Production and removal of soluble organic nitrogen by nitrifying biofilm
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Recent guidelines for discharging total nitrogen (TN) are approaching ≤ 5 mg TN/L for several parts of the United States. These guidelines aim to curb the hypoxic conditions and eutrophication issues in vulnerable receiving water bodies. With advancements in science and technology, water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) are capable of removing > 95% of inorganic nitrogen resulting in soluble organic nitrogen (sON) being a major nitrogen fraction (> 50%) of the effluent TN [1]. Several studies have described that about 60–70% of the total influent sON is removed by activated sludge process (ASP) [2], [3], [4] while Simsek et al. [5] found that 37–50% of the influent sON is biodegraded by a trickling filter system. The majority of the research work related to sON degradation has focused on conventional ASP [6], [7], [8], [9] while few studies have touched on the fixed film processes, mainly on trickling filter and post-denitrification filters (DNF) [5], [10], [11].
At WRRFs, moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) are employed usually as a separate stage nitrification process (to nitrify wastewater with a lower carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio). Considering the consequences of elevated fraction of sON in the effluent (complication with permit compliance and impairment of receiving water quality), it will be reasonable to identify the available strategies in an MBBR process to control the concentration of sON while avoiding the need for (additional) advanced removal technologies. Simsek et al. [10] investigated the fate of biodegradable sON (bsON) and bioavailable sON (AbsON) in a full-scale WRRF consisting of both ASP and MBBR. The biodegradable fraction of sON or bsON can be biochemically oxidized by bacteria to produce ammonia N [12] whereas the bioavailable fraction of sON or AbsON can be uptaken by algae or other aquatic plant species for growth [13], [14], [15]. Nitrogen cycling can be influenced by the form of sON in the effluent. For instance, dissolved free amino acids can be directly uptaken by (bioavailable to) the algae; however, other forms of sON might have to be first hydrolyzed and/or mineralized (biodegraded) by bacteria making them bioavailable to the algae or other phytoplanktons in the receiving waters [10], [16]. Simsek et al. [10] concluded that ASP removed 29% of sON whereas MBBR removed only 4% of sON. The authors suggested that a low C/N ratio, solubilization of particulate organics from the biofilm, and/or release of soluble microbial products (SMPs) might have affected the sON removal in the MBBR process [10].
Hu, Liao, Geng et al. [11] investigated the effect of different C/N ratios (3, 4, 5 and 6) on the removal of sON and AbsON in DNFs. They fed secondary effluent to the filters and noticed the maximum effluent sON at C/N ratio of 3 (1.91 mg sON/L) and no impact on effluent sON for higher C/N ratios i.e., 4 (1.70 mg sON/L), 5 (1.70 mg sON/L) and 6 (1.69 mg sON/L). However, effluent AbsON decreased with increasing C/N ratio suggesting that sON produced by DNFs at higher C/N ratios will be less bioavailable, a scenario favorable for the receiving waters [11]. The studies of Simsek et al. [10] and Hu, Liao, Geng et al. [11] indicated that relatively less sON removal should be expected under a lower C/N ratio. However, no study has explicitly investigated the removal of sON in an MBBR process under different C/N ratios.
Effluent sON from biological treatment processes is primarily from influent- and process-derived sources. The influent-derived sON is the result of recalcitrant organic nitrogen, which is not biodegraded or removed during wastewater treatment [16]. Process-derived sON is released by metabolic activities associated with biological processes (e.g., SMPs and extracellular polymeric substances) [7], [14], [17], [18]. Since process-derived sON is contributed by the growth and decay of microorganisms during the biological treatment processes, process-derived sON is unavoidable and more closely related to operational parameters than influent-derived sON [15]. Approximately 33% of the effluent sON are process-derived while the rest of it is from the influent [19], [20]. However, the extent of the biological production of sON varies from one biological system to another [6]. Therefore, reducing the formation of process-derived sON in biological treatment processes will be beneficial in achieving the low TN discharge limits and eventually safeguard the water bodies receiving treated wastewater. Parkin and McCarty [21] investigated the influence of organic loading (glucose, acetate, glucose-acetate mixture) on sON production and found that an increase in organic loading increased sON production in ASP [21]. Although there have been several studies investigating the effect of organic loading (measured as chemical oxygen demand (COD)) on nitrification in an MBBR process [22], [23], [24], [25], no study has investigated the effect of organic loading on the production of sON by biofilm particularly those in an MBBR.
Simsek et al. [10] reported sON removal of 29% by ASP and 4% by MBBR (for nitrification) in a full-scale WRRF. Their study suggested that in an MBBR, lower ammonification of sON occurred due to less ability of ammonifying bacteria to compete for oxygen compared to nitrifiers [10]. Ammonification is a major pathway for sON degradation and is considered to be achieved primarily by heterotrophs and phytoplanktons [26]. Ammonia produced from ammonification is transformed via nitrification and/or assimilated by biomass. Since nitrifiers are primarily autotrophs, they are not believed to be directly associated with sON degradation [10], [27]. Hence, sON degradation is largely considered to be a heterotrophic bacterial process.
Studies reported that while heterotrophic processes remove higher fraction of sON, reduction in sON concentration was also observed after nitrification stages at full-scale WRRFs highlighting the involvement of nitrifiers in sON biodegradation [5], [10]. Wadhawan et al. [28] reported 57% of sON removal through the nitrification process in secondary effluent and lesser removal through the heterotrophic process (38%). The nitrification process biodegraded higher concentration of sON compared to the heterotrophic process. The study also claimed that during the nitrification, ammonia oxidizing bacteria rather than nitrite oxidizing bacteria were responsible for sON degradation and it is the first study that reported the involvement of nitrification in sON degradation. Based on the results from these previous studies [5], [10], [28], this study aimed at exploring the production of sON and the effect of C/N ratios on sON degradation during nitrification in a MBBR.
The objective of this study was to identify the influence of organic loading and different C/N ratios on sON activity (production and removal) in bench-scale reactors that mimic the nitrification process of MBBRs. Specifically, this study examined the effect of readily biodegradable COD on the production of sON by feeding synthetic wastewater with no organic nitrogen. The study also investigated the effect of different C/N ratios on sON degradation for which the reactors received real wastewater samples representing different C/N ratios. Results from the work could extend our knowledge on the fixed film process with respect to sON activity to regulate and optimize reactor operation in order to achieve low TN discharge limits.
Section snippets
MBBR carrier and wastewater sample sources and collections
The biofilm carriers shown in Fig. S1 in Supplementary Material (SM) used in this study were collected from a nitrifying MBBR basin of the Moorhead wastewater treatment plant (MWWTP), Moorhead, MN. The biofilm carriers were collected from the basin in bulk using a 5 L bucket and transported within 15 min to a laboratory where experimental work was conducted. The carriers were separated from the liquid phase using a stainless-steel strainer. The separated carriers were weighed, and equal amounts
Effect of organic loading on nitrification and sON profile
Fig. 2 displays the nitrification profiles wherein, by 4.5 h of operation, the MBBR carriers added to each reactor successfully nitrified ammonia (> 99%) to below the detection limit. In reactor B (glucose), nitritation and nitratation were achieved relatively earlier than reactor A (control). At 2.5 h of operation, higher removal of influent ammonia was observed under reactor B (94.6%) than reactor A (54.2%). Bassin et al. [23] reported that less time was required to achieve complete removal
Conclusions
This study investigated sON activity in batch nitrifying reactors mimicking MBBRs. The production of sON was examined by feeding SWW (no organic nitrogen), whereas sON degradation was analyzed by feeding actual wastewater samples with different C/N ratios. The study also identified the variation in the activity of the biofilm during nitrification when exposed to different C/N ratios in the influent. This is the first study demonstrating that influent organic carbon concentration influences the
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Ruchi Joshi: Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Murthy Kasi: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Tanush Wadhawan: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Eakalak Khan: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
Stipends for the first author (R. Joshi) were supported by the National Science Foundation, USA under Grant No. 1355466. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Gratitude is extended to staff at the City of Moorhead for providing assistance in wastewater sample collections from their wastewater treatment plant.
References (60)
- et al.
A comparison of the characteristics of soluble organic nitrogen in untreated and activated sludge treated wastewaters
Water Res.
(1981) - et al.
Fate of dissolved organic nitrogen in two stage trickling filter process
Water Res.
(2012) - et al.
Impact of solids retention time on dissolved organic nitrogen and its biodegradability in treated wastewater
Water Res.
(2016) - et al.
Effect of temperature on the characterization of soluble microbial products in activated sludge system with special emphasis on dissolved organic nitrogen
Water Res.
(2019) - et al.
Bioavailable and biodegradable dissolved organic nitrogen in activated sludge and trickling filter wastewater treatment plants
Water Res.
(2013) - et al.
Bioavailability of wastewater-derived organic nitrogen to the alga Selenastrum capricornutum
Water Res.
(2004) - et al.
Organic nitrogen transformations in a 4-stage Bardenpho nitrogen removal plant and bioavailability/ biodegradability of effluent DON
Water Res.
(2009) - et al.
Dissolved organic nitrogen in wastewater treatment processes: transformation, biosynthesis and ecological impacts
Environ. Pollut.
(2021) - et al.
Modeling the formation of microorganism-derived dissolved organic nitrogen (mDON) in the activated sludge system
Water Res.
(2020) - et al.
Identification of the production and biotransformational changes of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment processes: a short review
Chemosphere
(2020)