Abstract
How does the European Union export its rules and regulations to its partners during free trade negotiations? While the research fields on EU foreign policy promotion abroad and external perceptions seem to have settled on the notion that the success of EU rule export increases with the internalization of the negotiation partner’s wants, this article challenges this academic consensus. Scrutinizing the EU-India free trade negotiations (2007–2013) where the perception of EU norms turned from positive to inherently negative, the article shows that the Commission successfully constructed the notion of congruence between European and Indian standards on multiple (international, bilateral, regional) fronts during an initial “honeymoon phase” (2007–2011). Yet, once the negotiations’ focus shifted to hard bargaining over core interests, the notion of congruence gave way to tensions and discrepancies, so that perceptions turned negative over the “cooldown” (2011–2013). Analysing claims made by EU and Indian policy officials in four Indian English-speaking quality newspapers—Times of India, Hindustan Times, Hindu Business Line and the Business Standard—the article suggests that the discursive construction of congruence with the local context, however successful, cannot prevail against battles over core interests. Hence, this article provides starting points for new academic junctures in that it introduces a more nuanced understanding of the EU’s approach to rule promotion abroad.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data, including the transcripts of the interviews, are in the author’s possession and can be made available upon request. They have not been made public in order to protect and respect the interviewees’ right to privacy and anonymization.
Notes
A fourth frame, the regional frame (F4), was compiled out of “MISSING” values. Here, congruence is constructed by linking EU rules to regional policy structures. It emphasizes the perception of regional equivalence of standards and structures, for example, by referencing regional security norms of the SAARC or the SCO or by mentioning standards agreed upon by the ASEAN. Yet, as this frame accounted for a maximum of 5% of the total discourse per year, I excluded it from the empirical analysis
According to the literature on claims-making, claims contain seven variables: a location (where?), a date (when?), a claimant (who?), a form (how?), an addressee (at whom?), an issue (what?), an object (for or against whom?) and a justification (why?) (Koopman & Statham 1999:55). Yet, the “when”, “where” and “how” are usually self-explanatory as they refer to the newspaper, date of publication and addressee (Haunss and Kohlmorgen 2008: 5)
Can be made available upon request
Transcripts can be made available upon request
Abbreviations
- ASEAN:
-
Association of Southeast Asian Nations
- EU:
-
European Union
- FTA:
-
free trade agreement
- FICCI:
-
Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry
- IPR:
-
intellectual property rights
- WTO:
-
World Trade Organization
References
Interviews
Interview 1 (2019, June 11) Personal interview with former member of the European Parliament’s Delegation to India
Interview 2 (2019, June 14.) Personal interview with member of the Indian Embassy to Brussels
Interview 3 (2019, June 14) Telephone interview with former head of unit of DG Trade
Interview 4 (2019, June 20) Personal interview with deputy head of unit of DG Trade, Brussels
Literature
Acharya A (2004) How ideas spread: whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. Int Organ 58(2):239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024
Bicchi F (2006) ‘Our size fits all’: normative power Europe and the Mediterranean. J Eur Publ Policy 13(2):286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451733
Bijsmans P (2017) EU media coverage in times of crisis: Euroscepticism becoming mainstream? In: Caiani M, Guerra S (eds) Euroscepticism, Democracy and the Media. Communicating Europe, contesting Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 73–94
Björkdahl A (2005) Norm-maker and norm-taker: exploring the normative influence of the EU in Macedonia. Eur Foreign Aff Rev 10:257–278
Björkdahl A (2008) Norm advocacy: a small state strategy to influence the EU. J Eur Publ Policy 15(1):135–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701702272
Björkdahl A, Chaban N, Leslie J, Masselot A (2015) Importing EU norms: conceptual framework and empirical findings. Springer International, Basel
Bretherton C, Vogler J (1999) The European Union as a global actor. Routledge, London
Business Standard (2007a, July 6). ‘EU may not put human rights condition for FTA’
Business Standard (2007b, November 30). 'India-EU differ on FTA'
Business Standard (2010a, April 10). 'Hope floats for India-EU FTA'.
Business Standard (2010b, October 14). ‘Hope floats for India-EU free trade pact talks’
Business Standard (2011, July 10). ‘EU pressing for strong IPR regime in India trade pact’
Business Standard (2012, February 11). ‘India, EU to expedite trade talks’
Chaban N, Holland M (eds) (2005) The EU through the eyes of the Asia-Pacific: public perceptions and media representations. National Centre for Research on Europe, Canterbury
Chaban N, Masselot A, Vadura K (2015) Introduction. Asia-Europe dialogue on norms: revisiting the role of norm-receivers in the conceptualisation of the ‘normative power Europe. Asia-Europe Journal 13(3):233–239
Council of the EU (2018) Council conclusions on the EU Strategy on India, 10 December 2018. Online: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/12/10/india-council-adopts-conclusions-on-a-new-eu-strategy [Accessed 23 June 2019]
De Souza R (2010) NGOs in India’s elite newspapers: a framing analysis. Asian J Commun 20(4):477–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2010.496863
De Wilde P (2013) Representative claims analysis: theory meets method. J Eur Publ Policy 20(2):278–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.746128
Entman R (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43(4):51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
European Commission (2007) Europe and indispensable India. Speech by Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson at the EU-India Business Summit, 30 November 2007. Online: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressrelease_SPEECH-07-769_en.htm [accessed 22 June 2019]
European Commission (2012) EU-India: a strategic relationship in an evolving world. Speech delivered by José Manuel Barroso to the FICCI, Mumbai, 13 February 2012. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_12_90 [accessed 22 June 2019]
Fischer Boel M (2007) EU-India trade and Doha Round of WTO. Speech delivered on a conference organised by FICCI (Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry), New Delhi, 6 March 2007. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_07_120 [accessed 21 June 2019]
Garcia M, Masselot A (2015) EU-Asia Free Trade Agreements as tools for social norm/legislation transfer. Asia Europe Journal 13:241–252
Gordon N, Pardo S (2015) Normative power Europe meets the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Asia-Europe Journal 13(3):265–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-015-0426-x
Groß L (2015) The journey from global to local: norm promotion, contestation and localisation in post-war Kosovo. J Int Relat Dev 18(3):311–336. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2015.16
Haunss S, Kohlmorgen L (2008) Codebook for the analysis of political claims in conflicts on intellectual property rights in Europe. Online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236346735_Codebook_for_the_Analysis_of_Political_Claims_in_Conflicts_on_Intellectual_Property_Rights_in_Europe [accessed 4 March 2019]
Hindu Business Line (2007, November 30). ‘India, EU may wrap up FTA next year: Nath’
Hindu Business Line (2011, March 13). ‘Dismantling trade barriers of 6 trading partners is EU’s top priority’
Hindu Business Line (2012a, March 1) ‘A European pill best avoided’
Hindu Business Line (2012b, August 5). ‘Year-end is a realistic deadline for sewing up India-EU trade pact talks’
Hindu Business Line (2013, October 29). ‘EU wants full-scale reforms in India’s insurance sector’
Hindustan Times (2007, March 6). ‘No rights clause in EU trade deal’
Hindustan Times (2008, January 11). ‘EU keen to have free trade agreement with India’
Hindustan Times (2009, April 23). ‘India, Poland should target $5 bn trade in five years: CII’
Hindustan Times (2012, October 17). ‘A holiday destination’
Hindustan Times (2013, November 22). ‘An unfinished business’
Indian Readership Survey (2017) The Economic Times is number 4 among English newspapers: IRS 2017. Online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/media/entertainment/media/the-economic-times-isnumber-4-among-english-newspapers-irs-2017/articleshow/62612582.cms [accessed: 28 June 2019]
Ismail F (2009) An assessment of the WTO Doha Round July–December 2008 collapse. World Trade Rev 8(4):579–605. [online:. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745609990073]
Jain RK (2017) India, the European Union and Human Rights. India Q 73(4):411–429. [online:. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928417731640]
Jain RK, Pandey S (2010) The European Union in the eyes of India. Asia-Europe Journal 8(2):193–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-010-0258-7
Jetschke A, Murray P (2012) Diffusing regional integration: the EU and Southeast Asia. West Eur Polit 35(1):174–191. [online:. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.631320]
Kalirajan K, Bhattacharya S (2008) Free trade arrangement between India and Japan: an exploratory analysis. ASARC Working Paper 2007/09. Online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f2ff/f3053d96cc9f34539f749d46224a6f51c1b5.pdf [accessed 23 March 2019]
Kim L (2011) Denotation and connotation in public representation: semantic network analysis of Hwang supporters’ Internet dialogues. Public Underst Sci 22(3):335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511401784
Kleinnijenhuis J, Rietberg EM (1995) Parties, media, the public and the economy: patterns of societal agenda-setting. Eur J Polit Res 28(1):95–118
Koopmans R, Statham P (1999) ‘Theoretical framework, research design and methods’. In: R. Koopmans and P. Statham (eds), The Making of a European Public Sphere. Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: university press: 34-62
Krippendorff K (2018) Sampling. In: Krippendorff K (ed) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (4th ed). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 115–128
Lavenex S (2004) EU external governance in 'wider Europe. J Eur Publ Policy 11(4):680–700. [online:. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000248098]
Lavenex S, Schimmelfennig F (2009) EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics. J Eur Publ Policy 16(6):791–812. [online:. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903087696]
Legro JW (2000) The transformation of policy ideas. Am J Polit Sci 44(3):419–432
Meissner KL (2016) A case of failed interregionalism? Analyzing the EU-ASEAN free trade agreement negotiations. Asia-Europe Journal 14(3):319–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-016-0450-5
Müller, P. and Falkner, G. (2014). 'The EU as a policy exporter? The conceptual framework' In G. Falkner and P. Müller (eds), EU Policies in a Global Perspective: Shaping or Taking International Regimes? London: Routledge: 1-19.
Orbie J, Khorana S (2015) Normative versus market power Europe? The EU-India trade agreement. Asia Europe Journal 13(3):253–264. [online:. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-015-0427-9]
Oxford Dictionary (2018) Definition for ‘norm’. Online: https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/norm [accessed 25 June 2019]
Prange-Gstöhl H (2009) Enlarging the EU’s internal energy market: why would third countries accept EU rule export? Energy Policy 37(12):5296–5303. [online:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.070]
Registrar of newspapers in India (2018). Press in India. Chapter 4: Circulation of publications. Online: http://rni.nic.in/all_page/press_india.aspx [accessed 20 June 2019]
Riffe D, Lacy S, Fico FG (2005) Sampling. In: Riffe D, Lacy S, Fico FG (eds) Analyzing media messages. Using qualitative content analysis in research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 96–122
Sicurelli D (2015a) The EU as a norm promoter through trade. The perceptions of Vietnamese elites. Asia Europe Journal 13(1):23–39. [online:. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-014-0407-5]
Sicurelli D (2015b) The EU as a promoter of human rights in bilateral trade agreements: the case of the negotiations with Vietnam. J Contemp Eur Res 11(2):230–245
Times of India (2011, May 1). ‘India to talk tough on IPR issue in free trade talks with EU’
Times of India (2012a, February 9). “We want an ambitious, balanced trade agreement”
Times of India (2012b, July 10). ‘India against EU study of its data security laws’
Wouters J, Goddeeris I, Natens B, Ciortuz F (2013) ‘Some critical issues in EU-India free trade negotiations’. Working Paper No. 102, February 2013. Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies
Young AR (2015) Liberalizing trade, not exporting rules: the limits to regulatory co-ordination in the EU’s ‘new generation’ preferential trade agreements. J Eur Publ Policy 22(9):1253–1275. [Online:. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1046900
Young AR, Peterson J (2006) The EU and the new trade policies. J Eur Publ Policy 13(6):795–814. [online:. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600837104]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The author, Mrs. Marie Sophie Peffenkover, developed and carried out the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by her between March and June 2019. The manuscript has been written by Mrs. Peffenkover as single author and reflects her original thoughts and contributions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All interviewees gave their free consent to participate in the interviews and, unless agreed otherwise, to have their interviews recorded and transcribed. All interviewees were ensured that their interview transcripts and quotes from/references to these transcripts are completely anonymized and in no way relatable to their person or position.
Adherence to national and international regulations
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All interviewees gave their consent for publishing quotes from/references to their interviews in an anonymized way that does not allow drawing conclusions on their person or their position.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peffenköver, M.S. Congruence-building on multiple fronts: Indian elite perceptions of EU rule promotion in India during the EU-India FTA negotiations (2007–2013). Asia Eur J 19, 149–165 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-020-00591-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-020-00591-2