Skip to main content
Log in

Dialectical Hegelian Logic and Physical Quantity and Quality

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Ontology, quality determines beings. The quality-quantity bipolarity reveals that a conceptual logical comprehension that can include negation must be a dialectical logic. Quality is a precise characteristic of something (or a subject predicate) capable of augmentation or diminution while remaining identical through differences or quantitative changes. Thus, quality and in opposition quantity are inextricably linked, giving definition to each other, so constituting a logical bipolarity. The theory is that a magnitude G is never separated from secondary qualities α and β, and therefore, a measure depends on a concrete quality Gα or Gβ, that is to say on one pole of a logical bi-pole. However, the particular number, the unit, that expresses the result of a measure is the quality G alone. Examples drawn from physical and chemical experiments illustrate these ideas and elaborate the structure of the concept of opposition between the secondary qualities α and β of a magnitude G.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A system with concepts is a semiotic system when representations and functions form pairs. The function is determined by semantic properties (significance) within their physical restrictions (signifier). (Nescolarde-Selva and Usó-Doménech, 2013).

  2. The frontier of Spain, is it not, and possibly above all, that of non-Spain?

References

  • Alekseev, G. N. (1986). Energy and entropy. Mir Publishers.

  • Aristotle. (2015). Physics. Translated by R.P. Hardie and R.K. Gave. The University of Adelaide Library. University of Adelaide. South Australia.

  • Bohm, D. (1961). Causality and chance in modern physics. Harper and Brothers.

  • Bridgman, P. W. (1922). Dimensional analysis. Yale University Press.

  • Fraser, G. (2000). Antimatter. Cambridge University Press.

  • Gibbings, J. C. (2011). Dimensional analysis. Springer.

  • Guggenheim, E. A. (1967). Thermodynamics: An advanced treatment for chemists and physicists (5th ed.). Wiley: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). Science of logic. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hjelmslev, L. (1968). Structure fondamentale du langage. Ed. De Minuit. Paris. 1968. (In French).

  • Huxley, J. (1962). Higher and lower organisation in evolution. J R College Surgeons Edinburgh, 7, 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nescolarde-Selva, J., & Usó-Doménech, J. (2013). Topological structures of complex belief systems. Complexity, 19(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nescolarde-Selva, J., & Usó-Doménech, J. L. (2014a). Semiotic vision of ideologies. Foundations of Science, 19(3), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nescolarde-Selva, J., & Usó-Doménech, J. L. (2014b). Reality, systems and impure systems. Foundations of Science, 19(3), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nescolarde-Selva, J. A., Usó-Doménech, J. L., & Alonso-Stenberg, K. (2015). An approach to paraconsistent multivalued logic: Evaluation by complex truth values. In J. Y. Beziau, M. Chakraborty, & S. Dutta (Eds.), New directions in paraconsistent logic (pp. 147–153). Springer.

  • Nescolarde-Selva, J., Usó-Doménech, J. L., & Gash, H. (2014). A theoretical point of view of Reality. Perception and Language Complexity, 20(1), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nescolarde-Selva, J. A., Usó-Doménech, J. L., & Sabán, M. (2015a). Linguistic knowledge of reality: A metaphysical impossibility? Foundations of Science, 20(1), 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1967). Thermodynamics of irreversible processes (3rd ed.). Wiley.

  • Smil, V. (2008). Energy in nature and society: General energetics of complex systems. MIT Press.

  • Usó-Doménech, J. L., & Nescolarde-Selva, J. A. (2019). Mathematical logic of notions and concepts. Foundations of Science, 24(4), 641–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usó-Doménech, J. L., Nescolarde-Selva, J. A., Gash, H., & Segura-Abad, L. (2019). Dialectical logic for mythical and mystical superstructural systems (II): Infinity and coincidentia oppositorum in Cusanus’ thought. Kybernetes, 48(8), 1851–1870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usó-Doménech, J. L., Nescolarde-Selva, J. A., & Segura-Abad, L. (2016). Proposal for the formalization of Dialectical Logic. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math4040069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usó-Doménech, J. L., Nescolarde-Selva, J. A., & Segura-Abad, L. (2017). Dialectical multivalued logic and probabilistic theory. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math5010015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usó-Doménech, J. L., Nescolarde-Selva, J. A., Segura-Abad, L., & Sabán, M. (2019). Dialectical logic for mythical and mystical superstructural systems. Kybernetes, 48(8), 1653–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Nescolarde-Selva.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Usó-Doménech, J.L., Nescolarde-Selva, J.A. & Gash, H. Dialectical Hegelian Logic and Physical Quantity and Quality. Found Sci 27, 555–572 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-021-09790-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-021-09790-5

Keywords

Navigation