A theoretical study on screening ionic liquids for SO2 capture under low SO2 partial pressure and high temperature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.04.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Most studies on SO2 capture using ionic liquids (ILs) have been carried out under mild conditions (e.g., about 1 bar of SO2 and 20–40 °C). However, these ILs only exhibit a fraction of their original SO2 uptake under harsher conditions, i.e., much lower SO2 partial pressure and evidently higher temperature (e.g., ≤0.2 mbar of SO2 and ≥110 °C). In this work, we screen 127 reported ILs for multi-molar SO2 absorption under the harsher conditions, covering nearly all the chemical space explored of the SO2 capturing IL. A unique cooperative anion-SO2 interaction mode with two forms (the insertion adduct and the ringed adduct) has been identified for branched anions, where SO2 acts as both acid and base to attack different reactive sites on anions. The simulated Langmuir isotherms further help screen out potential sorbents (amino-based branched singly charged anions with an Al atom as the center and carboxyl-based divalent anions) with both high overall capacity and high per-cycle absorption capacity. The energies of the reacting orbitals of the anions are linearly correlated to their SO2 binding energies. This work provides new insights for the design of task-specific ILs under harsh conditions.

Graphical abstract

Screen and explore multi-molar sorbents for reversible SO2 capture under harsh conditions.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (147KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

The emission of SO2 mainly comes from the combustion of fossil fuels. Traditional desulfurization techniques use sorbents like limestone and ammonia to scrub flue gas to achieve direct SO2 removal [1], [2], [3]. After desulfurization, however, the sorbents cannot be recovered and large amounts of wastes or valueless byproducts are left behind. To overcome these issues, novel reversible capture materials both in the forms of liquids (ionic liquids (ILs) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56] and deep eutectic solvents (DESs) [57], [58], [59], [60]), and solids (metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [61], [62], [63], [64] and two dimensional materials [65], [66], [67]) have been studied broadly in recent years. Most reversible SO2 capture materials are liquids because solid materials are likely to undergo structural degradation due to the strong SO2 bindings when exposed in humid SO2 gas [68], [69], [70], [71].

ILs are especially promising because of their unique properties, including high thermal and chemical stability, low vapor pressure and virtually unlimited tunability, etc. In 2004, Han group reported the first example of chemisorption of SO2 by employing the functionalized guanidinium-based ILs [4]. Later, ILs consisting of alkyl phosphonium cations and tetrazolide or imidazolide anions ([P66614][Tetz] and [P66614][Im]) were synthesized by Dai group in 2011, which achieved multiple-site SO2 absorption for the first time (up to 4.80 mol SO2 per mol IL at 1 bar of SO2 and 20 °C) [17]. As the studies continue, two strategies to improve the absorption performance have been followed. One is mainly to optimize the absorption sites of ILs by tethering anions or cations with various functional groups comprising electronegative atoms like N, O, S, and halogens [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [54], [55]. The other is to increase the negative charges carried by an anion, from one to two and even to three by using multiple carboxylic acid groups [45], [46], [53], [72]. As a result, both high overall SO2 uptake and high effective uptake per absorption-desorption cycle have been achieved.

In general, the reported multiple-site SO2 ILs exhibit superior performance under mild conditions, i.e., at room temperature and near 1 bar partial pressure of SO2, whereas, the direct capture of SO2 from flue gas means much harsher conditions (>40 °C and 0.2−2 mbar of SO2 in the absorber), which requires stronger chemical interactions between ILs and SO2 [2]. Up to now, only a few works have focused on the IL-based SO2 capture under low SO2 partial pressure and/or at higher than room temperature [4], [23], [24], [31], [32], [45], [46], [73], [74], [75], [76]. Although relatively strong chemisorption is involved in these ILs, most of them still exhibit good reversibility. The first functionalized ILs by Han group maintains 1:1 IL to SO2 molar ratio at 0.08 bar of SO2 and 40 °C [4]. In 2013, Hu group reported a series of dicarboxylate-based ILs (e.g., [N2224][disuccinate]) with the potential advantage for direct flue gas desulfurization at even lower SO2 partial pressure of 0.02 bar, which form hydrogen bonds with SO2 to promote the absorption [24]. Later, a hydrophobic IL [Et2NEmim][PF6] was synthesized by Wu group, which exhibits 0.94 mol SO2 per mol IL through a combination of chemisorption and physisorption under hydrous conditions at 30 °C and 0.03 bar of SO2 [31]. Subsequently, Wang and Li group prepared a series of azole-based ILs and measured their SO2 absorption at 20 °C and 2 mbar of SO2. Among these ILs, [P4442][Triz] shows the highest SO2 absorption capacity (1.22 mol SO2 per mol IL) and its absorption enthalpy (−107.2 kJ/mol) is the most exothermic [32]. The temperature of flue gas is about 130−160 °C and is usually cooled to around 50 °C before entering the absorber [2]. Thus, it is desirable to absorb SO2 at higher temperature to reduce the requirement for the cooling. In the meantime, the subsequent heating of desulfurized gas to meet the emission standard can also be mitigated. For this purpose, Wu group was the first to explore SO2 capture at raised temperature. Their lactate-based ILs absorb over equimolar SO2 at 1 bar of SO2 and 110 °C [75].

However, up to date, few reversible sorbent has been shown to uptake multi-molar SO2 under higher temperature (≥110 °C) and lower SO2 concentration (≤0.2 mbar of SO2) simultaneously, i.e., directly capturing SO2 from flue gas. So far, over a hundred ILs have been experimentally or theoretically proved to effectively absorb SO2 under mild conditions, many of which chemisorb SO2. Usually, the binding strength of a IL-SO2 complex is proportional to its absorption capacity. We naturally wonder whether some of the ILs may have appropriate binding strength to be able to trap SO2 under these harsh conditions and at the same time can be regenerated to afford acceptable active capacity per sorption-desorption cycle.

Since the interaction between acidic SO2 and absorbent is acid-base reaction in nature, the anionic part carrying negative charge acts as base and dominates the SO2 uptake and the positively-charged cation portion is of secondary importance [17], [26], [51], [77]. Here, we mainly focus on the anions of the reported ILs. With the assistance of our homemade configuration search program coupled with semi-empirical Hartree-Fock and density functional theory (DFT) methods (Fig. S1, in the Supporting information), we first explore the configuration space comprised of one SO2 molecule and the reactive sites in each of the reported 130 or so kinds of anions. Via the computed first SO2 binding energies, we identify the most stable configurations of anion-SO2 complexes. We then convert the theoretical binding energies into the reaction enthalpies according to experimentally available absorption isotherms. Next we simulate their Langmuir absorption isotherms under harsh conditions. After exhaustively surveying the existing SO2 design space, we screen out the best anions for SO2 capture. Later, we briefly discuss the cation effect and identify two descriptors that can qualitatively describe the difference in the reactivity among anions. Finally, we extend the study to investigate the possibility of multi-molar SO2 capture per mole of IL under harsh conditions as well as the reversibility of the sorbents. We hope to find a promising route of designing SO2 capture materials under harsh conditions.

Section snippets

Computational methods

All the calculations were performed with the Gaussian 09 program [78]. PM6 [79] and the hybrid B3LYP [80] functional combined with the 6-311++G(d,p) [81] basis set were chosen for the semi-empirical level optimization and the DFT level optimization, respectively. Frequency analysis was conducted at the same DFT level of theory to determine the energy minima and the transition states, which has been proven to be suitable for similar systems [17], [28], [32], [34], [35], [42], [82]. The

Studied anions

From recent experimental and theoretical works on ILs for SO2 capture, we select 127 anionic structures (labeled as Axx, Fig. S2) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55]. The experimentally studied anions have been proved to be stable

Conclusions

We have investigated the SO2 absorption capability of 127 kinds of reported ILs (with a focus on anions) under the so-called harsh conditions (≤0.2 mbar of SO2 and ≥110 °C, close to the actual conditions of flue gas). The currently explored design space of SO2 capturing IL has been covered entirely. A few key observations are summarized below.

  • (1)

    Through exploring the interaction configuration space between each anion and SO2, the cooperative interaction mode that SO2 molecule acts as both acid and

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21477096 and 21406175). We also acknowledge Xi’an Jiaotong University High Performance Computing Center, the H2 and H4 clusters of FIST for providing the computational resources.

References (98)

  • X. Ma et al.

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2000)
  • X. Gao et al.

    Appl. Energy

    (2010)
  • K. Lee et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2008)
  • Y. Shang et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • K. Huang et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • K. Huang et al.

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • M. Mohammadi et al.

    J. Mol. Liq.

    (2014)
  • S. Tian et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2014)
  • K. Huang et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • C. Herrera et al.

    J. Mol. Liq.

    (2017)
  • K. Zhang et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2017)
  • K. Zhang et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • H. Dong et al.

    Carbon

    (2017)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2016)
  • K. Huang et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2014)
  • S. Ren et al.

    Green Energy Environ.

    (2018)
  • S. Zeng et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2014)
  • F.J.G. Ortiz et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2006)
  • W. Wu et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2004)
  • J. Huang et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2006)
  • X.L. Yuan et al.

    J. Chem. Eng. Data

    (2007)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2007)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2008)
  • S. Ren et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2010)
  • K.-Y. Lee et al.

    Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.

    (2010)
  • M.B. Shiflett et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2010)
  • M.B. Shiflett et al.

    Energy Fuels

    (2010)
  • A.F. Ghobadi et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2011)
  • S.Y. Hong et al.

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2011)
  • C. Wang et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
  • G. Yu et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2011)
  • G. Cui et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2012)
  • Z.Z. Yang et al.

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2012)
  • R.W. Berg et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. A

    (2013)
  • G. Cui et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2013)
  • K. Huang et al.

    RSC Adv.

    (2013)
  • H. Lee et al.

    RSC Adv.

    (2013)
  • C. Wang et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2013)
  • J.D. Morganti et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2014)
  • G. Cui et al.

    Green Chem.

    (2014)
  • K. Chen et al.

    AIChE J.

    (2015)
  • G. Cui et al.

    RSC Adv.

    (2015)
  • G. Cui et al.

    ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.

    (2015)
  • G. Cui et al.

    Chem. Eur. J.

    (2015)
  • G. Garcia et al.

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2015)
  • X. Lu et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2015)
  • H. Tang et al.

    ChemPhysChem

    (2015)
  • D. Kumar Sahoo et al.

    ChemistrySelect

    (2016)
  • A. Mondal et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text