikova TP, Krivoshapkina EF, Tropnikov EM, Krivoshapkin PV (2018) Express Al/Fe oxide–oxyhydroxide sorbent systems for Cr (VI) removal from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 350:344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.023

  32. Omer AM, Khalifa RE, Hu Z, Zhang H, Liu C, Ouyang XK (2019) Fabrication of tetraethylenepentamine functionalized alginate beads for adsorptive removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions. Int J Biol Macromol 125:1221–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.097

  33. Ranjbar N et al (2018) Chromium (VI) removal by bone char–ZnO composite: parameters optimization by response surface methodology and modeling. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 37(5):1684–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Akpomie KG, Dawodu FA (2015) Montmorillonite-rice husk composite for heavy metal sequestration from binary aqua media: a novel adsorbent. Trans R Soc South Africa 70(1):83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fenti A et al (2020) Cr (VI) sorption from aqueous solution: a review. Appl Sci 10(18):6477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang J, Huang B, Lin M (2020) Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by a chitosan/bentonite composite: isotherm, kinetics, and thermodynamics studies. J Chem Eng Data 65(5):2751–2763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dawodu FA, Akpan BM, Akpomie KG (2020) Sequestered capture and desorption of hexavalent chromium from solution and textile wastewater onto low cost Heinsia crinita seed coat biomass. Appl Water Sci 10(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Akpomie KG, Conradie J (2020) Advances in application of cotton-based adsorbents for heavy metals trapping, surface modifications and future perspectives. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 201:110825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chukwuemeka-Okorie HO et al (2018) Calcined corncob-kaolinite combo as new sorbent for sequestration of toxic metal ions from polluted aqua media and desorption. Front Chem 6:273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sing KS (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl Chem 57(4):603–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Brunauer S, Emmett P (1940) Chemisorptions of gases on iron synthetic ammonia catalysts1. J Am Chem Soc 62(7):1732–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Akpomie KG, Conradie J (2020) Banana peel as a biosorbent for the decontamination of water pollutants. A review. Environ Chem Lett 18(4):1085–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-00995-x

  43. Jin X et al (2018) Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions via reduction and absorption by green synthesized iron nanoparticles. J Clean Prod 176:929–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Huang Y et al (2018) Fast and efficient removal of chromium (VI) anionic species by a reusable chitosan-modified multi-walled carbon nanotube composite. Chem Eng J 339:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu F-C, Tseng R-L, Juang R-S (2009) Characteristics of Elovich equation used for the analysis of adsorption kinetics in dye-chitosan systems. Chem Eng J 150(2-3):366–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zang Y et al (2018) Research on adsorption of Cr (VI) by poly-epichlorohydrin-dimethylamine (EPIDMA) modified weakly basic anion exchange resin D301. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 161:467–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Labied R et al (2018) Adsorption of hexavalent chromium by activated carbon obtained from a waste lignocellulosic material (Ziziphus jujuba cores): kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic study. Adsorpt Sci Technol 36(3-4):1066–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ogbu I, Akpomie K, Osunkunle A, Eze S (2019) Sawdust-kaolinite composite as efficient sorbent for heavy metal ions. Bangladesh J Sci Ind Res 54(1):99–110. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v54i1.40736

  49. Langmuir I (1933) Surface chemistry. Chem Rev 13(2):147–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Choy KK, Porter JF, McKay G (2000) Langmuir isotherm models applied to the multicomponent sorption of acid dyes from effluent onto activated carbon. J Chem Eng Data 45(4):575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rao M, Parwate A, Bhole A (2002) Removal of Cr6+ and Ni2+ from aqueous solution using bagasse and fly ash. Waste Manag 22(7):821–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Li Y et al (2008) Adsorption thermodynamic and kinetic studies of dissolved chromium onto humic acids. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 65(1):25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Altundogan HS (2005) Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution by iron (III) hydroxide-loaded sugar beet pulp. Process Biochem 40(3):1443–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ma M et al (2014) Hexavalent chromium removal from water using heat-acid activated red mud. Open J Appl Sci 4(05):275

    Google Scholar 

  55. Baral SS et al (2007) Chromium (VI) removal by calcined bauxite. Biochem Eng J 34(1):69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bhattacharya A et al (2008) Adsorption, kinetics and equilibrium studies on removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using different low-cost adsorbents. Chem Eng J 137(3):529–541

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hu J et al (2009) Removal of chromium from aqueous solution by using oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater 162(2):1542–1550

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mi X et al (2012) Preparation of graphene oxide aerogel and its adsorption for Cu2+ ions. Carbon 50(13):4856–4864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Chagas PMB et al (2018) Nanostructured oxide stabilized by chitosan: hybrid composite as an adsorbent for the removal of chromium (VI). J Environ Chem Eng 6(1):1008–1019

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. Qiu J et al (2009) Adsorption of Cr (VI) using silica-based adsorbent prepared by radiation-induced grafting. J Hazard Mater 166(1):270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zambrano-Intriago LA, Gorozabel-Mendoza ML, Córdova Mosquera A et al (2020) Kinetics, equilibrium, and thermodynamics of the blue 19 dye adsorption process using residual biomass attained from rice cultivation. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00944-2

  62. Eze SI, Akpomie KG, Ezekoye OM, Chukwujindu CN, Ojo FK, Ani JU, Ujam OT (2021) Antibiotic adsorption by acid enhanced Dialium guineense seed waste. Arab J Sci Eng 46(1):309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04771-5

  63. Liang X et al (2018) Efficient removal of Cr (VI) from water by quaternized chitin/branched polyethylenimine biosorbent with hierarchical pore structure. Bioresour Technol 250:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Dawodu FA, Akpomie KG (2014) Simultaneous adsorption of Ni (II) and Mn (II) ions from aqueous solution unto a Nigerian kaolinite clay. J Mater Res Technol 3(2):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Nessim RB et al (2011) Biosorption of lead and cadmium using marine algae. Chem Ecol 27(6):579–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang J et al (2018) Polyvinylpyrrolidone and polyacrylamide intercalated molybdenum disulfide as adsorbents for enhanced removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 334:569–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Samuel MS et al (2018) Preparation of graphene oxide/chitosan/ferrite nanocomposite for Chromium (VI) removal from aqueous solution. Int J Biol Macromol 119:540–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mystrioti C et al (2016) Comparative evaluation of five plant extracts and juices for nanoiron synthesis and application for hexavalent chromium reduction. Sci Total Environ 539:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from TETFund National Research Fund grant (TETF/DR&D/CE/NRF/STI/66/Vol.I).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James F. Amaku.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 36 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amaku, J.F., Nnaji, J.C., Ogundare, S.A. et al. Chrysophyllum albidum stem bark extract coated tillite adsorbent for the uptake of Cr(VI): thermodynamic, kinetic, isotherm, and reusability. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 4865–4877 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01489-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01489-8

Keywords

Navigation