Skip to main content
Log in

Consideration of Both Discriminated and Generalized Responding When Teaching Children with Autism Abduction Prevention Skills

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We taught three children with autism how to respond to abduction lures presented by strangers. We then tested undesirable generalization of the safety response to matched instructions to leave by a familiar adult. Following training, all three participants engaged in the safety response across both strangers and familiar adults. Thus, we evaluated a set of procedures for establishing discriminated responding. Appropriate responding to instructions to leave by strangers versus familiar adults was achieved only after discrimination training. Discriminated responding occurred across a novel setting and maintained across 3 months; however, performance during stimulus generalization probes within community settings was variable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

Download references

Author Note

All data for this study were collected by Megan Leveque-Wolfe and Jessica Niemeier-Beck, under the supervision and guidance of Nicole Rodriguez. We thank the wonderful staff in the Early Intervention, Virtual Care, Severe Behavior, and Pediatric Feeding Programs for volunteering their time to serve as confederates.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Funding

Internal funding from the University of Nebraska Medical Center’s Chancellor’s Office provided partial support for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All data for this study were collected by Megan Leveque-Wolfe and Jessica Niemeier-Beck, under the supervision and guidance of Nicole Rodriguez .

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole M. Rodriguez.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

University institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was obtained from the parents of all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 34 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 36 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levesque-Wolfe, M.A., Rodriguez, N.M. & Niemeier-Beck, J.J. Consideration of Both Discriminated and Generalized Responding When Teaching Children with Autism Abduction Prevention Skills. Behav Analysis Practice 14, 396–409 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00541-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00541-9

Keywords

Navigation